| Author | Message | ||
     Jawmetri Comedian Username: Jawmetri Post Number: 1581 Registered: 12-2009 Posted From: 49.204.37.247 Rating: N/A |
best bribe will get you contract. this judgement is shameful. if it is a resource, it is very simple, it must be kept for auction. if it is works, then that is a different matter | ||
| Ballasticmissile Comedian Username: Ballasticmissile Post Number: 1038 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 125.99.197.136 Rating: N/A |
naa opinion veru annai....ippudu policy prakaram land allocations for industries lo 33% reserved , next preferance for lady+technocrat next preferance for lady same bank loan policy's kuda unnatu unnai for giving loans .... ee policy's valla manam kotta industrialists tayaru avutarante neenu support chesta lady industrialists,lady bar owners,lady mining mafia etc  Pawan || YSR|| Indira|| Adi-shankaracharya ||Cleopatra | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 8933 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 125.22.249.81 Rating: N/A |
you will understand the problem with this judgment soon. Many thieves will escape .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda Amra Morbo, Jagat Jagbe (We shall die to awaken the nation) - Bagha Jatin | ||
| Ballasticmissile Comedian Username: Ballasticmissile Post Number: 1037 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 125.99.197.136 Rating: N/A |
annai annitiki auctions veste only ambanis,birla group,vendanta groups,tatas,etc will get all resources so differant policies must be there for allocation of resource exploitation.. Pawan || YSR|| Indira|| Adi-shankaracharya ||Cleopatra | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 8931 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 125.22.249.81 Rating: N/A |
I think this is a very bad judgment .. specially in the era we are .. and the corruption cases we have seen .. Going forward govt will use this judgment to say that 2G, CoalGate etc allocations are not wrong and there is no corruption involved .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda Amra Morbo, Jagat Jagbe (We shall die to awaken the nation) - Bagha Jatin | ||
| Ballasticmissile Comedian Username: Ballasticmissile Post Number: 1034 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 125.99.197.136 Rating: N/A |
New Delhi: The Supreme Court today clarified that it does not believe that all national resources must be auctioned -the opinion, delivered by five judges, provides relief for the government, partly because it accepts that the government has the right to decide policy, and also because it emphasised that "maximisation of revenue...can't be the sole criteria in all situations and circumstances." The judges said "which policy is best is the wisdom of the executive, since the judiciary doesn't have the expertise to decide which method is suitable for disposal of a particular natural resource." The Supreme Court has, however, said that it agrees that spectrum or airwaves for mobile network licences must be auctioned - a point the government has already accepted. The country's two largest swindles, according to the national auditor or CAG, were enabled because the government did not auction spectrum and coal fields. The government has been arguing that a competitive bidding process would have led to increased costs which would have adversely impacted consumers and the industry. The Supreme Court appears today to have accepted that point of view. "Merely because there is scope for potential abuse of the process, the policy of auction can't be declared as the only route for disposal of natural resources," the judges opined. In February this year, the court cancelled 122 telecom licenses issued by former minister A Raja in 2008 on the basis of a first-come-first-serve policy which he allegedly manipulated. In its landmark judgement, the court said that a get-in-line policy was fundamentally flawed because it favours those "with access to the corridors of power" and that all natural resources must be auctioned by the government. The government then asked for a Presidential reference -it sought a clarification from the Supreme Court on whether its stand on an auction, as expressed in the telecom or 2G verdict, applies to other national resources. The Supreme Court's opinion today is not binding on the government, or on other courts, but will have a persuasive effect on their judgements.  Pawan || YSR|| Indira|| Adi-shankaracharya ||Cleopatra |
