| Author | Message | ||
     Shawshank Side Hero Username: Shawshank Post Number: 3873 Registered: 08-2008 Posted From: 24.14.122.255 Rating: N/A |
what ever gatha says is endorsed positively by sopathi is the meaning !  Ekam Sat, Viprah Bahuda Vadhanti - Rig Veda  | ||
| Anand_n Side Hero Username: Anand_n Post Number: 4332 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 167.24.104.150 Rating: N/A |
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/lan/e n/atlas.html I think this is about as scientific as we can get with today's data on timing civilization, settlements and I would think languages... Check out the timeline of Haplogroups M*, M174, M130 and M69.. M*, the first haplogroup to break from African and travel to India took the middle Indian path..then you have the branches going northward from the Indus Valley area in 3 directions. M* is prevalent in Southern parts of pakistan and northwest India - not found much outside the Indus Valley area...The language of the Indus Valley civilization would be the oldest language in India then.If the guys who finally acknowledged the symbols in Indus valley to be a language script, can find enough patterns to correlate the grammar to any known language, say sanskrit - that should settle the issue M174 and M160 did not touch the Indo-gangetic plains , they took the path thru the southern peninsula only - I would think they had a language (proto-dravidian?) If Sanskrit was not inherent to Indus Valley but was brought in much later thru the M69ers( the Indian Marker) or M9ers..that puts the dravidian languages ahead of Sanskrit If you have not seen this before, click on the timeline tabs at the top of the map and then on the paths to read the genetic marker history - it is very interesting aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Iamim Comedian Username: Iamim Post Number: 1984 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 118.94.229.64 Rating: N/A |
I think the oldest Indian language is long dead and deeply buried in the Dandakaranya... | ||
| Mental_sachinodu Comedian Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 1165 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 63.161.147.10 Rating: N/A |
What did you mean by this? the world of appearances may or may not be real, or both may and may not be real - or may be indescribable; or may be real and indescribable, or unreal and indescribable; or in the end may be read and unreal and indescribable - its all Syadvada | ||
| Skywalker Side Hero Username: Skywalker Post Number: 4562 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 202.133.58.31 Rating: N/A |
Dude you sound like a guy who is hell bent in supporting the western theory of the aryans.......aka claim everything good to themselves. When arya bhatta was writing books on astronomy.......whole of europe was a bunch of hooligans and bandocoots just killing each other and fighting each other.........so zip your trash.................. I will stick to my parties,leaders and affiliations. You can keep the CHANGE . | ||
| Sarvasanga_parithyagi Junior Artist Username: Sarvasanga_parithyagi Post Number: 64 Registered: 05-2009 Posted From: 164.164.45.250 Rating: |
Konkini Pracheena Language in whole world.......  PP - Palakollu Potugaadu; VP - Vodipoyina Prasad ; Gobama; Fooley ....inkenni soodalo sitraalu.. | ||
| Anand_n Side Hero Username: Anand_n Post Number: 4328 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 68.206.110.236 Rating: N/A |
There is no fool proof dating available on any of the languages - oldest written samples of kannada and tamil are from around 200 BC anukunta.. Does not mean the language did not exist way before then - same with Sanskrit - Panini's grammer is usually dated around 450-500 BC but I do not recall reading that there are written samples of sanskrit dating that far back either ... So this is all conjecture Age of script is different from age of language aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Subzero Comedian Username: Subzero Post Number: 1828 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 59.93.64.104 Rating: N/A |
primitive language mama adi. I think tamil is the oldest language in India. సర్వ దేవాత్మకో హ్యేస తేజస్వీ రశ్మీభావనాః ఎస దేవాసుర గణమ్ లోకాం పాతి గభాస్తీభీః | ||
| Anand_n Side Hero Username: Anand_n Post Number: 4327 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 68.206.110.236 Rating: N/A |
Oops forgot the river Yamuna aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Anand_n Side Hero Username: Anand_n Post Number: 4325 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 68.206.110.236 Rating: N/A |
History matladutu geography marchipoyara  Mathura is not submerged, it is a landlocked city in UP , Dwaraka is the city that is submerged off the coast of Gujarat aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1834 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
which is correct. what gatha said India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Bejawadamonagadu_1 Junior Artist Username: Bejawadamonagadu_1 Post Number: 380 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 216.113.168.128 Rating: N/A |
Basic and Fortran are the oldest languages.. Baamma, Bendakaya, Balayya eppudu bore kottaru.. | ||
| Mental_sachinodu Comedian Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 1164 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 63.161.147.10 Rating: N/A |
where did i ever say sanskrith is the mother of all indian languages. you are the one saying tamil is the purest native indian language. to which i responded. the world of appearances may or may not be real, or both may and may not be real - or may be indescribable; or may be real and indescribable, or unreal and indescribable; or in the end may be read and unreal and indescribable - its all Syadvada | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 683 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Yes. But these thoeries should be taught as thoeries not "facts" unless proven beoynd doubt. But that is not happenning. | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1833 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
yes because those events occurred before writing came into existence. but there are compelling theories to support it. thats why they are called theories. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 682 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Agreed. One cannot avoid that. Can any one prove the so called "Persia" existed without folklore documentation ???? Where is the base ? But None of the Aryan Invasion thoeries are proved with any scientific data from 360 degrees perspective. | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1832 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
area folklore and epics cannot be part of history. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 680 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
+++++ If you say Sanskrit is mother of all Indian languages, then you may have to accept that European laguage is mother of Sanskrit +++++ This argument is not valid. With any one quote and quote proving that Sanskrit is Europian / persian roots , we cannot conlude so. } | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 679 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Agreed. They call it Methura, based on some scriptures. If so, Nothing can be proved, Neither Jesus Birth, Nor Mohmd's Birth etc. Where is the scietific proof that Aryans have come from Persia ? How can you any one proove that Old Persia existed at all ????? Every Hsitorical even can be questioned. History is always a cofluence of "some historical documentation + area folklore + epics + scietific notations" | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1831 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
both statements are not even related. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 376 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.152 Rating: N/A |
We can agree that all languages are good but we cannot make one language lower or higher than anyone. Telugu, Tamil, Kannada and Malayalam are have their own weightage, no need to make Sanskrit the root language. If you say Sanskrit is mother of all Indian languages, then you may have to accept that European laguage is mother of Sanskrit. | ||
| Mental_sachinodu Comedian Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 1163 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 63.161.147.10 Rating: N/A |
this is absurd. anyone who knows decent tamil knows that it has so many roots related to sanskrit. Most south indian languages today have a sanskrit influence, and tamil is no exception. Toda was a branch of the proto-dravidian languages which split in to tamil and kannada. tamil and telugu never belonged to the same branch of languages. except for the common root of proto dravidian. telugu comes under proto-central-dradvidian, and tamil comes under proto-southern-dravidian, and they existed simultaneously. if you say tamil is oldest, telugu was existing along the same time too. but the truth today's telugu or tamil are not the same as the yester years. they have a lot of sanskrith influence. one more than the other. the world of appearances may or may not be real, or both may and may not be real - or may be indescribable; or may be real and indescribable, or unreal and indescribable; or in the end may be read and unreal and indescribable - its all Syadvada | ||
| Jalsa Side Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 4477 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.110.144 Rating: N/A |
Gatha, Sopathi okalley kaadha? | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1830 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
its not proven that the submerged city is Mathura. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 678 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
*** megasthenes only recorded some folklores *** Then Let all his work be folklore, not just Krishna. Only what ever so called "Aryan Invasion Thoery Historians" write (with thier wild imginations, not with complete wholistic scitific data) be taken as truth :lol After all they have the ability to go back and watch the past and make affirmative statements. BS!!!! | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 677 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Thats why I said. One has to keep thier Beliefs with oneself. FYI - Krishna was also king of Mathura. Just because you don't beelive, better not call them Sollu. Then all what your so called versions can be treated the same. Who said Ayodhya is 2000 years back. May be what you are talking about is the temple. I am trying to show scietific proofs from ASI of Mathura which is contradicting the timings of "Aryan Invasion thoery". | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1829 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
megasthenes only recorded some folklores. I dont think he proved that krishna indeed existed and existed 3,500 years back. yeah he must have recorded good things about kings at the time he visited india. if so how come ayodhya has archeological artifacts which are only 2000 years old. according to sollu puranas, ramayana occurred before mahabharata. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 675 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Why do you guys attribute every thing to RSS (I don't care RSS), if some facts seem to be different than what you think. Greek Ambassador Magasthenis, is very respectable personality among Historians and many historians teart his work with respect. | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1828 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
how could he record? is it really valid? or some bussu by RSS historians. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 674 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Lets See the Scietific Data, Not the Writer's Own perception Mahabharata period ranges from 5000 B.C. to 6000 B.C. and Dwarka fits into this scenario perfectly. The first archaeological excavations at Dwaraka were done by the Deccan College, Pune and the Department of Archaeology, Government of Gujarat, in 1963 under the direction of H.D. Sankalia. It revealed artifacts many centuries old. Marine Archaeology Unit (MAU) jointly by the National Institute of Oceanography and the Archaeological Survey of India. Under the guidance of Dr. Rao, a great marine archaeologist, a team consisting of expert underwater explorers, trained diverphotographers and archaeologists was formed. The technique of geophysical survey was combined with the use of echo-sounders, mud-penetrators, sub-bottom profilers and underwater metal detectors. This team carried out 12 marine archaeological expeditions between 1983 to 1992 and articles and antiquities recovered were sent to Physical Research Laboratory for dating. By using thermo-luminescence, carbon dating and other modern scientific techniques, the artifacts were found to belong to the period between 15th to 18th century B.C. In his great work, The Lost City of Dwaraka, Dr. Rao has given scientific details of these discoveries and artifacts. Between 1983 to 1990, the well-fortified township of Dwaraka was discovered, extending more than half mile from the shore. The township was built in six sectors along the banks of a river. The foundation of boulders on which the city's walls were erected proves that the land was reclaimed from the sea. The general layout of the city of Dwaraka described in ancient texts agrees with that of the submerged city discovered by the MAU. The ASI conducted a second round of excavations in 1979 under S.R. Rao's direction. He found a distinct pottery known as lustrous red ware, which could be more than 3,000 years old. Based on the results of these excavations, the search for the sunken city in the Arabian Sea began in 1981. Scientists and archaeologists have continually worked on the site for 20 years. The UAW began excavations at Dwaraka again from January 2007. Dr. Tripathi said: "To study the antiquity of the site in a holistic manner, excavations are being conducted simultaneously both on land [close to the Dwarakadhish temple] and undersea so that finds from both the places can be co-related and analyzed scientifically." The objective of the excavation is to know the antiquity of the site, based on material evidence. In the offshore excavation, the ASI's trained underwater archaeologists and the divers of the Navy searched the sunken structural remains. The finds were studied and documented. Thirty copper coins were also found in the excavation area. The structures found on land belonged to the medieval period. "We have also found 30 copper coins. We are cleaning them. After we finish cleaning them, we can give their date," he said. Dwaraka is a coastal town in Jamnagar district of Gujarat. Traditionally, modern Dwaraka is identified with Dvaraka or Dvaravati, mentioned in the Mahabharata as Krishna's city. Dwaraka was a port, and some scholars have identified it with the island of Barka mentioned in the Periplus of Erythrean Sea. Ancient Dwaraka sank in sea and hence is an important archaeological site.â My idea is not to go in the discussion of how the city went under the sea but the fact is that this city is now approximately under water of the Arabian sea some 135 feet below water. This city has been mentioned in the Mahabharata and that this city has been found, dated, and mapped. The probable date of this city is between 9500 to 7500 years before present which will put it as 7500 to 5500 years BC. The Greek Ambassador Magasthenis has recorded that 138 generations have passed between Krishna and Chandragupta Maurya. Many scholars have taken this evidence, but taking only 20 years per generation they fixed the date of Krishna as 2760 years before Chandragupta. But this is wrong because the record is not of ordinary people to take 20 years per generation. In the matter of general public, one says that when a son is born a new generation starts. But in the case of kings, the name is included in the list of Royal Dynasty only after his coronation to the throne. Hence, one cannot allot 20 years to one king. We have to find out the average per king by calculating on various INDIAn Dynasties. I have considered 60 kings from various dynasties and calculated the average of each king as 35 years. Here is a list of some of important kings with the no. of years ruling. Chandragupta Mourya 330-298 B.C. 32 years. Bindusar 298-273 B.C. 25 years. Ashok 273-232 B.C. 41 years. Pushyamitra Shunga 190-149 B.C. 41 years. Chandragupta Gupta 308-330 A.D. 22 years. Samudragupta 330-375 A.D. 45 years. Vikramaditya 375-414 A.D. 39 years. Kumargupta 414-455 A.D. 41 years. Harsha 606-647 A.D. 41 years. --------- 327 years. The average is 327/9 = 36.3 years. Multiplying 138 generations by 35 years we get 4830 years before Chandragupta Mourya. Adding Chandrgupta's date 320 B.C. to 4830 we get 5150 B.C. as the date of Lord Krishna. Megasthenis, according to Arian, has written that between Sandrocotus to Dianisaum 153 generations and 6042 years passed. From this data, we get the average of 39.5 years per king. From this we can calculate 5451 years for 138 generations. So Krishna must have been around 5771 B.C. Pliny gives 154 generations and 6451 years between Bacchus and Alexander. This Bacchus may be the famous Bakasura who was killed by Bhimasena. This period comes to about 6771 years B.C. Thus Mahabharata period ranges from 5000 B.C. to 6000 B.C. and Dwarka fits into this scenario perfectly. | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1827 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 63.119.227.6 Rating: N/A |
dravidian languages root took birth in India and are true native indian languages. rest mee bhayya banana... India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 374 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.137 Rating: N/A |
Indo-Aryan derives from an earlier Proto-Indo-Iranian stage, usually identified with the Bronze Age Sintashta and Andronovo culture north of the Caspian Sea. Their migration to and within Northwestern parts of South Asia is consequently presumed to have taken place in the Middle to Late Bronze Age, contemporary to the Late Harappan phase (ca. 1700 to 1300 BC). An influx of early Indo-Aryan speakers over the Hindukush (comparable to the Kushan expansion of the first centuries CE) together with Late Harappan cultures gave rise to the Vedic civilization of the Early Iron Age. This period is marked by a gradual and continual shift of the population to the east, first to the Gangetic plain with the Kurus and Panchalas, and further east with the Kosala and Videha | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 672 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Its Not the Question of Who has written / supported the theory. Did you Read the Book. What did he say ? | ||
| Indian Junior Artist Username: Indian Post Number: 386 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.185.125.75 Rating: N/A |
Looser , Unable to digest reality and truth// looser ledhu bongu ledhu.. i am not from north india aryan avtaaniki, i dont speak hindi or sanskrit, yetaakaaramu cheste gudhax paguludhi ani aa post yesaaa. male, female british vallu cheppinanthavaraku indians theleedhaaa??? | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 373 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.125 Rating: N/A |
Even Bal-Ganghadhar Tilak wrote a book about Aryan Immigration to India. | ||
| Okatelugodu Side Hero Username: Okatelugodu Post Number: 5581 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 98.221.49.98 Rating: N/A |
Ekkaiko elthandi thread  | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 372 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.82 Rating: N/A |
Looser , Unable to digest reality and truth...  } | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 671 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
I don't understand in what context you posed this question. Here is some info , which i got from Wiki The Persian Empire was a series of successive Iranian or Iraniate empires that ruled over the Iranian plateau, the original Persian homeland, and beyond in Western Asia, South Asia, Central Asia and the Caucasus The Iranian plateau, also known as the Persian plateau[1][2] is a geological formation in Southwest Asia, Southern Asia and the Caucasus region. It is the part of the Eurasian Plate wedged between the Arabian and Indian plates, situated between the Zagros mountains to the west, the Caspian Sea and the Kopet Dag to the north, the Hormuz Strait and Arabian Sea to the south and Hindu Kush to the east. The Caucasus or Caucas (also referred to as Caucasia,[1] Russian: ÐавкаÌз) is a geopolitical region located between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is home to the Caucasus Mountains, including Europe's highest mountain (Mount Elbrus) North Caucasus comprises: Russia (Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Adyghea, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachai-Cherkessia, North Ossetia, Krasnodar Krai, Stavropol Krai) South Caucasus comprises: Georgia (including disputed, partially recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia) Armenia Azerbaijan (including disputed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) | ||
| Viceroy Junior Artist Username: Viceroy Post Number: 25 Registered: 05-2009 Posted From: 68.100.24.78 Rating: N/A |
chaaaala wrong maama.. south indian languages anni dravidian languages.. sanskrit tho asslau sambandhaledu... evo konni words teesukoni vundocchu but... South indian languages ki origin sanskrit kaadhu Christians ku jerusalem elaago, Hindhuvulaku KAASI elaago, Thuraks ki Makka elaago.... alage maa ANNA gari abhimanulaku VICEROY alantidhi | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 370 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.82 Rating: N/A |
Personnel Vadhu ... | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 369 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.82 Rating: N/A |
Britishers created Black & White Color o divide and rule...Lol | ||
| Indian Junior Artist Username: Indian Post Number: 385 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.185.125.75 Rating: N/A |
british also created male and female gender concepts to divide and rule.// nuvvu gudhaxx muyyaraa lava deke baal | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1826 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
According to many western historians, its from northern iran that aryans colonised europe and northern india. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1825 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
Is Persia in Europe? India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1824 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
indus valley civilisation is not aryan. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 670 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
This is still controversy with each group having thier own say. This is created by English Historians to tell world that "They (Euroians) are Superiror. Its been argued / fought still debatable issue "History cannot be frozen with few avaiable facts. It has to ve validated against the continuous process of fact finding coupled with technology to support it" | ||
| Okatelugodu Side Hero Username: Okatelugodu Post Number: 5579 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 98.221.49.98 Rating: N/A |
Typo. Bandicoot | ||
| Okatelugodu Side Hero Username: Okatelugodu Post Number: 5578 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 98.221.49.98 Rating: N/A |
Indus valley civilatization was from 3000BC to 1500BC. Ah region lo vundi Aryans antaru | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1823 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
british also created male and female gender concepts to divide and rule. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Okatelugodu Side Hero Username: Okatelugodu Post Number: 5577 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 98.221.49.98 Rating: N/A |
English keeps on adding words from every language. Its a continous process. For eg. Badicoot is added from Telugu from Pandikokku | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1822 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
I didnt say that. sanskrit, latin, greek, avesta etc all their mother(root) is same(PIE language) India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Indian Junior Artist Username: Indian Post Number: 384 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.185.125.75 Rating: N/A |
moghals, muslims india ku vaachaaru ani telusu gaani ee aryans india ku yeppudu vachaaru. aryans ante iran nunchi vachina valaaa?? Leka british vaallu india nu devide and rule polocy li aryans, dravidians ani devide chesaaraa??? | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 669 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
May be. But that doesn't mean Sanskrit is Originated from European Languages. Becuase we see some specific words of in English which are originated from Sanskrith. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Sanskr it_origin | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 368 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.152 Rating: N/A |
Sanskrit is daughter of Indo-Iranian Language and Indo-Iranian Language is daughter of Indo-European Languages. So Sanskrit is Grand-daughter of Indo-European Languages. Tamil is purely Native Indian. | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 367 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.137 Rating: N/A |
Sanskrit is the standard register as laid out in the grammar of Panini, around the 4th century BCE. Its position in the cultures of South and Southeast Asia is akin to that of Latin and Greek in Europe and it has significantly influenced most modern languages of Nepal and India. The pre-Classical form of Sanskrit is known as Vedic Sanskrit, with the language of the Rigveda being the oldest and most archaic stage preserved, its oldest core dating back to as early as 1500 BCE, qualifying Rigvedic Sanskrit as one of the oldest attestation of any Indo-Iranian language, and one of the earliest attested members of the Indo-European language family. | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1820 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
almost all linguists agree that sankrit belongs to indo-european family of languages. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 667 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
Languages inherit words from other popular languages. There is no scietific proof to say Sanskrit is brach of Europian Languages, except a group which supports this thoery. | ||
| Sopathi Comedian Username: Sopathi Post Number: 1819 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 209.172.101.244 Rating: N/A |
chaa... chinese is the mother of all indian language yemi kaadhu? FYI, all indian languages root is not same. India la theguva unna jaathulu moodu ... Sikh, Marati and Tamil. Rest mee bhayya banana ... | ||
| Mvssr75 Junior Artist Username: Mvssr75 Post Number: 666 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 12.10.219.168 Rating: N/A |
These proof are relatived to the latest avaiable excavations. Based on that we can say yes, it may be Tamil. But this may not be correct , one we get more proofs. | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 366 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.137 Rating: N/A |
Sanskrit is in branch of European languages, Tamil is purely Native Indian. Kannada and Telugu got heavily corrupted by Sanskrit. | ||
| Indian Junior Artist Username: Indian Post Number: 383 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.185.125.75 Rating: N/A |
I thought sanskrit is mother of all indian languages, madhya lo ee Tamil yeppudu vachindhi | ||
| Indian Junior Artist Username: Indian Post Number: 382 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.185.125.75 Rating: N/A |
tamil oldest language yendhi saamy comedy kaakapothe. Vinataaniki antha ashayamu gaa untundhi, yedho dabba lo rallu yesi sound chesinatlu. kannada vintaaniki baaguntundhi eventhough I dont understand. Hindi songs vinataaniki chalaa baguntaayi eventhough I dont understand. But Tamil yaaak thu... adhi oldest language yendhi saami, mana poorveekula intha chandalamaina laguage lo maatlaadukunevaraaa?? | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 365 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.152 Rating: N/A |
Good Joke, RSS,VHP have brainwashed people like you..Lol | ||
| Kalikaalam Comedian Username: Kalikaalam Post Number: 1653 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 72.78.244.128 Rating: N/A |
"Tamil oldest language anadaaniki aadhaaraalu vunnaayi" anadaaniki pedha pedha grandhaalu vunnaayi | ||
| Bhikhu Side Hero Username: Bhikhu Post Number: 2734 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 148.129.71.53 Rating: N/A |
you r wrong sanskrit is a kajin of Ahura mazda and 2nd cousin of Jarutha | ||
| Gatha Junior Artist Username: Gatha Post Number: 364 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 193.200.150.125 Rating: N/A |
Tamil is much much older than Sanskrit, Sanskrit is cousin of Avesta and it was written in arabic script ,after Aryans came to India, Sanskrit was written in devanagari script or hindi script.} | ||
| Woodpecker Side Hero Username: Woodpecker Post Number: 2760 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 199.198.251.106 Rating: N/A |
tamil older than sanskrit ani arava kurrol gola | ||
| Viceroy Junior Artist Username: Viceroy Post Number: 24 Registered: 05-2009 Posted From: 68.100.24.78 Rating: N/A |
Sanskrit idea ledu... South languages lo.. idhi order... Tamil baaga pracheena.... next Kannada.. next Telugu.... Christians ku jerusalem elaago, Hindhuvulaku KAASI elaago, Thuraks ki Makka elaago.... alage maa ANNA gari abhimanulaku VICEROY alantidhi | ||
| Cinejeevi Comedian Username: Cinejeevi Post Number: 1669 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 65.244.125.146 Rating: N/A |
tamil ani kkd seppamannaaD inta batuku batiki istarlu esukunE daani kaaLLa meeda paDDam enTi raju gaaru? | ||
| Indian Junior Artist Username: Indian Post Number: 381 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.185.125.75 Rating: N/A |
Telugu or Sanskrit or Tamil or Kannada or something else} |
