| Author | Message | ||
     Coolpix Side Hero Username: Coolpix Post Number: 5342 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 68.196.76.246 Rating: |
Sure why not...ikkada unchi desa news antha tella intelligent ki ivvadanikaa..  | ||
| Nbkfan Side Hero Username: Nbkfan Post Number: 5508 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 71.166.143.41 Rating: N/A |
kavalante italy tarmeddamu sonia nu. Film Star NBK, Real Star YSR, DB Star OT ki Fan. | ||
| Coolpix Side Hero Username: Coolpix Post Number: 5339 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 68.196.76.246 Rating: |
Pettina sonia ni itlay lo vicharinchali.. | ||
| Nbkfan Side Hero Username: Nbkfan Post Number: 5502 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 71.166.143.41 Rating: N/A |
>>Enti gud..desanni teesukelli..Americans ki taakatuu pettesaru>> ippatikedo takattu pettanattu Film Star NBK, Real Star YSR, DB Star OT ki Fan. | ||
| Coolpix Side Hero Username: Coolpix Post Number: 5333 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 68.196.76.246 Rating: |
Enti gud..desanni teesukelli..Americans ki taakatuu pettesaru.. Italy mahila desam lo unte jarigedi ide.. | ||
| Nbkfan Side Hero Username: Nbkfan Post Number: 5497 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 71.166.143.41 Rating: N/A |
gud Film Star NBK, Real Star YSR, DB Star OT ki Fan. | ||
| Gotcha Junior Artist Username: Gotcha Post Number: 973 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 24.1.161.76 Rating: N/A |
NY times vadi news http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/world/asia/07india.html?_r =1&hp&oref=slogin Atomic Club Removes Ban on Trade With India * Sign In to E-Mail or Save This * Reprints * Share o Linkedin o Digg o Facebook o Mixx o Yahoo! Buzz o Permalink Article Tools Sponsored By By HEATHER TIMMONS Published: September 6, 2008 NEW DELHI — The 45 nations that supply nuclear material and technology worldwide removed a major obstacle on Saturday to the passage of a landmark nuclear deal between the United States and India. The organization, the Nuclear Suppliers Group, agreed to lift a ban on nuclear trade with India after three days of acrimonious talks in Vienna, overcoming opposition from countries fearful that it could set a dangerous precedent. India has not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The deal, pushed by the Bush administration, still needs approval from the United States Congress, where it has been divisive. The accord would allow India to buy nuclear fuel and technology from the world market for its civilian energy program. India has been prohibited from doing so for three decades, since it tested nuclear weapons. The pact is important to both President Bush and the Indian prime minister, Manmohan Singh, who have made it a central piece of their foreign policy agendas. President Bush has wanted to deepen the United States relationship with India at a time when the balance of power in Asia is in flux. Mr. Singh has said that India needs the technology to increase its electricity production so it can continue to feed its economic boom, but it is also a matter of national pride. Many Indians say an agreement allowing nuclear trade would show that their country has truly become a global power six decades after its independence from British rule. On Saturday, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that she was hopeful that the administration could get the agreement through Congress, but acknowledged that it would be difficult. Congress is expected to recess this month so members can campaign for November’s elections. She and other State Department officials, who were ecstatic about the Vienna agreement, said that even if it did not win congressional approval this year, they had set the stage for the next administration to try. “I don’t think a lot of people thought we’d be able to get this through the N.S.G. this weekend,” Ms. Rice said. Administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Ms. Rice had made at least two dozen calls over the last two days to lean on allies to win approval from the Nuclear Suppliers Group. They said she also called the foreign minister of China, which is worried about a surging India, to urge China not to block the deal. The deal nearly cost Mr. Singh his job this summer when the Communist Party, a member of the governing coalition, dropped out. The Communists and others fear that the United States will try to use its closer ties with India to dominate the country. Mr. Singh’s party maintained power by aligning with new splinter groups, and the prime minister called a confidence vote in July, which he won. The news of the approval by the Nuclear Suppliers Group was greeted with a mix of relief and elation by many in India. Citizens were celebrating Saturday night: small groups of revelers set off fireworks in the nation’s capital, and groups gathered to dance outside the headquarters of Mr. Singh’s Congress Party. The prime minister, in a statement, called the decision “historic” and said it was the “end of India’s decades-long isolation from the nuclear mainstream and of the technology-denial regime.” Several Congress Party officials, as well as independent commentators, described the deal as one of the biggest breakthroughs in India’s history. India’s opposition parties condemned it. Yashwant Sinha, the leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the main opposition party, said the country had “walked into the nonproliferation trap” set by the United States. “We have given up our right to test nuclear weapons forever,” he said. The agreement, announced by Mr. Bush and Mr. Singh in 2006, says the United States could stop supplying nuclear fuel if India conducts a weapons test. Helene Cooper contributed reporting from Algiers. | ||
| Firehawk Junior Artist Username: Firehawk Post Number: 3 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 71.8.194.160 Rating: N/A |
This article, india ante dwesham vunana vaadu raasindi.. Text, Analysis, and Response to NSG "Statement on Civil Nuclear Cooperation with India" Note for Reporters by Daryl G. Kimball (202-463-8270 x107) September 6, 2008 In an unprecedented move that will undermine the value of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and the already beleaguered nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), the NSG reluctantly agreed today in Vienna to exempt NPT hold-out India from its guidelines that require comprehensive international safeguards as a condition of nuclear trade. Click here for a PDF file of the NSG statement on India. The decision is a nonproliferation disaster of historic proportions that will produce harm for decades to come. Contrary to the Orwellian claims of the George W. Bush administration, the India-specific exemption from NSG rules and safeguards standards does not "bring India into the nuclear nonproliferation mainstream." Unlike 179 other countries, India has not signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. It continues to produce fissile material and expand its nuclear arsenal. As one of only three states never to have signed the NPT, India has not made a legally binding commitment to pursue nuclear disarmament. India's political promises on nonproliferation and a voluntary test moratorium are not in any way equivalent to the legal obligations and commitments made by the member states of the NPT. Given India's history of violating its peaceful nuclear use agreements to build nuclear weapons, India's promises provide little confidence, especially if the consequences of noncompliance are not made clear by India's future potential nuclear supplier states. As a result, the India-specific exemption from NSG guidelines severely erodes the credibility of global efforts to ensure that access to peaceful nuclear trade and technology is available only to those states that meet global nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament standards. Also, nuclear fuel sales to India for Indian power reactors may marginally help increase India's energy output, but at the same time it will free up India's limited domestic uranium supplies to be used exclusively for bomb-making. This will lead Pakistan to follow suit and help fuel the South Asian arms race. Making matters worse, the Bush administration resisted efforts by a group of responsible NSG states to incorporate in the NSG waiver language that would unambiguously establish the same restrictions and conditions on nuclear trade that are mandated through U.S. law (the 2006 Henry Hyde Act) and U.S. national policy. The Arms Control Association and our allies and supporters will work to ensure that the current Congressional requirements and expectations regarding U.S. nuclear trade are fully addressed and that additional measures are taken to ensure that other nuclear suppliers do not undercut the minimal but vital restrictions, requirements, and conditions on nuclear trade mandated by Congress. The NSG Waiver The NSG statement on India does not meet ACA's standards or that of a large number of NSG states, nor should it satisfy key U.S. congressional leaders, but it is not the "clean" and "unconditional" waiver India was demanding either. There were language changes made to the revised U.S. NSG proposal during the Sept. 4-6 discussions. Because of the negotiations were tough and the real differences not fully resolved, there will likely be serious differences between India and most of the NSG about the interpretation of what the guidelines allow and don't allow and what the consequences of any violation of India's nonproliferation and disarmament commitments would be. This outcome is a failure of the NSG as a whole, the U.S. delegation, and the NSG chair Germany. The text of the NSG's Sept. 6 statement on India -- along with the national statements issued today by Austria, China, Germany, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, and others -- indicates that even if the NSG guidelines are not as clear as they should be or fail to include key provisions to reduce the adverse nonproliferation consequences, for all practical purposes: - NSG states should not and will not likely engage in "full" nuclear trade with India; - NSG states should and very likely would terminate nuclear trade with India if it resumes testing; and - India's compliance with it pre-2005 nonproliferation commitments and the implementation of bilateral trade with India will be reviewed on a regular (probably annual) basis by the NSG. Why? Most states will try to remain consistent with U.S. law, policy, and the U.S. interpretations of its bilateral trade agreement with India. Collectively, these bar the transfer of enrichment, reprocessing, and heavy water technology to Indian national facilities, the Hyde Act also mandates a cutoff of U.S. trade if India resumes testing, and according the State Dept's January 16 responses to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. fuel supply assurances will be invalid if India tests for any reason. See <http://www.armscontrol.org/node/3338>. Linkage Between India's Commitments and the Waiver The connection between India's nonproliferation statements and the NSG decision to allow nuclear trade and its possible termination of nuclear trade should have been clear and unambiguous. Yet, Paragraph 3 of the NSG statement undeniably says the "basis" of the India specific waiver includes its July 2005 pledges and the Sept. 5 statement by India's External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, which include a pledge to maintain India's nuclear test moratorium. Following the NSG's reluctant approval of the statement on India, several states delivered national statements that clarify their views on how the NSG's policy on India shall be implemented. Among the states that delivered statements were: Austria, China, Germany, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Switzerland. Japan noted that the exemption for India was decided on the condition that India continues to observe its commitments, especially its nuclear test moratorium pledge. Japan noted that if India resumed testing, "the logical consequence is to terminate trade." Most of the other statements also made this point. Germany, and perhaps others, added that it expects India to take further nonproliferation and disarmament measures, including "entry into force of the CTBT and a termination of fissile material production for weapons." Therefore, if India tests, the NSG would immediately meet in an emergency session (as already allowed for in the NSG guidelines) and the widespread expectation would be for all NSG states to terminate nuclear trade immediately. And despite the Indian government's false representations to its public and parliament, neither the United States nor other responsible nuclear suppliers are going to feel obliged to respect earlier fuel supply guarantees or help find some other country to supply India with nuclear fuel if India tests for any reason or violates its safeguards commitments. Permanent Safeguards: Paragraph 2.a refers to India's March 2006 "separation plan" which says India will put at least 8 additional nuclear power reactors under safeguards by 2014. The inclusion of this language was resisted by Inda, which has still not formally filed the list of facilities its will actually put under safeguards with the IAEA. Paragraph 2.b of the NSG statement on India also refers to the maintenance of facility-specific safeguards in accordance with IAEA standards and practices including Gov. 1621, which means that the safeguards agreement puts India's materials and facilities under indefinite safeguards that Indian cannot legally terminate unilaterally. The Government of India has suggested to its parliament that this is not the case. Enrichment and Reprocessing Transfers: International safeguards cannot prevent the replication or possible use of sensitive fuel cycle technologies transferred to India for "civilian" purposes for use in its military sector. The NSG should have explicitly banned such technology transfers. India Paragraph 3.a in the NSG statement on India maintains that Paragraphs 6 & 7 of the current NSG guidelines will continue to apply. This means that NSG states must continue to exercise "utmost restraint" with respect to transfers of sensitive dual use technologies and enrichment and reprocessing technologies to India or any other state. In addition, in the course of the NSG meeting, the United States confirmed that participating NSG governments expressed assurances that they did not intend to transfer enrichment or reprocessing technology to India. Review of the Implementation of the Statement: Paragraph 3.c and 3.e require NSG suppliers to report on their nuclear transfers to India and consult regularly on India's implementation and compliance with India's its nonproliferation commitments and bilateral nuclear cooperation with India. India and the NSG: In Paragraph 2.f, the NSG statement notes that India has pledged to harmonize its export policies with that of the NSG and that India commits to adhere to all NSG guidelines. But contrary to India's demands, India may not "participate" in future NSG decisions or the development of future guidelines. Instead, India may be consulted by the NSG chair regarding future policies. One of those policy discussions will soon be aimed at establishing clearer limitations on the transfer of enrichment and reprocessing technology, including a ban on any transfers to non-members of the NPT | ||
| Nihil Junior Artist Username: Nihil Post Number: 212 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 59.93.120.157 Rating: N/A |
USA ni septic tank ani nenu pilavadam enti Kallis ? Chala famous slang word adi  Check this -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septic_tank#.22Septic_tank.22_i n_slang In Cockney Rhyming Slang (common in Britain and Australia) "septic tank" or, more commonly, simply "septic" or "seppo" is used as a pejorative word for an American.The use of the nickname "seppo" in Australia is also derived from the preconception that all Americans are full of shit  | ||
| Zulu Comedian Username: Zulu Post Number: 1219 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 70.112.167.87 Rating: N/A |
USA ni septic tank ani mudhu ga ilichevadivi..Opinion marinda..nenemanna miss ayyana? Think Global,Act Local | ||
| Abcdefghij Comedian Username: Abcdefghij Post Number: 1870 Registered: 02-2007 Posted From: 68.79.100.149 Rating: N/A |
maa state lonu okkati vundi...no new and very dangerous anni konni plants ni appestunnaru no new anni chadivanu...dems kudaagianst building new nuke plants | ||
| Guriginja Side Hero Username: Guriginja Post Number: 3069 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 97.81.110.190 Rating: N/A |
almost every big state has nuke power plants...kotthavi kattadaniki ledu anthe...GA we are with in 100 miles of one. | ||
| Cylonesubbarao Side Hero Username: Cylonesubbarao Post Number: 8293 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 72.90.150.88 Rating: N/A |
Naaku telisi NY lo okati undi... appudappu evacuation plans gurinchi evaro okaru godava chesthaaru. US asalu use cheyyadu ante doubte! You must be the change you wish to see in the world  | ||
| Abcdefghij Comedian Username: Abcdefghij Post Number: 1869 Registered: 02-2007 Posted From: 68.79.100.149 Rating: N/A |
nenu alage feel aiyya rao garu | ||
| Cylonesubbarao Side Hero Username: Cylonesubbarao Post Number: 8292 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 72.90.150.88 Rating: N/A |
 You must be the change you wish to see in the world | ||
| Abcdefghij Comedian Username: Abcdefghij Post Number: 1868 Registered: 02-2007 Posted From: 68.79.100.149 Rating: N/A |
manmohan gattiga vunadu.... good luck manmohan... entha varaku safe nuke power? US dont use it.... | ||
| Nihil Junior Artist Username: Nihil Post Number: 211 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 59.93.120.157 Rating: N/A |
Nuke deal approved by NSG in Vienna today Kudos to Congress for acting in the interest of Nation ( Which is a very rare thing to expect from cong ) against all odds - News Media, Political parties ( shame on BJP to join hands with Commie dimwits ) etc. Nuke deal is good for Electricity, Business & Jobs, and out of all its a diplomatic victory . INDIA& US . |
