| Author | Message | ||
Discoveringself Side Hero Username: Discoveringself Post Number: 2278 Registered: 01-2016 Posted From: 99.243.218.18 Rating: N/A |
Rajdeep Sardesai laanti donga journalists changing their tweets everyday... there was other protests going on w.r.t Rohingyas who are settled in Jammu by previous cong govt.... too many issues.....avi ivi anni kalipesi.....bharat mata ki jai annaaru....to protect rapists ani story allesaaru.... | ||
Enigmatic Comedian Username: Enigmatic Post Number: 1412 Registered: 11-2010 Posted From: 100.34.214.219 Rating: N/A |
that is not right. evadanna police valla personal enmity vunte vallani random gaa vesesi criminal encounter anochhu. you don't want police to be judge judiciary and executioner. | ||
Abhysg Legend Username: Abhysg Post Number: 46754 Registered: 08-2008 Posted From: 183.83.66.145 Rating: N/A |
is CBI allowed to investigate in J&K...? as per constitution..? prev incidents unnaya...CBI involvment vi? | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62486 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
dead man's wedding..whatever dowry comes..take it.. | ||
Enigmatic Comedian Username: Enigmatic Post Number: 1410 Registered: 11-2010 Posted From: 100.34.214.219 Rating: N/A |
they are eliminating small time criminals. pedda vallani touch cheyyaru endukante vallu mps, mla's and minsiters ayyuntaru. monna evado si talk with ganster kuda vachindi deal with bjp district president otherwise you will be eliminated ani. https://theprint.in/politics/bjp-government-39-alleged-gangs ters-killed-encounters-none-wanted-list/39268/ | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62480 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
Encounters lo busy unnaru kurroll.. having said that..CM inti mundu suicide ni kooda serious gaa follow up cheyyakapovadam bad | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62479 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
evariki clean chit ivvaledu rao garu nenu.. I was looking at alternative narrative..reason for that is.. same old formula applied by Lutyen's gang..first national media lo halla machao..followed by synma actors and celebrities..followed by international media.. template routine ayyinappude naaku doubt vachindi..otherwise I would have taken things on face value itself | ||
Enigmatic Comedian Username: Enigmatic Post Number: 1409 Registered: 11-2010 Posted From: 100.34.214.219 Rating: N/A |
kathua lo chala angles vundochhu. but unnao lo bjp up govt. is at fault. considering that up has lax law & order, terrible primary health care besides a ton of other issues yogi should have at least concentrated on law & order aspect since swearing in as cm | ||
Brightlife34 Junior Artist Username: Brightlife34 Post Number: 368 Registered: 11-2017 Posted From: 160.83.72.207 Rating: N/A |
good points Rajusk.. if this comes out as an attempt to malign the H community and score political brownies serious thupuk on J&K govt and police.. avesam lo nenu konni anesaa local BJP ni kani, this has to be delved deeper. kaani nenu tittindi chesinavallani or police ni kaadu, aftermath lo BJP politicians la reaction ni | ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 54789 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 65.24.38.103 Rating: |
bjp clean ki clean chit ichhesara meeru? | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62478 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
The locals/villagers are asking for CBI probe(Bharatmaatha ) instead of local police probe(J/K state police) adi angle...ani nenu anukontunna.. | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62477 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
meeru kooda local social issue ni murder case ni mixie lo vesi vadulthunnar like sickular media.. | ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 54788 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 65.24.38.103 Rating: N/A |
victim indian kaada? | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62475 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
Hindus in Jammu Bharatmatha ki jai ante meeku problem aa ? Pakistan Zindabad ani aravaledu ani feel avuthunnara ? i quechen you answer  | ||
Last_avataar Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 10461 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 139.71.144.5 Rating: N/A |
Looks like there is bigger problem between Local Muslims and Hindus of that area and Tensions are simmering. So some one used this little Girl as pawn | ||
Siloan Legend Username: Siloan Post Number: 54787 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 65.24.38.103 Rating: N/A |
101 bharath maatha ki jai slogan kyon? | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62472 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
oops wrong format There are only about six more months left in the tenure of the present Chief Justice of India and there is always the likelihood that the motion might end up being rendered infructuous before the same reaches any conclusion whatsoever. The next question to be asked is, whether any political benefit is likely to accrue to the opposition if they were to take this step irrespective of the chances of its success. The answer to this question too, unfortunately for the opposition, is in the negative. The biggest case that is being heard before the Chief Justice of India today is related to the Ram Janma bhoomi issue. Despite the protestations of the Congress party to the contrary, the presence of Kapil Sibal as an arguing counsel for the Sunni Waqf Board has given rise to an impression in the minds of the public that the Congress does not want the Ram Temple to be built on the disputed site at all. If they do give in to the âsecularâ fringe of their party and end up supporting the electorally bankrupt Left, it will also have serious detrimental implications for the newly minted âHinduâ avatar of their leader, Rahul Gandhi. | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62471 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
Bonus gaa idi kooda unchu.. Sonia Gandhi and Dipak Misra Sonia Gandhi and Dipak Misra Snapshot The answer most likely to be correct â delay, or altogether prevent, an unfavourable ruling in the Ram Janmabhoomi case. So opposition parties led by the Congress have met with the Vice President and have submitted to him a notice for the impeachment of the Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra. The other parties which have agreed to the motion are the Communist Party of India (CPI), Communist Party of India (Marxist),the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Samajwadi Party (SP),the Bahujan Samaj Party(BSP) and the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML). By doing this, they risk serious embarrassment as they just donât have the numbers to make a successful bid for the removal of the chief justice. Moreover, the process of impeachment is something that has never really been activated successfully in the past against a judge of the honourable Supreme Court. The last time the provision was invoked against a judge of the apex court was in the early 1990s against Justice V K Ramaswami. The said motion did fail quite spectacularly on the floor of the House and the judge in question went on to serve the remainder of his term with some semblance of distinction as well. He even unsuccessfully contested an election to the Lok Sabha against Vaiko of the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam(MDMK) in Tamil Nadu from the Sivakasi constituency. In this regard, it would be instructive to examine the bare text of the relevant Constitutional provision which is produced below: 124 (4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Simply put, what is needed in order to actually remove a judge of the Supreme Court is a special majority of the members present and voting in both Houses of Parliament. Do the Congress or the Left or any of the other members that group have the requisite strength? The answer to this, as mentioned earlier, is a resoundingly and unequivocally in the negative. Having said that, the provisions of the Judges Inquiry Act of 1968 do offer some hope to the opposition, inasmuch as under the said Act, they might find it not altogether impossible to initiate proceedings, if not take them to their logical conclusion. Section 3 of the said Act whereby the procedure for initiation has been laid down is reproduced below: 3 (1) If notice is given of a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of a Judge signed,- (a) in the case of a notice given in the House of the People, by not less then one hundred members of that House; (b) in the case of a notice given in the Council of States, by not less, then fifty members of that Council, then, the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman may, after consulting such persons, if any, as he thinks fit and after considering such materials, if any, as may be available to him either admit the motion or refuse to admit the same. (2) If the motion referred to in sub-section (1) is admitted, the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman shall keep the motion pending and constitute as soon as may be for the purpose of making an investigation into the grounds on which the removal of a Judge is prayed for, a Committee consisting of three members of whom - (a) one shall be chosen from among the Chief Justice and other Judges of the Supreme Court; (b) one shall be chosen from among the Chief Justices of the High Courts; and (c) one shall be a person who is in the opinion of the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman, a distinguished jurist. . A perusal of the said provision would make it amply clear that the opposition must mobilise at least a hundred members (Lok Sabha) or fifty members (Rajya Sabha) depending upon wherein it intends to initiate the process. Having said that, from thereon it is the discretion of the Speaker (Lok Sabha) or the Vice President (Rajya Sabha) as the case may be, to first make an assessment as to whether the motion is fit for him to constitute a committee to frame charges and conduct a prima facie appreciation of whether the complaints made against the judge in question contain any substance. Assuming that the opposition manages to negotiate the second hurdle, the committee constituted under the provisions of the said Act has to come to a conclusion that the charges framed by it are substantial at the conclusion of a proper process of quasi-judicial inquiry and fact-finding. In such a scenario, the motion for removal has to go before both the Houses of Parliament where it has to be passed by a majority of the members of both Houses and a two-third majority of the members present and voting. In the unlikely scenario that the motion contemplated by the opposition is approved by the committee, it shall surely be defeated on the floor of the House. There are only about six more months left in the tenure of the present Chief Justice of India and there is always the likelihood that the motion might end up being rendered infructuous before the same reaches any conclusion whatsoever. The next question to be asked is, whether any political benefit is likely to accrue to the opposition if they were to take this step irrespective of the chances of its success. The answer to this question too, unfortunately for the opposition, is in the negative. The biggest case that is being heard before the Chief Justice of India today is related to the Ram Janma bhoomi issue. Despite the protestations of the Congress party to the contrary, the presence of Kapil Sibal as an arguing counsel for the Sunni Waqf Board has given rise to an impression in the minds of the public that the Congress does not want the Ram Temple to be built on the disputed site at all. | ||
Lisk Junior Artist Username: Lisk Post Number: 898 Registered: 12-2017 Posted From: 192.158.48.160 Rating: N/A |
raju khaaka..avani maku teluvadhu..memu Modi ni thidutham..anthe.. | ||
Amaravathi_road Junior Artist Username: Amaravathi_road Post Number: 347 Registered: 09-2016 Posted From: 165.156.39.32 Rating: N/A |
valley lo vunna hindus pandits voolla ki voolu vadhili petti valasa pothunnaaru sontha state nunchi. you can think of plight of hindus in valley. came up with cooked up emotional story as 2019 is nearing to drive away hindus squinted eye is lot better than blind | ||
Last_avataar Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 10460 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 139.71.144.5 Rating: N/A |
The way new papers narrated the incident day by day is unbelievable cooked up story. But I feel deeply pained by the agony given to little one, no matter what who ever has done that. But i want to ask one question, No smoke wihout fire ? why only these people are accused ? is there a bigger problem with these people vs some others around the area and Little one was made scape goat ? | ||
Amaravathi_road Junior Artist Username: Amaravathi_road Post Number: 346 Registered: 09-2016 Posted From: 165.156.39.32 Rating: N/A |
monna ee Madhya kontha mandhi pseudo social activists db lo voogi poyaaru bjp rss meedha. no sounds ippudu ee stray dogs squinted eye is lot better than blind | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62470 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
The Conspiracy - 2: How did they know about Sanji Ramâs involvement on 17 January itself? The girlâs body was sent to Kathua district hospital for autopsy on the afternoon of 17 January . Villagers say that activist-lawyer Talib Hussain was also present. How did he reach Kathua from "his hometown Poonch in a matter of hours", the villagers ask. "Hussain appeared out of nowhere and even accompanied the Bakarwals when they went to Kathua hospital for autopsy around 12 pm. Was he already here In Kathua? Why?" asks one Radhakrishna, a relative of the accused Mannu. Rasana residents say it was Hussain as well as two Bakarwal brothers, sons of one Mohammad Jaan, who first took Sanji's name at the protest that was launched in the evening of 17th. âHow did they know about Sanji Ram when no one had any clue that day who killed the girl? We saw Hussain for the first time that day. Neither he knows us nor we know about him,â quips a local resident. | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62469 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
media ki masala dorikindi festival chesukontunnar.. IMF Chairman goru middle lo lectures kooda thodu ayyinayi | ||
Amaravathi_road Junior Artist Username: Amaravathi_road Post Number: 344 Registered: 09-2016 Posted From: 165.156.39.32 Rating: N/A |
it's a pure fabricated story to blame hindus and drive them out of valley. but poor kid became a scapegoat. villagers have been asking for cbi investigation DNA tests and everything but state govt is refusing to do so. squinted eye is lot better than blind | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62468 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
The Many Questions Of Villagers As per the charge sheet, the body lay dumped in the forest till it was discovered on the morning of 17th. The villagers raise several questions. First, how come the body emanated no foul smell even after three days (13th night, 14th, 15th and 16th)? Second, why did no one spot the body while on their way to Devasthan, especially on 16 January, when they visited the shrine in large numbers? Third, why, in the cold of January, did the body not become stiff? Villagers claim that when they saw the body at a protest staged by Bakarwals, it was limp. Fourth, why would Sanji Ram, to whom his sister had sent her wayward minor son so that he could study under his stern guidance, deploy him to carry out a criminal conspiracy? Would the mother have sent her son if she knew his brother had such bent of mind?( --this is masala added, can be ignored) Fifth, why would the key conspirator leave the body just outside Devasthan even on the day of Fanda when scores of people came and feasted on Bhandara? Why didn't he simply dig up the earth and bury the body? The charge sheet says the accused had washed the girl's clothes to destroy evidence and so "FSL Srinagar could not frame any opinion on the basis of examination of the washed clothes..." But why would the accused only stop at washing clothes and not make any effort to hide the body? Sixth, how did no one spot the girl in the Devasthan even on 13 January when lots of people visited the place? "It was Lohri. We all went to Devasthan. Food was distributed. We picked up darees from the table and placed them on the floor to sit and sing devotional songs. There is no chance a girl is kept under the table and no one sees it," said Bishan Das, a 76-year-old Rasana resident who retired as subedar from the Army. Seventh, how could Sanji Ramâs son, Vishal Jangotra, be in Meerut and Kathua at the same time? The crime branch investigation places Vishal in Rasana while the college records show that he was giving exams in Meerut. His elder sister Monika shows us Vishalâs instagram posts which display Muzzafarnagar as his location. But itâs fairly easy to retrospectively change the location of an Instagram post. However, the jury is still out on whether Vishal was indeed in Rasana at that time. The police say they have confiscated the CCTV footage of the exam centre but hasnât revealed its findings yet. âFirst, they tried framing Sanji Ramâs elder son, but since he is in the Navy, they knew it wasnât possible to do so. Later, they decided to go with Vishal,â says a family member of Jangotra. Eighth, the charge sheet mentions that the juvenile hit the girl with a stone twice and âkilled her by pressing his knees against her back and strangulated the girl by applying force on both the ends of her chunni.â However, according to the medical reports, the â...victim had been kept without food and administered sedatives and her cause of death was asphyxia leading to cardiopulmonary arrest.â Which one is it? Ninth, the charge sheet says the investigation team found a hair strand in the Devasthan. If the girl was kept for days in the room, how come the cops found only a strand of hair there? Tenth, how come the mastermind of the sordid tale who is supposed to have carried out the grand conspiracy turned out to be a nincompoop? When he spent lakhs in bribing local cops for covering it all up, why couldnât he arrange a vehicle to bury or hide the body? Why, of all the places in the entire jungle, would he chose to throw the body in the open, barely a stone's throw-away from his home, at a spot from where his house is the nearest and thus most vulnerable to suspicion? | ||
Rajusk Legend Username: Rajusk Post Number: 62467 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 170.74.248.21 Rating: N/A |
https://swarajyamag.com/politics/kathua-ground-report-why-vi llagers-are-not-convinced-on-fairness-of-probe btw..crime ni andaram khandisthunnam..but who is accused ..who is real culprit anedi still not clear.. |
