| Author | Message | ||
     Jupiter Moderator Username: Jupiter Post Number: 7228 Registered: 05-2011 Rating: N/A |
contexts might be diff ... but there r several times i wanted to send such communication when people r f'ing aroud so openly .. but i have a job at stake and could not ... i liked his way of just sticking to the point that u can not break some thing and think u can give an excuse or two ... Maa cinema collection ATHYADHIKA kotlu .. maave genuince collections | ||
| Dreamcatcher Side Hero Username: Dreamcatcher Post Number: 2805 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 208.86.145.68 Rating: N/A |
He seems more interested in coming across as an a'hole than putting forward his point properly. There are better ways to communicate without using any of these choice words and still make your point. | ||
| Khandada Comedian Username: Khandada Post Number: 1365 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 64.79.135.151 Rating: N/A |
ee linus olu aa linus aa Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,Humpty Dumpty had a great fall | ||
| Emc2 Side Hero Username: Emc2 Post Number: 5663 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 199.107.16.132 Rating: N/A |
abbai oka mukkalo cheppu aa email ento.. cherapakura chedevu. | ||
| Jupiter Moderator Username: Jupiter Post Number: 7227 Registered: 05-2011 Rating: N/A |
deenemma corporate world lo .. management .. leadership .. naa L lo diplomacy and communication .. okka pali .. open source world lo etta untadho sudandi .. G lo acid posadu ... okka mail tho .. that should be crism, up to the point and accurate communication if u leave out the choice of the words ... ================================ From Linus Torvalds <> Date Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:40:26 -0800 Subject Re: [PATCH] sysfs: Optionally count subdirectories to support buggy applications On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: > > Keeping compatibility is easy enough that it looks like it is worth > doing, but maintaining 30+ years of backwards compatibility Stop right there. This is *not* about some arbitrary "30-year backwards compatibility". This is about your patch BREAKING EXISTING BINARIES. So stop the f*&^ing around already. The patch was shown to be broken, stop making excuses, and stop blathering. End of story. Binary compatibility is more important than *any* of your patches. If you continue to argue anything else or making excuses, I'm going to ask people to just ignore your patches entirely. Seriously. Binary compatibility is *so* important that I do not want to have anything to do with kernel developers who don't understand that importance. If you continue to pooh-pooh the issue, you only show yourself to be unreliable. Don't do it. Dammit, I'm continually surprised by the *idiots* out there that don't understand that binary compatibility is one of the absolute top priorities. The *only* reason for an OS kernel existing in the first place is to serve user-space. The kernel has no relevance on its own. Breaking existing binaries - and then not acknowledging how horribly bad that was - is just about the *worst* offense any kernel developer can do. Because that shows that they don't understand what the whole *point* of the kernel was after all. We're not masturbating around with some research project. We never were. Even when Linux was young, the whole and only point was to make a *usable* system. It's why it's not some crazy drug-induced microkernel or other random crazy thing. Really. Linus Maa cinema collection ATHYADHIKA kotlu .. maave genuince collections |
