| Author | Message | ||
     Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 4508 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
oka SC judge ki against ga petetion file cheyyatam indian history lo first time anukunta | ||
| Onlooker Comedian Username: Onlooker Post Number: 1669 Registered: 07-2010 Posted From: 12.184.71.130 Rating: N/A |
  | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 4507 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
 Good job shah and jethmalani | ||
| Onlooker Comedian Username: Onlooker Post Number: 1668 Registered: 07-2010 Posted From: 12.184.71.130 Rating: N/A |
patel baaa...nee enkmom...enti ee torsure  | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 4506 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
http://www.dailypioneer.com/280598/Shah-tightens-screws-on-C BI-in-PF-scam.html Shah tightens screws on CBI in PF scam Abraham Thomas | New Delhi Former Gujarat Minister Amit Shahâs petition in the Supreme Court for recall of its order for a CBI probe into the Sohrabuddin encounter case could open a can of worms and bring into the centre of controversy Justice Tarun Chatterjee who has been accused of transferring the case to the central agency in a quid pro quo. In an exhaustive submission running into 87 pages, Shah has charged that Justice Chatterjee ordered the CBI probe under pressure from the Centre since he was himself being probed by the same agency in the PF scam. At the same time, Shah has also raised the serious question as to why the probe against the retired judge has been soft-peddled by the CBI. Mocking at the CBI claim of âno prosecutable evidenceâ against retired Supreme Court judge Justice Tarun Chatterjee in the provident fund scam, Shah has told the Supreme Court that such a concession could not be given once the judge was found guilty of serious acts of âomission and commissionâ. âThe finding of âno prosecutable evidenceâ recorded by the CBI, which was investigating him (Justice Chatterjee) and which even afterwards has not found him innocentâ¦is unknown to criminal law so far,â Shah said. In support of his contention, Shah quoted portions of the affidavit filed by the CBI before another Bench of the Supreme Court monitoring the PF scam investigation. It said, âInvestigation was also conducted with regard to the allegations of receipt of valuables/services by various judges/judicial officers. However for want of sufficient evidence, their names are not recommended for prosecution.â The CBI affidavit further said, âA CBI report has been sent to the competent authorities for appropriate action against them for various acts of omission and commission on part of the 24 judges/judicial officers.â To supplement his charge, Shah also referred to a comment made by Attorney General Goolam E Vahanvati in the apex court during the hearing of the PF scam case that, âThere is no sufficient evidence to prosecute 24 judicial officers but findings against them are also of a serious nature.â This list of 24 judges included Justice Chatterjee as well. Hinting at the possibility that this circumstance was crucial to the decision of January 12 in deciding whether the Sohrabuddin encounter case be handed over to the CBI, Shahâs application suggested, âThe pending investigation in the PF scam against Justice Tarun Chatterjee (since retired) provided a strong reluctance to displease the CBI in the impugned order (of January 12) or make any finding that the CBI could not or would not impartially handle the investigation in the case sought to be transferred to it. So Justice Chatterjee could only have decided in favour of and not against ordering CBI investigation into the Sohrabuddin case.â On this ground, Shah has sought recall of the order claiming there was reasonable apprehension that the judge would have had a "conscious or an unconscious disinclination to record any finding adverse to the integrity and impartiality of CBI", knowing fully well that the CBI was investigating a case against him and the fact that the CBI was never known to act as a fair, independent probe agency. Further, owing to the fact how Sohrabuddin was made the political poster boy by Congress to launch a vitriolic campaign against the BJP Government in Gujarat, the application suggested, "The apprehension is rendered conclusive and justifiable in the context of another belief that the Congress Government at the Centre having failed to secure a finding from the SIT on the Godhra episode was under a political compulsionâ¦to arrive at findings suitable to their political designs of discrediting the Gujarat Government." The application even demanded that knowledge of these facts, even if it was not known to the other judge Justice, Aftab Alam, who sat with Justice Chatterjee, should offer to recuse now, in the light of the recent revelations. ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 4503 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
Good job shah...these corrupt rascal black coat idiots who hide under the guise of justice should be thoroughly exposed....they don't deserve even an ioata of respect......they are worst than any type of criminal and their black deeds should be challenged and exposed just like any other political animal http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/sep/03/sohrabuddin-case-s hah-wants-sc-to-recall-cbi-order.htm Gujarat former minister Amit Shah, arrested in connection with the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, has asked the Supreme Court to recall its order for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe on the grounds of "bias", levelling allegations of conspiracy against its judge and the Centre. Shah, a close aide of Chief Minister Narendra Modi [ Images ], alleged that Justice Tarun Chatterjee (since retired) who as part of the Bench ordered the CBI probe in the case on January 12, was under the scanner of the investigating agency in the Uttar Pradesh [ Images ] Provident Fund Scam for "breach of trust". The 87-page application by Shah, which sought recall of the order, contended that the entire exercise was the result of "political conspiracy to launch an unconstitutional assault on the constitutionally formed and democratically elected Gujarat Government". The application prepared under the guidance of Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, also questioned the propriety of Justice Aftab Alam in hearing the matter when he was aware that the name of Justice Chatterjee had cropped up in the PF scam and that CBI was probing his alleged involvement. "The January 12 order ought to be recalled on the ground of bias as there is reasonable possibility or likelihood that (retired) Justice Chatterjee who passed the order was biased and suffered from automatic disqualification to hear the case," the application said. It also spoke about Justice Alam saying that "if he was in the know of the fact that Justice Chatterjee suffered from automatic disqualification, he too ought to have recused himself". The application by Shah has also raised some points identical to that mentioned in the curative petition filed by senior IPS officer Geeta Johri, who alleged that the CBI was proceeding in the case with a particular political colour. Like Johri, the former minister also alleged the CBI was coercing witnesses to depose in a particular manner and deputed a officer, who was questioned in connection with the case. He also demanded removal of Balwinder Singh, special CBI director from the probe, as he was interrogated in connection with the case when he was the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. Asking why the CBI is not investigating the role of the Andhra Pradesh Police in the alleged abduction, Shah sought the removal of Kandaswamy, IPS, who is in-charge of the investigation. He said that the "most shocking aspect of the CBI investigation is that Balwinder Singh who ought to be answering questions from any investigator of the Sobrabuddin encounter on the role of the AP police is now supervising the very investigation and Geetha Johri, who as the head of the Gujarat CID Crime was heading the investigation of the Sohrabuddin encounter and was wanting to question Balwinder Singh, is now being questioned and even threatened with arrest." |
