| Author | Message | ||
     Iamim Side Hero Username: Iamim Post Number: 5195 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 106.78.205.29 Rating: N/A |
T Icchina.. Supreme court lo challenge chese chance undi.. if they infringe on the niceties of the Constitution... | ||
| Methhanithodugu Megastar Username: Methhanithodugu Post Number: 26155 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 117.195.216.119 Rating: N/A |
Ikkada reverse amendment not needed... i guess hyderbad ni chandigarh model kosame amendment kaavali DB is for leg pulling,info share,timepass dont take all posts to heart/dil pe ..DB is Pressure Release | ||
| Nippu Side Hero Username: Nippu Post Number: 5139 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 67.82.138.12 Rating: N/A |
bjp kee kuda easy kadu if what he wrote is true. it can only be done through some national consensus like second src like that. Indira Gandhi fitting pettindi bhane. | ||
| Nippu Side Hero Username: Nippu Post Number: 5138 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 67.82.138.12 Rating: N/A |
already election commission kee get ready ani indications velliniyyi. one main reason for going to early elections is modi factor. there are surveys that in general elctions coming in four states in November. bjp is retaining two of their and also bagging the other two delhi and rajastan from congress. so this tempo may pass onto the elections if held in april -may. so they want to go early in nov along with those four states to decimate modi factor. | ||
| Methhanithodugu Megastar Username: Methhanithodugu Post Number: 26151 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 117.195.216.119 Rating: N/A |
Bottomline Congress Motaash ...BJP ettagu isthaadi DB is for leg pulling,info share,timepass dont take all posts to heart/dil pe ..DB is Pressure Release | ||
| Nippu Side Hero Username: Nippu Post Number: 5137 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 67.82.138.12 Rating: N/A |
lagada gadi confidence kuda ide ayyi vundachu. congress playing game again to go to people and get some seats . now they will say we are supporting telangana and august lo they will declare elections. nov - dev elections. after that SAME story. cbn letter , jac, pac , karevepaku. | ||
| Nippu Side Hero Username: Nippu Post Number: 5136 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 67.82.138.12 Rating: N/A |
You are hereHome » News » Politics Digvijay Singh throws statute T-wister DC | Ch V.M. Krishna Rao | 2 hours 2 min ago Share inShare0Printer-friendly version Send by email Hyderabad: AICC general secretary Digvijay Singh said on Thursday that the creation of the state of Telangana would need a Constitutional amendment, sparking a fresh debate on the eve of the Congress Core Committee’s crucial meeting on Friday to decide on the issue. While votaries of Telangana insist that creation of Telangana does not require a Constitutional amendment — it was not needed to create the states of Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand — there does appear to be more to it than that. If Singh’s line of argument is taken to its logical conclusion, the measure to create Telangana would have to be passed by a two-third majority by Parliament, and should be ratified by at least half the states of India. In normal circumstances, the formation of new states is governed by Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Constitution. Article 2 deals with ‘Admission or establishment of new states’; Article 3 with ‘Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing states’. Nod of 50% states needed Article 4 of the Constitution deals with ‘Laws made under Articles 2 and 3 provide for the amendment of First and Fourth Schedules (of the Constitution) and supplemental, incidental and consequential matters.’ Article 4 (2) states: ‘No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of Article 368.’ And Article 368 empowers Parliament to make amendments to the Constitution. This made it easy for the NDA government to create the three new states from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. But Telangana faces a peculiar situation. After the two agitations, one in 1969 for Telangana state, and another in 1972 for pro-Andhra protagonists, the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had brought in the 32nd Constitutional Amendment Bill, by inserting new Articles, 371 (D) and 371 (E) under the head ‘Special provisions with respect to the state of Andhra Pradesh.’ This was done to bring equitable opportunities and facilities to people belonging to different parts of the state for public employment and education and establishment of a Central University in Andhra Pradesh. When the 32nd Amendment was adopted in Parliament, it was duly inserted in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution which deals with Union, State and Concurrent Lists. The creation of Telangana may impinge on the Seventh Schedule. And that has created the problem. Article 368 also says that any measure that seeks to make any changes in the Seventh Schedule requires to be adopted by a ‘special majority’. This means that the Bill has to be passed in each House by a majority of the total membership of that House, and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of members of that House present and voting. Not only that. Article also says the amendment must be ratified by the legislatures of not less than one half of all the states in India by a resolution to that effect. In this background, the UPA government, which is struggling to keep its simple majority in Parliament, will have to think twice before making a constitutional amendment as it requires a special majority, and also 50 per cent of legislatures in the country need to approve the same. This means that unless there is a consensus on the issue at national level, it will not be possible to get both the constitutional amendment and approval of 50 per cent of legislatures for the same. | ||
| Nippu Side Hero Username: Nippu Post Number: 5135 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 67.82.138.12 Rating: N/A |
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130712/news-politics/article/ digvijay-singh-throws-statute-t-wister. only second src can achieve it. |
