More Thoughts on the Nature of God Chalanachithram.com | Topics | Search
Hide Clipart | Log Out | Register | Edit Profile

Last 30 mins | 1 | 2 | 4 hours     Last 1 | 7 Days

Chalanachithram.com DB » Archives » Archive through March 18, 2010 » More Thoughts on the Nature of God « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1944
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 06:42 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Jawmetri:

God and the Purpose of Life, I stopped thinking about these. Ignorance is Bliss. I go to temples, I pray to all gods and i dont analyze the rationality of my beliefs. It is nice and simple this way as long as im keeping myself busy with work and fun activities.




good brother ....belief itself is rational if it works for you and doesn't disturb others..that's how world works...no need for further rational analysis
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jawmetri
Junior Artist
Username: Jawmetri

Post Number: 405
Registered: 12-2009
Posted From: 59.93.66.19

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 05:55 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

God and the Purpose of Life, I stopped thinking about these. Ignorance is Bliss. I go to temples, I pray to all gods and i dont analyze the rationality of my beliefs. It is nice and simple this way as long as im keeping myself busy with work and fun activities.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1938
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, March 18, 2010 - 01:00 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Kamal:

Ante .. there is a point in the way people argue against Idol worship. When the discussion ultimately boils down to what is God .. we usually come up with abstract definition of 'all pervading' .. meaning .. anything and everything is God .. that draws two small contradictions .. when God is unlimited, boundless .. why are we limiting him to an image of a small idol or a shape? second is, if everything is God and if God is a positive character as is often put out .. then why are "negative things", "negative objects" not attributed to God ..

ofcourse these are the primary questions that I faced in my quest till this point .. but as I pointed out the other day .. I convinced myself that Idols are for good .. they are an embodiment of such a huge God for the convenience of a minute mankind .. I also agree that every religion/faith "visualises" God in one or the other way .. some in a building .. some in a cross .. some in multitude of idols .. and good thing about us Pagans is .. we have different "perfect" representations of different qualities .. the ultimate 'Maryada Purushottam' can only be Rama ; when it comes to love and Dharma - its only Krishna ; when it is anger - its Kali etc etc .. boledu examples .. which I feel people who oppose idol worship miss upon !





manaki God ante eppudu all pervading ee enduku avvali brother.....he can be minute and limited also....antha bagavantunni choodagalige vallu vigrahalu lo maatram enduku choodaleru.....infact there were many instances where deities interacted with devotees
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kamal
Hero
Username: Kamal

Post Number: 11936
Registered: 08-2009
Posted From: 130.36.62.142

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 12:05 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Vjavasi:


why should we think god as something abstract and what is so special about those who are capable of seeing God in abstarct ideas... ability and inclination to see god in form is a divine gift...those who feel threatened by his form look for complex abstract ideas




Ante .. there is a point in the way people argue against Idol worship. When the discussion ultimately boils down to what is God .. we usually come up with abstract definition of 'all pervading' .. meaning .. anything and everything is God .. that draws two small contradictions .. when God is unlimited, boundless .. why are we limiting him to an image of a small idol or a shape? second is, if everything is God and if God is a positive character as is often put out .. then why are "negative things", "negative objects" not attributed to God ..

ofcourse these are the primary questions that I faced in my quest till this point .. but as I pointed out the other day .. I convinced myself that Idols are for good .. they are an embodiment of such a huge God for the convenience of a minute mankind .. I also agree that every religion/faith "visualises" God in one or the other way .. some in a building .. some in a cross .. some in multitude of idols .. and good thing about us Pagans is .. we have different "perfect" representations of different qualities .. the ultimate 'Maryada Purushottam' can only be Rama ; when it comes to love and Dharma - its only Krishna ; when it is anger - its Kali etc etc .. boledu examples .. which I feel people who oppose idol worship miss upon !

Saughmraat:

but its about nature of people's definition of god



poni alage anandi .. it does not change the point here :D

Vjavasi:

who is the author of this theory?..why he feels that bhakthi is selfish?....culmination of all gnana is bhakthi....when did karma yoga became service to man kind....



Author is some Menon annai ..

Yes, he did it falter when he quoted Ramakrishna and said he is selfish and then quoted Vivekananda in the next sentence. He should have realized his folly of saying Ramakrishna as selfish - bcoz .. he inspired and made Vivekananda what he is for us all ! and that aint selfish ! that was his dharma, which he exemplarily followed ! I too differ with the point that bhakti is selfish !
"Each nation has an identity and destiny. As far as Bharat is concerned, Hindu is its identity and religion is its way of working" - Swami Vivekananda
"Embracing Islam or Christianity would have meant going away from the cultural soil of India, which I do not wish to do." - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1936
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 07:21 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Kamal:

Hindus suggest three paths to salvation. They are bhakti, karma and jnana. Of these bhakti is rather selfish, for it seeks the salvation of the individual only. Ramakrishna is the finest example of a bhakta. In karma, one does service to mankind. The best examples are Mahatma Gandhi and Vivekananda. And finally we have jnana, which seeks salvation through knowledge of God. The Jnani spreads enlightenment among men. The best example of the jnani is Sri Aurobindo.




who is the author of this theory?..why he feels that bhakthi is selfish?....culmination of all gnana is bhakthi....when did karma yoga became service to man kind....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jacksparrow
Comedian
Username: Jacksparrow

Post Number: 1093
Registered: 07-2008
Posted From: 89.234.93.245

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 06:02 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Kamal:

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 12:56 am:


identi time vichitramga undi... time 12:56 AM anta... is it not 00:56 AM?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Saughmraat
Junior Artist
Username: Saughmraat

Post Number: 373
Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 122.183.65.2

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 05:44 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

i guess..
this is not about nature of god...


but its about nature of people's definition of god
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gandhiguevara
Side Hero
Username: Gandhiguevara

Post Number: 4876
Registered: 10-2009
Posted From: 24.130.92.164

Rating: 
Votes: 6 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 02:47 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Ramakrishna swartha parudu
Gandhi goppavadu
Yee article rasindi Arbindo bhaktudu...hence bhaktudu swarthapadudu kabatti yee article rasina vaadu swartha parudu...JOKE
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1935
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 01:58 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Kamal:

"We all believe God to be without form or shape, but as we begin to think of him, he acquires form and name." This is true for the vast majority of mankind, including Muslims. They cannot think of God in the abstract. Only a few can do so. Which is why gods have come to have forms.




why should we think god as something abstract and what is so special about those who are capable of seeing God in abstarct ideas... ability and inclination to see god in form is a divine gift...those who feel threatened by his form look for complex abstract ideas
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kamal
Hero
Username: Kamal

Post Number: 11925
Registered: 08-2009
Posted From: 24.1.202.142

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - 12:56 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


quote:

DEAR Reader, is there a God? No, if we mean by God a "superhuman being" (Oxford dictionary) or if we mean by it a God with a form. But there is an intelligence in the universe, which seems to guide it. We may call it God or by any other name.

Did God create the universe? No. The universe was always there. If we admit that God created the universe, we would raise questions that we can never answer. That is why we say that God and the universe are coeval. Shelly, the poet, says: "The by-pothesis of a pervading spirit co-eternal with the universe remains unshaken." This is the position taken by Kapila, author of Sankhya system of philosophy.

If God has no form, then what is God like? To this question, Einstein has an answer. He says: "My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable supreme spirit, Who reveals Himself in the slightest detail we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a supreme reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe forms my idea of God." We are all familiar with this "reasoning power".

I am quite happy with Einstein's concept of God. Do I need a form of this "reasoning power"? Hardly. In any case, any attempt at representation of God is as futile as the effort to picture an electron. The electron is inconceivable.

As God has no form, is it right to set up idols? Yes. Why? Because it is only through symbols of the formless that we can think of God. Symbols are used in all religions. For example, Light. Light is a symbol of God in all religions.

This is not the only argument on the question of form. Vivekananda asks: Who is it that has taken all the forms that exist in the universe? Obviously God.

The fact is: It is inconceivable to think of God in the abstract, says Vivekananda. He writes: "We all believe God to be without form or shape, but as we begin to think of him, he acquires form and name." This is true for the vast majority of mankind, including Muslims. They cannot think of God in the abstract. Only a few can do so. Which is why gods have come to have forms. Forms help men concentrate their thought on the form. This also explains why Shankara provided an Ishwara in his doctrine of Advaita. In short, at the heart of every symbolic representation lies that which is beyond form. It is equally true that one sees God according to one's nature. And the nature of a man depends on how the three gunas-satvic, rajasic and tamasic-are combined in a man. As the nature of men differ from one to another, they can have a God of their own, says Vivekananda. Interestingly Gandhi agrees with it.

Hindus suggest three paths to salvation. They are bhakti, karma and jnana. Of these bhakti is rather selfish, for it seeks the salvation of the individual only. Ramakrishna is the finest example of a bhakta. In karma, one does service to mankind. The best examples are Mahatma Gandhi and Vivekananda. And finally we have jnana, which seeks salvation through knowledge of God. The Jnani spreads enlightenment among men. The best example of the jnani is Sri Aurobindo.

Is the universe pre-determined? This question is often raised. But there is no satisfactory reply. Spinoza, the philosopher of Europe, says that if the universe is pre-determined then God has no role to play in it. Which is why there is need for freedom. Dr S Radhakrishnan says that freedom and necessity lie intertwined in nature without this element of freedom, the cosmic process will appear to be a puppet play, says St. Augustine.

The concept of God never went beyond anthropomorphism among the Semitic faiths. To them God without form was inconceivable. They say that God made man in his own image. What does this mean? It means that God looks like man. The concept of a universal God, a God of all mankind, was never thought of by the Semitic faiths.



http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa =showpage&pid=336&page=5
"Each nation has an identity and destiny. As far as Bharat is concerned, Hindu is its identity and religion is its way of working" - Swami Vivekananda
"Embracing Islam or Christianity would have meant going away from the cultural soil of India, which I do not wish to do." - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.