| Author | Message | ||
Chand Hero Username: Chand Post Number: 17281 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 183.83.158.103 Rating: N/A |
Emi viphalam ayyaru they never made to finals in WC yet , no need to consider SA This one match is of the kind to recognise both teams what’s wrong in declaring joint champions when tied after super over also , instead of playing a junk rule https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket_World_Cup That too why only to consider boundaries when scores are level | ||
Sachin Legend Username: Sachin Post Number: 44172 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 198.202.241.81 Rating: N/A |
endi comedy chetshunnava....memade kufli tournaments lo kooda thelusu super over tie ayithe boundaries count avuthayi ani.... | ||
Idiot1 Side Hero Username: Idiot1 Post Number: 5748 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 174.225.9.210 Rating: N/A |
next enti SA anni WCs ki mundu iragateesi WC lo fail avutunnaru next cup vallaki icheddamaa  | ||
Megapowerstar Side Hero Username: Megapowerstar Post Number: 9550 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 183.83.157.152 Rating: N/A |
As a matter of fact, those kinda contingencies and uncontrollables (as Kane Williamson said) make the game more interesting. I personally loved each one of these - catching and then falling over the boundary, ricochet from bat to the fence and missing out on 2 runs in the last ball. My comment was that all these things happened around Martin Guptill. | ||
Raptors Side Hero Username: Raptors Post Number: 4410 Registered: 09-2017 Posted From: 198.33.159.252 Rating: N/A |
mari emi cheyyali antav...elections/cricket season done...next BB3 season varuku koncham time pass avvali ga 2019 NBA WORLD CHAMPIONS || WE THE NORTH | ||
Chand Hero Username: Chand Post Number: 17280 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 183.83.158.103 Rating: N/A |
Fielding, catching , over throws are part and parcel of game If and buts will always be there , no body knows what’s the result of next ball in game of cricket So we need not consider catch missed , ball went to boundary etc But the final rule is junk and can be questioned , they should have declared joint winner and shared the price money and cup It would have recognised both teams efforts , but favouring one and disappointing some one in the name of some stupid rule on that big stage is not correct | ||
Megapowerstar Side Hero Username: Megapowerstar Post Number: 9549 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 183.83.157.152 Rating: N/A |
Joint winners gaa declare chesi undali (or) they should have continued with another super over. Aina England valla sudda lo gudi mama. No can scratch when u have such kinda luck. Martin Guptill gaadu daridram chetilo pettukuni digaadu ground loki. - Failed with the bat in the first innings - In the 49th over, Boult caught Stoke's hit but because he did not watch the boundary stepped over it. Konchem aa ball ni pakkane unna Martin Guptill vypu relay catch gaa padesi unte, the game was finished then. Remember Kiwis are a brilliant fielding team and have taken such amazing catches many a time. - Guptill's throw got deflected and England got 6 runs in place of 2. The target which was 9 runs in 3 balls became 3 runs in 2 balls. If that did not happen, the score was 7 runs in 2 balls and Kiwis had a chance. - Super over last ball 2 runs ki Guptill chatikila paddadu. He is one of the best hitters and could not get 2 runs. Intha sani Guptill tala meeda unte, ela gelustaru Kiwis  | ||
Megapowerstar Side Hero Username: Megapowerstar Post Number: 9548 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 183.83.157.152 Rating: N/A |
1999 last super six match was b/w SA and Australia at Headingley. SA scored 271 and Australia chased it down thanks to a superlative innings with Steve Waugh who scored 120*. Few days later, they met at again for the semi final that ended in a tie. But Australia entered the finals since it beat SA at Headingley. May be the same rule should have applied (or) another super over should have been continued. | ||
Ferrari Hero Username: Ferrari Post Number: 17723 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 192.158.44.12 Rating: N/A |
ippudu ee Sprint Retrospective avasaram andi..WC ayipoindhi..cup ichesaru..England vallu taagi thooli enjoy chesi untaru..NZ kurrol back ellipoyi untaru..janalu andaru sallapaddaru...ayina kuda mana DB lo ee bongulo analysis lu aagavu.. | ||
Chand Hero Username: Chand Post Number: 17277 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 183.83.158.103 Rating: N/A |
asalu team managements and players lo majority mandhiki ilanti junk rules gurinchi idea kooda undadu Umpires ee rules chaduvutaru book teesi appatikiappudu , don’t think players will have clear knowledge on such rules | ||
Chand Hero Username: Chand Post Number: 17276 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 183.83.158.103 Rating: N/A |
Varsham padi washout ayite CUP share cheyochu ani chepparu Why can’t Cup be shared if super over also got tied instead of some junk rule that more boundary’s is the decider of winner If Cup can be shared it can be done in any circumstances , what’s wrong in having a joint winner If it’s the point of revival of cricket I would prefer cup should be given to NZ after all they are consistently played well for decades unlike England who was fallen flat after 1992 and just recently rebuilding Infact the future cricket looks dull for NZ when compared to England I don’t buy this propaganda of if England wins cup it revive cricket in Europe , cup gelchina English men won’t much care as they are already so much adopted to football, tennis What current English team having 80% of them are migrants , biggest joke is archer was selected in to team by changing rules of ECB look at this ECB can change thire rules to bring in a non local and can give a visa , but ICC is not showing interest to change thire junk rules Some of guys saying rules are on paper , so what no one will feel the pain unless it comes overs and hurts and mostly take them casually | ||
Idiot1 Side Hero Username: Idiot1 Post Number: 5747 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 174.225.9.210 Rating: N/A |
Rules tournament ki munde frame chesaaru kada akkadiki edo eng score card choosi more no of boundaries unnai ani appatiki appudu rules frame chesinattu endi mee lolli. Felt bad for NZ and williamson. | ||
Bharateeyudu Hero Username: Bharateeyudu Post Number: 12899 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 117.195.246.226 Rating: N/A |
https://twitter.com/ZaltzCricket/status/1150701975849394176 according to andrew zaltman ..the probability of tie in worldcup final is 400 years!!!!we most probably will never witness this kinda of cricket match..its pinnacle of sorts in ODI cricket..no last ball sixes etc will enthuse us.. may be india vs pak odi world cup final tie aithe adiripovachchu..( HAR GHAR BHAGWA CHAAYEGAA | ||
Bharateeyudu Hero Username: Bharateeyudu Post Number: 12898 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 117.195.246.226 Rating: N/A |
according to andrew zaltman ..the probability of tie in worldcup final is 400 years!!!! HAR GHAR BHAGWA CHAAYEGAA | ||
Chitti_babu Legend Username: Chitti_babu Post Number: 30279 Registered: 03-2012 Posted From: 169.198.254.71 Rating: N/A |
Dhenabba malli ilaanti match raadhamma, we can never witness mother of all finals NZ lost by game of stupid rules not by game. Morale Winners NZ. A final should not have ended like this. seems unjustified. iddharu winners but one will celebrate other had to adjust annattu vundhi munda rule and result. Imagine NZ fans, players and country emotion. | ||
Raptors Side Hero Username: Raptors Post Number: 4406 Registered: 09-2017 Posted From: 198.33.159.252 Rating: N/A |
they should have gone for super over bowling...after super over batting was tied...stupid rules 2019 NBA WORLD CHAMPIONS || WE THE NORTH | ||
Ringo_rangaswamy Megastar Username: Ringo_rangaswamy Post Number: 24364 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 148.74.44.126 Rating: N/A |
one in 4 years tournament. should have more super overs. unlikey it will be a tie in the next also. | ||
Venkatesh68 Junior Artist Username: Venkatesh68 Post Number: 456 Registered: 11-2014 Posted From: 170.248.165.95 Rating: N/A |
umpires misatke chesthe england ni enduk anatam | ||
Speaker Side Hero Username: Speaker Post Number: 6615 Registered: 01-2019 Posted From: 192.197.178.2 Rating: N/A |
Overthow lo wrong decision, n the decision to go with most number of boundaries still seems whackeddddddddddddddddd whatever, in case of tie with same score..why couldnt they have chosed the winner based on number of wickets per the same score instead of going in2 super over...that idea itself seems dumb...bcoz based on number of wickets per same score, NZ has won it hands down by 2 wickets.. NZ should have been awarded the cup by all meansssssssssssssss... Inform, Amuse, Confuse, Evoke.. | ||
Oceanseven Hero Username: Oceanseven Post Number: 10784 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 166.137.240.81 Rating: N/A |
so 2 balls 4 runs required with Rashid on strike ? Then Rashid is a fresh batsman, 5th would have gone for four, England win with a ball to spare, cool naa | ||
Rajakeeyam Junior Artist Username: Rajakeeyam Post Number: 95 Registered: 03-2019 Posted From: 88.73.132.24 Rating: N/A |
veellu eppudu thinnaga gelicharu ani Worldcups..even in Football..they won because of Wembley goal. | ||
Ringo_rangaswamy Megastar Username: Ringo_rangaswamy Post Number: 24363 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 148.74.44.126 Rating: N/A |
https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/27194046/umpires-mad e-error-judgement-overthrows-simon-taufel Rule - Law 19.8, pertaining to "Overthrow or wilful act of fielder", says: "If the boundary results from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs scored shall be any runs for penalties awarded to either side, and the allowance for the boundary, and the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act." Which means - "It's a clear mistake.. it's an error of judgment," Taufel said. "They (England) should have been awarded five runs, not six. Taufel also said that Stokes and Rashid should have switched ends once the run was found to be incomplete - which meant Rashid would have played the fifth ball with three runs required to win. "They did not cross on their second run, at the instant of the throw. So given that scenario, five runs should have been the correct allocation of runs, and Ben Stokes should have been at the non-striker's end for the next delivery." |