| Author | Message | ||
Special_status Junior Artist Username: Special_status Post Number: 310 Registered: 11-2018 Posted From: 86.135.49.199 Rating: N/A |
Manollu bomb esaru andulo vallu gun fire lo poyaru | ||
Neel Hero Username: Neel Post Number: 10668 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 104.176.65.193 Rating: N/A |
galthi hogayi maaf kijiye  | ||
Xxx Hero Username: Xxx Post Number: 17629 Registered: 04-2009 Posted From: 149.168.132.16 Rating: N/A |
pak fasak ,india new Israel , modi jai - | ||
Bumper Hero Username: Bumper Post Number: 16361 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 67.240.45.153 Rating: N/A |
Same post kinda inko post undhi chudand. 2016 October image anta. | ||
Baatasari Side Hero Username: Baatasari Post Number: 3043 Registered: 10-2018 Posted From: 171.161.160.10 Rating: N/A |
mohtarma.. uss dehsha-gard mulk mein.. roj aatanki marte.. aur aap aise tasveer hamare muh mein maarke chali jaati hain.. ya allah .. inn admins ke sitam se hame bachale.. brahma satyam jagan-mithyä jivo brahmaiva näparah | ||
Neel Hero Username: Neel Post Number: 10667 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 104.176.65.193 Rating: N/A |
can someone confirm where these pictures are from ? https://twitter.com/MissKau97877553/status/11007586486561382 40 nake eduku ilantivi kanapadatayi | ||
Baatasari Side Hero Username: Baatasari Post Number: 3041 Registered: 10-2018 Posted From: 171.161.160.10 Rating: N/A |
Modi picture abhi baaki annadi.. context different man.. mana hyper-active media fed some goli to you.. edge-of-the-seat thriller lekka.. i think picture ho gaya.. aawam idhar Costco se wholesale popcorn khareedke baithi hai.. brahma satyam jagan-mithyä jivo brahmaiva näparah | ||
Whyme Megastar Username: Whyme Post Number: 28594 Registered: 09-2009 Posted From: 107.77.68.20 Rating: N/A |
Annai chest thumping aapandi for some time Picture abhi baaki annad kada ento sooddari | ||
Baatasari Side Hero Username: Baatasari Post Number: 3039 Registered: 10-2018 Posted From: 171.161.160.10 Rating: N/A |
janaab.. itna gyan ? ek post mein ? Jumme ki shaam, aawam ko tashreef rakhne ka mauka toh dein brahma satyam jagan-mithyä jivo brahmaiva näparah | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 3305 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 73.104.252.173 Rating: |
https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-uri-to -pulwama-modi-s-strategy-to-end-a-terror-talk-cycle-15513590 44581.html Opinion | Uri to Pulwama: Modi’s strategy to end a terror-talk cycle 3 min read . Updated: 28 Feb 2019, 06:53 PM IST Pramit Pal Chaudhuri Reprisals against Pakistan are part of Modi’s long-term strategy to change both Indian and Pakistani passivity towards terror The Narendra Modi government had concluded early in its term that the India-Pakistan relationship had fallen into an unthinking cycle of talks, followed by terror, followed by more talks, ad nauseam. Both governments had unthinkingly come to accept this pattern but it was India which was taking the punishment. The outgoing government, when asked about how to handle Pakistan’s terror actions, simply told the Modi team, “Just keep talking to them." Modi’s National Security Advisor Ajit Doval privately described this terror-talk cycle as the “left hand washing the right hand, while the right hand is washing the left hand." This passivity had originated from earlier circumstances. In the past India’s military and economic strength was only marginally greater than Pakistan’s. The international community was as likely to blame New Delhi for mismanaging Kashmir as it was to blame Islamabad for sponsoring terror. India’s own domestic difficulties with Kashmir were a third element. The Modi government decided it was time to break the cycle. It adopted a more muscular approach. Pakistan would have to learn that a major terrorist strike would be met with a strong Indian retaliation. Islamabad should no longer be able to predict the Indian response, other than it would be punitive. An old framework needed to be broken. But Modi’s national security team accepted it was an educational process that would have to unfold over a number of years – and would apply to both Pakistanis and Indians. The first class took place two years later. The 2016 Uri attack and the reprisal that followed were effectively lesson one. India had carried out reprisals before, but it never gone public with them. It was like a military pop quiz: Islamabad could either admit the attacks and go head-to-toe with India, or it could deny them and de facto admit it didn’t want a fight. It chose the last. Uri showed the Line of Control would no longer be a barrier to Indian action. It also showed that global opinion had changed. The West and Russia criticized Pakistan, not India. Even “fair weather friend" China was very correct in its response. Pulwama and its aftermath now constitute lesson two. Body-bag counting is a largely useless method of measuring who won and who lost. The real success of the past week of tension is that India’s “calculus of deterrence" with Pakistan has been further changed and is more deeply ingrained in the bilateral relationship. One, India not only broached the Line of Control but it carried out a heavy bombardment on a part of Pakistan that India does not even claim is disputed. Until now, New Delhi had always attacked targets in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir to make the thin legal case that it was attacking “Indian territory" and, therefore, was not in violation of international law. With the Balakot strike, India dispensed with even this fig leaf. The message to Pakistan and the wider world: if India is hit, it will strike wherever it wishes. This has similarities to Pe'ulot Ha Tagmul, roughly acts of retribution, adopted by Israel from the 1950s. Two, Pakistan is even more isolated than it was before internationally. Traditionally, Islamabad has been able to count on the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and China to provide it diplomatic cover. Today, of these four only China continues to be supportive and, after Pulwama, its public statements were at best neutral. Islamabad can take some hope in the fact Russia has moved closer to the Chinese position. But this is more than compensated by the closeness between the Gulf emirates and India. Changing the behaviour of nations is a long process. And Modi’s moves have been as much about changing India’s mindset as it has been about changing Pakistan’s. It is unlikely that Uri and Pulwana will be enough. Some in Pakistan will wonder if the policy will survive if a weaker Indian government comes to power. There are also other elements that New Delhi must address – for example, the deterioration in the political climate in Kashmir since 2016. And, at some distant point, India will need to seek a political settlement with Pakistan but only when Islamabad has internalised that a new normal exists between the two countries. For now, however, a “new normal" has been further established both at home and next door. |
