| Author | Message | ||
     Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 10678 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.1.202.142 Rating: N/A |
ee bill pass ayyaka .. purandhareswari ki congi chance vaste .. TDP inko term dooram avutundi anukuntunna ! but .. yeah 1994/1999 lo matram .. TDP had advantage of female votes Only'truth' (post 58485) - tellalists chesina vaatiki amaayaka muslims ni champadam india lo aacharaam | ||
| Jalsa Moderator Username: Jalsa Post Number: 11461 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
 | ||
| Ishan Side Hero Username: Ishan Post Number: 2531 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 68.90.235.198 Rating: N/A |
 Gaanamidi...nee dhyanamidi...dhyanamulo naa praanamidi...praanamaina mooga gunde raagamidi... | ||
| Sri1 Side Hero Username: Sri1 Post Number: 4947 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 122.169.3.95 Rating: N/A |
enduku .. inka 2003 lo laga ne alochistunnara? mahilala votu te de pa ke type lo?  akkada soniamma bomma ki guddede guddudu .. manaki chance ledu .. meeru memu waste aa vishayam lo .. anna garu unte edanna work out ayyedemo ..\ sonia bomma ki ladys padedi mana rastram lo takkuve ani appatlo edho election trend lo annaru compared to other states tdp ki anytime bagane untadi ladys backing Ladys bill first teermanam chesindhi first AP assembly lone kadha when tdp is in power , so credit tdp ki vastadi ani paiga first nunchi tdp is only party which is keen on implimenting women reservation bill 2004 lo ladys ki ekkuva seats ichhi experiment chesadu CBN , anty wave lo ekkuva gelavaleka poyaru kani so seats adjustment tdp ki peddaga kastam kadhu compared to other regional partys ani opinion | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 10668 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.1.202.142 Rating: N/A |
choosanu annai .. muddula tho record ento .. sarle .. evadi istam vaadidi ani vadilesa .. ennani aapagalam cheppandi manam matram .. Only'truth' (post 58485) - tellalists chesina vaatiki amaayaka muslims ni champadam india lo aacharaam | ||
| Jalsa Moderator Username: Jalsa Post Number: 11458 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
http://www.chalanachithram.com/discus/messages/125/77001.htm l?1267155256 | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 10663 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.1.202.142 Rating: N/A |
enduku .. inka 2003 lo laga ne alochistunnara? mahilala votu te de pa ke type lo? akkada soniamma bomma ki guddede guddudu .. manaki chance ledu .. meeru memu waste aa vishayam lo .. anna garu unte edanna work out ayyedemo .. Only'truth' (post 58485) - tellalists chesina vaatiki amaayaka muslims ni champadam india lo aacharaam | ||
| Sri1 Side Hero Username: Sri1 Post Number: 4946 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 122.169.3.95 Rating: N/A |
mana rastram varaku tdp ki fetching anukunta idhi pakka rastrallo matram regional partys ki bokka shivsena,JD(u),RJD,SP will definetly oppose the bill last time parlament lo bill pedtaniki try cheste , bill copys ni lakkuni chimpesaru SP,RJD vallu | ||
| Arjun1234 Side Hero Username: Arjun1234 Post Number: 2831 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 24.6.29.85 Rating: N/A |
ila aithe husband oka constituency wife oka constituency ... double dhamaka Winners never cheat... even in difficult times. | ||
| Netsaint Comedian Username: Netsaint Post Number: 1058 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 75.185.19.223 Rating: N/A |
koooosintha coloring ekkuva in chatta sabhalu | ||
| Ipc302 Side Hero Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 4368 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 24.167.20.113 Rating: N/A |
mostly it will be wife's, daughters of existing MP's and minister's....but nonethe less a good step if it achieves 25% of its intended good purpose in terms of electing qualified women | ||
| Guttonkay Side Hero Username: Guttonkay Post Number: 2264 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 70.174.128.9 Rating: N/A |
This just means instead of 100% male MLAs and MPs eating, it will be 50 50 corruption. Not sure why they had to reserver 30% of the seats for women candidates though. Guess there is no way they will get a ticket otherwise. | ||
| Guttonkay Side Hero Username: Guttonkay Post Number: 2263 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 70.174.128.9 Rating: N/A |
This just means 100% male MLAs and MPs eating, it will be 50 50 corruption. Not sure why they had to reserver 30% of the seats for women candidates though. Guess there is no way they will get a ticket otherwise. | ||
| Iamim Side Hero Username: Iamim Post Number: 3472 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 119.235.54.170 Rating: N/A |
33% has no meaning.. make it 50%.. | ||
| Kish Side Hero Username: Kish Post Number: 9760 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 98.215.115.88 Rating: N/A |
Women reservation clear aithe nuvvenduku sad annai? Mahilalanu gouraviddhaam vaariki ketayinchina seatlalo vaarine koorchoniddhaam ani sinnappati nunchi sadhuvuthunnaam kada! Why so sad? Fatwas against Jujubi | ||
| Zulu Side Hero Username: Zulu Post Number: 3011 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 66.68.181.197 Rating: N/A |
 Maathru bhasha vegataipoyina mudanastapu jathi manadhi | ||
| Iamim Side Hero Username: Iamim Post Number: 3470 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 119.235.54.170 Rating: N/A |
Road cleared for 33% reservation of all MP, MLA seats for women Himanshi Dhawan, TNN, Feb 26, 2010, 12.34am IST NEW DELHI: The Union Cabinet on Thursday cleared the women's reservation bill which has been hanging fire for close to 14 years. And this time, the bill might go through in Parliament as the Congress, BJP and the Left have pledged support to it. The three parties put together add up to the necessary two-thirds majority in Lok Sabha for the constitutional amendment, and falls manageably short in Rajya Sabha. In short, astute floor management by the Congress in the 15th Lok Sabha could see 33% of all seats in Parliament and state assemblies being reserved for women. Such large women representation in the legislatures could not only change the emphasis in policies but also alter the very nature of politics in India. This gender-bender of a move by the Congress leadership has been aided by the absence of parties like Lalu Prasad's RJD in the UPA and the reduced relevance of Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav. Both OBC chieftains have relentlessly opposed the bill demanding that one-third of the proposed women's bill be earmarked for OBCs and minorities. JD(U) leader Sharad Yadav is another opponent, but BJP, Congress and Left can help carry the day. They can also bank on the DMK which, once a backer of the "quota-within-quota' stand, has come around to argue that the priority is to get the gender quota introduced, while other details are negotiated later. If the bill is to become reality, it will require a Constitutional amendment. For that the bill must get the vote of two thirds of the members present and voting, but not less than majority mark of the House. The government -- having cleared the bill -- is not bound by fresh recommendations or dissent notes made by the standing committee on law and justice which submitted its report in December 2009. The bill can be placed for consideration and passing in the form that it was introduced in Rajya Sabha in 2008 and for this reason is likely to be placed for consideration in the Upper House first. The government needs 158 votes to meet the two-thirds mark in Rajya Sabha. The Congress, BJP and Left add up to 137 MPs in this house, a little short of requisite figure. It is here that some clever floor management would be necessary. Once cleared by the Upper House, the bill is as good as through, because in the Lok Sabha the three blocs virtually have the requisite numbers. The government also has the option of holding a joint session of both Houses as NDA had done to pass the anti-terror POTA bill. The government managers would also be counting on the support of the DMK, some smaller groups and independents, as well as on the possibility of BJD not likely to outright oppose the bill, to get its numbers. DMK spokesman said T K Elangovan said, "Let the bill be passed first, we will see quota within quota later." Even AIADMK supports women's reservation "in principle", while Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar does not share the intensity of opposition of his JD-U colleague Sharad Yadav. MPs, other those of the Congress, BJP and the Left, who are support the bill in Rajya Sabha are, seven of AIADMK, 12 of BSP and four of DMK -- sufficient for a two-thirds majority. In Lok Sabha, the government can count on the support of 19 Trinamool MPs, 18 DMK and nine AIADMK MPs. BJP leader Arun Jaitley welcomed the move saying his party would support the proposed legislation in Parliament. Expressing her party's support for the proposed legislation, CPM leader Brinda Karat said, "We are glad the bill has got the cabinet nod but this has happened before and the distance between thSources said that the bill could be placed in Parliament in this session itself as suggested by President Pratibha Patil in her address to the joint sitting of Parliament. The UPA move is powered by the keen interest of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi in the bill. She has batted strongly for it and has expressed her despair over the aggressive opposition in Parliament. If it does actually become law, it will be a fitting tribute by Congress for the year-long centenary celebrations of International Women's Day this year. Given the huge political point to be scored, BJP and Left are unlikely to be found wanting. It is not clear whether smaller regional parties like BJD or DMK will oppose it outright. Even if parties like Mayawati's BSP support the bill, it will go through. |
