| Author |
Message |
   
Nagfan_kkd
Junior Artist Username: Nagfan_kkd
Post Number: 586 Registered: 09-2009 Posted From: 117.200.16.170
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 03:10 pm: |
    |
ee theddu ento  http://nagfanz.com/ |
   
Dts
Junior Artist Username: Dts
Post Number: 611 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 188.40.51.71
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 02:39 pm: |
    |
Vjavasi:if total energy is relative how it is conserved
By conservation of energy we mean energy changes it form but amount of energy is same. Again this is relative to an observer. E.g. For an observer standing under a coconut tree the coconut has PE as it falls down it gains KE and the amount of KE it gains is equal to amount of it's loss in PE neglecting other losses. But for an observer right on the middle of coconut tree the values of KE and PE differ due to his position, but KE+PE is different for different observers w.r.t position. కోటిపల్లికి దారడిగి కొండపల్లికి వెళ్తున్నావేమిటి? ...మనసు మార్చుకున్నాను! DTS "The digital experience" |
   
Vjavasi
Comedian Username: Vjavasi
Post Number: 1859 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 06:22 am: |
    |
Ishan:Yes, total and kinetic energies both are relative.
if total energy is relative how it is conserved |
   
Vjavasi
Comedian Username: Vjavasi
Post Number: 1855 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 11:46 pm: |
    |
Der_schuler:
If i am not wrong lagragian and other classical mathematical formalism are centered around accelaration(dynamic systems) which is same for all inertial frames..... |
   
Dts
Junior Artist Username: Dts
Post Number: 610 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 188.40.51.71
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:20 pm: |
    |
Der_schuler:
The initiator's question is on KE. Secondly if you consider total energy (all forms of energy) the observer is also part of that energy. As long as the observer is not the part of the system it is relative. కోటిపల్లికి దారడిగి కొండపల్లికి వెళ్తున్నావేమిటి? ...మనసు మార్చుకున్నాను! DTS "The digital experience" |
   
Der_schuler
Side Hero Username: Der_schuler
Post Number: 4938 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 64.241.37.140
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:15 pm: |
    |
remember as long as we are in the realm of classical mechanics.... |
   
Der_schuler
Side Hero Username: Der_schuler
Post Number: 4937 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 64.241.37.140
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:12 pm: |
    |
Dts: Yes! Energy is also relative
False....KE and PE seperately are but the sum total is always conserved!!!! |
   
Ishan
Side Hero Username: Ishan
Post Number: 2576 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 68.90.244.232
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:12 pm: |
    |
Vjavasi:.Is energy relative also?...if energy is not relative what is the absolute frame to calculate kinetic energy.....
Yes, total and kinetic energies both are relative. Gaanamidi...nee dhyanamidi...dhyanamulo naa praanamidi...praanamaina mooga gunde raagamidi... |
   
Dts
Junior Artist Username: Dts
Post Number: 609 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 188.40.51.71
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 08:52 pm: |
    |
Vjavasi:
Yes! Energy is also relative. It varies from observer to observer. Here one should remember that the basic question is that of relativity not about something being vector or scalar. కోటిపల్లికి దారడిగి కొండపల్లికి వెళ్తున్నావేమిటి? ...మనసు మార్చుకున్నాను! DTS "The digital experience" |
   
Subzero
Side Hero Username: Subzero
Post Number: 3849 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 59.93.66.33
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 08:47 pm: |
    |
Der_schuler:priciple of least action which is a application of calculus of variations to the lagrangian and one can actually derive all the laws of motion from the principle of least action
 |
   
Der_schuler
Side Hero Username: Der_schuler
Post Number: 4918 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 24.14.147.0
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:27 am: |
    |
Vjavasi:then kinetic energy should have no seperate physical meaning
very true...infact the idea of KE is in many ways misleading..... Study the priciple of least action which is a application of calculus of variations to the lagrangian and one can actually derive all the laws of motion from the principle of least action |
   
Vjavasi
Comedian Username: Vjavasi
Post Number: 1854 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:20 am: |
    |
Der_schuler:energy is a scalar and in not a vector......independent of the frame of reference
then kinetic energy should have no seperate physical meaning |
   
Cocanada
Moderator Username: Cocanada
Post Number: 18199 Registered: 01-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:16 am: |
    |
Der_schuler:energy is a scalar and in not a vector
simpulu |
   
Der_schuler
Side Hero Username: Der_schuler
Post Number: 4917 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 24.14.147.0
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 09:06 am: |
    |
No....energy is a scalar and in not a vector......independent of the frame of reference, the energy of the moving object should be the same... the traditional intrepretation of KE is not a natural for dynamical systems...read the concept of a Lagrangian |
   
Vjavasi
Comedian Username: Vjavasi
Post Number: 1853 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 08:54 am: |
    |
we calculate kinetic energy using speed.....if speed is relative to observer...for an observer in train everything else he sees outside the train is moving with same velocity in opposite direction...can he use same 1/2*m*v2 for the outside world ...Is energy relative also?...if energy is not relative what is the absolute frame to calculate kinetic energy..... |