| Author | Message | ||
Farmer Side Hero Username: Farmer Post Number: 5003 Registered: 04-2015 Posted From: 207.244.66.70 Rating: |
march 2015 news ki ippudu perantam ettaru enti? | ||
Abhysg Legend Username: Abhysg Post Number: 41692 Registered: 08-2008 Posted From: 72.219.210.147 Rating: N/A |
it's his way of expression... just like a cartoon.. | ||
Durgamma Comedian Username: Durgamma Post Number: 1937 Registered: 09-2014 Posted From: 193.240.29.45 Rating: N/A |
Ravindra kurrodidhi morphing case not expression of words. TDP for life. Nationalism does nothing but teach you to hate people you never met and to take pride in accomplishments you had not part in. CBN for President == 2022. C V Reddy (President of elections and judicial outcomes forecasters association)-Prakmukha ?YKAPA Jyothushulavaru | ||
Abhysg Legend Username: Abhysg Post Number: 41683 Registered: 08-2008 Posted From: 72.219.210.147 Rating: N/A |
sooper amma.. freedom on expression ni kapadina Jasthi Chalameshwara Rao gariki dandalayya... ipudu ravindra kurrod ki sorry cheptara..kiki | ||
Andhravodu Moderator Username: Andhravodu Post Number: 13023 Registered: 07-2015 Rating: N/A |
mottaniki pappu ki world popularity and aa case lo hole by supreme court  | ||
Discoveringself Comedian Username: Discoveringself Post Number: 1440 Registered: 01-2016 Posted From: 136.1.1.103 Rating: N/A |
wow...great verdict.....this is root of liberty.....snowflake mentality should not be encouraged...... | ||
Durgamma Comedian Username: Durgamma Post Number: 1936 Registered: 09-2014 Posted From: 193.240.29.45 Rating: N/A |
The pseudo nationals got a slap in supreme court WhatsApp admin not at risk - No arrests under Sec 66-A for social media posts, rules SC http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/no-arrests-under-sec -66-a-for-social-media-posts-rules-sc/57893.html The Supreme Court struck down Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, on Tuesday. Pronouncing their verdict on a PIL filed against the section in a packed courtroom, which empowers the police to arrest a person for allegedly posting ‘offensive materials' on social networking sites, a Bench of Justices J Chelameswar and RF Nariman said the section violated the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and was therefore was illegal. Terming liberty of thought and expression as "cardinal", the Bench said: “The public's right to know is directly affected by Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act." "Section 66-A of the IT Act is struck down in its entirety," said the apex court bench of Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman. "Our Constitution provides for liberty of thought, expression and belief. In a democracy, these values have to be provided within constitutional scheme," said Justice Nariman, pronouncing the verdict. "There is no nexus between public order and discussion or causing annoyance by dissemination of information. Curbs under Section 66A of the IT Act infringes on the public right to know." Calling the written word of the provision, which comprises terms such as ‘"annoying", "inconvenient" and "grossly offensive", vague, the apex court said: “What may be offensive to a person, may not be offensive to others". The assurance given by one government was not binding on its successor, the Bench said. "Governments come and go but Section 66-A will remain forever," the bench said. The SC, however, refused to strike down two other provisions of the IT Act that provide blocking of websites. TDP for life. Nationalism does nothing but teach you to hate people you never met and to take pride in accomplishments you had not part in. CBN for President == 2022. C V Reddy (President of elections and judicial outcomes forecasters association)-Prakmukha ?YKAPA Jyothushulavaru |
