| Author |
Message |
   
Kamal
Side Hero Username: Kamal
Post Number: 5601 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 130.36.62.141
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 03:38 pm: |
    |
Rajusk:Way back in 1983, the Sarkaria Commission had laid its finger on the heart of the matter when it recorded: â??Discredited and disgruntled politicians from the party in power in (sic) the Union, who cannot be accommodated elsewhere, get appointed (as governors)â?¦ and tend to function as agents of the Union government rather than as impartial constitutional functionariesâ??. The commission made the salutary recommendation that those in active politics should be ineligible for the governorâ??s post and, in any case, a politician belonging to the ruling party at the Centre should not be appointed governor in a state where some other party, or combination of parties, rules.
Rajusk:during her 15-year reign in two innings, Presidentâ??s Rule was imposed in states close to 100 times, most of the times high-handedly.
ND Tiwari from UP ..  Sach aur saahas hai jiske mann mein - anth mein jeeth usee ki rahe .. |
   
Rajusk
Side Hero Username: Rajusk
Post Number: 9044 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 66.93.90.250
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 03:35 pm: |
    |
According to one estimate, during her 15-year reign in two innings, President’s Rule was imposed in states close to 100 times, most of the times high-handedly. This became possible because of a sharp and steady decline in the quality of people sent to Raj Bhavans Way back in 1983, the Sarkaria Commission had laid its finger on the heart of the matter when it recorded: “Discredited and disgruntled politicians from the party in power in (sic) the Union, who cannot be accommodated elsewhere, get appointed (as governors)… and tend to function as agents of the Union government rather than as impartial constitutional functionaries”. The commission made the salutary recommendation that those in active politics should be ineligible for the governor’s post and, in any case, a politician belonging to the ruling party at the Centre should not be appointed governor in a state where some other party, or combination of parties, rules. All successive governments have treated the report with contempt |
|