| Author |
Message |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Monk
Side Hero Username: Monk
Post Number: 2010 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 166.137.246.17
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 04:06 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Biggboss:
Annai ee case lo first 140 approve ayindi from company 1 under owner 2 so no amendments |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Biggboss
Side Hero Username: Biggboss
Post Number: 3590 Registered: 08-2017 Posted From: 173.247.200.98
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:52 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Gochi:Each company has their own 140...
in this case I doubt it...Company A got acquired by company B, company B only amends company A's approved I-140 since it's not a different petition and the job role has not changed. naa case lo acquisition ayyaka, just I-140 amendment file chesaru 2 months lo approve ayyindhi.. I would definitely ask attorneys to get peace of mind |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Monk
Side Hero Username: Monk
Post Number: 2005 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 155.98.164.38
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:43 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bobby:No Issues as it is already ported.. this is very common scenario...either company 1 fraud or Chapter 11
Thank annai for info |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Bobby
Junior Artist Username: Bobby
Post Number: 459 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 207.70.163.246
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:42 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Any chances of missing I140 priority date under fraudulent case? No Issues as it is already ported.. this is very common scenario...either company 1 fraud or Chapter 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Monk
Side Hero Username: Monk
Post Number: 2004 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 155.98.164.38
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:40 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Gochi:Each company has their own 140...only date is ported..
Thanks Annai nenu ide anukunna but chinna doubt |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Gochi
Side Hero Username: Gochi
Post Number: 3439 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 64.121.67.210
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:39 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Each company has their own 140...only date is ported...so I dont think there will be any issue as the current 140 is completely with a different company....old 140 revoke chesina I dont think they will track which date got ported to what and then revoke second 140 as well with another company... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Monk
Side Hero Username: Monk
Post Number: 2003 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 155.98.164.38
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:34 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here is the scenario Company 1 Owner 1 Owner 1 sold company to owner 2 I 140 approved by company 1 under owner 2 I 140 ported to Company 2 Company 1 Owner 1 meda visa fraud case and proved guilty. Any chances of missing I140 priority date under fraudulent case? or It wont fall under this category as it is approved under owner2 and successfully ported to company 2? |