| Author | Message | ||
     Tilak Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 16817 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 14.96.58.195 Rating: N/A |
akkada CBI is a shameless caged parrot .. A community that can break the country is no minority - Sardar Patel "Congress Mukt Bharat" - www.narendramodi.in | ||
| Teluguhero Comedian Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 1137 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 24.129.109.137 Rating: N/A |
Ishrat Jahan was declared a martyr by Lashkar-e-Toiba http://arisebharat.com/2011/11/22/ishrat-jahan-was-declared- a-martyr-by-lashkar-e-toiba/ | ||
| Teluguhero Comedian Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 1136 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 24.129.109.137 Rating: N/A |
http://www.niticentral.com/2013/06/28/cbi-forging-facts-in-i shrat-case-96629.html CBI forging âfactsâ in Ishrat case? By Kartikeya Tanna on June 28, 2013 On Thursday, NDTVâs Sreenivasan Jain came up with an âexclusiveâ report on the Ishrat Jahan encounter case claiming access to evidence with CBI and the draft status report CBI has to submit in the Gujarat High Court next month. This is mostly on the lines of an âinvestigativeâ report by Tehelka. Should CBI uncover IB? Apart from the war between the IB and CBI on the veracity of the LeT connection of Ishrat Jahan and her accomplices who were killed in an encounter in 2004, the genuineness of which is under probe, both reports hint, rather loudly, at the possibility that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and his close aide Amit Shah may have been in the know of the encounter. Whether or not the encounter is fake, and to what extent IB officer Rajinder Kumarâs intelligence input on the LeT connections is true and genuine, shall be known as the law takes its course. The sheer hurry with which NDTV and Tehelka have âhintedâ at Modi and Shah, however, needs to be examined. Journalistic incompetence or predetermined mind? Firstly, in the report (at 5:25), he actually says that the High Court has already established the Ishrat encounter as fake. One wonders what is left for the CBI and the courts to do! In fact, only around two weeks ago, when the CBI obsessed over the LeT links of the dead, the High Cpurt told it to focus on whether the encounter was fake. Whether this is pure journalistic incompetence or a predetermined mind, I would let readers decide. Calls between Vanzara and Modi and Shah Coming to the âfinger of suspicionâ pointing at Modi and Shah, the reports allege that one of the IPS officers accused in the case, DG Vanzara has claimed to have overheard another accused saying he got the go-ahead from âwhite beardâ and âblack beardâ. To assume that, in this context, these code words refer to Modi and Shah respectively isnât entirely off the mark. But let us examine how the CBI is claiming this âfactâ. The CBI has got to know of Vanzaraâs claim from a testimony by an officer. There is an immediate problem with this. X is testifying before the CBI that he heard Y telling Z that A and B had given the green signal. This isnât just hearsay which any court would deal with abundant caution, it is double hearsay! One is instantly reminded of Justice Suresh Hosbetâs callous interview to NDTV last year where he said that Haren Pandya had told him that an IPS officer who attended the meeting at Modiâs residence on February 27, 2002, told Pandya that Modi had instructed officers to go soft on Hindus. And, to corroborate Vanzaraâs claims, the reports point out calls between Vanzara and Modiâs residence and Shah several times on the date of the encounter and prior thereto. Does that reveal something sensational per se? Not quite. It is important to remember that Modi, apart from being the Chief Minister, was also the Home Minister. Amit Shah was Minister of State (Home). If Ishrat and her accomplices were LeT modules on a mission to kill Modi, among others, the two Home Ministers would obviously be in the know of surveillance and a likely chase. NDTV and Tehelka (and, perhaps, the CBI) would do better by distinguishing between a Home Minister and MoS (Home) being aware of surveillance and chase and actually approving a cold-blooded murder without any risk of imminent danger. If a Home Minister were to be suspected every time call records showed calls between the police officers in an encounter and the Minister, many Home Ministers would be in trouble. Unless there is incontrovertible evidence of what conversation actually took place, to point the finger at Modi and Shah, just because an officer kept the two Home Ministers informed on a serious matter is irresponsible | ||
| Onlytruth Legend Username: Onlytruth Post Number: 121347 Registered: 01-2007 Posted From: 98.223.227.71 Rating: N/A |
when ordered cbi inquiry into this case.....highcourt kukka dobbulu on modi government http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/gujarat-hc-orders-cbi-to- probe-ishrat-jahan-case/1/162331.html | ||
| Onlytruth Legend Username: Onlytruth Post Number: 121345 Registered: 01-2007 Posted From: 98.223.227.71 Rating: N/A |
couple of montha ago news : Ishrat Jahan case: Gujarat HC satisfied with CBI probe Gujarat High Court on Friday expressed satisfaction about the progress made by CBI in the investigation of Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ishrat-jahan-case-guja rat-hc-satisfied-with-cbi-probe/article4512643.ece | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 41482 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
HC doesnt tell what news to print. | ||
| Onlytruth Legend Username: Onlytruth Post Number: 121344 Registered: 01-2007 Posted From: 98.223.227.71 Rating: |
Scope of the CBI investigation as ordered by gujarath highcourt is to find if ishrat encounter is staged or not. Highcourt did not request to find who is she. Talk to HC | ||
| Teluguhero Comedian Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 1135 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 24.129.109.137 Rating: |
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/intelligence-bureau-s-lett er-to-cbi-david-headley-told-fbi-ishrat-jahan-was-a-suicide- bomber-388096?pfrom=home-lateststories ntelligence Bureau's letter to CBI: 'David Headley told FBI Ishrat Jahan was a suicide bomber' Written by Sudhi Ranjan Sen | Updated: July 05, 2013 01:16 IST New Delhi: When officers of India's National Investigating Agency (NIA) were allowed to interrogate David Coleman Headley in a jail in Chicago in 2010, the Pakistani-American allegedly told them that Ishrat Jahan, a college student shot dead by the Gujarat Police in 2004, had terrorist links. Mr Headley has confessed to his role in the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai in which 166 people were killed in 2008. He has admitted that he videotaped the landmarks that would be targeted on behalf of terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba. In an 119-page report that the NIA prepared on its seven-day questioning of Mr Headley, the agency recorded that Mr Headley said Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi, a Lashkar commander, had told him of a terror operation that had failed - Ishrat Jahan and those assigned with her had died. Most Recent In this Uttarakhand village, summer jobs became death traps BJP's Arjun Munda urges Jharkhand Governor to dissolve assembly The NIA shared its interrogation report of Mr Headley with the Intelligence Bureau. The document was also made available to the media. But in this version, the two paras that refer to Ishrat Jahan are missing. Nine years after Ishrat was killed with three men on the outskirts of Ahmedabad, the CBI has found the Gujarat Police and Intelligence Bureau guilty of a joint operation "in close blood." In the chargesheet it filed in court on Wednesday, the agency did not comment on whether Ishrat and the others were terrorists who were on a mission to assassinate Chief Minister Narendra Modi, as alleged by the cops who shot them. The Intelligence Bureau maintains that it had reason to believe this was a terror unit, and in 2004, its Gujarat branch shared that information with the police. The BJP alleges that the government has deliberately withheld details of Ishrat's terror links to discredit Mr Modi and his administration. NDTV has learnt that in March 2010, the FBI had independently warned India's Intelligence Bureau that in his questioning by US investigators, Mr Headley had said that Ishrat and her associates were planning terror strikes on Gujarat temples including the Akshardham temple in Gandhinagar. |
