Physics question Chalanachithram.com | Topics | Search
Hide Clipart | Log Out | Register | Edit Profile

Last 30 mins | 1 | 2 | 4 hours     Last 1 | 7 Days

Chalanachithram.com DB » Archives » Archive through March 03, 2010 » Physics question « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nagfan_kkd
Junior Artist
Username: Nagfan_kkd

Post Number: 586
Registered: 09-2009
Posted From: 117.200.16.170

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 03:10 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

ee theddu ento
http://nagfanz.com/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dts
Junior Artist
Username: Dts

Post Number: 611
Registered: 08-2009
Posted From: 188.40.51.71

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 02:39 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Vjavasi:

if total energy is relative how it is conserved




By conservation of energy we mean energy changes it form but amount of energy is same. Again this is relative to an observer.

E.g. For an observer standing under a coconut tree the coconut has PE as it falls down it gains KE and the amount of KE it gains is equal to amount of it's loss in PE neglecting other losses. But for an observer right on the middle of coconut tree the values of KE and PE differ due to his position, but KE+PE is different for different observers w.r.t position.
కోటిపల్లికి దారడిగి కొండపల్లికి వెళ్తున్నావేమిటి? ...మనసు మార్చుకున్నాను!
DTS "The digital experience"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1859
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 06:22 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Ishan:

Yes, total and kinetic energies both are relative.





if total energy is relative how it is conserved
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1855
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 11:46 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Der_schuler:





If i am not wrong lagragian and other classical mathematical formalism are centered around accelaration(dynamic systems) which is same for all inertial frames.....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dts
Junior Artist
Username: Dts

Post Number: 610
Registered: 08-2009
Posted From: 188.40.51.71

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:20 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Der_schuler:




The initiator's question is on KE. Secondly if you consider total energy (all forms of energy) the observer is also part of that energy. As long as the observer is not the part of the system it is relative.
కోటిపల్లికి దారడిగి కొండపల్లికి వెళ్తున్నావేమిటి? ...మనసు మార్చుకున్నాను!
DTS "The digital experience"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Der_schuler
Side Hero
Username: Der_schuler

Post Number: 4938
Registered: 01-2009
Posted From: 64.241.37.140

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:15 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

remember as long as we are in the realm of classical mechanics....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Der_schuler
Side Hero
Username: Der_schuler

Post Number: 4937
Registered: 01-2009
Posted From: 64.241.37.140

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:12 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Dts:


Yes! Energy is also relative




False....KE and PE seperately are but the sum total is always conserved!!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ishan
Side Hero
Username: Ishan

Post Number: 2576
Registered: 01-2009
Posted From: 68.90.244.232

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:12 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Vjavasi:

.Is energy relative also?...if energy is not relative what is the absolute frame to calculate kinetic energy.....


Yes, total and kinetic energies both are relative.
Gaanamidi...nee dhyanamidi...dhyanamulo naa praanamidi...praanamaina mooga gunde raagamidi...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dts
Junior Artist
Username: Dts

Post Number: 609
Registered: 08-2009
Posted From: 188.40.51.71

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 08:52 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Vjavasi:




Yes! Energy is also relative. It varies from observer to observer.

Here one should remember that the basic question is that of relativity not about something being vector or scalar.
కోటిపల్లికి దారడిగి కొండపల్లికి వెళ్తున్నావేమిటి? ...మనసు మార్చుకున్నాను!
DTS "The digital experience"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Subzero
Side Hero
Username: Subzero

Post Number: 3849
Registered: 04-2008
Posted From: 59.93.66.33

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 08:47 pm:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Der_schuler:

priciple of least action which is a application of calculus of variations to the lagrangian and one can actually derive all the laws of motion from the principle of least action



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Der_schuler
Side Hero
Username: Der_schuler

Post Number: 4918
Registered: 01-2009
Posted From: 24.14.147.0

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:27 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Vjavasi:

then kinetic energy should have no seperate physical meaning




very true...infact the idea of KE is in many ways misleading.....

Study the priciple of least action which is a application of calculus of variations to the lagrangian and one can actually derive all the laws of motion from the principle of least action
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1854
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:20 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Der_schuler:

energy is a scalar and in not a vector......independent of the frame of reference




then kinetic energy should have no seperate physical meaning
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cocanada
Moderator
Username: Cocanada

Post Number: 18199
Registered: 01-2008

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:16 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Der_schuler:

energy is a scalar and in not a vector


simpulu
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Der_schuler
Side Hero
Username: Der_schuler

Post Number: 4917
Registered: 01-2009
Posted From: 24.14.147.0

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:06 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

No....energy is a scalar and in not a vector......independent of the frame of reference, the energy of the moving object should be the same...

the traditional intrepretation of KE is not a natural for dynamical systems...read the concept of a Lagrangian
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Vjavasi
Comedian
Username: Vjavasi

Post Number: 1853
Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 192.127.94.7

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 08:54 am:   Insert Quote Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

we calculate kinetic energy using speed.....if speed is relative to observer...for an observer in train everything else he sees outside the train is moving with same velocity in opposite direction...can he use same 1/2*m*v2 for the outside world ...Is energy relative also?...if energy is not relative what is the absolute frame to calculate kinetic energy.....

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image HASH(0x8678214){Movie Clipart}
Show / hide regular icons selection options

Click on following links to open cliparts by Alphabetical Order

 A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M  

 N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Show / Hide Filmy icons selection options

Click on following links to open cliparts by Alphabetical Order

 A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M  

 N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: