| Author | Message | ||
Gandhiguevara Legend Username: Gandhiguevara Post Number: 69692 Registered: 10-2009 Posted From: 104.190.153.104 Rating: N/A |
http://www.eenadu.net/vasundhara/vasundhara-inner.aspx?topfu llstory=28159 | ||
Moviebuff001 Hero Username: Moviebuff001 Post Number: 10976 Registered: 06-2013 Posted From: 73.136.80.68 Rating: N/A |
I read it too baa. Well put. _________________________________________________ Your words will tell others what you think. Your actions will tell others what you believe in. | ||
Lenin Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 17428 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 1.152.104.31 Rating: N/A |
Nuv manishivena Antha type chesav Guntur, Hyderabad, Andhra, Telangana, Tamilnadu, Karnataka first....India last!!! | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 9237 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
thanks balls uncle for taking the pain to read that long post  appreciate your kind heart Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 9235 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
 atleast okallu chadivina super kada baa... aa post antha important ne...padi postlalo veyyali ante time bokka...morning time ledu...so ala start chesesi raasukunta poya Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Ballasticmissile Hero Username: Ballasticmissile Post Number: 10821 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 178.200.56.78 Rating: N/A |
I read it fully..... To test my reading skills...it took me exactly 7 minutes to read it completely..... I’ll write summary in 4 lines here is it Every woman goes for 498A ....as it’s one which can induct relatives too....though charges may be real and there are other sections which are more harsher still women goes for 498 A for following reasons 1)vengeance on relatives Oder kins 2) more money can be demanded Lawyers and judges are also taking cases and giving judgements on basis of 498a though in many of cases they can’t stand on that sections preamble Dowry in form of lump sum amount is only in India why?? Why can’t indian judges give judgement of monthly maintenance compensation ani last 4 paragraphs.... Idi the essence of it. Capacity vundi, laziness, and uninspired life is a waste of time. YOLO kada.... But experiences is how you bring meaning to life. Worthiness should be earned with adequate efforts. | ||
Ferrari Hero Username: Ferrari Post Number: 15263 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 192.158.48.90 Rating: N/A |
 thed lo edaina masala untademo ani vasthe aa essay lu endhi..moral of the story endhi..assalu antha peddha essay rasemundhu kanisam okkadaina saduvutada ani edho oka time lo doubt raledha ba.. | ||
Dma Megastar Username: Dma Post Number: 21185 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 159.87.134.174 Rating: N/A |
checks is over rated. Just in case if any of the other person has deceases, the person involved in illegal relation is bringing life threating risk to the family. Jai Andhra!! Jai Jai Andhra!!! | ||
Nyk Side Hero Username: Nyk Post Number: 2300 Registered: 04-2018 Posted From: 49.207.188.2 Rating: N/A |
 | ||
Whitecollar Hero Username: Whitecollar Post Number: 18927 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 73.24.39.20 Rating: N/A |
Yeah, idhe case kottesaaru.. Inka husband case pettaledu.. veni.. vidi.. vici.. if you want to test a man's character, give him power - Abraham Lincoln | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 9229 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
feminists aduguthunnadi veru... illicit relationship lo unna lady ni bokkolo veyyali ani so that incase of separation magaadu anevaadu divorce kosam wait cheyyalsinde adhi padhellu iravai yellu ayuna anthe kaani vere relation pettukotaaniki veelu ledu ani control the bloody husband is the moto.. SC mothaniki feminist ni appease chestunattu paiki kanipistu paramour meeda cases lekunda chesindi a ram gopal varma verdict...mans side na womans side na evariki ardamkaadu kiki Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Kick Side Hero Username: Kick Post Number: 2496 Registered: 11-2013 Posted From: 117.196.250.177 Rating: N/A |
ippudu ide kada kottesindi.divorce matramm thiskochu | ||
Whitecollar Hero Username: Whitecollar Post Number: 18924 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 73.24.39.20 Rating: N/A |
Wife is a property of husband as per constitution. Ippudu oka lady ki extra marital affair undi, husband case pedithe vaadini maatram arrest chestharu.. Lady ki case ledhu.. That law is one sided and not feminist.. Feminists should be very happy with this verdict. Eppudo Malladi novel dharma yudham lo ee point vaadaaru.. Super novel idhi.. veni.. vidi.. vici.. if you want to test a man's character, give him power - Abraham Lincoln | ||
Jeffa Comedian Username: Jeffa Post Number: 1842 Registered: 10-2012 Posted From: 12.229.156.34 Rating: N/A |
Nee clarification adirindi saami.. Even I respect your final opinion (of including the wife's rights instead of removing husband's rights), it a way(especially from Indian conservative ideology, its more appropriate while Personally, I liked the idea of keeping the rights of woman (of not being the slave of anyone by law). A wise woman use it in positive way while others may misuse it(and thats what happening in 498 mostly) | ||
Legend Username: Twitter Post Number: 62182 Registered: 10-2009 Posted From: 136.56.134.148 Rating: N/A |
Blessing in disguise for mogadu entante divorce easy aindhi..so woman inkoditho ani thelusthe divorce applying seskovochhu..its win win | ||
Sicago Side Hero Username: Sicago Post Number: 3754 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 80.255.245.234 Rating: N/A |
498 comedy yemante ye sambandham leni husband yokka brother in law ni kooda lopala vesthunnaru.... complete gaa lepeyyali yee section ni.... asalu nannu adigithey sagam mandhi judges ki kooda yee section limitations gurinchi thelisi chavadhu ani.... | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 9222 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 146.115.122.165 Rating: N/A |
oh inko point maricha...pelli chesukuni vere desalaki thengestunnaru anetollaki...yes thats true as well...kaavuna keep 498...section delete kottamani anatamledu...but just remove relative of the husband matram peekeyandi babayya chaalu aa keyword is what causing the misuse....men are designed to fight...as a husband we will fight all our life...but family ni techenta cruelty ammayilaki undakoodadu...please remove that relative of the husband term and let me love the women again thats all my lord.. Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Sicago Side Hero Username: Sicago Post Number: 3752 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 80.255.245.234 Rating: N/A |
Monday morning morning, kaneesam muddi moothi ayina kadukkunavaa ledhaa, yendhi yee class peekudu aaaa.... | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 9221 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 146.115.122.165 Rating: |
idi true..
idendidi idi complete wrong...2nd man tho sambandame ledu...mee perception wrong ikkada....fake 498 cases is a norm...mostly anni fake ye... fake chestaaru...no respect for law kabatti...oka padi caselu petteyi...make quick buck jump...it doesnt matter whose wrong....money money money thenkesey tvaraga...adi jaragaali ante bhayapettali..criminal case tho bhayapettu ani....10000 ways lo fake chestaaru...thokkalo illegal relationship lo unna vaallu fake chesedi 1 of those 10000 ways....migata anni kooda fake ye kada.. first thing 498A is for dowry harassment...section em cheptaadi...mental harassment to the level of suicide or physical ga harassment limb fracture to acquire additional dowry laanti lanulu cheste ani... lambdi kodukulu police, lawyers, judges successful ga for years together aa section lo acquiring additional dowry ane context ni naakinchaaru...anduke adi final legal terrorism ayyundi...matrimonial house lo aadadaaniki anni hakkulaki anni aasalaki aani duraasalaki okate mandhu ga 498 ni teerchididdaru and courts allowed it all these years...they intentionally pampered that misuse...they inturn allowed compromise in a criminal section...no where in the world this happens...dabbu mokaana kottu harassment ledu thokkaledu compromise petition padeyu case kotteyunchuko...tappemundi ani nuvvu anukuntunnavemo...tappe...who will define how much should be monetary compensation? gun petti blackmaling chesi dabbulu thenkatam kooda hakku ena? thats where is the misuse...asalu dabbulu enduku kaavali? common property ayuna pillala labor kosam kontha...pillala ke kontha...this should never been lumpsum in the first place...ayuna lumpsum allow cheseyi courtlu in the name of protecting families...again led the way to misuse...USA lo ekkada lumpsum maintenance nenaithe vinale...ee concept kooda mana law lo abuse cheyataniki techina oka provision...so what should have been ideally done? monthly maintenance or timely support with the view of supporting kids matrame allow chesi undalsindi...not the wife...wife is an adult, she should win her bread...and also her part of maintaining the kid kooda vellali...ala vellaali ante she must and should work kada...aa gender neutral sensitivities anni pakkanabetti thini thonguni harass cheyataniki oka 498 techaaru...aa lumpsum kosam oka mogudni vaadi parents ni, siblings, sibling sposuses, inka andarni related to the husband ni criminilize chesi himsinchatam ee 498 law speciality....anybody who understands this law should be ashamed of using this law....this law is INHUMAN...physical ga kaalo cheeyo irigindi ante daaniki doctor certificate undaali...adi evadu pattinchukodu case padellu nadustaadi kabatti..invetigating police officer pani adi...aath care...enduku ante mental harassment ane umbrella undi kabatti...ee padam aadollaki sree rama raksha...anything and everything is mental harassment no?you can term anything under the sun as mental harassment kada...idi policollaki lawyerlaki kalpa vruksham...nachindi raasuko...jailloki toseyi mundu...wife tho paatu veellu kooda extortion ki digutaaru..indaaka cheppinattu section em cheptaadi mental harassment to the level of committing suicide for demanding additional dowry...so context additional dowry which no one gave a F...adi kooda aa context lo aa harassment bharinchalenanta undaali...harassment ni evaraina ela quantify chestaaru...naako oka level of mental strength untaadi...weakness untaadi...vere ollaki vere okati...normally mental harassment cases should go to PWDVA(domestic violence act which is different from 498) ki refer cheyyali..oka protection officer untaadu vaadu deal cheyyali because all those harassment that she is talking about is not specific to dowry. ONLY dowry related harassment should go 498...kaani akkada DV act is psuedo criminal in nature...first lo civil adi...oka protection order estaru moosukuni kurchomani...adi athikramiste appudu criminal avuddi...abbe aa section ala vaadithe kudarde...bhayapetti dabbulu thenkaali kabatti annitiki 498a vaadestaaru....padellu ayyaaka judge gaaru abbe ee case lo em ledu ani kottestaaru ledaa adiginanta dabbulu ichi kalla neellu nethina challukuni vellali..adi paristhithi.. so ippudu illegal relationship antaava...illegal relationship doesnt come under dowry related offence...daaniki aa section lo refer chestunna mental harassment chaduvukunnavaadu vaadakoodadu....daaniki domestic violence vaadali...kaani akkada judge em peekagalaru...they cant stop a man from having relationship...they can only guide him...nuvvu aa relationship lo tagaladdaav...but nuvvu wife ni pillalni chusukovalsina(ardhikamga) bhadhyata undi...so intha ammaount ivvu...ee goodu ivvu ani cheppataniki undi...anthe kaani morally nuvvu inko daanitho tirakka anataniki DV act lo kaani 498 lo kaani ledu ledu ledu ledu...but still 498 vaadestunnaru..vaadakoodadu asalu etti paristhithullo...vaadithe aa section ni abuse chesinatte...over a period kottestaaru elaanu aa cases ni ayuna money vachestundi kada chaalu vaallaki....mari adhe wife illicit relationship lo unte husband elaanti criminal act invoke cheyaledu(497 kottesaaru kabatti ippudu ayuthe completely nill) mari 498 vaadukuni advantage women pondhutunnaru kabatti....498 ni kooda control cheyyalsina badhyata...media lo illicit relationships ni highlight chesi men ni shame chese roganni kooda court lu control cheyyali kada...adi jaragakunda 497 lo affect avutunna men ki sambandinchina right matrame laageste tappu kada...to be honest I liked this judgement...its very fair...freewill ki sambandinchindi...iddaru illegal relationship lo unte magadni matrame sikshinchatam enti...raasina pundakor lanjodukuni cheppu teesukuni kottali in the first place...so adi CJI ippudu kottesaaru which is good...feminists actually wanted to different section to prosecute the women involved....vaallaki kavalsindi raaledu...vaallaki raaledu...cheppu debba to them...alaage matrimonial house lo anni rights sankanakipoyuna magadi ki minuku minuku mantu aa okka section to punish one of the wrong do-ers ni kooda sankanakinchaaru...so cheppu debba to men as well iddariki digindi...thats allright as per me...if they consider this judgement as a landmark judgement and make sure 498 lo evaranna illicit relation ni mental harassment ani ante daanni police consider cheyakunda undettu supreme court orders pass cheste this judgement would have been landmark judgement...adi explicit ga evaru cheppaledu kabatti adi policulu, media, judgelu ardamchesukogalgutaaru ani aasinchatam tappithe em cheyyalem.. couple of years back oka saari idhe db lo illicit relation tappenti annanu...naaku gurtuledu evaru counter chesaaro kaani...illicit relationship ni open ga db lo support chese madisini ninnu okadine first time chustunna ani evaro naa meeda satire esaaru...atleast now they know even the supreme court of india or world wife they say the same thing....it is FREEWILL....babayya understand that...families break avuthunnayi thokka thotakooda argument ki middle finger...enjoy.. PS: just for information, sections that should have been used in place of 498...kaani aa sections vaadakunda 498 lo relative of the husband undatam valla daanni use chesukuni extort cheyataniki uvvillu oorupothu sambaripadipothu vaaduthunnaru...any feminist that doesnt acknowledge this reality and support this misuse should not live on this land...they are scum anamaata...nazi supporters laaga vaallu kooda adhe raktam...alantollani nallini nalipinattu nalipeyaali... 1. ammayi bangaram/dabbulu/samanlu undipoyiniyyi...then she should use section 406...which is also criminal section but vaadaru...endukante akkada okadine involve cheyagalam...mothum family lo andarini gampaguthuga chesi dabbulu nokkeyalem kada.. 2. illicit relationship or some other kind of mental and physical abuse but not related to dowry...then vaadalsindi prevention of domestic violence act...DVC act antaaru...they get all the privileges...idi inkaaaaaa ekkuva misuse avuthundi...but still idi vaadochu...monetary benefits kooda pushkalamga unnaayi..but arrest lu gatra immediate ga undavu kabatti lady ki kasi teeradu kabatti vaadaru.. 3. suicide chesukunte evaram emcheyyalem unless that is dowry related... other mental harassment ki ayuthe should not be a case at all....magadu marriage ayuna first 7years lo chanipothe case ledu...nobody can prosecute wife...but adhe wife ala chesukunte 498 pettestunnaru which is wrong...498 lo untaadi suicide cases lo pettochu ani...but adi dowry related ayuthene...dowry related death ayuthe section 304b already undi which is much more serious...so 498 section actual ga very specific ga very thin layer ni matrame cover chestaandi...like suicide chesukunenta dowry harassment but suicide chesukoledu instead approached the courts for justice ane oka angle ni cover chestaandi...adi no one understands petti dobbu anthe... 4. pillala maintenance kosam vaadalsindi crpc 125...kaani aasti raadu kada...aasti lo share kavali kabatti 498 vaadestaaru..malli ee maintenance section lo moodo nalugo unnayi...veella pindakoodu.. 5. suicide chesukunettu usigolputhunnaru but not related to dowry then vadalsindi section 306 6. dowry kakunda physical hurt chesaadu then vaadalsina sections defined here, kaani vaadaru: https://devgan.in/ipc/chapter_16.php on a whole 498 is a disgrace...chaala matuku different sections already provide help to the victim women...but relative of the husband term ni use chesukuni dabbulu extort cheyataniki aa sections help cheyyavu...adhe 498 lo help avuddi...so women are misusing it...now wells annai never ever say 498 fake cases takkuva ani Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Moviebuff001 Hero Username: Moviebuff001 Post Number: 10958 Registered: 06-2013 Posted From: 172.58.96.236 Rating: N/A |
Law doesn't and shouldn't demand loyalty. Morality issues are also not under legal purview unless there is some sort of torture (mental or physical) involved. _________________________________________________ Your words will tell others what you think. Your actions will tell others what you believe in. | ||
Blue_jeans_buddha Junior Artist Username: Blue_jeans_buddha Post Number: 75 Registered: 06-2018 Posted From: 77.100.60.41 Rating: N/A |
Aa Dana tho set cheyyandra baabu. And close the series there. Ippatike late ayyindhi. Bodhi Vruksham Kindha Bodi Lingam | ||
Kick Side Hero Username: Kick Post Number: 2492 Registered: 11-2013 Posted From: 117.196.250.177 Rating: N/A |
King lanti maa boss harvey specter jeevithamlo athi pedda badha entante vallamma inkoditho illicit relationship pettukodam and he cuts his ties with her. The man he is,he can pickup any girl but andulo kuda no married woman ani rule ettukuntadu  Only then i understood the gravity of situation | ||
Kick Side Hero Username: Kick Post Number: 2491 Registered: 11-2013 Posted From: 117.196.250.177 Rating: N/A |
I agree. But offended party naga vaishnavi caselo la react aithe penta penta aipoddi entire families ike last avataar said.. leda victim husband ki thikka regithe | ||
Nyk Side Hero Username: Nyk Post Number: 2279 Registered: 04-2018 Posted From: 49.207.188.2 Rating: N/A |
Intha varaku illegal affairs lo men 497 use chesevallu, women ki 497 lo provision ledu kaabatti 498A(only harassment) lo inkokari tho relationship pettukuni harassment chestunnadu ani reason kindha choopinchevallu. But ippudu men ki harassment jarigina, wife illegal affair pettukunna fight cheyadaniki provisionea ledhu. Men ante aatalo bananas aipoyaru ee feminist samajamlo | ||
Wellsfargo Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 10409 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.158.137 Rating: N/A |
stalker bhayya opinion avasaram ikkada. Usual gaa emavuthadi ante wife illicit relation pettukoni, still husband meeda 498a cases vesi nappudu ee 497 vaade vallu men on the guy who had affair with his wife. appudu aadu dariki vacchi edo comprimise ki velle vaadu. when there is no 2nd man involved, fake 498 cases are rare. Ippudu common aipothayi... Modi as PM, Jagan as CM for 2019. Idi charithraka avasaram.... | ||
Ballasticmissile Hero Username: Ballasticmissile Post Number: 10816 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 93.199.40.139 Rating: N/A |
Well in western societies there’s a concept called open relationships.... Anyone heard of them?? 2 of my friends are following that concept... Similarly there is a concept called bisexuality.....I know a lesbian couple who are bisexual....one of them is my classmate..... All this depends on nature of society....in a conservative catholic countries like Poland same sex marriage is still not legal...infact in balkans it’s a issue used by political parties to rally crowd behind them........read of Romanian referendum about to take place in few days....... For me, I don’t care......but in the institution called marriage, extramarital relationship is the basis for divorce..,,,but you can’t abuse the other physically for this..... Same judgment is given by Indian courts.....you can divorce....and it can be used as ground to take kids with father....because a woman not following her duties as wife can’t follow it as mother.....that’s the end of it....,you can’t throw her behind bars or abuse her for it.... Capacity vundi, laziness, and uninspired life is a waste of time. YOLO kada.... But experiences is how you bring meaning to life. Worthiness should be earned with adequate efforts. | ||
Nyk Side Hero Username: Nyk Post Number: 2278 Registered: 04-2018 Posted From: 49.207.188.2 Rating: N/A |
Idhoka feminist judgement laaga consider cheyochu. In an illegal affair (say XandY), section 497 provides husband of Y can initiate case on the man X if he doesn't like their affair. In case it's happening with his consent then there is no problem. Here if the wife of the man X wants to put case on the man X, there is no such provision in this section. CJI thought that this section 497 deals with two men's rights on one wife where as the wife the man(in illegal affair) has no say. In that context CJI stated that husband is not the master of wife. Ikkada criminal rule ni kottesaru. So, no punishment but under this grounds one can go for divorce. Basicga husband and wife Madhya accountability meeda unna chattanni teesesaru. CJI could have included the wife's right. But court dismissed the entire punishment. | ||
Last_avataar Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 10827 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 139.71.144.4 Rating: N/A |
illegal relationships , when in a committed relation with others ALWAYS LEAD TO DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES | ||
Jp_rocks Hero Username: Jp_rocks Post Number: 18384 Registered: 06-2009 Posted From: 24.1.170.94 Rating: |
TIME bro...time bokka, illicit affairs valla mental tension bokka..total ga time bokka | ||
Kick Side Hero Username: Kick Post Number: 2490 Registered: 11-2013 Posted From: 117.196.250.177 Rating: N/A |
married woman with unmarried man married man with unmarried woman married man with married woman ee mooditlo man ki bokka pade case edanna unte cheppandi.. except for divorce | ||
Jeffa Comedian Username: Jeffa Post Number: 1838 Registered: 10-2012 Posted From: 67.164.25.41 Rating: N/A |
This is the right way of understanding the change in the law. Many (at least 70% of folks) are incorrectly interpreting the change and speculating the venom in the space. Chus!!!! | ||
Emc2 Legend Username: Emc2 Post Number: 71607 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 71.127.33.124 Rating: N/A |
Closed or open relations after marriage legal evaru emi peekaleru I don’t think there is any punishment for it It's ok | ||
Jp_rocks Hero Username: Jp_rocks Post Number: 18382 Registered: 06-2009 Posted From: 24.1.170.94 Rating: N/A |
Good deal..from when is government in the business of regulating morality? This law shouldn’t have been written in the first place | ||
Confused Junior Artist Username: Confused Post Number: 612 Registered: 05-2017 Posted From: 76.100.12.125 Rating: N/A |
main point is even wife has a freedom to have relationship outside of marriage..... so main intention abbayilu/ammayilu are equal ani court teerpu. but victim spouse divorce file chesi can request alimony. Third party man/woman ki helpful ayindi kakapote ee law valla | ||
Wellsfargo Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 10408 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.159.179 Rating: N/A |
endi idi... chala mandi guttu gaa chesukuntunnaru tera chatu bhagotalu... ippudu official gaa chesu kovacchu.... https://www.livelaw.in/husband-is-not-the-master-of-wife-sc- strikes-down-158-year-old-adultery-law-under-section-497-ipc / Modi as PM, Jagan as CM for 2019. Idi charithraka avasaram.... |
