| Author | Message | ||
Telugu_times Legend Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 53655 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.0.30.9 Rating: N/A |
eenadu chadhivinatlu levu. read last line in first para one more time CCDB - Caste Chemchas Discussion Baavi | ||
Moviebuff001 Hero Username: Moviebuff001 Post Number: 10646 Registered: 06-2013 Posted From: 165.225.34.171 Rating: N/A |
Unpaid.
This should have been the law long time ago. Extra marital affairs are not a crime. Amoral. Definitely enough grounds for a divorce though. _________________________________________________ Your words will tell others what you think. Your actions will tell others what you believe in. | ||
Confused Junior Artist Username: Confused Post Number: 607 Registered: 05-2017 Posted From: 150.148.14.139 Rating: N/A |
may be unhappy marriage nunchi bayatiki vellali anukune valaki help avtundi ... third parties ki emi problem kadu kabatti unhappily married ones can now freely date someone even before divorce. | ||
Mental_sachinodu Megastar Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 22095 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 45.26.154.245 Rating: N/A |
how? if ther is of evidence of infidelity, divorce can be filed. the option was already there. here the advantage is only to the third party. | ||
Last_avataar Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 10757 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 139.71.144.2 Rating: N/A |
Now 1. other man cannot be charged if it is done with consent so adultery with mutual consent is trouble free. it opens a can of worms , as some one told in this thread. women can fully use this if they are willing to | ||
Mental_sachinodu Megastar Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 22089 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 45.26.154.245 Rating: N/A |
hmmm i should stop trolling abit probably... anyway - There are two things we need to understand about this law 1) Under this law, only a husband can file an infidelity case on wife and another person. Even when such a case is filed, only the "other person" is committed with the crime. probably a good news for guys in general  , as they cannot be charged anymore for such "crimes". 2) like i alluded in my first point, only a husband can file infeidelity case, a woman cannot file an infidelity case against a husband, even she has proof that he is involved with another man. now this law is not valid anymore, so its a win-win for both guys and gals. guys cannot be charged for hooking with another married woman, and gals have the right to say that they have equal rights as men the thing to note is, infidelity can still be used for a cause of divorce. it was earlier too, that is a wife or husband could use this reason for a divorce. that does not change. | ||
Jeffa Comedian Username: Jeffa Post Number: 1814 Registered: 10-2012 Posted From: 216.113.160.70 Rating: N/A |
Naaku poorthi gaa artham kaaledu kaanee.. its not a criminal act ani arthamaindi.
498A misuse is at its peak. While I agree with you about the misuse, the law should be bit more clear instead of the unilateral woman-pro one way treatment for a simple complaint. | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 8857 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
*sevaanni Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 8856 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
same privileges na...baaga dooramga aduvullo kaani untunnava annai j/k daanilo okka privilege kaani asalu dari daapullo kooda lemu as a man ila edaina cheste devanni kooda 100 times champutaaru samjaa  Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Mental_sachinodu Megastar Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 22088 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 45.26.154.245 Rating: N/A |
in other words.. the same priviliges men have now? | ||
Brighton Side Hero Username: Brighton Post Number: 4882 Registered: 05-2014 Posted From: 206.220.18.42 Rating: N/A |
idi konchem better emo.. atleast raafes ayina taggutay konchem... | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 8852 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
Marriage is a contract under Civil Law. A breach of trust in a Civil Contract shouldn't be a criminal offense. Similarly, in universal law, a unilateral termination of a civil contract isn’t a criminal offense either. The cornerstone of Civil Law is compensation or damage; not punitive measures. Just as punishment is the cornerstone of Criminal Law. Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 8850 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: |
different perspectives: This further justifies that women are immune to nuclear bombs🤪 Get married to the man your parents choose, have an affair with a man of your choice, dump the husband and take his kids with you as pawns, claim hefty maintenance, live with the other man, do not divorce the HUSBAND material just to ensure you don't lose out on financial benefits, and have a GALA TIME!! Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Stalker Side Hero Username: Stalker Post Number: 8849 Registered: 08-2012 Posted From: 12.252.19.134 Rating: N/A |
eedi bonda eede kada misuse avuthunna 498A meeda inka arrest lu cheyataniki oppukunna edava...3 judge bench kotteste ee sannasi re-instate chesaadu feminist groups ki bhayapadi guddodu emo.. Stalker - 'S'traight talker | ||
Jeffa Comedian Username: Jeffa Post Number: 1813 Registered: 10-2012 Posted From: 216.113.160.70 Rating: N/A |
The nasty ownership of husband on female personal choice is REMOVED. In the past, after marriage, a female can not have X with any other. If so, the husband(nasty ownership) can prosecute the other subjects who had X with his wife regardless of if there is a willing X between two humans in the situation. So, the OWNERSHIP is removed. Very welcoming change. Ref: Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code makes it a crime for a man to have intercourse with another man's wife "without the consent or connivance of that man." The law gives a husband exclusive right to prosecute his wife's lover — and does not grant a wife power to do the same. It does not penalize the woman, nor any married man who has sex with an unmarried woman. The 158-year-old law dates back to Victorian times, during British colonial rule of India. The penalty for adultery was up to five years in prison, or a fine, or both. Source: https://www.npr.org/2018/09/27/652075778/women-are-not-chatt el-says-india-s-supreme-court-in-striking-down-adultery-law Chief Justice Dipak Misra: The God.. of modern rights in India. I wish he sits on that holy position for few more years ahead to wash out the dirty laws from the books. | ||
Uno Side Hero Username: Uno Post Number: 3402 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 99.231.161.157 Rating: N/A |
I think it is not made legal ,but removed it from criminal offense | ||
Savyasachi Side Hero Username: Savyasachi Post Number: 2688 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 216.173.184.52 Rating: N/A |
good for you, mari weekend ki emina plan chestunnava mari?  | ||
Jeffa Comedian Username: Jeffa Post Number: 1810 Registered: 10-2012 Posted From: 67.164.25.41 Rating: N/A |
Definitely welcoming(at least in my opinion). And also controversial. EM-X : Xtra Marital X http://www.eenadu.net/homeinner.aspx?category=home&item=brea k71 |
