| Author | Message | ||
     Mclovin Junior Artist Username: Mclovin Post Number: 222 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 69.45.100.129 Rating: N/A |
Fultoo dependents ni claiming sesukoni tax kummutaaru ani 'no' seppuntaaru.. but nee point naaku nachhindi.. | ||
| Just4fun Junior Artist Username: Just4fun Post Number: 602 Registered: 10-2007 Posted From: 24.131.225.94 Rating: N/A |
manusulu jantuvulu and magallu maggalu--leads to--->AIDS ..meeru(gays) mararu.. | ||
| Zulu Junior Artist Username: Zulu Post Number: 79 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.162.112.174 Rating: N/A |
Lets say the Traditional defination of marriage (accepted by the majority) as "a legal relationship between a man and woman." Proponents of gay marriage argue that it should be changed as "relationship between two people, regardless of gender". Reason : A third person or Govt has no right to get involved in two mature peoples business. If this sounds reasonable..why not allow polygamy? why cant the defination be changed as "relationship between "n" number of people" Reason could be: Fourth person or (n+1)th person or Govt has no right to get involved in 3 or 'n' number of peoples business Think Global,Act Local |
