| Author | Message | ||
Time_pass Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 11035 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5 Rating: N/A |
18 nelalu single hole chippa koodu tinnodu inka free ga tirugutunandu aadi matham kulanni PUSJHPALAKi taakattu petti aadi sodarudu ekama ga 10 ticket lu ichharu GOWMOOTHRA gallu ee SYSTEM meeda pedda THUPUK aadu GAALI gaadu | ||
Time_pass Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 11034 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5 Rating: |
eediki ekkada leni fake publicity ichharu small time killer gaadini tellalist ni chesaaru bandodidi ni bayata padeyadaaniki malli power loki raagane case lu kottinchesaru KA lo antha public ga chesi AP lo 36 nui daggara ki teesi malli 2019 ki maarathara,  | ||
Polavaram Side Hero Username: Polavaram Post Number: 2650 Registered: 08-2016 Posted From: 99.203.28.142 Rating: N/A |
Emundhi dhantlo champi aadini LET person ni chesad apotlo police boss Sohrabuddin ane vidimi champatani main reason Evado pedda business li chesukune vadini bediristhe Vallu mee amit shaw gadiki dabbulu icchi lepesar He is nothing but contract killer Aadu chrsina vintalu gujju kand ki home minister ga chala vunnayi chaduvuko | ||
Chandhra Side Hero Username: Chandhra Post Number: 2872 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 71.62.75.64 Rating: N/A |
CBN public ga pattubadina emi cheyyaleka pothundhi ... And all cases meeda "stays" ... ee system waste ...Thupuk. | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2757 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: N/A |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Sohrabuddin_Sheikh The Sohrabuddin Sheikh encounter case is an ongoing criminal case in the Gujarat state of India, after the death of Sohrabuddin Anwarhussain Sheikh on November 26, 2005, while he was in police custody. According to claims, apart from being involved in the criminal extortion racket in Gujarat, Sheikh was also involved in arms smuggling in Madhya Pradesh, and also had murder cases registered against him in Gujarat and Rajasthan.[1] Sheikh was also claimed by the police to be associated with the banned global terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Pakistani intelligence agency Inter-Services Intelligence, and was alleged to have planned to create communal chaos in the state by assassinating "an important political leader".[1][2] Although the target of Sheikh's plans has never been officially revealed, the impression was given to political effect that it was to have been Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi. | ||
Polavaram Side Hero Username: Polavaram Post Number: 2649 Registered: 08-2016 Posted From: 99.203.28.142 Rating: N/A |
Sohrabuddin ane vadini ap police & nayeem help tho gujju police ki appa jeppar Sohrabuddin & wife ni fake encounter lo lepesar Appudu gujju land HM minister amit shaw Aadini champi terorist ni chesar CBI vallu amitshaw gado phone tecords kooda evodence pettar. Ayina cbi court case kottesindhi Adhi bjp party power loki vacchina ventane | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2756 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: |
Yes ceasefire is bad decision and also tickets to Gaali relatives a big mistake,BJP should not repeat those mistakes in 2019 elections. | ||
Time_pass Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 11033 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5 Rating: N/A |
LOL encounter to kill some one is illegal? Inthaki J&K lo ramzan selvalu gurinchi emantunnaru tellalists ALlage GOA lo Parikar government bhale clean chit ichhindhi ga GAALI gaadiki | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2755 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: N/A |
LOL you are comparing corrupt politicians who involved in thousands of crores in scams with encountering a terrorist case (its not fake).Most of our judges are congress stooges and thats the reason modi fought 10 years in courts regarding godhra riots case. | ||
Time_pass Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 11032 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5 Rating: N/A |
Mee GOW MOOTHRA galani support chese 36 and GAALI gaallkai credibility ivvataniki CBN bale kalipesavu ga inthaki Munde koothuru pappula scam emiyyindhi? | ||
Time_pass Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 11031 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5 Rating: N/A |
Aa judge bangaaram amit shaw koduku meeda alalegations vasthe okka case kood alekunda cleose chesaru Nirav, Lalit, Malya lu enjoying | ||
Polavaram Side Hero Username: Polavaram Post Number: 2646 Registered: 08-2016 Posted From: 24.107.84.134 Rating: |
Mari BJ party power loki vacchina ventane CBI court Amit shaw meedha vunna sohrabuddin & prajpathi fake encounter case ni ela kottesindhi appudu judge gadini komesara | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2754 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: |
CBN,Jagan,Gaali etc all are escaped thanks to corrupt judges and loopholes in judicial system | ||
Time_pass Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 11027 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5 Rating: N/A |
Mari GAALI ki freedom ela vachhindhi? | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2752 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: N/A |
Judge O.P. Saini should also be investigated for his Congress connections. | ||
Teluguhero Side Hero Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 2751 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158 Rating: |
https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/2g-case-s pecial-judge-delivered-directionless-verdict-cbi-11806020028 1_1.html 2G case special judge delivered directionless verdict: CBI ANI | New Delhi [India] Last Updated at June 2, 2018 13:50 IST The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has accused Special Judge O.P. Saini of being directionless and diffident while delivering his verdict in a 2G Spectrum case linked to former telecom minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader A. Raja. In its appeal filed before the Delhi High Court in March this year, the CBI said Special Judge O.P. Saini "had not applied his mind" while delivering his verdict in the 2G case last December, which ensured the acquittal of Raja and others in what it called one of the biggest scams to hit the country. The CBI further said that Special Judge Saini had made the mistake of taking the statements of all of the accused as "gospel truth" and ignoring the material evidence available as well the statements of reliable witnesses. Special Judge Saini had acquitted Raja, his party colleague Kanimozhi and several top corporate honchos, including Unitech Managing Director Sanjay Chandra, D B Realty chief Shahid Balwa and others on December 21, 2017, while accusing the CBI of failing to prove its case. He also concluded that the charges filed against the accused by the CBI were based on "rumour, gossip and speculation". In its defence, the CBI reiterated that the impugned judgment suffered from serious infirmities and did not reflect "much application of mind with regard to the interdependence of documentary evidence, witness statements and the backdrop of the case". The CBI petition before the Delhi High Court further stated that Judge Saini ignored testimonies of reliable witnesses, including then Solicitor General G E Vahanvati, former telecom secretary D S Mathur and Asheervatham Achary, former additional private secretary to Raja, among others. He also committed a grave error by wrongly interpreting provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), stating that once the accused are acquitted in connection with a scheduled offence, they have to be acquitted for the offence of money laundering, as once the crime goes, there can't be any offence for having the proceeds of crime, which is completely erroneous and contrary to the schemes and provisions of PMLA 2002. The CBI said Judge Saini erroneously proceeded on a piecemeal analysis of the evidence regarding the conspiracy and had a distinct lack of appreciation of it. The CBI also maintained that A. Raja had abused his office and had completely ignored the telecom department's need for providing reasonable time to applicants to meet criteria for applying for 2G Spectrum. This, the trial judge had failed to consider. It also said that the defence provided by Raja was a complete "eye wash" and that he had deposed before court falsely. It asked why Judge Saini had ignored this fact. It said that the trial court had failed to appreciate that the investigation for the offence of money laundering is not like a police investigation. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), the statements recorded by the police or CBI under Section 161 of CRPC are not admissible as evidence. It said in its petition that the trial court had failed to appreciate that the complaint of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) with regard to a money laundering offence in spite of the existence of independent documentary evidence that clearly established a money trail showing A Raja had made wrongful gain and loss to the public exchequer. |
