| Author | Message | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 3004 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: N/A |
Printing 3 lakh cr money is just a media propaganda and Guru murthy never mentioned this anywhere | ||
Polavaram Side Hero Username: Polavaram Post Number: 3768 Registered: 08-2016 Posted From: 99.203.28.3 Rating: N/A |
Judge la ne champi suicide ani create chese gujju thugs galkaki emaina sadhtam | ||
Polavaram Side Hero Username: Polavaram Post Number: 3767 Registered: 08-2016 Posted From: 99.203.28.3 Rating: N/A |
| ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 59269 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 166.170.0.34 Rating: N/A |
bd gadu cbi ni brasttu pattinchada leda | ||
Aggipidugu116 Side Hero Username: Aggipidugu116 Post Number: 4710 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 167.102.249.42 Rating: N/A |
Arey, nvvu ee vishayam supreme court lo cheppalsindi.. Poraptuna supreme court marola teerpu ichesindi .. ee vishayam teliyaka..sorry ee | ||
Polavaram Side Hero Username: Polavaram Post Number: 3766 Registered: 08-2016 Posted From: 99.203.28.3 Rating: N/A |
Mass murderer modi gaadini save chesinandhuku Mgujju aasthana gadiki cbi lo position icchar Anthakanna dorbagyam emanna vundha Malla pakka party la ki neethulu Mottham sustems no brasttu pattinchar Gujju thugs | ||
Linkmaster Legend Username: Linkmaster Post Number: 60632 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 67.175.129.167 Rating: |
well said... donga donga annattu undi cbn supporters | ||
Mandharam Side Hero Username: Mandharam Post Number: 5066 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 122.167.142.52 Rating: N/A |
USA print koduthoone vundhi kada Why don't you think India shouldn't follow USA? | ||
Tintin Comedian Username: Tintin Post Number: 1068 Registered: 01-2018 Posted From: 183.82.42.130 Rating: N/A |
pmo lo kurchoni veedu chese pani ida.. maree yedava laga unnaduga https://economictimes.com/tech/internet/facebook-says-steep- rise-in-data-requests-from-indian-government/articleshow/666 66390.cms | ||
Raman Legend Username: Raman Post Number: 58487 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 175.101.144.132 Rating: N/A |
Ban yodha for spreading fake news operation Gary's etc..tilak is not this guy you are spreading fake | ||
Yodha Hero Username: Yodha Post Number: 14802 Registered: 08-2011 Posted From: 85.17.24.66 Rating: |
This Teluguhero aka Kamal aka Dharmic Happiness must be banned for peddling fake news everyday in this DB. This BJP IT cell guy restlessly posting fake news site opindia •••••• content to earn his pakoda and chai, Please ban this guy. If CBN and ministers were thugs what should we call MOSHAS? Fingered in CBI Fingered in RBI Fingered in UPPSC Fingered in SSC Fingered in CVC Fingered in All institutions Recently the faking bakth known as gurmurthy suggested to turn our country into Zimbabwe by priting 3 lakh cr money This fakers are ruining country for country's sake please don't buy these bjp IT cell crap Bhagat Singh|Subhash chandra bose | ||
Nice Megastar Username: Nice Post Number: 22309 Registered: 05-2009 Posted From: 110.227.239.246 Rating: N/A |
Oh meeru kuda aa baapathe na | ||
Jai_tdp Legend Username: Jai_tdp Post Number: 46151 Registered: 02-2009 Posted From: 49.204.214.85 Rating: N/A |
Center lo Mana party unte 3 endi 30 aina vesukovachhu. Power lekapothe paristhithi endo Jaggadi chippakoodu example. | ||
Jai_tdp Legend Username: Jai_tdp Post Number: 46150 Registered: 02-2009 Posted From: 49.204.214.85 Rating: N/A |
what corruption charges?? Any small proof. First Jagan should accept CBI is transparent and fair. | ||
Sannayi_nokkulu Legend Username: Sannayi_nokkulu Post Number: 31500 Registered: 06-2014 Posted From: 166.137.240.123 Rating: N/A |
babu mee mod ki siggu unte mundu enni lopala yeyamani chepandj sachipotava , avineethi ga batukutava okkate option ante alochinchakunda chachipotaa ane type cbn - OT | ||
Macbook Junior Artist Username: Macbook Post Number: 617 Registered: 12-2012 Posted From: 208.54.147.131 Rating: N/A |
1995 rojulu kaavu ivi cheppulu vepinchukodaniki, cbn lanti dongodu calm ga undala egarakoodadu | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 3002 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: N/A |
LOL so far only two states Andhra and west bengal withdrew consent. | ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 59264 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 132.174.20.41 Rating: N/A |
 | ||
Chandhra Side Hero Username: Chandhra Post Number: 3507 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 71.62.75.64 Rating: |
When CBN asked - YSR had CBI come in 3 times at least .. What about CBN .. with all the corruption charges he is facing ? and everyone asking for it ? Cheppedhi Sriranga neethulu .. Dooredhi dummera gudiselu .. ani oorike annara ? | ||
Bumper Hero Username: Bumper Post Number: 14946 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 161.11.160.176 Rating: N/A |
andhra vasthey beedi gadni battalu vippa tisi kodatharuu janam. beedi hatavoo desh batchavoooooo | ||
Sp1234 Hero Username: Sp1234 Post Number: 10069 Registered: 11-2014 Posted From: 70.102.136.132 Rating: N/A |
CBI is done amma..... many states will withdraw consent. its a dent to credibility of CBI. | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 3001 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: N/A |
LOL case is in supreme court and Modi govt provided all details to court .Modi never scared to fight at courts and he fought Gujart riots case 11 years in all courts and finally court absolved modi of any involvement in riots. | ||
Aggipidugu116 Side Hero Username: Aggipidugu116 Post Number: 4696 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 71.179.98.93 Rating: N/A |
national manaki enduku.. edo Polavaram meeda cheyyiddari ani adagali mana bob..cbi enquirey.. | ||
Scorpio Megastar Username: Scorpio Post Number: 21607 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 170.167.192.250 Rating: |
What about Rafael Deal ? Modi antha neethi manthudu ayithe...Rafael meeda CBI tho investigate cheyinchochu gadaa Nagarjuna Sagar...SriSailam...Polavaram...Handri-Neeva...SomaSila...ThotaPalli...VeliGonda...PuliChintala..etc | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 3000 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: N/A |
It doesn't matter who ever involved in corruption are thugs or crooks. | ||
Tintin Comedian Username: Tintin Post Number: 1065 Registered: 01-2018 Posted From: 223.182.63.179 Rating: |
cbn thug ithe.. jaffas and pichios, Nazis and Narcos aa  | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2999 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: N/A |
Dont expect from Modi the he will punish corrupt politicians because there are so many loopholes in judicial system. Judicial reforms are necessary. Only expectation from modi is so far no scams and if will come back to power again,modi and his ministers should not involve any scams in future also. | ||
Sasibabu Legend Username: Sasibabu Post Number: 62446 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 45.20.143.145 Rating: |
adhi kula sena batch le .. donât tie them to bjp .. valla nayakudu laane moshas ni ante bp tho voogipothaaru | ||
Shikari Megastar Username: Shikari Post Number: 27635 Registered: 03-2010 Posted From: 124.123.56.129 Rating: |
abbo..bapan-bania party vallu vere vallani commenting aa...daavuda? http://i.imgur.com/eUYcc.gif | ||
Stellar Megastar Username: Stellar Post Number: 21402 Registered: 02-2016 Posted From: 24.188.207.52 Rating: |
pacha kamerlu | ||
Sasibabu Legend Username: Sasibabu Post Number: 62445 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 45.20.143.145 Rating: |
Ohooooo.. ykapa and janthikalsena pathiths ani fixed aa .. nice and cute  | ||
Aggipidugu116 Side Hero Username: Aggipidugu116 Post Number: 4686 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 71.179.98.93 Rating: |
tondara enduku nayana.. it is a big risk by cbn.. I think he and his chamchas will face decimation.. complete.. full resources of center after 2019 elections on corruption on naidu and his kulapalem brokers.. in the mean time.. people also should think twice before giving vote to kulaparties.. like TDP and khangress.. | ||
Chandhra Side Hero Username: Chandhra Post Number: 3500 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 71.62.75.64 Rating: |
Modi's image went down as he is not able to do anything with corruption that is going on in Andhra. CBN has eaten lakhs of crores .. but no action from Center. | ||
Shikari Megastar Username: Shikari Post Number: 27634 Registered: 03-2010 Posted From: 124.123.56.129 Rating: N/A |
lol..not corrupt doesn't make him efficient..he is a power monger..only power matters to him..mehbooba mufti tho alliance..2g case ni nakincheyyatam..shows his true colors...cbn corrupt aithe prove chesi lopaleyyandi memu kuda mechukuntam..daily ee spamming endhuku db lo brain washed kakapothe. http://i.imgur.com/eUYcc.gif | ||
Whyme Megastar Username: Whyme Post Number: 27146 Registered: 09-2009 Posted From: 171.161.160.10 Rating: N/A |
 CBN is Fire SnakeKing ani shikari annai tolded | ||
Taurus0807 Side Hero Username: Taurus0807 Post Number: 6928 Registered: 12-2011 Posted From: 198.208.47.92 Rating: |
 mari evaru gain avuthunnaru? jail pakshaa or P kalyan? | ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 59262 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 205.160.169.248 Rating: N/A |
mandapeta dommetodi gelupu meeda pandalunnaya | ||
Taurus0807 Side Hero Username: Taurus0807 Post Number: 6927 Registered: 12-2011 Posted From: 198.208.46.81 Rating: N/A |
videos vesi maree dkaadu in Delhi appudu em counter cheyaledhu endhuku with proofs? ippudu oka paid story to counter him in forming front. | ||
Becbeckon Side Hero Username: Becbeckon Post Number: 7353 Registered: 02-2007 Posted From: 202.3.72.253 Rating: N/A |
CBN is losing all his educated and neutral votes with such kind of foolish acts. I repeat it.. This votes will be anywhere between 5 to 10 percent. We cal them as swing votes. Rest TT la thadika | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2996 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: |
brain washed batch ? People believed & supported(including me) Modi because he is honest and never involved in any scams or corruption activities when he was Gujrat CM and now as PM. Tomorrow if Modi may involve in scams/corruption ,we dont have any obligation to criticize him because 95% Modi supporters don't belong to his caste. Now what about CBN supporters in this DB ? You guys are defending his corruption activities as if like your family member and everyone knew the reason.Now tell me who are brain washed batch CBN supporters or Modi supporters ? | ||
Stellar Megastar Username: Stellar Post Number: 21397 Registered: 02-2016 Posted From: 24.188.207.52 Rating: N/A |
ee debate lo first day ne start chesadu ee survey tappu ani oka bhakt https://youtu.be/L9DMQ06EtaE | ||
Shikari Megastar Username: Shikari Post Number: 27631 Registered: 03-2010 Posted From: 124.123.56.129 Rating: N/A |
brain washed batch..attage untaru..kiki http://i.imgur.com/eUYcc.gif | ||
Stellar Megastar Username: Stellar Post Number: 21393 Registered: 02-2016 Posted From: 24.188.207.52 Rating: N/A |
fake news meeda survey tappu ani malli fake analysis ready chesaraa? | ||
Sasibabu Legend Username: Sasibabu Post Number: 62436 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 70.133.255.125 Rating: N/A |
ayyindochu.. so that .. yedho retort ichesaadu ani db janalu anukovali ettagu antha sadhavaleru kabatti .. nice nikkar strategy | ||
Shikari Megastar Username: Shikari Post Number: 27630 Registered: 03-2010 Posted From: 124.123.56.129 Rating: N/A |
evaru chadavakudadhu ane antha lengthy posts copy+paste chesthadu..kiki http://i.imgur.com/eUYcc.gif | ||
Sasibabu Legend Username: Sasibabu Post Number: 62434 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 70.133.255.125 Rating: |
Gurujee .. nijam gaane ee kindha post motham sadhavamamtunnavaa db manalni .. ippudu yenti process ... selavu petti maree sadhavaala leka selava vunna rojullo sadhavaala  | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2995 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: N/A |
https://www.opindia.com/2018/11/qualitatively-garbage-the-bo gus-methodology-employed-by-bbc-in-their-research-on-fake-ne ws/ Qualitatively garbage: The bogus methodology employed by BBC in their research on âFake Newsâ In an earlier report, OpIndia.com has comprehensively debunked the BBC research on âFake Newsâ. The BBC has tried to brush the criticisms under the garb of âQualitative Researchâ and âEthnographic Researchâ, therefore, it is imperative that we take a moment to understand what these terms actually mean and what such research entails. For those unaware, Qualitative Research focuses on subjective experience and itâs objective is not to determine objective truth which can be generalized across all sections of the population. It employs techniques such as interviews and on-field observations to develop a greater understanding of a particular social phenomenon. It seeks to answer the questions of âwhyâ and âhowâ to understand a particular social phenomenon. One of the ontological principles of qualitative research is that there are multiple realities which can be accessed through subjective experiences. Limitations of Qualitative Research One of the fundamental positions of Qualitative research is that there are multiple realities and people perceive reality in their own unique way. Thus, the focus is not on discovering an objective reality that holds true across all situations but to explore relationships within a unique setting and based upon the purpose of research and its results, develop hypotheses which could then be tested using Quantitative methods. Qualitative methods cannot be generalized to any significant extent, much less, an entire country. - Advertisement - - Article resumes - Even an editor at the BBC claimed that since it isnât possible to interview 1.2 billion people, âthere will have to be a generalizationâ. Anyone who knows anything about Qualitative research knows that generalization is not the objective of such research and the results obtained from it cannot be generalized across all situations to any significant extent. It appears that the BBC isnât even aware of the purpose and objective of the Qualitative research. Vega Challawar @vegavnc · 15 Nov 2018 Replying to @Trushar is more amongst the politically right leaning, IS a generalization. And context is not limited... For a country as diverse as India, even 'twitter users' isn't divisible into only Rt vs Lt leaning and any combinations thereof. I am no researcher/mathematician, though... -2 Trushar Barot â @Trushar Unless we interview all 1.2bn people in India, there will always have to be a generalisation though. We are at least laying open our methodology and want to encourage genuine conversation and debate about this research. #BeyondFakeNews 16 04:26 - 15 Nov 2018 · Gurgaon, India Twitter Ads information and privacy 16 people are talking about this Twitter Ads information and privacy There are some crippling limitations of Qualitative research. It depends a lot on the personal skills and biases of the researcher. Since such research employs methods such as interviews and case studies, a research may choose to focus on one aspect due to his or her own individual biases even though another detail in the study is more significant. Under such circumstances, it was imperative that researchers in their team included people of diverse political affiliations if they wanted their research to be more authentic. However, the research makes no mention of the political affiliations of the researchers themselves. Flaws in Research Methodology Flaws in the using the âlocalised version of left-right orientation questionnaire The research states that it used a âlocalised version of the 10 point left-right orientation questionnaire developed by John Curtice and Caroline Brysonâ to determine the political affiliation of their subjects to ensure an equal representation. But the reliability and validity of the localized version is not mentioned. And itâs unclear to what extent such a test would be effective in a country like India considering the âLeft-Rightâ paradigm is not applicable in our country. For instance, if the test indicated that a person was likely to vote for Shiv Sena, would he be classified as pro-BJP or anti-BJP? The researchers state that using the localized version of the test âallowed us to recruit for political affiliation without asking questions about peopleâs voting behaviours or support for particular political entities.â The researchers need to justify their reasoning here as India has a multi-party political system where the left-right paradigm is not applicable by giving more details about the localized version of the test that was used. Binaries can work for countries like the USA where they have to choose between the Republicans or the Democrats, but in India, that prism gives a skewed result and thus, the validity of methodology employed has to be provided with respect to India. Flawed definition of âFake Newsâ The problems with the research begin with the operational definition of âFake Newsâ itself. The research defines Fake News as âinformation, however, conveyed, in whichever format, on whatever platform, which is not fully supported by factual evidenceâ. The researchers appear to be unaware that people across the political spectrum differ on what constitutes as factual evidence and that naturally pervades even the academia whose standards of factual evidence they claim to have followed. However, if âinformation not fully supported by factual evidenceâ is the core definition, then will every message declaring the greatness of Gods be dubbed âFake Newsâ? More realistically, will messages that proudly proclaim âDiversity is our strengthâ be treated as âFake Newsâ because thereâs evidence which suggests that diversity is definitely not our strength and homogeneous societies tend to function a lot better in almost every respect. If the aforementioned message is regarded as âFake Newsâ, then every single liberal is guilty of being the purveyor of Fake News. Why havenât they been named in the list of people who spread Fake News? The fact that OpIndia.com, Swati Goel and R. Jagannathan were mentioned as purveyors of âFake Newsâ, it only goes to show that their definition of âFake Newsâ and âfactual evidenceâ arenât reliable at all. And what about that news which was believed to be true at one point of time but was proven as false after a couple of weeks, or maybe even a couple of days, with the revelation of new data? Were those clubbed as Fake News as well considering the study was completed within 3 months? Flaws in selection and nature of interviews, sample selection and generalisation The follies in the research do not stop there. There are multiple mistakes to show that the researchers themselves were not very serious about their research. For one, The research was limited to major cities alone. Smaller towns and cities did not have any representation, let alone the rural population. Secondly, 40 subjects were distributed across 10 cities, that is 4 subjects on an average in each city. With such an infinitesimally small sample size, that the researchers hoped to learn anything at all from their study only shows that the entire exercise was merely to provide them with a convenient excuse to peddle their agenda. Under the best of circumstances, the results of Qualitative research can be generalized only across immediate homogeneous settings and here they have generalized the opinions of an average of four people across 10 cities to the entire nation which just magically happens to be one of the most heterogeneous countries in the entire world. Moreover, the researchers state that they screened their subjects only for political affiliation and economic background. Any student of social science is aware that the educational qualifications of people play an important role in determining their behaviour in a social setting. In the âData and Methodology Appendixâ section, the researchers do not mention anywhere that they took the educational qualifications of an individual into account. If the BJP supporters who were part of the study were not very highly educated and the anti-BJP subjects were, then it is natural that their study will come to very dubious conclusions. Moreover, the researchers do not state whether they took into account the mental health of the subjects or any personal history of mental illness or in their family which could be a very important factor as mentally unhealthy people may be more inclined to believe and share âFake Newsâ. Even the economic background of individuals isnât mentioned as a criterion in the âData and Methodology Appendixâ section although it is said in Methodology section that subjects came from a âmixâ of economic backgrounds. If they indeed came from a mix, then what are the different categories of economic backgrounds the subjects were categorized under? It is not mentioned. Was it ensured that the four groups of 10 subjects each had an equal representation of supporters from various political parties from the various categories of economic background? It was not mentioned. The researchers havenât even mentioned the sampling technique they have used. In Qualitative Research, random sampling is not employed. Usually, the purposive sampling technique is used to ensure that researchers have the desired subjects necessary to fulfil the objective of their study. The researchers state that they ensured there was equal representation of various political affiliations among their subjects. But with the multitude of political parties that we have, how did they ensure such a thing and how many supporters of each political party was part of the research exactly? It should also be borne in mind that itâs true that ethnographic studies generally study a very small population and the BBC is not wrong when they say it explains the small number of people they studied. But they compromise on their ability to generalize across different situations with their small sample. And when the sample is so small, researchers need to have an extra robust sampling technique if they wish to generalize their findings at all. Therefore, what measures were taken to ensure that researcher bias did not creep into sampling? Were any measures taken at all? Unfortunately, the research provides no answer to these questions. Call for Quantitative research The conclusion segment of the research states, âGiven that central to our observations is the idea that peopleâs socio-political identities seem to influence their consumption and sharing of fake news quite a bit, and that national pride and nationalistic feelings seem to affect their critical thinking, fake news will need to be handled as a social problem. We would urge future researchers to quantitatively assess â perhaps through regression analysis techniques â just how important socio-political identities are in fake news consumption relative to other factors.â Thus, it is clear from the conclusion that researchers believe certain aspects of people identities âseemâ to felicitate sharing of fake news and call for quantitative research into the matter. Journalists at the BBC, on the other hand, take the leap to âNationalism a driving force behind fake news in India, research showsâ without mentioning that the researchers themselves call for more Quantitative research to determine the extent to which socio-political identities play a part. Ethnographic or Semi-ethnographic? The research employs words like âethnographicâ and âsemi-ethnographicâ liberally. On page number 18, the research states that they used âsemi-ethnographic approachesâ to describe their interviews while in the âData and Methodology Appendixâ, they mention âethnographic in-depth interviewsâ. Which one was it? Ethnographic or semi-ethnographic? An editor at the BBC also claimed that it was ethnographic research but how could it be if it adopted semi-ethnographic approaches? To the laymen, it may appear trivial but you cannot have that ambiguity in your research if you want it to be taken seriously. The most egregious assault on academic rigour was the fact that the researchers took only 7 days to conclude their field immersion. In Ethnographic research, the researcher attempts to study people in their own natural setting. This requires the researchers to get to know more about the day to day life of their subjects and the subjects, too, need to get comfortable around the researchers to behave as they would naturally so that the researchers can observe their natural behaviour. Is 7 days enough for such an endeavor? Ethnographic research is unique for the long duration it takes to complete the collection of data. Generally, it takes months if not a whole year and on certain occasions, it takes years to complete the collection of data. Of course, due to practicality, the time frame is being decreased due to various constraints but 7 days although not unheard of is much too less if you are to make such fantastical claims. One could call it semi-ethnographic (as they did call it in the methodology section) perhaps but it certainly cannot be said that the findings will offer results that could be generalized on such a high scale. It could still be excusable if they had mentioned that field immersion for the âethnographicâ research was completed in 7 days, as research methods are subject to various constraints, but they should have mentioned and highlighted that fact if they were honest about their research. One of the most fundamental criticisms of ethnographic research is that researcher bias plays too much of a significant role in the conclusions that are drawn. The bias of the research was amply revealed when they used portals like AltNews as their source for Fake News. Therefore, whatever findings the BBC observed from their study can be said to hold true only for those set of 40 people at its worst and maybe, just may, for other groups which bear a close resemblance to that particular group of 40 people. The Qualitative study does not reveal a single thing about the phenomenon of Fake News beyond that which could be generalized for other groups. The crisis in social science BBCâs research also points towards the crisis within social sciences. There have been numerous revelations regarding how corruptible social science research is. There is a widespread replication crisis where researchers have failed to reproduce the findings of previous studies and experiments. On plenty of occasions, especially in high profiled ones, researchers have admitted to falsifying data to produce desired results. The BBCâs research may well be one of them. The million other problems with the research, including how their algorithm worked, has already been elaborated by my editor and therefore, I shall not elaborate on them here. BBC also mentioned that their algorithm selected for portals which shared even a single fake news. If that was indeed the case, why donât all mainstream media channels including the BBC feature in the list? In conclusion, the BBC research is an assault on academic rigour and Ethnographic research. The most egregious assault on academic rigour was the fact that the researchers took only 7 days to conclude their field immersion. | ||
Sasibabu Legend Username: Sasibabu Post Number: 62428 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 70.133.255.125 Rating: N/A |
Donge donga donga ani arichinattu .. gujju thugs bhale kyamedy sethaaru | ||
Ringo_rangaswamy Megastar Username: Ringo_rangaswamy Post Number: 21419 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 8.36.66.4 Rating: N/A |
India varaku ee BBC lambdi kodukulu A1s in Fake news. Vaadu seppadani manam nammeyyatam yendhi!! | ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 59255 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 132.174.20.41 Rating: |
ittaantollani choochukuni kaadu MOSHAS vongobettindi AP ni | ||
Shikari Megastar Username: Shikari Post Number: 27626 Registered: 03-2010 Posted From: 124.123.56.129 Rating: |
btw,bhakts are fekus like Modi ani BBC telchindhi anta CHENNAI: A British Broadcasting Corporation report on fake news in the country suggests that pro-Modi political activity and fake news overlap, suggesting that the ruling party is actively and effectively peddling fake news about Prime Minister Narendra Modi across social media platforms such as Twitter, WhatsApp and Facebook. In this end-to-end research initiative conducted by gaining access to phones from a wide demographic, the BBC found that fake news stories about Indiaâs progress, Hindu power and revival of lost Hindu glory are widely being shared without fact-checking. It has been found that by sharing such messages, people feel like they are into nation-building. âWhilst most discussion in the media has focussed on âfake newsâ in the West, this piece of research gives strong evidence to suggest that a serious set of problems are emerging in the rest of the world where the idea of nation-building is trumping the truth when it comes to sharing stories on social media,â said Jamie Angus, Director, BBC World Service, in a release. Interestingly, an overview of messages shared on WhatsApp alone suggests that almost 30 per cent of messages have a nationalistic flavour. Further, it has been found that more than two thirds of the messages considered to be nationalistic are about âcultural preservationâ. http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2018/nov/13/p ro-modi-posts-account-for-major-chunk-of-fake-news-bbc-repor t-1897415.amp? http://i.imgur.com/eUYcc.gif | ||
Raman Legend Username: Raman Post Number: 58449 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 148.64.7.49 Rating: |
syed modi fan .. kakapote clarity undi pakkolla bhujalmeda aninchi shooting cheyyali ante andariki kudaradu .. vallu manollani kummuta unte post cheyyala vadda ani badhalo nidraleni ratrulu gaduputu my odarpu to you | ||
Giant Side Hero Username: Giant Post Number: 6636 Registered: 11-2008 Posted From: 206.190.152.176 Rating: N/A |
Which Modi, nirav modi or Lalit Modi lol | ||
Stellar Megastar Username: Stellar Post Number: 21385 Registered: 02-2016 Posted From: 24.188.207.52 Rating: |
vachesada modi bhaktudu | ||
Raman Legend Username: Raman Post Number: 58446 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 148.64.7.49 Rating: |
endi inka nuvvu godameeda atu itune unnava eppudo okaroju gate dookali kada?  | ||
Giant Side Hero Username: Giant Post Number: 6634 Registered: 11-2008 Posted From: 206.190.152.176 Rating: N/A |
Gujju thugs em peekutunnaru mari.. Bokkalo thoyachu ga eedini | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2992 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: |
Was Chandrababu Naidu a Corrupt Leader? | CNN News18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgf8O3bjRGw |
