| Author | Message | ||
     Pipeline Comedian Username: Pipeline Post Number: 1662 Registered: 05-2009 Posted From: 68.147.231.162 Rating: N/A |
Eellaki theleekapothe mana decoit batch daggara training theesukovalsindi, anavasramga book ayyaru | ||
| Pulpfiction Megastar Username: Pulpfiction Post Number: 20088 Registered: 02-2009 Posted From: 115.242.96.177 Rating: N/A |
 | ||
| Muddamandaram Hero Username: Muddamandaram Post Number: 12318 Registered: 05-2011 Posted From: 82.145.210.181 Rating: N/A |
ohhh. Okayyy http://imgur.com/Y4e0Y | ||
| Bharathi Comedian Username: Bharathi Post Number: 1369 Registered: 03-2012 Posted From: 124.123.216.174 Rating: N/A |
Yesterdayâs bluster has already given way to todayâs retreat. Barely hours after Subramanian Swamy went public with his allegations of financial impropriety and other assorted malpractices in the National Herald case, directly implicating Congress President Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul Gandhi, the Congress appeared momentarily to rise to his challenge. A letter purporting to be from âRahul Gandhiâs officeâ, issued on Thursday night, said he reserved the right to take legal action against Swamy for his âbaselessâ allegations. But barely 24 hours later, the Congress is already dialling back its rhetorical bravado. Rahul Gandhi doesnât actually have to file a defamation case against Swamy; his mere threat to file a case counts as adequate response, says Manish Tewari,} recently inducted into the Manmohan Singh ministry as reward for his past exertions as indefatigable party spokesperson. Other assorted Congress underlings have rustled up yet more inventive excuses for the partyâs reluctance to pick up the gauntlet thrown by Swamy. If anything, it is for Swamy to go to court to establish the verity of his allegations, they say, oblivious to the fact that Swamy has promised to do precisely that â after observing the due process of exhausting all other options, as the courts would want him to do. But in this case, silence may not prove golden for the Congress party. Its leaden-footed response whenever direct allegations are made against the First Family that presides over its destiny is creating a vacuum in the political space that gets filled, at least in the popular perception, with doubts and suspicions that the party has much to hide. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi have much to answer for. PTI Late on Friday, the Congress came out of its shell sufficiently long to address one of Swamyâs allegations: that the Congress had violated election laws governing the conduct of political parties by extending a loan of Rs 90 crore to Associated Journals, the company floated during the freedom struggle by Congress leaders (using public donations) to advance the cause of independence through the channel of National Herald and other newspapers. Congress General Secretary Janardan Dwivedi claimed in a press release that the Congress had âdone its dutyâ in supporting Associated Journals to âhelp initiate a process to bring the (National Herald) newspaper back to health in compliance with the law of the land.â This support, the release noted, âwas extended by the Indian National Congress in the form of interest-free loans from which no commercial profit has accrued to INC.â The Congress further sought to paint itself in glory for having extended the loan to Associated Journals. âIt is a matter of pride for the Indian National Congress that it has supported Associated Journals, publisher of the National Herald and other newspapers,â Dwivediâs press release said. The Congress, he added, had âdone its dutyâ in supporting Associated Journals to âhelp initiate a process to bring the newspaper back to health in compliance with the laws of the land.â Noble sentiments, doubtless, except that they are at variance with Rahul Gandhiâs own articulation (as channelled by his voice-throwing office) that the party had no plans whatsoever of relaunching National Herald or any other newspaper. The Pioneer reported earlier in October (here) that Rahul Gandhiâs office had clarified in an e-mail message that Young Indian, the Section 25 company that was floated with Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi as majority shareholders (and is at the centre of Swamyâs allegations), had no intention to relaunch any newspaper. The e-mail from Rahul Gandhiâs office reportedly observed: âYoung Indian is a company registered and holding a licence granted under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. As a Section 25 company, Young Indian, is a not-for-profit company and does not have commercial operations. The activities of the company are in the public domain. Anyone who chooses to can inspect the Objects of the Company. The company has no intention of starting any newspaper.â There is another inherent problem with the transactions that effectively ensured that prime real-estate offered to Associated Journals passed over to a private company in which Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi were majority shareholders. If Associated Journals, which was started with public donations, had become defunct, the land that it had secured (for the purposes of publishing newspapers) ought to have been returned. But Young Indian secured them for just Rs 50 lakh, and if what Swamy claimed at his press conference is true, is using the land to generate revenue by renting out the premises. It is too much to expect the Congress, which has already done one somersault, to launch an investigation into allegations of malpractices that lead to Sonia Gandhiâs doors. Such whimsical exercise of executive power is typically directed against Opposition leaders. However, there is a compelling case for the Election Commission, a Constitutional body, to investigate whether the Rs 90 crore loan that Congress has admitted it lent to Associated Journals violated any section of the Representation of the People Act. In addition, the Election Commission ought to investigate whether Rahul Gandhiâs alleged failure to disclose details his shareholdings in Young Indian, while filing his election affidavit in 2009, was in breach of election laws. The Congress is manifestly looking to brazen it out in the face of these allegations of wrongdoing that lead up to Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. But it has also sufficiently damned itself , which leaves open a window of opportunity for constitutional entities to at least initiate a preliminary enquiry into the allegations. If none of these happen, of course, there is always the final date in court that Swamy has promised the Congress. The last word on this sordid episode hasnât yet been said | ||
| Bharathi Comedian Username: Bharathi Post Number: 1368 Registered: 03-2012 Posted From: 124.123.216.174 Rating: N/A |
As if it was now Subramanian Swamy's turn for big expose, he said âThe deal is a sham, bogus, and a violation of several laws. It is a fraud committed in order to grab the Herald House in Delhi for just Rs. 50 Lacs, that is located in a hub and which is valued at about Rs. 1600 crores.â. 1.Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi had floated a Section 25 private company called Young Indian, and acquired the public limited company, the Associated Journals Ltd., which is the owner of National Herald and Quami Awaz Newspapers, and all high value real estate property in Delhi and other places in Uttar Pradesh of the said company. The deal is a sham, bogus, and a violation of several laws. It is a fraud committed in order to grab the Herald House in Delhi, that is located in a hub and which is valued at about Rs.1600 crores. 2.The first dubious fact of the AJ Company RoC details is that Jawahar Lal Nehru, Indira, Feroze Gandhi, GD Birla and other like noted deceased person, are shown as current shareholders! In fact 80 per cent of the original shareholders are no more alive So too many of the defunct firms, including several companies having dubious addresses in Kolkata, are shown as shareholders of the Associated Journals Ltd. 3.The second dubious fact is the acquisition of the associated Journals Ltld. Judging by documents filed with RoC it is wholly illegal. On February 26, 2011, the Board of AJ Pvt. Ltd. passed a Resolution approving that All India Congress Committee 9AICC) had loans to the Company unsecured and for zero interest rate to extinguish the liability of the company of more than Rs.90 crores. It is illegal for a political party to give loans to any company. The Resolution also resolved that in lieu of this deal with AICC, the Board decided to allot all AJâs nine crore shares, of Rs.10 each to Young Indian, the private company of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, where both together more than three fourths of the total shares and fully control the said Young Indian Company. 4.The third dubious fact is that Young Indian filed statements with the RoC disclosing that the shareholders meeting was held in Sonia Gandhiâs Government allotted 10, Janpath. This is violation of the law since the 10, Janpath, New Delhi Government accommodation cannot be used for commercial purposes and business. 5.The fourth dubious fact is that the Rs.90 crore liability of The associated Journals was owned by Young Indian for a mere Rs.50 lakhs! 6.Thus the deal was to grab the Rs.1600 crore worth Herald House and other properties of the National Herald/Quami Awaz in Delhi and in different part of UP for a commitment to pay Rs.50 lakh to AICC for the Rs.90 crores advanced as unsecured zero interest loan. 7.Therefore, I urge immediate institution of a SFIO/CBI probe into this dubious stinking deal between Young Indian and The Associated Journals as also the illegality of the AICC in giving a loan to a private company in reckless cronyism since the AICC President is Ms. Sonia Gandhi and General Secretary Rahul Gandhi who are also owners of Young Indian, the beneficiary. More curiously, the associated Journals Ltd.âs Chairman Shri Motilal Vore is also the Treasurer of the AICC! I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ON THIS .some one good in legal aspects or company affairs or who have some knowledge on these can answer 1) AICC gave 90 cr loan to ASSOCIATED JOURNAL A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY .so why did AJ transfer 9 cr shares each worth 10 rs to YOUNG INDIAN a non profitable company if congress party gave loan and if AJ could,nt pay it it should transfer it 9 cr shares to congress party ..but not a YOUNG INDIAN company in which sonia and rahul hold three fourth equity 2) how could young indian company settle this loan by giving 50 lakhs to AICC ..SO FOR 90 CR LOAN AICC ACCEPTED 50 LAKHS AND SETTLED IT.NOW ALL 9 CR SHARES ARE OWNED BY YOUNG INDIAN company and with that 1600 cr property 3) YOUNG INDIA lent AJ building to govt and getting rent from govt ..HOW R TEHY DOING IT WHEN AJ buildings are supposedly only to be used for publication and not to be used commercially SUBBU SIR ia a great litigant with 95% success rate.he might have done a lot of homeworl already.SO RAHUL BUDDHA WHO SAID DEFAMATION SUITE now backed off lol lol lol so if u violate tax laws and companies act what punishment will be there i.e can tehy be punished criminally ??? please answer |
