| Author | Message | ||
     Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17531 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
Lord Macaulay would be proud of these representatives they have left us with in our backyard. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind  | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5068 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 75.131.192.17 Rating: N/A |
Another looser http://www.deccanchronicle.com/blogs/dc-correspondent/ram-la lla-resident-159 | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 6377 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
what that heck article is that? shame on that fellow for writing such blasphemous crap...is that guy blind or what...hasn't he seen the countless idols from hundreds of years ago depiction of Lord Ram...ilanti vallani kukkani kotti nattu kottali | ||
| Chiru_fan Hero Username: Chiru_fan Post Number: 13844 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 108.12.164.245 Rating: N/A |
aadi meeda raathee...kosi sesthuloo yedathaar ani eediki maatram teliyadaa.. CHIRU - SACHIN - FEDERER | ||
| Chiru_fan Hero Username: Chiru_fan Post Number: 13842 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 108.12.164.245 Rating: N/A |
Lmunda ki line & length loo pagilindi!  CHIRU - SACHIN - FEDERER | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5062 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 75.131.192.17 Rating: N/A |
Ravishanker prasad slaps this NDTV Bxitch hard http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY7YZY1wQB4 | ||
| Chiru_fan Hero Username: Chiru_fan Post Number: 13831 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 108.12.169.179 Rating: N/A |
 oho! ee pentamunda baadha adhaa!CHIRU - SACHIN - FEDERER | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5061 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 75.131.192.17 Rating: N/A |
daani mogudu kashmir muslim anta | ||
| Chiru_fan Hero Username: Chiru_fan Post Number: 13818 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 108.12.169.179 Rating: N/A |
Burka yee METRO RED LIGHT area loo vuntundi? oka court judgment icchina tharuvaathaa ee maayadaarimunda chunni yenduku chimpukuntundi... idi tulak aa? CHIRU - SACHIN - FEDERER | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5172 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
Dude what is wrong in asking that. He did reiterate that Bijli Sadak Paani are more important for mus..ms. He openly asked a Cong MP, on national media, about Shah Bano, Shilanyas, and its vote bank politics. Indulo crying enti? Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Telugu_times Moderator Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 19091 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: N/A |
After seeing this name in your post...inka article sadhavadam dhandaga. time bokka | ||
| Ipc302 Moderator Username: Ipc302 Post Number: 6369 Registered: 02-2008 Rating: |
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hindus-help-muslims-restore-mosqu e-in-karnataka/132167-3.html?from=tn A small village in North Karnataka has showed the way to communal harmony. In Purtageri near Gadag in North Karnataka, it's Hindus who've come forward to help their Muslim brethren restore a mosque that was on the brink of collapse. It’s a century old mosque that's been crying for attention since last October. It's roofs started leaking and a portion of it was badly damaged in the heavy rains that lashed many parts of north Karnataka last year. But the rains set off a lesson -- a rare show of communal harmony. Hindus taking the lead to pitch in with donations and construction material to re-build the damaged mosque in remote Purtageri, a village near Gadag in north Karnataka, about 400 kms from Bangalore. There are about 150 households in Purtageri, of which only about ten families are Muslim who are daily wagers or agricultural labourers. So they couldn't afford the renovation of their only place of worship. But Hindus from the neighbouring historic town of Gajendraghada donated willingly and work is now on in full swing with donations to the tune of about Rs 1 lakh that has come in. In fact, some Hindus who couldn't donate in cash or kind, have volunteered to help with the masonry and labour. The mosque is likely to get ready by December this year -- the month that's known for the demolition of the Babri Masjid that these villagers hope will now be known for their efforts at communal unity. | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17523 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/132170/has-young-india-moved-we ll-beyond-ayodhya.html Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17522 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
annai .. Rajdeep was not as blatant as the others in the list were .. but then he was not too off the mark with his liberal extremism .. see what kind of questions is he posing to shazia ilmi from Kanpur .. he is directly asking are the muslim community disappointed with the verdict etc .. this is not the talkshow I saw him cry at the peaks of his lung power though .. this is just an example .. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Rajusk Hero Username: Rajusk Post Number: 10253 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 192.234.99.1 Rating: N/A |
Veellantha okate umbrella kindiki vachinappudu veseyyalsindi..daridram vadilipoyedi | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5169 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
Annai I followed Rajdeep. Aayana cheppina dantlo liberal extremism emundi? Give me at least one example. Issue ni politicians vadukuntara malli annadu. Correct ye ga, poni BJP clean anukunna OYC akkade unnadu gaa? Oka side annadu ani enduku anukovadam? Conservatives on both sides discussion lo koorchunte compromise raadu. Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17521 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/132154/devils-advocate-arun-jai tley-on-the-ayodhya-verdict.html ee video choodandi .. Jaitley on fire .. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17518 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
but how about all the pseudo-secular ranting going on annai?? what shall we do about it? you are finding faults with conservatives on both sides and that is understandable and acceptable .. but how about the likes of Sagarika, Barkha, Rajdeep, Bhupendra Chaubey, Guha, Vinod Mehta, and countless other "liberal extremists"???? Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5167 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
Veellu thinnaga unte ee thippalu enduku. OYC ooguthadu. Subramanya swami prana prathista antadu. Asalu veellani pilchina media ni anali. Both parties in the case mathrame involve aithe easy gaa solution vastundi anukuntunna. Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5166 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
Sagarika Ghose di nenu choodala. I cannot tolerate Barkha Dutt, thanks. kaani naaku Rajdeep emantha unreasonable gaa anipinchaledu. He asked the same questions to everybody. Daaniki eeyana okkade oogadu. Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5056 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: |
Arun Jaitley interview http://news.rediff.com/interview/2010/oct/01/bjp-not-interes ted-in-exploiting-ayodhya-issue.htm On the disappointment of Muslims after the judgment I don't think that's correct. First, nobody has read the entire judgment. The so-called liberals and secularists were reasonably certain that there would be a setback to the supporters of the Ram temple. So, all the media, lawyers, journalists, historians, archaeologists and commentators were singing the virtue of accepting the court verdict. But by 4.15 pm on Thursday, the moment they saw that it's a step forward towards the construction of the temple, they ran down the judicial verdict. I see it as constitutionalism of convenience. I have not come across any significant Muslim reaction to the verdict in the country. Some hardliners may have said something, but I am sure the average Muslim wants this issue to be settled. The court has provided the direction for temple construction and also on resolving the issue. The opposition to the judgment is not coming from the Muslims, but from those who regard secularism as a euphemism for majority-bashing. Suddenly, they found that the judgment is suiting the majority and its aspirations, so they changed their position. Therefore, to say that there is heartburn in Muslims is not correct. The Bharatiya Janata Party [ Images ] is not at all interested in exploiting the issue. This is a matter of faith, belief, religion, culture and heritage of billions and billions of people. The Ayodhya issue is far higher than politics.    | ||
| Jp_rocks Side Hero Username: Jp_rocks Post Number: 7247 Registered: 06-2009 Posted From: 167.83.101.22 Rating: N/A |
ee nayallu silent ga undachu kada..by not commenting or by saying they respect the judicial system and its decisions ani....ippudu unnecessary tensions among the two religious groups.. can't the govt request the media to not publish any damaging opinions/articles? Ntr_rocks: Day 1: Mahesh feminine hero Day 2: Jr vuch@ posukunnadu Mahesh ki... Oct 14th kanesam Varun sandesh cinema kuda ledu....evadu lenapudu release settunnadu maa hero....Varun sandesh cinema vundi vunte...vadiki kuda vuch@ posukuni inko 1 week postpone sese vaadu... tailpiece: Siggu saram vunna ee fan cinema ni sudadu.. | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17513 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/ayodhya-verdict-cong-seeks -reconciliation-bjp-says-let-temple-be-built-56172 http://www.ndtv.com/video/special/ravi-shankar-prasad-let-th e-temple-be-built-160/166822 plzz see the videos and tell your opinion .. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17511 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
whats your opinion on Sagarika Ghose, Ram Chandra Guha, Barkha Dutt reactions on TV. Hope you caught those awesome sound bites! Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5161 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
em chesadu? His rant was out of place, at least on CNN-IBN. Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5055 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
Yes, atane ravi shankar prasad......ninna pseudo-secular channels ni shake shakeela chesadu | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5160 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
Baboi OYC ni include chesa ani vadiki support anukokandi. Vadante parama chiraku naku. Chaduvukunna moorkhudu. Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Indiarocks Side Hero Username: Indiarocks Post Number: 5159 Registered: 09-2008 Posted From: 207.141.5.253 Rating: N/A |
I do not remember his name, kaani ithanena chief counsel for the case or something ani vachadu? Rajdeep was very fair in the whole conversation, at least IMO. Ee issue political ga malli use cheskobadutunda, ani general gaa adigadu. Daniki aayana okkade shoulder shaking enduku? Akkada OYC unnadu, Cong vallu, Mahesh Jethmalani unnadu. Rajdeep only "asked" if a closure to the issue can be found on the issue from this verdict. Daniki nuvvu decision cheptaventi antadu, BJP meeda indirect comments antadu. Political parties, at least now, please leave our RAM alone. TIA. | ||
| Netra Moderator Username: Netra Post Number: 17916 Registered: 01-2008 Rating: N/A |
burka ki etta soukhryam gaa unte atta settamu ani seppandi.. aavida suokhryam manaku kaavali and adhi manaku chaala important.. YSR AMAR RAHE | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17508 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
my meaning of everybody is including them annaii .. total Sangh Parivar is very happy .. Hanuman Jagaran ani oka program chesaru country wide ga .. last 50-60 days .. Hanuman Chalisa patanam annamata .. they are very happy with the verdict and Bhagyanagar Sangh lo okaru aithe ade antunnaru .. those prayers did not go unanswered ani .. Thoroughly disappointed with BJP on Modi issue .. opposition party ga undi povadaniki decide ainattu unnaru .. ! evadi kharma ki evadu badhyudu .. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5054 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
Bjp kadhu kamal...vhp,sangh vallu....Bjp gurinchi pattinchu ko dalchukola..naaku kavalsina Ram temple ki line clear ayyindhi....i don't care only about bjp anymore....ee roju news choosava modi bihar lo campaign cheyyadu anta.....veellu oka national party ee na....shameless people.....aa Nitish gadu aid venakki ichestadu, evaru campaign cheyyalo decide chestadu....endulo anna dooki chavali veellu | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17505 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
everybody is happy annai. ekkuva sepu matladataniki ledu .. chala busy ga unnaru .. with some program called "palle pilupu" .. state mottam lo 5000 places ki velli .. some party program chesunnaru .. kaani cheptunnaru .. Supreme court ki velthe .. total ga Hindu favor lo vastundi antunnaru ..  BJP side nunchi direct action emi undadu like 90s .. but will support the movement in the courts and politically ani cheptunnaru .. public lo evarini emi matladaddu ani strict orders ata. next parliament session lo racha choostamu manam .. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5053 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
kamal, Desham ki call chesi matladava....Hyd lo mana vallu emi antunnaru | ||
| Kamal Hero Username: Kamal Post Number: 17501 Registered: 08-2009 Posted From: 24.0.123.37 Rating: N/A |
I am loving it as well annai, Ravishankar Prasad is having a field day .. seriously .. and I am delighted to see pseudo-secularists exhibiting their true colors and shedding crocodile tears with irrational logics. Jai Sri Ram - Jai Hind | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5052 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
ninna cheptundhi Grand temple kattakoadadu anta....kadithe chinna temple kattukovali anta... | ||
| Netra Moderator Username: Netra Post Number: 17894 Registered: 01-2008 Rating: N/A |
dhenamma dheeni baadha chinna baadha kaadhu monna.. godavalu jaragaledhu annattu moham pettundhi talk show lo.. YSR AMAR RAHE | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5050 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
http://news.rediff.com/interview/2010/oct/01/the-court-never -said-it-is-the-birthplace-of-ram.htm | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5048 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: N/A |
Ram Madhav's interview....asal interview content ki pettina headline ki emanna sambandham vundha? | ||
| Vjavasi Side Hero Username: Vjavasi Post Number: 5047 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 192.127.94.7 Rating: |
Likes of Burkha dutt, Rajdeep sardesai, Arnab Goswami, Ramachandra guha,Rajendra Yadav and other Pseudo-civil society grops including Fraud historians are beating their chests and sobbing since yesterday....Ravishankar prasad ripped them apart on their Own channels......I am thoroughlu enjoying it since yesterday http://www.dailypioneer.com/286992/Sahmat-slams-Ayodhya-verd ict-finds-it-gravely-disturbing.html Sahmat slams Ayodhya verdict, finds it 'gravely disturbing' October 01, 2010 11:06:23 PM IANS | New Delhi The Allahabad High Court judgment on Ayodhya is a "blow" to India's secular fabric, a group of over 50 eminent historians, artists and activists said Friday, raising their "serious concerns because of the way history, reason and secular values" have been treated in the verdict. Coming together under the umbrella of Sahmat (Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust), they questioned the court's premise to base its judgment on the findings of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which had claimed that remains of a temple were found beneath the mosque. "The judgment delivered by the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute has raised serious concerns because of the way history, reason and secular values have been treated in it," said a joint statement signed by eminent personalities like Romila Thapar, D.N. Jha, K.N. Panikkar, Irfan Habib, Zoya Hasan, M.K. Raina and Madan Gopal Singh. ".. the view that the Babri Masjid was built at the site of a Hindu temple, which has been maintained by two of the three judges, takes no account of all the evidence contrary to this fact turned up by the Archaeological Survey of India's own excavations -- the presence of animal bones throughout as well as of the use of ‘surkhi' and lime mortar (all characteristic of Muslim presence) rule out the possibility of a Hindu temple having been there beneath the mosque," the statement said. It also alleged that the ASI's findings were fraudulent. "The ASI's controversial report which claimed otherwise on the basis of ‘pillar bases' was manifestly fraudulent in its assertions since no pillars were found, and the alleged existence of ‘pillar bases' has been debated by archaeologists." According to the statement, site notebooks, artefacts and other material evidence relating to the ASI's excavation be made available for scrutiny to scholars, historians and archaeologists. "No proof has been offered even of the fact that a Hindu belief in Lord Rama's birth-site being the same as the site of the mosque had at all existed before very recent times, let alone since ‘time immemorial'." "Not only is the judgment wrong in accepting the antiquity of this belief, but it is gravely disturbing that such acceptance should then be converted into an argument for deciding property entitlement. This seems to be against all principles of law and equity," the experts stated. As they see it, the most objectionable part of the judgment is the legitimisation it provides to violence and muscle-power. "While it recognises the forcible break-in of 1949 which led to placing the idols under the mosque-dome, it now recognises, without any rational basis, that the transfer put the idols in their rightful place." "Even more astonishingly, it accepts the destruction of the mosque in 1992 (in defiance, let it be remembered, of the Supreme Court's own orders) as an act whose consequences are to be accepted, by transferring the main parts of the mosque to those clamouring for a temple to be built," the statement said. For all these reasons, the statement said, they "see the judgment as yet another blow to the secular fabric of our country and the repute of our judiciary". "Whatever happens next in the case cannot, unfortunately, make good what the country has lost," they added. A three-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court's Lucknow bench Thursday ruled by majority that a temple had been destroyed to build the Babri mosque in Ayodhya in the 16th century and so the mosque violated Islamic tenets. The judges ruled that the entire disputed land in Ayodhya should be divided among the Sunni Waqf Board, Hindus and the Nirmohi Akhara, a Hindu sect, who were among those who fought the court battle. The status quo, however, would be maintained for the next three months, the court ordered. |
