| Author | Message | ||
     Subzero Side Hero Username: Subzero Post Number: 7059 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 59.93.69.89 Rating: N/A |
oh ! atleast konchem better | ||
| Subzero Side Hero Username: Subzero Post Number: 7052 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 59.93.67.34 Rating: N/A |
these % will reduce the quality drastically  Sad for us | ||
| Cyberabadsinnodu Comedian Username: Cyberabadsinnodu Post Number: 1005 Registered: 02-2010 Posted From: 68.206.116.251 Rating: N/A |
add the % for the Dept of Energy staff..  ఎంత చికాగో యునివర్సిటీ లో చదువుకున్నా చిలక్కొట్టుడికి సరైన ఇంగ్లీషు పదం దొరుకుతుందా..!! | ||
| Subzero Side Hero Username: Subzero Post Number: 7047 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 59.93.67.34 Rating: N/A |
 why cant we use solar power by placing photo voltaic cells over the sea ? wind power plants kooda pettochu coastal areas lo. tidal power kooda use cheyochu. we are not using that because of high installation costs. photo voltaic cells are expensive | ||
| Jujung Junior Artist Username: Jujung Post Number: 176 Registered: 02-2010 Posted From: 68.45.60.104 Rating: N/A |
Also consider the lack of progress that is due to the unavailability (or lack of consistent supply) of power. And how it hampers millions of people from transitioning to a better life and opportunities. Especially for a country like India, with infrastructure being pathetically poor even in the 21st century, lack of power is akin to economic violence - condemning millions of people to poverty deliberately. The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us.- Paul Valery | ||
| Ram1 Junior Artist Username: Ram1 Post Number: 448 Registered: 09-2010 Posted From: 98.233.99.102 Rating: N/A |
perfect cheppinav...solar better nuke kanna japan incident chusaka tech one way good one way it's bad anipisthundhi.. | ||
| Jujung Junior Artist Username: Jujung Post Number: 175 Registered: 02-2010 Posted From: 68.45.60.104 Rating: N/A |
FYI see this: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=beware-th e-fear-of-nuclearfear-2011-03-12 Some info from the post: The roughly 100,000 survivors of the two atomic bomb blasts are known in Japan as hibakusha. They have also been extensively studied, and 66 years later, by comparing them to cancer rates among Japanese not exposed to radiation, public health researchers estimate that only about 500 of the hibakusha died prematurely from cancer due to radiation exposure. Radiation-induced cancer killed roughly half of one percent of the exposed population. We also know that many of the children of hibakusha women pregnant at the time they were exposed suffered horrible birth defects. Studies of the atomic bomb survivors have also taught us, however, that there is apparently no generational genetic impact from radiation exposure. Kids born to parents who got pregnant after the exposure, were normal. Nuclear energy certainly has its risks, but are they as great as those from burning coal and oil, given what�s happening to the climate of the earth? Are nuclear emissions, including releases from accidents, as bad as the particulate pollution from fossil fuels? Not close. Remember the low radiation-induced cancer death toll among the hibakusha, or the WHO estimate of 4,000 lifetime cancer deaths from radiation for Chernobyl. Fossil fuel particulates kill several hundred thousand people around the world per year. } The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us.- Paul Valery | ||
| Jujung Junior Artist Username: Jujung Post Number: 174 Registered: 02-2010 Posted From: 68.45.60.104 Rating: N/A |
FYI see this: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=beware-th e-fear-of-nuclearfear-2011-03-12 Some info from the post: The roughly 100,000 survivors of the two atomic bomb blasts are known in Japan as hibakusha. They have also been extensively studied, and 66 years later, by comparing them to cancer rates among Japanese not exposed to radiation, public health researchers estimate that /b{only about 500 of the hibakusha died prematurely from cancer due to radiation exposure. Radiation-induced cancer killed roughly half of one percent of the exposed population.} We also know that many of the children of hibakusha women pregnant at the time they were exposed suffered horrible birth defects. Studies of the atomic bomb survivors have also taught us, however, that /b{there is apparently no generational genetic impact from radiation exposure. Kids born to parents who got pregnant after the exposure, were normal.} Nuclear energy certainly has its risks, but are they as great as those from burning coal and oil, given what’s happening to the climate of the earth? Are nuclear emissions, including releases from accidents, as bad as the particulate pollution from fossil fuels? Not close. Remember the low radiation-induced cancer death toll among the hibakusha, or the WHO estimate of 4,000 lifetime cancer deaths from radiation for Chernobyl. /b{Fossil fuel particulates kill several hundred thousand people around the world per year. } The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us.- Paul Valery | ||
| Shikari Side Hero Username: Shikari Post Number: 2364 Registered: 03-2010 Posted From: 122.169.180.190 Rating: N/A |
india lo safety measures experts reccommendations okala unte application ki vachepatiki inkola untayi,sagam sanka nakinchestharu,edhayina quake lantidhi vasthe bhopal incident replay chustham malli,better avoid it for now. asalu US type lo gas pipelines antene vucha padathandhi chala mandhiki,evadi ishtam vachinattu vaadu tavvestharu india lo,asalu careful ga undaru,monitor cheyalsina authorities kuda lanchalu mingi moddu nidra potharu. http://i52.tinypic.com/11k81lj.jpg http://i56.tinypic.com/2psggtd.jpg | ||
| Katthi Side Hero Username: Katthi Post Number: 3591 Registered: 07-2010 Posted From: 24.34.29.159 Rating: N/A |
nuke tech is so horrible that it may even kill life in the region for decades. And weather can carry radiation for years. Even nuke tech is there for years no one know how to stop when there is failure. I do not think india can handle this kind of situation as population is billions. Papi gadu post este katthi la digali | ||
| Abcdefghij Side Hero Username: Abcdefghij Post Number: 9658 Registered: 02-2007 Posted From: 76.226.46.171 Rating: N/A |
coming years lo needs ki alternative energy is not a solution for india there are dangers in nuke but safety measures tesukovali one thing is sure india ni aa vidam ga hit cheste causalities would be in millions...not thousands. japan cannot handle it india i doubt it can... mana country lo they cannot even count if something like this happens... nenu aa post esinappudu nuvvu aa thred link ivvaledu..sein nuvvu edo ante react ayya annadu..so daani batte post esa...ippudu link icchav still choodanu.. classic DLM by Mav after blind blessings | ||
| Katthi Side Hero Username: Katthi Post Number: 3590 Registered: 07-2010 Posted From: 24.34.29.159 Rating: N/A |
India needs power generation but it should not be at the cost of human life. India having 1 billion of population would get effected if there is any failure in the nuclear reactor. YSR govt tried to build one in kadapa and one in coastal. Also india is pushing nuke tech for power generation and it might do bad for india rather than good. Assume a scenario where nuke power generation failure and spreading radiation in india. We would see thousands of people loosing life. Bopal kind of incident might happen. I am not questioning india capability to maintain quality and cooling system but it's capability to evacuate people when there is radiation leak is at question. And most of the people in india are poor and they cannot afford treatment of cancer. Geographically india has advantage for solar and wind. India might need to go in this direction rather than Nuke. FYI USA stopped building Nuclear plants in 1970. It is not going build any new one after many accidents which took many lifes. Still most of the power generation happens with Gas and coal. Papi gadu post este katthi la digali |
