| Author |
Message |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Teluguhero
Side Hero Username: Teluguhero
Post Number: 2714 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158
Rating:  Votes: 1 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 02:49 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Time_pass:If JJ was alive even Supreme Court would have aquited her entha fast ga vachhindhi Suprem Court teerpu choosava?
Then how can you guys blame Modi for court verdicts. Modi is ready for Judaical reforms,but supreme court judges not interested in judicial reforms and transparency . |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Andhrawala
Legend Username: Andhrawala
Post Number: 67604 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 152.51.56.1
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 02:42 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nirbhaya case lo justice prevailed becos all culprits are labor naayals from Jhuggi Jopris adhe okka MLA or MP kodukulu involve ayyuntee bayata padakapovacchu. No Signature |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Time_pass
Hero Username: Time_pass
Post Number: 10645 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 02:17 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Teluguhero:Nope. Remember what happened to Jayalalitha's case. Karnataka high court acquitted her,but supreme court overruled the high court
Suprem Court ruling came after JJ's death as people in POWER wanted Sasi out If JJ was alive even Supreme Court would have aquited her entha fast ga vachhindhi Suprem Court teerpu choosava? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Teluguhero
Side Hero Username: Teluguhero
Post Number: 2713 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 01:51 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Time_pass:Will those responsible Partys who concocted 2G story be punished?
Nope. Remember what happened to Jayalalitha's case. Karnataka high court acquitted her,but supreme court overruled the high court ED-CBI appeal in 2G case: Delhi high court issues notice to all accused https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ed-cbi-appeal-in-2 g-case-delhi-high-court-issues-notice-to-all-accused/article show/63392693.cms |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Time_pass
Hero Username: Time_pass
Post Number: 10643 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 136.174.187.5
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 01:35 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
PUSHPAM cried fowl about 2G court ruled no 2G Will those responsible Partys who concocted 2G story be punished? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Discoveringself
Side Hero Username: Discoveringself
Post Number: 2273 Registered: 01-2016 Posted From: 136.2.17.167
Rating:  Votes: 1 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 12:21 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and meanwhile a new story is emerging...damn...even the accused in J&K is asking for CBI....but stil...hindus/bjp against minor girls... short term gains kosam, intha chillara batch ki support cheyyadam...is something ppl have to ponder about themselves......it is the present we are building for our future generations.... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Teluguhero
Side Hero Username: Teluguhero
Post Number: 2708 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 12:06 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Teluguhero:The court made the observation in an order granting bail to one of the accused saying the initial dispute was 'only regarding the seat sharing and abuses in the name of castes and nothing more'. The observation was made in the order passed on March 28, granting bail to Rameshwar Dass, reported Indian Express. There is neither any evidence of any preplanning to cause incident deliberately or intentionally or to create disharmony, reads the order which has now been made public
Will those responsible Media houses who concocted beef story be punished? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Teluguhero
Side Hero Username: Teluguhero
Post Number: 2707 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 76.106.197.158
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 11:56 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-junaid-khan-lynching-pu njab-and-haryana-hc-says-dispute-was-over-seat-sharing-rules -out-communl-angle-2605862 Junaid Khan lynching: Punjab and Haryana HC says dispute was over seat sharing, rules out communal angle The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled out the communal angle in connection with the Junaid Khan lynching case. The court made the observation in an order granting bail to one of the accused saying the initial dispute was 'only regarding the seat sharing and abuses in the name of castes and nothing more'. The observation was made in the order passed on March 28, granting bail to Rameshwar Dass, reported Indian Express. âThere is neither any evidence of any preplanning to cause incident deliberately or intentionally or to create disharmony,â reads the order which has now been made public. Last year, the trial court had dismissed Dassâ bail. However, the Justice Chaudhari said, âI do not think, the distinction drawn by trial court is apt." The Additional District and Sessions Judge who was hearing the case had also said that a senior government lawyer was helping accused and sought an action. YS Rathore, in an interim order on October 25 said that Additional Advocate General Naveen Kaushik was assisting the counsel of the main accused, Naresh Kumar, in cross-examination of prosecution witnesses On June 22, 2016, Junaid was lynched and stabbed to death on a Mathura-bound train after an argument broke out, while his brothers, Hashim and Sakir, were injured by a mob which also allegedly hurled communal slurs against them. His brothers had claimed the attackers had taunted and repeatedly called them 'anti-nationals' and 'beef eaters'. They were going back from Delhi after doing Eid shopping. The accused, Naresh Kumar had 'confessed' to having stabbed the victim but insisted that the murder was not related to the beef issue. Naresh Kumar, a resident of Palwal in Haryana, was working as a security guard in a Delhi firm. |