| Author |
Message |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Raman
Legend Username: Raman
Post Number: 42079 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 117.202.180.48
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, February 23, 2016 - 11:05 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hazrat nizamuddin darga meeda national flag ledu fron centuries elli pettandi Who the f are rss ppl why are they so important if they fly a flag or not fly a flag what is the problem for the nation .. otoh silly leftist fellows are arguing that natl flag flying on the university campus is against th autonomy of the university anta |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Zulu
Megastar Username: Zulu
Post Number: 27716 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 199.168.243.252
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, February 23, 2016 - 11:02 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bushu: Private groups/individuals were not allowed to fly the tricolor until 2002 when SC allowed this in the new Flag code of India. RSS is a private org and once this constraint was removed, they have always been flying the flag at the HQ.
buss argument la undi.. private schools lo kooda flag hoisting chestaru/chesaru kadha when we were kids.. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Kindal
Side Hero Username: Kindal
Post Number: 3870 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 14.139.128.21
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2016 - 12:34 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mental_sachinodu:because they are not pseudo-patriots.. idhe naa answer?
perhaps, they could have argued better on this line of defence  5 mins after your birth, they decide your name, nationality, religion & sect & you spend rest of ur life defending something u didn't choose. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Mental_sachinodu
Hero Username: Mental_sachinodu
Post Number: 18299 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 209.60.166.146
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2016 - 12:19 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kindal:
because they are not pseudo-patriots.. idhe naa answer? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Kindal
Side Hero Username: Kindal
Post Number: 3869 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 14.139.128.21
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2016 - 12:18 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bushu:ehe. history thelvakundaa ee telegraph scum ni nammukuntey itne untadhi. RSS did have problems with the tricolor, that is true. but once the nation adopted it, they did not question it. Private groups/individuals were not allowed to fly the tricolor until 2002 when SC allowed this in the new Flag code of India. RSS is a private org and once this constraint was removed, they have always been flying the flag at the HQ.
Before 2002, Flag Code – India did not permit it on private buildings by individuals except on special occasions. http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr2002/fapr2002/f030420021.html On 26th January 2002, the Indian flag code was modified and after several years of independence, the citizens of India were finally allowed to hoist the Indian flag over their homes, offices and factories on any day and not just National days as was the case earlier. http://archive.india.gov.in/myindia/myindia_frame.php?id=4 Both the govt. sources say that private buildings are permitted to hoist on Independence and Republic days. Why did they have to ignore this part, and wait for 52 years to hoist the national flag? 5 mins after your birth, they decide your name, nationality, religion & sect & you spend rest of ur life defending something u didn't choose. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Bushu
Hero Username: Bushu
Post Number: 11567 Registered: 04-2009 Posted From: 96.237.166.145
Rating:  Votes: 1 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2016 - 09:36 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Update: https://twitter.com/kaushkrahul/status/701700146812178433 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Telugu_times
Legend Username: Telugu_times
Post Number: 46657 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 71.156.80.135
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, February 22, 2016 - 07:17 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good Ignore spam. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Lenin
Side Hero Username: Lenin
Post Number: 8435 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 110.22.191.92
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 11:08 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thikka_sankara:
http://www.prajasakti.com/District/Guntur try this... Sree Gurucharana Saroja rja nijamana mukura sudhari Varanau Raghuvara vimala yasa jo dayaka phala chari! Budhiheena tanujanikau sumirau pavana kumar Balabudhi vidya dehi harahu kalesa vikar! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thikka_sankara
Megastar Username: Thikka_sankara
Post Number: 26852 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 223.181.218.237
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 11:06 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenin: tadepalli edition eppudu vachindi ? district edition kada undedi
I mean tadepalli news cover ayye edition.... Perhaps nobody has changed the course of history as much as the historians. ~Franklin P. Jones" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Lenin
Side Hero Username: Lenin
Post Number: 8431 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 110.22.191.92
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 10:25 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thikka_sankara:
RSS political party ani eppudu anna nenu? political party office enti ani aduguthunna...just a doubt Sree Gurucharana Saroja rja nijamana mukura sudhari Varanau Raghuvara vimala yasa jo dayaka phala chari! Budhiheena tanujanikau sumirau pavana kumar Balabudhi vidya dehi harahu kalesa vikar! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Lenin
Side Hero Username: Lenin
Post Number: 8429 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 110.22.191.92
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 10:19 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thikka_sankara:
tadepalli edition eppudu vachindi ? district edition kada undedi Sree Gurucharana Saroja rja nijamana mukura sudhari Varanau Raghuvara vimala yasa jo dayaka phala chari! Budhiheena tanujanikau sumirau pavana kumar Balabudhi vidya dehi harahu kalesa vikar! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Bushu
Hero Username: Bushu
Post Number: 11564 Registered: 04-2009 Posted From: 96.237.166.145
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 10:05 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thikka_sankara:
namah the saar.
Lenin:Is the office of a political party - a public group or private group?
 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thikka_sankara
Megastar Username: Thikka_sankara
Post Number: 26849 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 122.164.220.18
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 10:00 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenin:
b/w prajasakthi tadepalli edition online lo dorukutundaa?? How easy is it to search for an article printed recently?? Perhaps nobody has changed the course of history as much as the historians. ~Franklin P. Jones" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thikka_sankara
Megastar Username: Thikka_sankara
Post Number: 26848 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 122.164.220.18
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:59 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenin: Is the office of a political party
Rss political party enti??? When did they contest anywhere??? Perhaps nobody has changed the course of history as much as the historians. ~Franklin P. Jones" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Lenin
Side Hero Username: Lenin
Post Number: 8428 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 110.22.191.92
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:58 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bushu:Private groups
Is the office of a political party - a public group or private group? Sree Gurucharana Saroja rja nijamana mukura sudhari Varanau Raghuvara vimala yasa jo dayaka phala chari! Budhiheena tanujanikau sumirau pavana kumar Balabudhi vidya dehi harahu kalesa vikar! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thikka_sankara
Megastar Username: Thikka_sankara
Post Number: 26847 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 122.164.220.18
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:56 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bushu:
annai namaste Perhaps nobody has changed the course of history as much as the historians. ~Franklin P. Jones" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Bushu
Hero Username: Bushu
Post Number: 11563 Registered: 04-2009 Posted From: 96.237.166.145
Rating:  Votes: 6 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:51 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hehe. history thelvakundaa ee telegraph scum ni nammukuntey itne untadhi. RSS did have problems with the tricolor, that is true. but once the nation adopted it, they did not question it. Private groups/individuals were not allowed to fly the tricolor until 2002 when SC allowed this in the new Flag code of India. RSS is a private org and once this constraint was removed, they have always been flying the flag at the HQ. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Teluguvaadu
Junior Artist Username: Teluguvaadu
Post Number: 515 Registered: 11-2012 Posted From: 117.195.254.142
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, February 21, 2016 - 09:42 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160220/jsp/nation/story_70368 .jsp#.VsppQjHdXnh New Delhi, Feb. 19: The Narendra Modi government getting central universities to agree to fly the national flag round the clock is ironic, because the BJP's ideological parent has had a persistently problematic relationship with the Tricolour. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has historically contended that the national flag should be awash in saffron and should particularly drop the colour green, which it believes was included to please Muslims. These concerns were raised as late as September 19 last year, at a seminar on secularism that the Sangh had hosted in Chennai. Sangh spokesperson Manmohan Vaidya told the meeting that several members of the flag panel, set up by the Congress in 1931, felt the adoption of multiple colours reflected "communal thought". After the first Republic Day in 1950, the Sangh never hoisted the Tricolour at its Nagpur headquarters, sticking to its Bhagwa Dhwaj (saffron flag), inscribed with an "Om", even on R-Day and I-Day. It changed the practice in 2002 when Atal Bihari Vajpayee was Prime Minister. Repeated attempts to contact Vaidya remained unsuccessful today. But BJP Rajya Sabha member Tarun Vijay, a former editor of Sangh-aligned weekly Panchjanya, said that no doubts should be cast on the organisation's "allegiance" to the Tricolour. "The Sangh lives and dies for the national flag," Vijay said. Asked why it had refused to raise the flag for 52 years, he replied: "It's not a question of hoisting it or not. The Sangh has a cultural flag that represents India's cultural ethos, prevailing in its temples right from the time of the Mahabharat. The Tricolour is a symbol of India's nationalist pride." However, K.B. Hedgewar and M.S. Golwalkar, the Sangh's first and third chiefs, had thought otherwise. When the Congress agreed to hoist the Tricolour in January 1931, Hedgewar circulated a directive among all Sangh shakhas to consider the Bhagwa Dhwaj their national flag. On July 14, 1946, Golwalkar told a congregation at Nagpur: "It was the saffron flag which in totality represented Bharatiya culture. It was the embodiment of God. We firmly believe that, in the end, the whole nation will bow before this saffron flag." Golwalkar again aired the Sangh's reservations about the national flag in the essay "The Eternal Basis", part of a compendium of his essays, titled Bunch of Thoughts. "For example, our leaders have set up a new flag for our country. Why did they do so? It is just a case of drifting and imitating," Golwalkar wrote. "How did this flag come into being? During the French Revolution, the French put up three stripes on their flag to express the triple ideas of 'equality', 'fraternity' and 'liberty'.... Three stripes therefore held a sort of fascination for our freedom fighters also. "So it was taken up by the Congress. Then it was interpreted as depicting the unity of the various communities - the saffron colour for the Hindus, the green for the Muslim and the white for all the other communities. "Out of the non-Hindu communities the Muslim was specially named because in the minds of most of those eminent leaders, the Muslim was dominant and without naming him they did not think that our nationality could be complete!" To Golwalkar, the inclusion of green did not constitute a "pure and healthy national outlook" but was "just a politician's patchwork, just political expediency". After Mahatma Gandhi's assassination, there were widespread reports of Sangh activists trampling on the Tricolour. In an article in The Hindu (September 26, 2004), historian and author Ramachandra Guha wrote of how Jawaharlal Nehru had in a speech on February 24, 1948, highlighted that "at some places members of the RSS dishonoured the national flag. They know well that by disgracing the flag they are proving themselves as traitors." Atul Kothari, a former ABVP general secretary who heads the Trust for the Uplift of Education and Culture, a Sangh offshoot, played down Golwalkar's statements on the national flag. "That's from a bygone era," he told this newspaper. "Now the RSS respects and honours the flag." |