| Author | Message | ||
     Chantodu Side Hero Username: Chantodu Post Number: 3304 Registered: 07-2007 Posted From: 12.34.246.39 Rating: N/A |
selli thanks | ||
| Anand_n Comedian Username: Anand_n Post Number: 1172 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 67.10.130.102 Rating: N/A |
bump for Chantodu aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Rasputin Junior Artist Username: Rasputin Post Number: 732 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 192.146.101.71 Rating: N/A |
 5 starsNbkfan: "merit anedi oka peda busa" Onlytruth: "naaku good speech for her backdrop anipinchindhi....i am neither her supporter nor opposer" Netra: "meeru vote veyyali anipistte veyyandi..ledhante no vote.." | ||
| Anand_n Comedian Username: Anand_n Post Number: 1171 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 67.10.130.102 Rating: N/A |
Chantodu, Could not find the thread but here's the links to the home page http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/personalitystu dies/ And his controversial book http://www.amazon.com/Twenty-Cases-Suggestive-Reincarnation- Enlarged/dp/0813908728 aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Anand_n Comedian Username: Anand_n Post Number: 1167 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 67.10.130.102 Rating: N/A |
Ian Stevenson -reincarnation research - Okappudu thread vesanu Unortho kosam - archives lo chusi link istanu  aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Chantodu Side Hero Username: Chantodu Post Number: 3302 Registered: 07-2007 Posted From: 12.34.246.37 Rating: N/A |
Dr. Ian Stevenson..selli do u have any online books of him on reincarnation | ||
| Anand_n Comedian Username: Anand_n Post Number: 1163 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 67.10.130.102 Rating: N/A |
Chantodu , Which VA professor ? Are you talking about Randy Pausch of the last lecture fame ? aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Chantodu Side Hero Username: Chantodu Post Number: 3300 Registered: 07-2007 Posted From: 12.34.246.38 Rating: N/A |
anand selli..do u have any on links/books written by VA professor.dont remmer his name | ||
| Anand_n Comedian Username: Anand_n Post Number: 1160 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 67.10.130.102 Rating: N/A |
RA, Why worry about what happens when we die when most of the time people have no consciousness of what's happening in their heads when they are alive - why they act and react the way they do aa chal ke tujhe main leke chalu ik aise gagan ke tale jahan gam bhi na ho, aansoo bhi na ho,bas pyaar hi pyaar pale | ||
| Jambalahaart_raja Junior Artist Username: Jambalahaart_raja Post Number: 119 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 146.184.0.114 Rating: N/A |
//getlunnav? antha manchigena// oh mastu sallanga unnam kaka. poddugaalnanthaa aapice la pani paataa lekunti, gidoo DB okkati sooskuntu, diskasans sadvakuntu gitla time pass sesthuntimi kaka. | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17850 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: N/A |
getlunnav? antha manchigena | ||
| Mclovin Side Hero Username: Mclovin Post Number: 9576 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 69.27.233.254 Rating: N/A |
yevaraina pongane, intlollu/dostaanlu oka range la edustaru.. konni dinaal.. oka 6mon taruvaata sharaa maamoole.. deshaanikochhina nastham emee ledu anna level lo untadi.. In this db, there's always someone watching you!!  | ||
| Jambalahaart_raja Junior Artist Username: Jambalahaart_raja Post Number: 116 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 146.184.0.114 Rating: N/A |
studies conduct chesaadu, enduku chesaadu? ela chesaadu? ela cheyaali? em jaruguthu undochhu......ivanni cheppadu kaani asalu em avthundi cheppaledu useless!!!! | ||
| Guntur Junior Artist Username: Guntur Post Number: 772 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 74.63.75.131 Rating: N/A |
RA bedar.. konchem spacing etta pani paata leka..  | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17849 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: N/A |
nenu esanu ga  | ||
| Guntur Junior Artist Username: Guntur Post Number: 771 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 74.63.75.131 Rating: N/A |
What was your first interview like with someone who had reported an out-of-body experience? Eye-opening and very humbling. Because what you see is that, first of all, they are completely genuine people who are not looking for any kind of fame or attention. In many cases they haven't even told anybody else about it because they're afraid of what people will think of them. I have about 500 or so cases of people that I've interviewed since I first started out more than 10 years ago. It's the consistency of the experiences, the reality of what they were describing. I managed to speak to doctors and nurses who had been present who said these patients had told them exactly what had happened, and they couldn't explain it. I actually documented a few of those in my book What Happens When We Die because I wanted people to get both angles - not just the patients' side but also the doctors' side - and see how it feels for the doctors to have a patient come back and tell them what was going on. There was a cardiologist that I spoke with who said he hasn't told anyone else about it because he has no explanation for how this patient could have been able to describe in detail what he had said and done. He was so freaked out by it that he just decided not to think about it anymore. Why do you think there is such resistance to studies like yours? Because we're pushing through the boundaries of science, working against assumptions and perceptions that have been fixed. A lot of people hold this idea that, well, when you die, you die; that's it. Death is a moment - you know you're either dead or alive. All these things are not scientifically valid, but they're social perceptions. If you look back at the end of the 19th century, physicists at that time had been working with Newtonian laws of motion, and they really felt they had all the answers to everything that was out there in the universe. When we look at the world around us, Newtonian physics is perfectly sufficient. It explains most things that we deal with. But then it was discovered that actually when you look at motion at really small levels - beyond the level of the atoms - Newton's laws no longer apply. A new physics was needed, hence, we eventually ended up with quantum physics. It caused a lot of controversy - even Einstein himself didn't believe in it. Now, if you look at the mind, consciousness, and the brain, the assumption that the mind and brain are the same thing is fine for most circumstances, because in 99% of circumstances we can't separate the mind and brain; they work at the exactly the same time. But then there are certain extreme examples, like when the brain shuts down, that we see that this assumption may no longer seem to hold true. So a new science is needed in the same way that we had to have a new quantum physics. The CERN particle accelerator may take us back to our roots. It may take us back to the first moments after the Big Bang, the very beginning. With our study, for the first time, we have the technology and the means to be able to investigate this. To see what happens at the end for us. Does something continue? A fellow at New York City's Weill Cornell Medical Center, Dr. Sam Parnia is one of the world's leading experts on the scientific study of death. Last week Parnia and his colleagues at the Human Consciousness Project announced their first major undertaking: a 3-year exploration of the biology behind "out-of-body" experiences. The study, known as AWARE (AWAreness during REsuscitation), involves the collaboration of 25 major medical centers through Europe, Canada and the U.S. and will examine some 1,500 survivors of cardiac arrest. TIME spoke with Parnia about the project's origins, its skeptics and the difference between the mind and the brain. What sort of methods will this project use to try and verify people's claims of "near-death" experience? When your heart stops beating, there is no blood getting to your brain. And so what happens is that within about 10 sec., brain activity ceases - as you would imagine. Yet paradoxically, 10% or 20% of people who are then brought back to life from that period, which may be a few minutes or over an hour, will report having consciousness. So the key thing here is, Are these real, or is it some sort of illusion? So the only way to tell is to have pictures only visible from the ceiling and nowhere else, because they claim they can see everything from the ceiling. So if we then get a series of 200 or 300 people who all were clinically dead, and yet they're able to come back and tell us what we were doing and were able see those pictures, that confirms consciousness really was continuing even though the brain wasn't functioning. How does this project relate to society's perception of death? People commonly perceive death as being a moment - you're either dead or you're alive. And that's a social definition we have. But the clinical definition we use is when the heart stops beating, the lungs stop working, and as a consequence the brain itself stops working. When doctors shine a light into someone's pupil, it's to demonstrate that there is no reflex present. The eye reflex is mediated by the brain stem, and that's the area that keeps us alive; if that doesn't work, then that means that the brain itself isn't working. At that point, I'll call a nurse into the room so I can certify that this patient is dead. Fifty years ago, people couldn't survive after that. How is technology challenging the perception that death is a moment? Nowadays, we have technology that's improved so that we can bring people back to life. In fact, there are drugs being developed right now - who knows if they'll ever make it to the market - that may actually slow down the process of brain-cell injury and death. Imagine you fast-forward to 10 years down the line; and you've given a patient, whose heart has just stopped, this amazing drug; and actually what it does is, it slows everything down so that the things that would've happened over an hour, now happen over two days. As medicine progresses, we will end up with lots and lots of ethical questions. But what is happening to the individual at that time? What's really going on? Because there is a lack of blood flow, the cells go into a kind of a frenzy to keep themselves alive. And within about 5 min. or so they start to damage or change. After an hour or so the damage is so great that even if we restart the heart again and pump blood, the person can no longer be viable, because the cells have just been changed too much. And then the cells continue to change so that within a couple of days the body actually decomposes. So it's not a moment; it's a process that actually begins when the heart stops and culminates in the complete loss of the body, the decompositions of all the cells. However, ultimately what matters is, What's going on to a person's mind? What happens to the human mind and consciousness during death? Does that cease immediately as soon as the heart stops? Does it cease activity within the first 2 sec., the first 2 min.? Because we know that cells are continuously changing at that time. Does it stop after 10 min., after half an hour, after an hour? And at this point we don't know. | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17848 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: N/A |
I always have this question in my mind...not exactly the same.... like what are we???????? ee puttadam.. ee sachipovatam...madyalo ee godavalu, db, ego, kopal,ee nutrition,ee muscle whats all this? | ||
| Chantodu Side Hero Username: Chantodu Post Number: 3296 Registered: 07-2007 Posted From: 12.34.246.39 Rating: N/A |
i have read lot of books on it lately..intrestin topic for me ..sprit world.karma imablace ..again birth..va profesor past 30 years research documented 150 cases on each country and proved reincarnation... | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17847 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: N/A |
enduku anukunnav? idi body or nutrition ki sambandinchindi kaadu ga.. | ||
| Telugu_times Side Hero Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 8010 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 40.0.40.10 Rating: |
What Happens When We Die >> tamud ee vyaasaalo sadhive opika illio...2 word lo seppu..>>> We die | ||
| Spy_india Comedian Username: Spy_india Post Number: 1757 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.35.224.64 Rating: |
yahoo lo choosta anukunnaa RA post vestaadu ani | ||
| Pavala Side Hero Username: Pavala Post Number: 3036 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 193.47.71.253 Rating: N/A |
tamud ee vyaasaalu sadhive opika illio...2 word lo seppu.. Yevadu boora voodhithey Pamulannee bussumani puttalo nundi bhayataku vasthaayo, vaade Pavala | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17846 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: N/A |
if anyone interested. go through it.... | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17845 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: N/A |
What was your first interview like with someone who had reported an out-of-body experience? Eye-opening and very humbling. Because what you see is that, first of all, they are completely genuine people who are not looking for any kind of fame or attention. In many cases they haven't even told anybody else about it because they're afraid of what people will think of them. I have about 500 or so cases of people that I've interviewed since I first started out more than 10 years ago. It's the consistency of the experiences, the reality of what they were describing. I managed to speak to doctors and nurses who had been present who said these patients had told them exactly what had happened, and they couldn't explain it. I actually documented a few of those in my book What Happens When We Die because I wanted people to get both angles - not just the patients' side but also the doctors' side - and see how it feels for the doctors to have a patient come back and tell them what was going on. There was a cardiologist that I spoke with who said he hasn't told anyone else about it because he has no explanation for how this patient could have been able to describe in detail what he had said and done. He was so freaked out by it that he just decided not to think about it anymore. Why do you think there is such resistance to studies like yours? Because we're pushing through the boundaries of science, working against assumptions and perceptions that have been fixed. A lot of people hold this idea that, well, when you die, you die; that's it. Death is a moment - you know you're either dead or alive. All these things are not scientifically valid, but they're social perceptions. If you look back at the end of the 19th century, physicists at that time had been working with Newtonian laws of motion, and they really felt they had all the answers to everything that was out there in the universe. When we look at the world around us, Newtonian physics is perfectly sufficient. It explains most things that we deal with. But then it was discovered that actually when you look at motion at really small levels - beyond the level of the atoms - Newton's laws no longer apply. A new physics was needed, hence, we eventually ended up with quantum physics. It caused a lot of controversy - even Einstein himself didn't believe in it. Now, if you look at the mind, consciousness, and the brain, the assumption that the mind and brain are the same thing is fine for most circumstances, because in 99% of circumstances we can't separate the mind and brain; they work at the exactly the same time. But then there are certain extreme examples, like when the brain shuts down, that we see that this assumption may no longer seem to hold true. So a new science is needed in the same way that we had to have a new quantum physics. The CERN particle accelerator may take us back to our roots. It may take us back to the first moments after the Big Bang, the very beginning. With our study, for the first time, we have the technology and the means to be able to investigate this. To see what happens at the end for us. Does something continue? | ||
| Rowdyalludu Hero Username: Rowdyalludu Post Number: 17844 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 165.89.84.90 Rating: |
A fellow at New York City's Weill Cornell Medical Center, Dr. Sam Parnia is one of the world's leading experts on the scientific study of death. Last week Parnia and his colleagues at the Human Consciousness Project announced their first major undertaking: a 3-year exploration of the biology behind "out-of-body" experiences. The study, known as AWARE (AWAreness during REsuscitation), involves the collaboration of 25 major medical centers through Europe, Canada and the U.S. and will examine some 1,500 survivors of cardiac arrest. TIME spoke with Parnia about the project's origins, its skeptics and the difference between the mind and the brain. What sort of methods will this project use to try and verify people's claims of "near-death" experience? When your heart stops beating, there is no blood getting to your brain. And so what happens is that within about 10 sec., brain activity ceases - as you would imagine. Yet paradoxically, 10% or 20% of people who are then brought back to life from that period, which may be a few minutes or over an hour, will report having consciousness. So the key thing here is, Are these real, or is it some sort of illusion? So the only way to tell is to have pictures only visible from the ceiling and nowhere else, because they claim they can see everything from the ceiling. So if we then get a series of 200 or 300 people who all were clinically dead, and yet they're able to come back and tell us what we were doing and were able see those pictures, that confirms consciousness really was continuing even though the brain wasn't functioning. How does this project relate to society's perception of death? People commonly perceive death as being a moment - you're either dead or you're alive. And that's a social definition we have. But the clinical definition we use is when the heart stops beating, the lungs stop working, and as a consequence the brain itself stops working. When doctors shine a light into someone's pupil, it's to demonstrate that there is no reflex present. The eye reflex is mediated by the brain stem, and that's the area that keeps us alive; if that doesn't work, then that means that the brain itself isn't working. At that point, I'll call a nurse into the room so I can certify that this patient is dead. Fifty years ago, people couldn't survive after that. How is technology challenging the perception that death is a moment? Nowadays, we have technology that's improved so that we can bring people back to life. In fact, there are drugs being developed right now - who knows if they'll ever make it to the market - that may actually slow down the process of brain-cell injury and death. Imagine you fast-forward to 10 years down the line; and you've given a patient, whose heart has just stopped, this amazing drug; and actually what it does is, it slows everything down so that the things that would've happened over an hour, now happen over two days. As medicine progresses, we will end up with lots and lots of ethical questions. But what is happening to the individual at that time? What's really going on? Because there is a lack of blood flow, the cells go into a kind of a frenzy to keep themselves alive. And within about 5 min. or so they start to damage or change. After an hour or so the damage is so great that even if we restart the heart again and pump blood, the person can no longer be viable, because the cells have just been changed too much. And then the cells continue to change so that within a couple of days the body actually decomposes. So it's not a moment; it's a process that actually begins when the heart stops and culminates in the complete loss of the body, the decompositions of all the cells. However, ultimately what matters is, What's going on to a person's mind? What happens to the human mind and consciousness during death? Does that cease immediately as soon as the heart stops? Does it cease activity within the first 2 sec., the first 2 min.? Because we know that cells are continuously changing at that time. Does it stop after 10 min., after half an hour, after an hour? And at this point we don't know. |
