| Author | Message | ||
     Pavala Hero Username: Pavala Post Number: 13855 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 85.80.227.204 Rating: N/A |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark  "Thatha title Viswav'ya nata.." topic lo: Akkada "Viswa" ante "Telugu prapancham" ani chaduvukovali. - New_user | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 4213 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
meedhi airopa naa. airopa lo ekkada | ||
| Pavala Hero Username: Pavala Post Number: 13854 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 85.80.227.204 Rating: N/A |
nuvvu maa europe ni etakaram sethunnav ani naaku theliyadh anukunnava?  "Thatha title Viswav'ya nata.." topic lo: Akkada "Viswa" ante "Telugu prapancham" ani chaduvukovali. - New_user | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 4212 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
emo annai ee madhya pedda follow katle news but as a general principle the need for obama to be a hero is costing US a lot. good news is other country policies are more stupid than US policies | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 4211 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
which means they did not have meaningful employment in their last job also. there is always a percentage of population that is looking for jobs - fresh graduates, layoffs, businesses tanking etc. to appeal to this group govt starts providing benefits by dipping into the capital pool that would have created more jobs more efficiently. change is a continuous process and only market is smart enough to deal with it, not bureaucrats. Think about it this way - if you were a politician or an economist during the time when automobiles came along, what would you do to save horse carriage driver jobs and blue collar jobs depending on horse carriage business how is the china challenge any different ? you are losing money in wages to foreign workers but you are also exporting at the same time that is called trade balance and a country's goal has to be to keep the difference as close to 0 as possible keeping the net result of its effect on jobs minimal | ||
| Pavala Hero Username: Pavala Post Number: 13851 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 85.80.227.204 Rating: N/A |
sanam tamud us economy sanka naakinchesi dollar ni endhuk leputhunnar...if possbl oka opin padey "Thatha title Viswav'ya nata.." topic lo: Akkada "Viswa" ante "Telugu prapancham" ani chaduvukovali. - New_user | ||
| Tenali_rk Side Hero Username: Tenali_rk Post Number: 5521 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 96.255.7.218 Rating: N/A |
Where do think the higher unemployment numbers are coming from...The high school educated or lesser educated whose jobs are shipped are the real losers. They cannot get a meaningful employment...hence dependent on Food stamps, Unemployment insurance....which is borne by the Tax payers... The economists also found that higher exposure to Chinese imports led to larger increases in unemployment insurance, food stamps, disability payments and other government benefits. Those add up to big losses, they said, because the higher taxes the government must collect to pay for benefits, and the way benefits reduce people's incentive to work, makes the economy less efficient. Rajesh Post, 33027: Apaartham chesukune aadadhi, Artham chesukoleni magaadu DB lo vunna okate, lekunna okate | ||
| Sanman Side Hero Username: Sanman Post Number: 4210 Registered: 08-2010 Posted From: 66.177.5.103 Rating: N/A |
the same report says imports from china as a share of total US spending is between 1 to 5% how many jobs is this 5% controlling even if you consider that the lost jobs are mostly blue collar jobs so the % may be higher but how about the jobs gained due to rearranged market efficiency towards better jobs in service,technology and innovation if some country is subsidizing something it is time for other countries to load up on that and focus their productivity in other areas some countries like US subsidize food production and some other countries like china subsidize labor if govt didnt interfere, this process of rearranging would happen naturally but because of politicians,media and some short sighted economists telling people they are "losing" those jobs, govt is forced to correct it ends up thwarting growth thus creating the real job loss | ||
| Tenali_rk Side Hero Username: Tenali_rk Post Number: 5516 Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 96.255.7.218 Rating: N/A |
Tallying the Toll of U.S.-China Trade For years, economists have told Americans worried that cheap Chinese imports will kill jobs that the benefits of trade with China far outweigh its costs. New research suggests the damage to the U.S. has been deeper than these economists have supposed. The study, conducted by a team of three economists, doesn't challenge the traditional view that trade is ultimately good for the economy. Workers who lose jobs do eventually find new work or retire, while the benefits from trade, such as lower prices, remain. The problem is the speed at which China has surged as an exporter, overwhelming the normal process of adaptation. The study rated every U.S. county for its manufacturers' exposure to competition from China, and found that regions most exposed to China tended not only to lose more manufacturing jobs, but also to see overall employment decline. Areas with higher exposure also had larger increases in workers receiving unemployment insurance, food stamps and disability payments. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020401060457659 5002230403020.html A Snap Shot in a Picture http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/NA-BN459B_USJob_G_ 20110926193304.jpg Rajesh Post, 33027: Apaartham chesukune aadadhi, Artham chesukoleni magaadu DB lo vunna okate, lekunna okate |
