| Author | Message | ||
     Redbull Comedian Username: Redbull Post Number: 1908 Registered: 03-2009 Posted From: 94.194.129.188 Rating: N/A |
guys, bridge camerara...are any worth? | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19282 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.46.140 Rating: N/A |
//http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/15-85mm.htm// started out by reading this guy's articles  inka nikon d40 ye vaaduthunnaanu antunnada? | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19281 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.46.140 Rating: N/A |
//Future lo full frame camera ki upgrade aite, idhi paniki raadu. // correct. this is only for cropped cams. L lenses or EF lens are compatible with both anukunta kadha? | ||
| Simba Hero Username: Simba Post Number: 10469 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 206.210.17.33 Rating: N/A |
baagane undhi anta. Future lo full frame camera ki upgrade aite, idhi paniki raadu. http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/15-85mm.htm | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19279 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.46.140 Rating: N/A |
canon 15-85mm meedha ettandi suggestion. | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40859 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
pelli kavalsina kurrodu okadiki putuvas teestaanu rammani cheppaa but in general..naaku manushula photo la kante objects teeyadam istam | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40858 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
anukunna focus..nikon meeda kaadu...aa mundu unna plastic mukka meeda | ||
| Maverick Legend Username: Maverick Post Number: 45483 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 70.39.231.189 Rating: N/A |
>> http://i.imgur.com/pVwu89W.jpg aa amir khan legs evarivi? Who is this DB member? nenu anumanapu mogudu laaga jrNTR seelanni sankinchina maata nijam BUT mugguru karudugattina only balayya fans (who watched badshah tho) matladaka they certified "maakemi anipinchaledhu" | ||
| Kuyyo_morro Hero Username: Kuyyo_morro Post Number: 10934 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 65.117.253.70 Rating: N/A |
Out of focus. | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40856 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
35 mm prime - coke putuvograpy http://i.imgur.com/pVwu89W.jpg http://i.imgur.com/Hv0yd6b.jpg | ||
| Kuyyo_morro Hero Username: Kuyyo_morro Post Number: 10933 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 65.117.253.70 Rating: N/A |
Indoor shoot ki normal ga vaade range is around 40-50. | ||
| Kuyyo_morro Hero Username: Kuyyo_morro Post Number: 10932 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 65.117.253.70 Rating: N/A |
Typical mana cinemallo vaadevi 10-100. Yes TFI lo. Close up to wide shots ki 20-100 range chaalu. 18-55 theesukunte you will end up buying a 55 to 200 or something. every time shot theeyali ante lens adjust chesukovaali. Carrying 2 lenses and changing them is a pain. Try to stick to one lens even if it is expensive. | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40854 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
| ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19274 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.174.140 Rating: N/A |
ledhantey 15-85mm http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/647013-USA/Canon_3560B 002_EF_S_15_85mm_f_3_5_5_6_IS.html | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19273 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.174.140 Rating: N/A |
oka added advantange to this lens entantey macro kooda option undhi although not 1:1 | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19268 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.78.143 Rating: N/A |
again, have the 55-250mm for telephoto range. but as i am looking to upgrade from kit lens, was taking a peek at this. | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19267 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.78.143 Rating: N/A |
//Jalsa - doesn't your 50 mm prime work as an all purpose lens. I use my prime for almost everything...// well, taking pictures of my kiddo running around in a park with 50mm prime would put me in a serious running business... ;-) | ||
| Filmbuff Comedian Username: Filmbuff Post Number: 1818 Registered: 11-2011 Posted From: 223.227.173.96 Rating: N/A |
Correct, i have a Zuiko prime (for my Olympus) 50 mm prime, conversion is 2 X, so that is 100 mm on a traditional camera. Great for portraits but it is too long, i think a 35*2 would have sufficed. Jalsa - doesn't your 50 mm prime work as an all purpose lens. I use my prime for almost everything... | ||
| Buduguuu Hero Username: Buduguuu Post Number: 14024 Registered: 01-2012 Posted From: 24.107.4.53 Rating: N/A |
portraits kosam 18-200 aite not a great idea. in general ga 18-200 bane undi. i have it with me. but nenu mee laaga lens meeda reviews iche stage ledu. just started with it and i am happy with those lens. may be oka one year full ga explore cheste ardam avtai emo ye lens specialty ento Coolmac : nanu comment sesey staayi ledhu neeku Biryani about Mahesh Babu | ||
| Simba Hero Username: Simba Post Number: 10434 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 206.210.17.33 Rating: N/A |
Thanks for crushing. Kindha nee post soodu.... indoor portrats ki 35mm max ani cheppavu kada? | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40851 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
bemmi_crush nenu general indoor gurinsi cheptunaa. portraits ki 85mm prime is the bhesht ani sinappudu Bala Bharati book lo chadivinattu gurtu | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19266 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.110.142 Rating: N/A |
//Kindha Filmbuff cheppinattu, it is neither wide nor standard zoom lens. I would pass.// chassssssss...sarey edhaina suggest cheyandi babulu...read in lot of forums about this being an alternative to canon's 15-85 IS | ||
| Simba Hero Username: Simba Post Number: 10433 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 206.210.17.33 Rating: N/A |
Portrait ante thala nundi kaalla daaka theeyalsina avasaram ledhu. A head shot is enough and 85mm excels in it. | ||
| Megastar Username: Twitter Post Number: 27162 Registered: 10-2009 Posted From: 192.193.171.150 Rating: N/A |
good lens as an alternative thossseii | ||
| Simba Hero Username: Simba Post Number: 10432 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 206.210.17.33 Rating: N/A |
Kindha Filmbuff cheppinattu, it is neither wide nor standard zoom lens. I would pass. | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40850 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
indoor lo deggara ninchi teeyali ante 85mm konchem struggle avvalemo?? | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19265 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.174.140 Rating: N/A |
@Simba, coke uncle inka chinna pillodu oggeyi. naa q ki s (suggestion) ivvu | ||
| Simba Hero Username: Simba Post Number: 10430 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 206.210.27.33 Rating: N/A |
Really? 85mm or 105mm macro lenses are used close up Portraits. The results are much better than 35mm prime. | ||
| Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 40849 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 168.244.164.254 Rating: N/A |
why this kolaveri? indoor ki prime lens...maximum 35 mm out door upto 300mm zoom lens set cheyyi | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19263 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.174.140 Rating: N/A |
where is goonda? Nanigadu? simbadu? | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19261 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 69.117.133.147 Rating: N/A |
Filmbuff, yeah makes sense. But portraits ki ayithe 50mm 1.8 prime undhi. Telephoto end ayithe 55-250mm undhi. The alternate all around lens us canon's 15-85mm 3.5-5.6 which is like 899$. In general kit lens nunchi upgrade avadaniki trying. Another option is 18-135mm by canon. Did not hear great things about that. Same with 18-200mm | ||
| Filmbuff Comedian Username: Filmbuff Post Number: 1816 Registered: 11-2011 Posted From: 122.160.66.90 Rating: N/A |
Koncham atu itu ga undi...it is neither a "wide" wide angle, nor a good portrait lens (100 mm unte bavuntadhi) and nor does it have a good aperture. 2.8 is not that great for taking indoor photos or portraits. Deenikante manchi lenses untayemo...my two bit.... | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19260 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 69.117.133.147 Rating: N/A |
Looks aa? Hmmm Kuyyo, for every day use, where I used the 18-55 kit lens, this should be a decent upgrade ani thinking | ||
| Kuyyo_morro Hero Username: Kuyyo_morro Post Number: 10926 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 65.117.253.70 Rating: N/A |
Idi waste. You need 20- 100 at least to shoot well. | ||
| Kingaa_bongaa Hero Username: Kingaa_bongaa Post Number: 17302 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 192.189.128.22 Rating: N/A |
Sigma baaane vuntundhi, only thing nee camera look choosko, for me sigma lenses dont match to any DSLR body (just looks) Manaki Manam Kingu, Choosevallaki Bongu. | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19259 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.46.141 Rating: N/A |
bump. | ||
| Jalsa Hero Username: Jalsa Post Number: 19258 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.78.143 Rating: N/A |
Sigma New 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM -- ee lens meedha mee opinion ettandi. Canon vaadi 15-855 is $300 more than this. |
