| Author | Message | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2842 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: N/A |
From âChurch attacksâ to âMuslims lynchedâ â how the narrative plays part in politics http://www.opindia.com/2017/06/from-church-attacks-to-muslim s-lynched-how-the-narrative-plays-part-in-politics/ | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2840 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: |
| ||
Masularex Side Hero Username: Masularex Post Number: 8021 Registered: 05-2010 Posted From: 157.44.178.80 Rating: N/A |
institutionalize the cheddi lunacy....  | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2836 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: N/A |
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/there-were-more-lynching-c ases-during-congress-rule-shah/20170702.htm There were more lynching cases during Congress rule | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2835 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: N/A |
http://www.mediacrooks.com/2018/07/the-lynch-fraud.html The Lynch Fraud The Ministry of Home Affairs has issued yet another advisory to all States on the issue of mob violence and âlynchingâ. They have laid down a NEW âMaha mantraâ â that law and order is a State issue and therefore States and Police must make all efforts to prevent such lynchings. This is following the recent observations by the Supreme Court which has directed the Centre and Parliament to enact a special law on lynchings. I have never seen such knee jerk reactions from the govt or the SC on such a matter. What exactly is lynching? And how the hell does SC assume the power to direct the Centre to enact a law? Making laws is beyond the authority of the SC and at best it can only make a recommendation. The lack of prudence in such a direction seems totally lost on our judges: While it is desirable that crimes be prevented, how exactly can the police prevent a crime unless they have a tip off or intelligence report on an event? Police cannot prevent rapes, murders, abductions or mob violence unless they have been tracking some case or get an advance warning. This nonsense of crime prevention is biggest nonsensical rant of media, politicians and many Big Bindi frauds. No one can prevent a crime; the only solution available is swift justice. Our courts fail to provide justice in reasonable time and therefore criminals and potential criminals are free to commit more crimes. The latest case of âlynchingâ according to the chest-beating of media is a guy called Rakbar in Alwar. The guy reportedly died in police custody and had previous FIRs and charge-sheets against him. So he had a history but was out, probably on bail and free to commit more crimes. No crime can ever be justified. Mob violence, regardless of the reasons, cannot be justified. In a group or a mob, people act in a frenzy of a different kind. Individually, a man may not burn vehicles or throw stones but when in a group, the rioter is pretty capable of all kinds of violence. Spectators and crowds are known to throw water bottles and other missiles at players when a match goes badly for their team. An individual by himself wouldnât dare to do so. But this entire campaign over âlynchingâ is nothing but a fraud. Who concocted this fraud? The Congress and the media inserted this term into mob violence that existed in India long before ModiSarkar came into power. In fact, the incidents of lynching under ModiSarkar are far lesser in number than under the criminal Congress during their term. A tweet by A.Ranganathan shows that there over a dozen lynchings under the Congress in 2013 alone. So, if one digs deeper into the ten years of Sonia and Congress, they would exceed the number of incidents in the four years of ModiSarkar. This is not to justify any killing but to indicate how the media and the Congress have labelled and created a terror-syndrome called âLynchingâ which has managed to fool even the SC. This is nothing but mob violence and mob frenzy which has existed for a long time but has surely been declining with greater awareness among citizens. What exactly is lynching? In technical or dictionary terms, a lynching is the execution of a person alleged to have committed a crime without any legal process or trial. This form of execution was usually by hanging. This form of execution was invented by none other than the Christians. They hanged people for blasphemy or even burned them at the stake. They have hanged people for merely being âBlackâ or for seeking equal rights. Lynchings were part of Christian rituals and this evil was most practiced in Europe and the US for a long time. The pic with Blacks being hanged comes from the South in the US where the White Supremacists were not willing to accept the erstwhile Black slaves as equal human beings. As with the Commies, the Christians too have a heavy guilt hanging on their conscience. The Commies in India wiped out all the crimes of the murderous Mughals from our history books and our school books. Worldwide, the Christians are unwilling to accept responsibility or blame for the evil practice of lynching in their history books or school books. Even in the US, the lynchings in America are covered up and blacked out to hide the evil side of Christianity and its rituals. This is a scene from Texas, US from 1893 which is not so ancient: What is different from mob violence and the Christian lynchings is that their lynching had the approval of society. Just look at the crowds collected to witness and enjoy the lynching above. In contrast, Indian society has not approved of lynching. It is simply another mob-violence crime. But given their guilt, the Christians under Congress and Christian-influenced media cleverly and mischievously planted the âLynchingâ concept in the public domain only after ModiSarkar came into power. During the ten years of Congress also there were many killings by mobs but there was no such ranting and raving about âLynchingâ as a terminology and label as it is now. The US has a history of over 4000 lynchings of blacks and that figure may not be accurate as there is no proper record of these crimes: This clever trickery is missed by the SC and the idiots of the BJP. The Congress and their slave media rant about Lynching because the Christians have cleverly transferred most of their guilt on their crimes to other societies. The powers that dominate our media, Congress, Sickulars and NGOs are all driven by Christian funding and Christian narrative. And the other side of the coin has Islamic funding which ensures Muslims are portrayed as the victims and blown out of proportion as the only victims. Even a death over a seat fight on a train was blown up as lynching. The deaths by lynching under Congress is far more than the incidents under ModiSarkar but the âLynch-songâ is played out specifically to tar PM Modi as the âperpetratorâ of the crime or empowering the perpetrators of the crime. This is the nonsense and crime by the lynchers of Congress and media. Neither the PM nor his ministers have the guts to do a straight-talk on this. Instead, they crawl before the SC and issue advisories over this fake narrative. The purpose of bringing out a brief history of lynching being a Christian ritual is not to hold Christians responsible for mob-violence in India but to point out that the narrative is set by none other than Christian-dominated forces that still drive certain political parties and much of our media. The record of their past gets more dismal if you read more about it: The Christians have cleverly, more or less, wiped out their history of lynch-crimes but have now transferred the terminology and guilt to India, particularly to ModiSarkar. The SC has been influenced into directing the Centre to make stupid laws specially for lynching by the same lobby that is permanently in a PIL mode to throw as much mud on ModiSarkar as any other issue not worth the time of SC. Current laws in the country are adequate to deal with mob violence and there is no need for a special âLynch lawâ. And there is technically no lynching in India because society does not approve it as it did in Christianity. Our society does not hold public hangings or beheadings or burning at the stake as a socially-approved practice in any state or in any society in this land. Therefore, this fraudulent narrative of lynching is yet another discourse that ModiSarkar has failed to combat effectively. And pray, what exactly is all this cow-smuggling and cattle-rustling for? In many states in India, cow-slaughter is banned. This ban should legally be extended to all states. Even in states where cow slaughter is banned, there may be illegal cow-slaughter and beef consumption. Here is a table of beef consumption across the world from 2016: The cow is a holy animal for Hindus. Still India figures at 52 in the world list of beef consumption. It is down in the charts only because of population numbers. If you look at the absolute quantity in the above chart, India would probably be in the top 5 or 6 countries. The fraudulent narratives on many issues continue because Modi wants to play Mahatma. The source of the cow-vigilantes problem is cow-rustling and cow-smuggling. Instead of addressing that as a serious issue, ModiSarkar is busy putting Band-aid on visible wounds. The wound that is NOT VISIBLE is the suffering of the farmer or poor family that depends on cattle for livelihood and source of income. What if a man came out of his house and suddenly found his car is stolen? A family that loses cows or cattle feels much the same way. And as with cars, the stolen cattle is never found unless you happen to be the Home Minister like Azam Khan and can order the police around. PM Modi needs to find some guts to address this serious issue: Either way, a law on total ban on cow-slaughter is required across India. That itself will stop a lot of crimes. But on priority, a law that punishes cow-theft and cow-smuggling severely will by itself deter criminals. Itâs not a stupid anti-lynch-law that we need. That is based on a fraudulent narrative. What we do need is a law that severely punishes cow-thieves and smugglers. |
