| Author | Message | ||
Awara1984 Side Hero Username: Awara1984 Post Number: 7853 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 125.16.29.4 Rating: N/A |
CJI seems to have written the worst judgement with out any supporting docs or judgements | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9421 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: N/A |
CJI almost negated this case. it is unfortunate both CJI and Nazeer carried all this case through their personal prism and agenda. here is CJI judgement - Religion freedom and practices are fundamental right of constitution - All personal laws are protected by article 25 of Consitution - so all personal laws become fundamental rights and cannot be questionned - since TQ is not part of 1937 CODYFYING it cannot be tested under constitutional validity - since 90% practice this TQ and part of thier religion it becomes fundamental right - No morality is violated Asalu he is so clever to put the words to derail the whole injustice happening to Women, This is the standard we have Now the 3-2 verdict thinks that all personal laws are fundamental rights and cannot be questioned (however bad they are, because they say constitution protects them m by wrongly projecting the words given in constitution) what a pity, - why should u question if a person smokes and rapes, drinks in public if it is added as part of aby religion personal law ? as it is practiced for 1000 of years and cannot be validated | ||
Awara1984 Side Hero Username: Awara1984 Post Number: 7851 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 125.16.29.4 Rating: N/A |
https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2017/08/22/the-supreme-c ourts-triple-talaq-judgment/ | ||
Lichtenberg Side Hero Username: Lichtenberg Post Number: 2561 Registered: 08-2013 Posted From: 76.184.139.27 Rating: N/A |
Lastavatar, will post tomorrow. There is a thing called 'essential practices test'. Will post tomorrow. Good night. | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9420 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: N/A |
This should have been 5-0 because even though constitution provides protection to Muslim personal law as Minority, there is an exception in the name of article 25 or something, that says personal law cannot be considered when violation happens to Human rights Shame on 3-2 verdict | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9419 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: N/A |
is it becuase Hindus never had any personal law ? these people talk so brave and careless when giving judgement on Hindus | ||
Lichtenberg Side Hero Username: Lichtenberg Post Number: 2560 Registered: 08-2013 Posted From: 76.184.139.27 Rating: |
The three majority judges lo Nariman, Lalit said it violates Art 14. Kurian Joseph went with this arg - TT is not essential practice in islam , so it does not violate sharia. - Dangerous segument. Final result good but reason shown by Joseph bad. Tells abt standard of our judiciary. They don't apply the same test in Hindu related cases | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9418 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: N/A |
enduku ilanti items ni CJI ga pettatam Dammu lekapote, should pass the buck back to Govt I appreciate the other 3 judges for condemning instant talaq practise How come those 2 Items felt instant talaq is justified | ||
Lichtenberg Side Hero Username: Lichtenberg Post Number: 2559 Registered: 08-2013 Posted From: 76.184.139.27 Rating: N/A |
Last_avatar, no law needed. It is stuck down with 3-2 judgement. The two minority judges (Nazeer & khehar) talked about bringing law - it is dissent and not binding. Majority stuck it. Item fellow Chirf justice khehar read the minority judgement first and caused confusion. Our idiot media is bad at reporting court judgements | ||
Abhysg Legend Username: Abhysg Post Number: 42121 Registered: 08-2008 Posted From: 72.219.210.147 Rating: N/A |
ipudu divorce ivvadaniki chance lekunda ayindi.. so Law must ipudu | ||
Ruj Megastar Username: Ruj Post Number: 21552 Registered: 03-2007 Posted From: 73.228.241.243 Rating: N/A |
uniform civil code teyakapothe waste..modi is buss anukovach.. | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9416 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: N/A |
Govt is escaping now as usual Modi style of touching any issue superficially and leave it for Air, and get the credit Govt says Muslim women can now file domestic violence if instant triple talaq was forced on them It doesnt want to make any new law explicitly to appease Muslim Men so that they can continue thier unfair practices at ground level told by OWAISI This is also another flop show of Modi like Demon | ||
Abhysg Legend Username: Abhysg Post Number: 42120 Registered: 08-2008 Posted From: 72.219.210.147 Rating: N/A |
domestic violence antonnav..malla men akul cool antonnav.. how yaa | ||
Asdf Legend Username: Asdf Post Number: 30659 Registered: 12-2014 Posted From: 76.102.43.117 Rating: N/A |
kummu avatar kurrodaa. national herald case any progress or AJ gaadu edaina brokerage chesaada? chid ki exact equivalent anipistaadu | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9415 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: N/A |
Now BJP seems to be taking predetermined U turn SC passed the Buck for special law Govt says no need for special law Such cases can be treated as domestic violence , if reported Modi as usual played a political trick showing - Muslim women HE is a messaih - by not doing law he is longing for Muslim men votes Endukandi ee tokkalo chiken hearted Nationalism Mr 56 | ||
Last_avataar Side Hero Username: Last_avataar Post Number: 9414 Registered: 09-2012 Posted From: 12.10.219.228 Rating: |
http://nri.andhrajyothy.com/latestnews/talak-system-in-musli m-countries-16762 Many Pure Islamic countries have stopped this insane practice followed in India, and consider Triple Talaq by Husband as 1st one even he utters 3 times Next it is shifted to courts. Such a Beautiful refined islam is practiced in those countries. Cong and Muslim personal law board has kept the country's islam in dark ages , Now Hats of to Shah Bano and Modi for the changing this barbarous rules. SC - meedku kooda siggu undali, shame on your comments on Religious personal Law , which you violated many times for Hindus chicken hearted judges talk about upholding Muslim personal law from govt encroachment, but always pass unilateral laws for Hindus, shameless folks |
