| Author | Message | ||
     Dma Side Hero Username: Dma Post Number: 6759 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 70.176.175.214 Rating: |
Krishna Rao. S T said... i am Hindu historian I ve read a old inscription named "bukkaraya sandi" available with archaeological dept. Karnataka. (you can visit city central library at bangalore for the copy)This is originally an agreement between jains and vaishnavas in 14th century stating jains have to leave thirumala neminath temple to vaishnavas and vaishnavas will not destroy Shravanabelagola bahubali statue as a good gesture. otherwise king buukkaraya (one of the founder of vijayanagar Empire?)will punish all jains in his kingdom ..... | ||
| Raman Hero Username: Raman Post Number: 10371 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 173.29.143.135 Rating: N/A |
ikkada chala temples okappudu church lu ayite eti? | ||
| Jatayu Comedian Username: Jatayu Post Number: 1752 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 122.172.227.187 Rating: N/A |
eduevado inko Zakir gadu laa unnadu.. tala toka lekunda mattadutunnadu.. hinduism bashing laa undi tappa article lo em ledu.. asalu aryan invasion ee tappu antonte.. edu emo comfirm sesesadu danni..
 Historian claim sesedi eti sinta kai..If you are good at something.. never do it for free.. | ||
| Ntr_rocks Moderator Username: Ntr_rocks Post Number: 38651 Registered: 04-2009 Rating: N/A |
neevu epudu Ary(J)ain a.....  This DB needs better class of Hater, Pyscho and Sadist. | ||
| Emc2 Side Hero Username: Emc2 Post Number: 8687 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 71.246.229.243 Rating: N/A |
Are the jains from iran?  cherapakura chedevu. | ||
| Qdoba Side Hero Username: Qdoba Post Number: 3003 Registered: 03-2012 Posted From: 199.19.107.181 Rating: |
Is this true ? http://www.hindu.com/2007/07/04/stories/2007070460201500.htm http://prearyan.blogspot.com/2010/03/tirupati-balaji-is-jain -temple-of.html This is originally a Jain temple converted by Ramanujam/Sankaracharya around 8th century A.D onwards along with 1000s other dravid temples. .Complete idol is covered to hide its original identity. Balaji has been photographed on many occassions without Jewellary and it is found to be a Jain Standing Tirthankara Neminath which many brahmins believe and admit. Archaelogical scientists, honest historians have proved this to be a Jain temple. Millions of people visit Balaji temple but no one know reality about this temple. It is truly a Dravid temple, which is confirmed by Archaelogical department as Jain temple. Many brahmins silently believe and agree that it is originally Jain temple converted by Ramanujam and Sankaracharya as 1000s of other dravid Jain temples converted, rechristened by Avatar philiosophy. No Historian can ever claim that there was any god by name Lord Venkateshwara. Many historians world wide believe - any given old temple in southern part of India is originally a Jain temple. However it may have changed its name. Archaeological Senior officers (who chose not to comment much due to political dominance ) firmly believe that originally complete dravid population was Jain who were not fighters like aryans, and believers of Ahimsa, whose heritage was stolen by cunning aryans who came to India around 3500 years ago. For example Thirukural was product of dravid civilization ( written by Jain Saints) but later it was labelled as Hindu literature at the time Hinduism was not known with its present name around 1st century B.C.when sacrifice of animals and vaidic religion was in vogue. To conclude Tirupati balaji temple is wonderful temple belonging to all devotees, it can be run the way it is going. But at least its true history and identity has to be made known. Most of gods elsewhere in Hinduism whose abhisekham is performed in public view, same way Tirupati's rituals need to be done in open with public view. As we all believe god are not property of brahmins alone, but they belong to devotees. Why Tirupati Lord venkateshwara's face has to be hidden. When no face of Lord Rama, Lord Krishna, Lord siva, Lord brahma, Lord Ganesha are hidden. This looks quite weird hiding face of god to mislead its real identity. We would all love to have our god let it be Brahmin or Jain , it has to be in open for everyone. Let us ask those brahmins to perform all pooja, abhisekham openly, not to hide with curtains or by closing doors. There is absolutely no need to keep God in private if this is real . This is one of reason only 2 % of complete structure is visible to devotees, which doesn't happen with Lord Krishna, Lord Rama, Lord Hanuman, Lord Ganesha in other parts of India. God's identy is hidden only in such temples when temple would have been converted from Jain temple and their naming is done on fabricated, non-historical avatars. Can we request temple authorities to reveal its true identity and to see full face and posture of god Can we have real photograph without artificial projected hands, face and other parts. From ages Dravid history has been mutilated, wrongly potrayed by so called responsbile vested interests of society, politics and even government. It is Aryans whose history, mythology and wrong facts are superimposed over dravid history, who were immigrants to India. Dr Santhalingam, senior director of Archaelogical survey and his assistant, and ASI has unpublished researched facts which clearly state that , Every old temple in south was once jain temple, presently known with different identity created by brahmins, few such examples out of 1000s of dravid jain temples converted to Brahmin temples are: 1) Madurai Meenakshi temple 2) Kanchipuram kamakshi temple (Kanchipuram has more than 100 temples) 3) Varadaperumal temple ( kanchipuram) 4) Thiruvanmalai Arunachalam temple 5) Mylapore kapaliswara temple 6) Nagaraja temple nagercoil 7) Thirumala Balaji temple, ( total resemblance to thirumalai jain temple in Arni district) Dr. Santhalingam expressed that due to political circumstances these facts cannot be disclosed or published, but facts remain same. He also said Thiruvalluvar was a Jain saint who wrote the famous Tamil classic Thirukural He has done enough research but unable to publish same.Even Tamil was evolved from Dravid Jain civilization born out of Brahmi language. Enough evidences are avaialable from epigraphyAccording to him Aryan Brahims invaded jain temples and converted them as their source of livelihood. |
