| Author | Message | ||
     Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4668 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.27 Rating: N/A |
Yes I agree with individual responsibility. In this case she the wife behaved irrresponsibly. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6826 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
 dhudgha direct gaa kakkaleka itlaa chidathalu vaayinchadam aindhaaniki kaani dhaanikiprajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 14507 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
 endho manaki nacchakapothe adhi morally ethically chemically wrong ani oka statement ettestharu... | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10791 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
 Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6825 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
 idhi baatam line. widows remarry chesukovadam valla mana samskruthi sampradaayam naashanam aipotunnayi. telugu cinema sangeetam chachipotundhiprajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 14505 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
| ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 14504 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
it is the responsibility of person to take care of elder parents/ inlaws etc etc. It is an individual decision to be made not the society.
there is no social rule that states a woman should get the job after the death of her husband. but there is a govt policy that gives a job to the widowed spouse. Mind you there is no law that makes a private company give a job to the deceased's wife. You are confusing the responsibility of the state with that of an individual. | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4667 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.15 Rating: N/A |
Abbbo new life by kicking out the in laws aa. Kiki bagundi. Okati kakunte 10 times cheskomanu I won't object. Compassionate govt choopinchindi govt. But eeeme chhhopinchaledu m in law ki . Ethically morallly it's wrong, technically remarrying is right. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10790 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Rayalaseema behind, Telangana competed with kosta ki separate state ki support, or opposition ki relation enti. Konchem vaadu... Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4666 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.27 Rating: N/A |
Ipc ikkada point dil mil ni choodatledu. I am fine. society Rules lo ledhu anta chooodali ani. Gooood. Mari aameki job ivvali ani undhaaa aaa society rules lo. Answer me. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 14503 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
how will kids get the benefits when their mother has lost the job. Do u think the salary from the job is kept by the wife and the kids don't have any benefit from it. I think you have a problem with women remarrying and trying to start a new life. | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4665 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.28 Rating: N/A |
Ipc stop it. Kids willl gets benifits. I am discussing here wife who got remarried and enjoying the job. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4664 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.28 Rating: N/A |
It is also about legal sanctity of she getting a job. The govt did mistake by giving it even though not legally entitled. I am fine dil need not see m in law. All I am saying is return the job and recover the entire salary. Pay her pension. Adjust the accounts balance. Now tomorow don't blame me if 2 nd hubby divorces her becoause he married her becoz she's on job. Kiki neeke kaadu naaaku koooda vaccchu querrrry cheyyadam kiki My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 14502 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
then who will take care of the dead jawan's kids's....Do u expect the step father to take care of somebpdy's kids... the dead jawan has the right to get benefits for his kids....why are u so focused on the wife getting remarried? are you paying her pension to be a widow or what? | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6824 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
right. but this already happened. you can't change that. no grateful soul is worried about how over compensated war widows are. the case is not about her getting the job. it is about ex D-I-L's legal obligation towards her ex M-I-L
i already told you constitution does not bother with these details. it would be a million pages long if it did. without that basic knowledge you are trying to bring in the constitution. prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4663 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.32 Rating: N/A |
War widows gets benifits like lifelong pension, subsidy in travel etc. Née drustilo cut throat cheppali antey YES NO JOBS to them. Instead that position must be filled by Recruiting Another JAwaan. So simpulu. Appudu née family responsibilities remarriage m in law issues sodhi Loki kooooda raaaaavu. Kiki and don't forget to add that if she remarries pension should also be stopppped. Constitution bujjja, akkada ilanti rules emi levu bujjjjaaaaa. Composanioate anta composaionate . Kikikiki My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6823 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
parents kaa ? those are the "benefits" they offered when her husband took up the job. are you saying war widows don't deserve a job ? prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4342 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
ikkada cheppedhi okkate ame living expenses kindha entho kontha iste first nundi . lekapothe kontha dabbulu icchi inka niku naku sambandham ledhu ani settle chesukovatam lantidhi cheste pani ayipoyedhi. they both probably fought ego clashes pakakna janalu kuda head ache endhuku lets move on ani cheppinavallu kuda undi undaru. anyways its not about who is right or who is wrong. jsut musalavida living ki ibbandhi kalagakapothe who cares about rest. kaligindho ledho kuda manaki telidhu. manamedho okka chinna news item chusi ikkada guddalu chimpukontunnamu | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4662 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.28 Rating: N/A |
Telivi takkuva sanman. Crpf gives pension . Basic knowledge ledhu née metta burra. Kiki Why give jobbbbbb. Pension undi kada saaami. Kiki My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4661 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.28 Rating: N/A |
kiki athirst telivi meeke kaadu naaku undi. Please return that job to govt. Kiki services Ila icchukuntu pothey andariki iyyali or no one. Compassionate ani Aaambekar constitution lo ledhu. Kiki she got that by mistake. Govt should recovery. I am fine if she doesn't care her m in law. Recovery cheyyandeheyyy kiki kiki Kiki My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6822 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
nobody is saying the old lady doesn't need help. everyone is targeting the widow because they act like giving a job to her is a favor and she is not entitled to her salary. nelanthaa kastapadi dabbu sampaadinchedi aame. maajeee atta gaariki bharanam anedhi kottha pokada prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4341 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
adhe nenu kinda cheppindhi. ameki child support laga kontha vellinatlayithe set ayyedhi. kani ala cheyaledhu. manaki conditions mottam teliyavu kadha asalu em jarigindhi ani. avi teliyakunda manam entha kottukonna upayopgam ledhu. i am sure her lawyer and musalavida lawyer presented the case to judge. and judge thought musalavida's argument is right. he passed this judgement. kinda nenu vesina first post lo asalu legal issue angle lo veyaledhu. general angle lo oka thalli responsiblity kodukudhi aa koduku chanipoyadu . aa koduku job kodaliki vacchindhi kodalu musalameni pattinchukoledhu. first look at it naku anipinchindhi kodalu wrong. kodalu should have paid some or made sure atta taken care of some how anipinchindhi cheppanu anthe. legal issues judge chusukoni untadu | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6821 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
aithe aa musalaavida ki pension kudaa ivvalsindhi kadha. paapam aa kodali bathuku aame batukutundhi. job vachindi husband duty lo povadam valla. musalaavidani support cheyamani ivvaledhu. job contract lo remarriage clauses levu . avi unte aameni emaina anochu prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6820 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
nee ishtam annai pandaga chesuko constitution does not direct the daily activities of people or govt. its purpose is to 1) give fundamental rights to citizens 2) direct as a policy guide for formation of country by states military lo chanipoina kutumbaala parihaaram gurinchi kids responsibilities towards parents gurinchi constitution lo undhi ani cheppi tharvaatha theyiyadhu anadam lone ardham autundhi mana avagaahana prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4340 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
http://www.loksatta.org/cms/documents/skc.pdf idhi loksatta srikrishna committee ki submit chesina report. chadhuvu . naku mottam chadhive opika ledhu. chadhivi cheppu if lokasatta supported telangana or not ani. lok satta submit chesina report lo. thanu icchina tables varaku chusa. ye table lo chusina rayalaseema behind . telangana competed with kostha. nadhi distortion ayithe telangana loksatta endhuku form avvalsi vacchindho mari naku telidhu. | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10789 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Needi observation kaadu, distortion of facts. Thappadu criminals ni support cheyali ante distortion of facts okkate margam. Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10788 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Ninna money in election gurichi topic etharu. If you have the patience...watch this video in full. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=FqkftS 66Ma8 Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4339 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
andhariki nila full knowledge undadhu kadha annai. ante ippudu emantavu. jp telangana ki first nundi yes annadu antavu. ayina telangana loksatta ani thenchukoni oorike vellaru antavu. ok niku jp manchivadu ayinantha matrana andharni manchi vadu anamante etla. evari observation tho vallu abhiprayam erparuchukontaru. u r entitled urs. i am entitled to mine | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30103 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
Forgot to mention.... Good Job , High Court. | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4659 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.24 Rating: |
Ok. How is it. Her job is illegal and govt commuted a illegal step of awarding a job who died in service. Crpf manual lo it's not thier responsibity for death, u are ready to die voluntary ani clause untundi. Wife got the job illegal. Nowhere in constitution passs on a husband job to wife. She must be fired and 17 yrs salary recovery should happen. Sanman sammaga undha kiki My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10787 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
2010 lo TRS vallu kottindi T ki Yes/No ane issue meeda? It is about upholding the law of the land. Not supporting gundaism in the name of an agitation. Chippa koodu batch ki support cheskovali ante chesko, kaani daani kosam half knowledge tho JP meeda judgementlu ivvaku. Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4338 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
prakatinchukonnaka kuda madama thipputhadu . what did u expect. indian political system and honesty and ethics dont go together. ala nuvvu undali anukonte u just looking for it in ur back yard even though u know u lost it out on the street. inka jp telangana pai tune marchaledhu ante nenu em chepthanu annai. naku alane anipinchindhi. niku anipinchaka pothe its up to u. 2010 lo trs vallu assembly andhari mundhu kottaru . ippudemo telnagana iste naku abhyantharam ledhu antunnadu. jp is 100% better than jagan i agree with u aswell. but athanni cm seat lo chudatam anedhi practical kadhu na dhrustilo i stay away from it. u can stick to ur principle. | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10786 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Go watch the 2 videos posted in your I dont have problem with YSR thread. Looks like Guj is a perfect example of centralized Govt. Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4337 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
adhe question enni salru aduguthavu annai. ikkada point asalu responsiblities of son or daughter in law kane kadhu. ikkada point ameki vacchina job athanidhi. aa musalame bathuku theruvu kuda athani job .point akkada adhi. ame job just thana sonthaga thecchukonnadhi ayithe she has no responsiblity like u said. ika constitution chupinchamante already cheppa nenu niku telenu. oka high court judge law lo lenidhi thisukocchi order vesadu ani nenu anukonu. nuvvu ayana own agenda set chesadu ante nenmi cheppalenu | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10785 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
This is even worse. Thoo...intha siggu leni thananni ekkada choodala. Election ki naa mogunni champesaru ani edupulu. 14 seats raagane media mundu navvulu. YSR must be either very happy that his family has learnt his tricks of the trade so well, or he must be crying in his grave. Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10784 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Dude stop the BS. JP eppudu memu Sonia, UPA meeda madama thippakund poradutamu ani prakatinchukola.
Neeku teliyakapothe judgements ivvaku. Changing tune enti, 2009 lo em cheppado T gurinchi ippudu ade cheptunnadu. Chee aina prajala sommu dobbi chippa koodu tintunna Jagan tho JP ki comparison enti. Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4336 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
iea thread enti ni ragam enti. ayina adigavu kabatti answer chepthunna. ie db lo evarnayina adugu nenu jagan pranab ki support chestadu ani munde cheppa. nenu akkada cheppindhi jp thappu chesthunnadu ani kadhu. jp doing same thing what jagan doing , cbn doing or congress doing. changing his tune on telangana just like political parties. and supporting upa in central etc. nenu he is completely like a political party ani cheppala. he is showing signs like a political party ani cheppa. | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10783 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
If she was a part of that family enti. Indian culture lo pelli aithe part of the family ye. Divorce theeskunda before death, ledu kada? Bcoz she got the husband's job, I don't think it is wrong to say that she is bound to support the MIL. This is even more valid if the MIL was dependent on the husband before his death. India lo parents kodukki education/job kosam valla aastulu, retirements anni pedatharu without blinking an eye. Parents ala cheyali ani ye law lo lede. Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6819 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
adhokkate kaadhu vijayamma gaaru bhartha mruthi midha anumaanaalu unnaai annaaru. ante HC ne kadha. mallee vaalla candidate ke support. anumaanaalu mottam teerinai anukunta. fucxing drama artists prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6818 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
aunu adhe chupinchamani adugutunna constitution lo responsibilities of son/daughter in law towards parents/in laws prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10782 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Monna Pranab presidency ki support iste JP UPA tho chetulu kalipadu. Supports central Govt ani edo annaru.. Mari ippudu Jagan chestunnadi enti? Aluperugani poratam, thippani madama 360 degrees turn teeskunnaya? Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6817 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
show me where i said anything about US... yes. irrespective of whether or not she got husband's job i would say it is, if she was part of that family. but now she is the ex mother in law. maajee attanu life long chusukovaali ani ae shaastraallo undho chupisthe santhoshistaam prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4335 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
enti anani thappu matladana. already cheppaga may be i am wrong ani | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10781 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
 Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4334 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.83.248 Rating: N/A |
there is constitutional law and administrative law. in this issue we talking about rights of mother of a deceased person. rights anevi constitutional law kindhaki vastayi. not administrative law. andhukani constitution annanu. may be i am wrong . nenu law chadhavaledhu kadha. naku telisisna half knowledge tho chepthunna . like i said may be i am wrong | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30102 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
over population thread mentioned for ...individual's responsibility blah blah blah. when it not the govt's responsibility to provide you a job in the first place, then where is the question of whether they are providing adequate salary or not? ani kavi baavam. re-marry tharuvaatha benefits undav anukunta, i am not sure . | ||
| Indiarocks Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 10779 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 184.155.119.232 Rating: N/A |
Ilanti laws society, culture batti change authayi. US lo 18 taruvatha parents daggara undaru. Parents rarely expect kids to financially support them. Ilantivi India lo kudaravu. US culture teeskochi India ki apply cheste ela? Btw, I am not commenting on whether 50% salary to the MIL is correct or not. But if the MIL was also a dependent on the son's job before his death, if the DIL got the job, is it not her resp to continue the status quo, that is continue supporting the MIL? Conquas(3609) about CBI arresting Jagan: TDP allegations chesindhi... vallu icchina evidence ee kadha cbi vallu teesukundhi.. What is JP doing for Kukatpally? | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6816 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
its a contract between govt and the employees. they don't have to do it. they are doing it. if they felt the parents deserved pension, they would have added it. they didnt. pension benefits spouse ki isthaaru. parents ki kaadhu. deeniki kuda population ae kaaranam ante em cheppalem add that clause to the job terms. don't tell her how to spend her hard earned money prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4658 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 198.228.200.21 Rating: N/A |
Sanman sodhi aapu. Crpf is a high risk profile. Akkada deaths authu unte jobs icchukunta pothaara endhi. Nuvvu née comedies. The girl did wrong by remarrying and still enjoying job she got on compassionate grounds. Mother ki icchunte sweeper ga annna cheskunedhi job and she would have got pension also thru out. Remarry cheskunevallu ammai ki inka old job enduku bujjjaaaa My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30096 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
Kani, penchi, peddha chesina thalli ki...koduku chani pogaanay....all rights gone. Ninna gaaka monna vacchina spouse ki...life long rights, can marry dozen times and get benefits on the way. Kevvu Keka Prapancham. | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30095 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
you answer it. That was your logic yesterday, in the over population thread. ki ki | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6814 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
 constitution ekkada vachindi sami indhulo thammudu younger aithe thammudiki isthaara. bhale cheptarayya. benefits apply to wife and kids. not to entire blood relations. law lo. constitution lo kaadhu. ya i agree if there were conditions before taking up the job and she accepted those thats a different issue. now the court is just trying to force a moral obligation on her prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4333 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
constitution rase time ki remarriage lu ilanti situation levu kadha. unna situation prakaram family lo okariki job istamu. aa job evaru thisukontaru ante usual ga younger person thisukontaru fmaily lo. since older person job retire avvalsi vasthundhi kabatti. aa job midha andaru bahtakela undali. ame musalametho edho oka settlement chesukoni undalsindhi remarriage chesukoni velletappudu . appudu ie problems undevi kadhu. asalu pattinchukokapovadam valla ippudu pedda debbba padetatlu undhi. tharuvathanna govt constitution lo correction cheyyalsindhi . ikkada child support lekka automatic ga pay check lo kontha cut ayyi velletlu parentski . | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6813 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
did the court also tell her to share 50% of this woman's responsibilities ? how is it justified that someone works day in day out and pays 50% to someone who she is not related to anymore ? if govt wanted the parents to be supported, they should have added a parents pension besides widow benefits. clearly no such conditions exist prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6812 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
i agree it is a moral obligation. but it is up to her whether or not to exercise that judgment. for that matter i don't even think courts should interfere where kids dont take care of their parents. because we don't know the circumstances of each family. here your mental notes are tingling because you see a helpless old woman. your heart tells you she should not be left helpless. and you are trying to pacify your moral obligation mentally by forcing the care on an ex daughter in law. these are human relations that are complex. we don't know the status of the daughter in law. what if she has ailing kid and the money that they make is not even enough for their own maintenance and medical care ? what if the woman who survived 17 years is just trying to settle an old score and she doesnt even need the money ? prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4331 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
annai. ame own ga thecchukonna job ayithe she is not responsible . ame own ga vacchina job kadhu husband death thoti vacchina job. aa job tho husband midha depend ayina vallandharu living cheyyali. aa prakaram she is responsible for old lady living constitution lo ekkadundho chupiyyamnai adigithe. niku indian constitution ni nenu thecchivallenu. court lu anevi unnadhi constitution ni apply cheyyataniki. aa judge aa musalamma ki constitution lo lekunda dabbulivvu ani ameki cheppi undadu. since he should follow the constitution. musalamma emayipoyina naku anavasaram ani nuvvu nenu daughter in law anukonna. court lo judge anukoledhu. aame follow kavalsindhi ippudu. supreme court kelli stay thecchukovacchu ofcourse. most likely musalmma chanipoyedhaka ie legal battle continue authundhi. that lady never might have to pay musalamma. inko vishayam court not telling her how to spend her pay. court telling her ni pay lo kontha bagam dont belong to u . belong to musalamma ani chepthundhi. ie badhalu anni endhuku anukonte mogudu chanipoyaka udhyogam thisukokunda dabbulu thisukonunte evari bagam vallu panchukonte probleme undedhi kadhu | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6811 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
kiki then why are they doing it ? we are not talking about responsibilities of govt. she got the job and we are talking here about a society should make her spend her income prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30094 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
if you dont enjoy...resign. why should i know the salaries of soldiers and why i care how much government pays? It is not the responsibility of govt to provide you job and pay as much as you want. It is the responsibility of citizens to get the job. If you dont get the job, stay hungry. Government and army can only provide that much salary. | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6809 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
right. thats what people. they "enjoy" jobs. thats why they paid. so they can enjoooooy the job. she probably slaves her ass off to get paid a meager 1000 to 2000 rs. if you know the salaries of soldiers you will know what kind of job their spouses get. prathi odu constitution anadame. ekkada undho chupinchu constitution lo idhanthaa idhi inko bokka. ae govt job lonu idhi undadhu. mana head lo unnavi anni constitution lo govt lo unnai anukunte ilaage untadhi prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4656 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
composannate condiotns ki POOR is also a condition. imagine if husbands family was rich and he had enough property or business to take care for, then crpf would have not offered JOB As composaionate grounds. just pension teeskondi ani cheppi vadilestharu. it is this poorness, taken into consideration, for that job. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Gandhiguevara Legend Username: Gandhiguevara Post Number: 31903 Registered: 10-2009 Posted From: 98.197.251.182 Rating: N/A |
ask her to remarry A...both will be rich and happy | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4655 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
Lol... even an army man gets a 1 time chance only as Ex-service man quota for 1 time govt job. he cannot use it multiple times to join resign, and re joiin as ex-serviceman quota. Alimony edho bhale undi..... minting free money... My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4654 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
constituion marcha mantava endhi... if re-married special pension will be stopped. adhi rule position clear. but job peekeyaadam gurinchi undadu, becoz job ivvatam anedhi RULE kaadu. on special grounds Job iccharu. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30093 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
how this works in the world? a woman married Husband A, then divorced. getting alimony she married Husband B, then divorced. getting alimony she married Husband C, then divorced. getting alimony When she marries Husband D... will she continue to get alimony from ex husbands A, B and C ? or will she get zero dollars from A, B and C ? | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30091 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
This is year 2012 17 yrs, she enjoyed the hubby's job. even if it was not immediate...atleast 12 yrs for sure anukuntunnaa. | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6808 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
right. the army can do that if thats what they mean. even now if she resigns she still has to pay 50k which she may not even have. why not ? if thats what it meant dont you think they would have added that clause ? you don't pay someone for their work and also tell them what to do with their pay prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4653 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
yes agreed. she would have to resign as she got under compassionate grounds. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4652 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
compassionate grounds ante ento telusa tamariki... suppose if she doesnt takeup that job, special PENSION(pinchanu) vachi undedi upto 65 years (husbands last emoluments). BUTTT RE-Marriage cheskunte, aa special provision kindha vacche pension aagipoyedhi. so she took up job, and re-married, but job peekeyyaleru kada.... adhanna maata.. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4651 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
athi telivi vaadithe etttaaaa... adhi govt job. refuses to do aithe, retd prakatinchi 50% teeskupotharu malla court petetion esi... rendo okkkate kada,,,, My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4320 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
aa place lo nenu unte i would have wanted my wife to give some moeny to my parents if the money she got was from me or life insurance or 401 k or job compensation from my work place. adhe i didnt give her none then she is nto responsible for my parents . aa angle lo ne cheppanu. andhuke how u feel ani adiganu. nothing personal | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30090 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
then... the moment she got married again...she is no longer a widow and no longer needs that job. Resign the job and dont pay MIL. | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6806 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
aa place lo nuvvunte ani cheppali ani try chestunnaaru kaani end of that route will not be pleasant so better not go there on the contrary i feel it is harder for a woman to support an ex M-I-L in Indian setting. Imagine the reaction from her current husband and in laws if she wants to bring an ex MIL in the house to live or send an amount monthly yes SC also put responsibility of parents on kids in India in the past. but this is not her child. the bond between the two women is broken when the husband died. i dont agree with both the points of the judgment 1) lifelong obligation to ex M-I_L 2) Assumption that her salary isnt earning of her work that month, but how she got the job 20 years ago. who is to say she wouldn't have gotten a better job or bigger income source had she not gotten this job prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 30083 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
ikkada brothers ki...prathidheee american law/western law ni, bench mark gaa theesukoni argue cheyyadam alavaatu. Indian Judgement partially karrestay anukuntunna. Half of the money antay ekkuvay emo, but MIL getting some share is right, as per the Indian law. your case is as good as your attorney's strength. USA lo, 18 yrs dhaatagaanay....kid evado, parents evaro. That is not the case in Indian law. | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4280 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
ayina nenu ninnu question adigithe ni question ki answer tharuvatha cheptha na question ki nuvvu answer chey anavalasina avasaram emundhi. what do u feel ani direct ga cheppavacchuga | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4274 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
yes | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4273 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
ilanti judgements this is not first time. yes as far as i know for the police to indict somebody and take em to court . there have to be some sections mentioned. | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6805 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
we will get to that soon. let me ask you this. are you married ? prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Pavala Hero Username: Pavala Post Number: 15849 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 85.80.227.204 Rating: N/A |
sanam tamud case poorvaparaal theliyakunda nee judgement enti ikkada? RE value seems to be very high in any other city , 3 bedroom apartments are 50 lakhs and above in B grade places like gunutur vijayawada - Xxx | ||
| Eluri_kurradu Hero Username: Eluri_kurradu Post Number: 16042 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 173.29.143.135 Rating: N/A |
law untene file cheyyali ane rule ledu .. some times judgement law avuddi for future reference | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4271 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
us lo nuvvu cheppindhi 100% correct bro. india lo most cases lo law is based on our culture. like i said already one month back mother complained to police on collector they filed fir on him. if there was no law they wudnt file fir kadha | ||
| Eluri_kurradu Hero Username: Eluri_kurradu Post Number: 16040 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 173.29.143.135 Rating: N/A |
responcibility is different from law tammudu ade septunnam actually futurelo mana gurinchi manam alochinchukovali retirement schems meeda ekkuva invest cheyyali specially medicare etc etc. | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4270 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
constitution thisis pakkana pettu. i ask u one simple question if ur parents need to be looked after do u think its ur responsiblity or its not? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4269 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
doubt emundhi. koduku job kodaliki vellindhi. clear gane undhi ga | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6804 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
right to life is different from right to living yes. but not ex daughter in law's family. even the sisters and brothers are part of his family. she has no obligation to any of them. oka line chupinchu constitution lo prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5838 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
idi kuda doubtful ee .. donno exactly wat the family law says .. but i guess .. she will have some responsibility if the lady does not have any other support .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5837 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
we dont know the complete story .. but i am assuming .. she doesnt have any support .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5836 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
Indian parents have a right to life .. and are part of the son's family .. and how did she survive ante .. we dont know .. and yes .. the lady has rights to her deceased hubby's property .. parents ki kuda rights unnayi .. they are defined as per the constitution .. patriarchal society ani cheedarinchukovachu .. but thats the fact .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Eluri_kurradu Hero Username: Eluri_kurradu Post Number: 16036 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 173.29.143.135 Rating: N/A |
ivi kaaadu le kargil war time lone chala godavalu ayyayi chanipoina soldiers compensation gurinchi | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4267 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
akkada ex in law ki kadhu point. aa job vacchindhi ameki koduku chanipovatam valla. akkada point adhi. ame job thana own ga vacchina job ayithe. she wudnt have been responsible | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 14486 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
aa Mom-in-law ki inka ye sons daughters lera support cheyyataniki....also 50% of salary is too much | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4266 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
bayya. india lo kuda us laga 14 nunde kids start working. 18 ki out of the house ayithe nuvvannatlu kids dont have to take care of parents . kani india lo vallu mana rear kindha 30 vacchinakayina manaki job lekapoithe chusukontaru. so manaki job vacchaka vallani chusukovali no questions should be asked. | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5835 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
bhayya .. aa lady place lo mogaadu unte .. court tana thadaaka chupinchedi .. adi nenu antunnadi .. papam .. that old lady .. i donno how she survived without an income for 17 years .. ee ex-d-i-l munde aavidaki ye 20% of the salary no ichesthe .. bagundedi gaa .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6802 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
idhi ekkada law kamalai ex in laws ki obligation ? ya if she didnt remarry its a different story but now she has 4 in laws to support ? how did the old lady survive 17 years ? obviously she has a job or support from someone else. someone filled her ears about the d-i-l getting a job because of late husband. technically she should his property too if he has acquired any during his life. afaik mother and kids have rights to a man's earnings not his parents prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Eluri_kurradu Hero Username: Eluri_kurradu Post Number: 16033 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 173.29.143.135 Rating: N/A |
chala chotla tallii kodallaki padadu aa godavalu enduku ani kodukulu mothers ni avoid chestaru. chala cases chusa ... marutunna kalamto rules marali | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5834 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
legally aithe .. case pettachu .. kaani most outraged Indian parents dont go to courts against their kids .. they just suffer through the ignominy ..
entha daarunam chudu .. oka helpless woman ni aa age lo as if there is no relation vadileyyadam .. ee d-i-l ki compassionate grounds meeda vachinaa udyogam jeetam lo .. attagari meeda compassion matram ledu!!! India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4263 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
absolutely indian constitution prakaram veyavacchu. even last month oka mother collector midha vesindhi. | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4262 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
bayya u have to look at from dauther in law side too. she the one done all the work. living expenses ki first nundi entho kontha icchinatlayithe age ni batti( ante mom in law work condition lo unnappudud less lenappudu little more ) asalu probleme ledhu. ame ala cheyaledhu daniki 50% anedhi already good punishment she makes 50% of salary with out working. | ||
| Eluri_kurradu Hero Username: Eluri_kurradu Post Number: 16031 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 173.29.143.135 Rating: N/A |
what if the women refuses to do the job ??? judgement lo tappu undi aame kashtapadite aame family ki ichukuntundi ... asala kodukule tallulnii pattinchukoni kalam lo endo ee patha chintakaya judgment ee lekkana tallulu kodukula meeda case veyyocha mammalni chusukovatledu ani case ettocha? | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4261 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
nobody talkign about her remarriage. she can do whatever she want with her life. remarriage is best for her. its kids responsiblity to take care of parents. and he died. his job has to be able to feed her . daughter in law didnt even have to take care of her. just some money for her living expenses would have been ok. but she didnt want to pay none. thats why punishment needed ani na abhiprayam. as tilak brother said u r enetitled to ur opinion ofcourse | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5832 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
you are entitled to imagine anything .. but his parents too are part of the family .. re-marriage meeda restrictions unnayani evadu cheppadu .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 6801 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: |
i don't agree with the judgment. there are no preconditions for a widow getting husband's job. i would imagine it is to support husband's wife and kids, not his parents. ya it would be nice if she did support them but she is not bound to them for the rest of her life. and she is not allowed to remarry because her husband died ? she got the job on compassionate grounds but she does not get the salary on compassionate grounds. she gets paid for the work she does. 50% of it has to go to her ex mother in law ? since when is it a woman's job to support ex mother in laws ? isnt it the job of her family (parents, siblings) to support her, not her ex daughter in law ? and remember this is the girl that brought in dowry, lost her husband in war, does all her household work, goes to a full time job, takes care of the kids, and has to attend to her husband. prajaa court - http://imgur.com/2Z3Kx | ||
| Tilak Side Hero Username: Tilak Post Number: 5822 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 101.63.134.168 Rating: N/A |
endi just 50% salary compensation chaala papam aa mom in law ki? darunam .. aalochinchu aa d-i-l place lo s-i-l aithe ee silly courts entha harsh ga punishment vestayo?? jail term kuda order chestayemo .. chass .. law and justice has become one-sided ..
super seppaav .. India must conquer the World and nothing less than that is my ideal - Swami Vivekananda | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4646 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
adhe cheptunna. musalamma great. koduku poyina 17 yrs brathaga kaligigindhi. mana useless UUTH batch, 5 days presssure ke tattukoleka, 2 days drugs teeskuni pubs lo eguruthunnaru... My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4230 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
17 years musalame kastapadinandhuku half anedhi punishment ga saripothundhi | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4644 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
1 view we see kodalu ni harass,champeyyadam 2nd view we see kodalu kicking out in-laws My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4643 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
yes ur right. rules lo prekaram aithe, mom ki koooda icchi undachu. but retirement tondarga vachesthundi ani, many prefer to pass this job onto wife or someone in 2nd generation. aame remarriage cheskuni vellindi bagane undi. but konchem money monthly icchi unte bagundedi. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ | ||
| Rock Side Hero Username: Rock Post Number: 4229 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 209.55.81.236 Rating: N/A |
good job judge. immediate ga ayithe enthokontha ayina saripoyedhi. 17 years ame kasta padalsi vacchinanaduku half salary is apt anukontunna | ||
| Netsaint Side Hero Username: Netsaint Post Number: 4641 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 24.127.230.135 Rating: N/A |
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/Give-half-sal ary-to-ex-mom-in-law-HC/articleshow/14873955.cms? JODHPUR: The high court, while disposing of a petition on Friday, ordered a woman to give half of her salary to her former mother-in-law. The court has also ordered her to pay a consolidated sum of Rs 50,000 as immediate relief to her mother-in-law. Petitioner Bhanwar Kanwar had filed a petition in the court that her son, who was employed with the CRPF, had died in October 1995. His wife Tej Kanwar got her husband's job after his death on compassionate grounds. But later on Tej remarried. In her petition, Bhanwar pleaded that since she has no source of income and her daughter-in-law had left her, half of her salary should be given to her for the rest of her life. Hearing the arguments, Justice Govind Mathur ordered Tej Kanwar to pay half of her salary to Bhanwar Kanwar on the 10th of every month and also ordered to pay a consolidated sum of Rs 50,000 to Bhnawar Kanwar as immediate relief. My Telugu Bhakthi Blog :http://gurugeetha.blogspot.com/ |
