| Author | Message | ||
     Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 17246 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
if people don't support you, play the victim card type lo unnaru antha... Hoping BAMA wins | ||
| Anand_n Hero Username: Anand_n Post Number: 12341 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 72.177.241.31 Rating: N/A |
True- Office lo pakkana kurchunna ayina - DB lo political supporters ki white-red version  ninna phone lo valla buddy to cheptunnaru - ee sari gelustam - gelavali - pedda cities nundi bayataki vellali counting results chudataniki - supporters untaru-ikkada kashtam - anta  The foolish man seeks happiness in the distance; the wise grows it under his feet : James Oppenheim | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 17232 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
Oka sametha undedhi" 50% of people read newspapers and the rest vote ani" ignorance is the only qualification for Rep voters these days.... | ||
| Newguy123 Hero Username: Newguy123 Post Number: 14290 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 24.44.15.166 Rating: N/A |
No wonder..roju rush gaadi radio program vinte ilage vuntadi  | ||
| Newguy123 Hero Username: Newguy123 Post Number: 14288 Registered: 01-2009 Posted From: 24.44.15.166 Rating: N/A |
insurance must ga teesukune vaallaki idi advantage ye kaani disadv kaadu. Rep sodarulu insurance cost perigi potayi ani bedarestannar jananni.. | ||
| Awara1984 Junior Artist Username: Awara1984 Post Number: 279 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 182.72.145.193 Rating: N/A |
After being unemployed for more than two years until recently, Woodruff says she has been a beneficiary of virtually every federal anti-poverty program that Love, along with Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, would like to cut or eliminate, including food stamps; the Women, Infants, and Children nutrition program; Medicaid; and even the federal mortgage relief program. Woodruff's husband is uninsured, and she recently filed for bankruptcy because of $60,000 worth of medical debt that Obamacare might have averted. But Woodruff would still like to see Obamacare repealed because she believes "government is not the answer." When I suggested that Obamacare might actually help her family, particularly her uninsured husband, Woodruff argued with me about it before she stalked off muttering something about the $3,000 in taxes she claimed the law was going to force her to pay. (It won't.) | ||
| Awara1984 Junior Artist Username: Awara1984 Post Number: 278 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 182.72.145.193 Rating: N/A |
fter the town hall, Denise Hadley, a West Jordan woman who suffers from multiple sclerosis, approached Love to ask her how she would address the high price of prescription drugs, noting that one medication she takes costs $46,000 a year. Love informed her that any solution would require a "free-market response," and she promised to arrange a meeting with her to discuss the problem. (She never did.) Love's non-answer on the prescription drug question didn't leave Hadley looking to Democrats for better ones, though. Instead, she told me she is "100 percent against Obama." And she still agreed with Love—and many other Republicans—that Obamacare should be repealed. Hadley seemed unaware of the myriad ways in which the law was likely to help her. Diagnosed with MS at 32, Hadley is now 55 and occasionally has to use a wheelchair for long trips. She works as a receptionist for a medical company earning $13 an hour. She has two separate insurance plans to meet her health care needs, one through her employer and one through her husband's. But before Obamacare, her illness put her at high risk of both losing her insurance and also becoming uninsurable, one of the reasons the National Multiple Sclerosis Society supported the law. Thanks to Obamacare, Hadley is now protected from those fates since insurance companies are required to cover everyone, no matter how sick. The new law may also reduce Hadley's out-of-pocket health care costs significantly. Her insurance covers the $46,000-a-year drug that keeps her healthy, but often requires $700 to $800 a month in co-pays. That one drug often eats up much of her paycheck. Once Obamacare is fully implemented in 2014, though, Hadley could benefit from a new cap on out-of-pocket expenses in all insurance plans offered on the individual market or in small group plans. The cap is based on a sliding scale depending on income, but still means that in such plans, her maximum out-of-pocket costs would be no more than about $6,000 (excluding premiums). The provision could save Hadley at least $1,000 a year just based on the cost of a single drug she uses, and probably more. Moreover, depending on her income and the sort of insurance her employer and her husband's offer, she may be eligible to buy a single and much better insurance plan than the ones she presently has from a state exchange. By law, those plans will be required to cover a broader range of services than many existing insurance plans, including a host of therapeutic services that are often critical to people with MS. She might also qualify for a tax credit to offset the cost of the new premiums. Hadley, though didn't know any of this. She emailed me later to tell me she voted for Love, who would like to see all of these benefits eliminated. Hadley wasn't the only person I met that night in Salt Lake who was vehemently opposed to a law that would so obviously help her. Chelsea Woodruff is a state Republican Party delegate and candidate for the state Senate. Woodruff is an example of how the Republicans have persuaded white, working-class Americans continue to vote against their own economic interests, in this case with regard to health care. | ||
| Awara1984 Junior Artist Username: Awara1984 Post Number: 277 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 182.72.145.193 Rating: N/A |
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/americans-cluele ss-obamacare-affordable-care-act-obama Is this true? |
