| Author | Message | ||
     Tilak Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 11704 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 125.22.249.81 Rating: N/A |
agenda blinds rationale .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Ringo_rangaswamy Side Hero Username: Ringo_rangaswamy Post Number: 3002 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 69.120.132.61 Rating: N/A |
Mana A.Poo. Pradesh lo maatramu vunnavi dochukovadaaniki, raashtraanni diwala tiyyataniki CM baaga work ayyaadu last 5-10 years lo  | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2087 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
Investments - development anedhi - it is a different issue. regulated Investments and Services will usually bring in all round development. but the article was about -Is it a CM / a single person who is responsible for Investments? And the answer is obviously NO....as the stats and the history has shown.... | ||
| Boston_baba Comedian Username: Boston_baba Post Number: 1076 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 192.55.79.165 Rating: N/A |
it raises another debate whether investment leads to progress & inclusive dev or not? if Q is whether investment depends on CM or not. i dont give too much credit to individual for that.
If i were a politician, i would have done same by projecting rosy picture.. but media and educated individual should play their part in this game. Future is not to be predicted.. It is to be created... | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2083 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
There was significant Investments during that time especially after 2002..... But the problem is politicians try and ride a wave and claim success for that.....and on the other hand, when they are responsible for wrong actions, they never claim responsibility. And it is the bureaucracy and officials who play a bigger role than the CM himself. So as you said - Ground reality ni evvaru choodatam ledhu....and everyone wants to believe in the wave created by the media | ||
| Methhanithodugu Megastar Username: Methhanithodugu Post Number: 22958 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 115.184.204.80 Rating: N/A |
nakithe idi kiran ni covering sese thread laaga undi ..... ofcourse cm + rains will have max% influence dont believe those BS articles .... sanna ga untaru kaani.... Middle class danemma Shock bagundi by Con-Gress!!! Jai Chandra Madiga garu | ||
| Boston_baba Comedian Username: Boston_baba Post Number: 1068 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 122.167.89.192 Rating: N/A |
1999-2004, india shining ani national media, AP zooming ahead ani AP media (primarily eenadu) entha udaragottina, reality manam chusam kada annai... Future is not to be predicted.. It is to be created... | ||
| Boston_baba Comedian Username: Boston_baba Post Number: 1067 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 122.167.89.192 Rating: N/A |
TATAs wanted it to be in singur till last minute, only when they come to terms with it that, its impossible they looked for other options (Guj and elsewhere). if Guj is so-investor friendly, it shud have been the first choice. Future is not to be predicted.. It is to be created... | ||
| Boston_baba Comedian Username: Boston_baba Post Number: 1066 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 122.167.89.192 Rating: N/A |
nice article babai... anduke stats chudandi. mee local ground realities chudandi. wt work is going on? wt benifits and quality if services they are gettting.. thats good enuf indicator for any governance. tokkalo news articles kadu. Future is not to be predicted.. It is to be created... | ||
| Thelegend Moderator Username: Thelegend Post Number: 22701 Registered: 04-2008 Rating: N/A |
article chadavale thread itle ki answer yes | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2082 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
That is the point I am trying to make....not just about AP....but the difference between the perception created and the actual ground reality.... In 2011 WB was on a wave called change.......and the result has been disastrous for a state already in disaster. | ||
| Rock Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 10925 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 76.185.166.13 Rating: N/A |
Urukondi annai ap gone to dogs paid article by cong or ysrc Cbn vacchi lokakalyanam chesi state ni save cheyyali ippudu | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2081 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
Forget the positive effect...Can politicians have a negative effect?? YES is the resounding answer :-) Singur is a classic case in point | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2080 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
On the list of actual foreign investment for 2011, in fact, Gujarat slips to No. 3 in the rankings, with Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh gaining traction. Karnataka and Jharkhand replace West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh. Investments in 2011 (actual) The proposed was much much higher Maharashtra- Rs. 4671 Cr AP - Rs.2439 Cr Gujarat - Rs.2148 Cr Karnataka - Rs.890 Cr AP lo perception is - the state has come to a standstill....nothing is moving...there is no leadership in the state at all..... A state in Western India - the perception is - that is the most developing part of the world...and has a dynamic leader... And both states have done well....despite the huge difference in public perception..... } | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2079 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
Between 1992 and 2008, a substantial period of 16 years, the top five states where FDI made its way were Gujarat, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh, in that order. While Gujarat, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh were expected in the top five, the surprise entries were UP and Bengal. During that period, UP was going through the Mandal-Mandir churn of identity politics and uncertain coalition governments, while West Bengal was under the Left party rule — factors which should have discouraged investment in these states. "This proves very clearly that political leadership is completely irrelevant to holding on to investment or, at the very best, it is of transient interest to investors," says economist Bibek Debroy. "What really matters is that the senior bureaucracy should be stable and efficient in dealing with business. These numbers basically reflect that. The chief minister of a state is less important as a factor." Besides, of course, the fact that West Bengal was embarking on its own version of perestroika under Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, the then CM | ||
| Dada Side Hero Username: Dada Post Number: 2078 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 115.43.45.26 Rating: N/A |
It is the bureaucracy and the overall economic environment that decide rather than a single individual or a few men at the top... Good article.....good read....Of course nothing new - but those with an open mind and without any leanings / prejudice can read this.... http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation /why-just-a-strong-cm-cannot-attract-investments/articleshow /18307915.cms |
