| Author | Message | ||
Country_mustach Junior Artist Username: Country_mustach Post Number: 4 Registered: 01-2017 Posted From: 66.85.88.15 Rating: N/A |
some one put in trackitt ere is the detailed analysis based on an example. Lets assume that an insurance giant in USA would like to implement a major IT project. Upon analysis it is found that the effort required to implement this project is 1000 man weeks or 40,000 man hours. The insurance company doesn't have sufficient resources to execute the project therefore it decides to procure the services of consulting companies to execute this project. Upon receiving the request for proposal, various consulting companies respond. Here is the profile of some of the companies who responded to execute this project along with the quoted fee - Company A - 100% US based work force. The average cost of each resource per hour for executing this project is $80. This company quotes a price of $3,200,000. Company B - 50% US based work force and 50% offshore work force. The average cost of each US resource per hour for executing this project is $80 and the average cost of each offshore (India/China/Brazil) resource for executing this project is $10. This company quotes a price of $1,800,000 (20,000X80+20,000X10) Company C - 25% US based work force and 75% offshore work force. The average cost of each US resource per hour for executing this project is $80 and the average cost of each offshore (India/China/Brazil) resource for executing this project is $10. This company quotes a price of $1,100,000 (10,000X80+30,000X10) Company D - 10% US based work force and 90% offshore work force. The average cost of each US resource per hour for executing this project is $80 and the average cost of each offshore (India/China/Brazil) resource for executing this project is $10. This company quotes a price of $680,000 (4,000X80+36,000X10) As you can see that now insurance company can save $2,520,000 by selecting company D over Company A and has no financial advantage to award the work to Company A. Company A will find it impossible to complete with Company B, C and D without cutting down its US based work force and offshoring the work. There by, resulting in loss of job opportunities for US based work force. This is what is happening today and resulting in job losses in the united states. To protect US economy US Customs and Border Protection must impose import duties based on the amount of services being imported. Lets see how the game changes if the CBP imposes duty tax of 200%, 400% and 600% on Company B, Company C and Company D. Company A - 100% US based work force. The average cost of each resource per hour for executing this project is $80. This company quotes a price of $3,200,000. Potential customs duty revenue to the government - $0. Company B - 50% US based work force and 50% offshore work force. The average cost of each US resource per hour for executing this project is $80 and the average cost of each offshore (India/China/Brazil) resource for executing this project is $30 ($10 cost, $20 custom duty). This company quotes a price of $2,200,000 (20,000X80+20,000X30). Potential customs duty revenue to the government - $400,000. Company C - 25% US based work force and 75% offshore work force. The average cost of each US resource per hour for executing this project is $80 and the average cost of each offshore (India/China/Brazil) resource for executing this project is $50 ($10 cost, $40 custom duty). This company quotes a price of $2,300,000 (10,000X80+30,000X50). Potential customs duty revenue to the government - $1,200,000. Company D - 10% US based work force and 90% offshore work force. The average cost of each US resource per hour for executing this project is $80 and the average cost of each offshore (India/China/Brazil) resource for executing this project is $70 ($10 cost, $60 custom duty). This company quotes a price of $2,840,000 (4,000X80+36,000X70). Revenue to the government - $2,160,000. As you can see now Company A can compete with Company B,C D by reducing its costs from $80 to $66 per hour there by bringing its price quote to $2,600,000 (40,000X65) and giving more job opportunities to residents of the United States. Note how customs duty resulted in a level playing field by rewarding those supporting domestic industry and penalizing those supporting offshore industries. http://www.trackitt.com/usa-discussion-forums/i140/171831108 1/breaking-news-h1-l1-bill-in-senate/page/last_page | ||
Sannayi_nokkulu Hero Username: Sannayi_nokkulu Post Number: 12548 Registered: 06-2014 Posted From: 68.100.238.187 Rating: N/A |
EB2 2013 valla paristhiti enti....next bill kosam wait cehayla?? sachipotava , avineethi ga batukutava okkate option ante alochinchakunda chachipotaa ane type cbn - OT | ||
Vbollu Junior Artist Username: Vbollu Post Number: 578 Registered: 05-2015 Posted From: 96.3.128.196 Rating: N/A |
from trackitt analysis... If this bill passes with the same Summary in IV document, 140K visas will not go to Indians. Here is the possible breakdown which needs a lot discussion. I may be wrong with my analysis.. Step 1: 85% of of 140K = 119K 2: 28.6% of 140K goes to EB1/2/3 = 34K each. 3: Assuming EB1 is current, EB2 will get EB1 spillover + 34K. 4. Indians with PD between 15APR08 and 15NOV12 (China PD) will consume all these available visas. 5. I believe there are about 35K EB2 Indians within the above PD period. EB2 India backlog itself will take atleast one year to clear. 6. Next in line will be EB3 Indians between PD of 22MAR05 and 01OCT13 (China PD).. They will start getting cleared once there is spillover from EB2 and EB3 India will continue to move in its current pace until EB2 India is Current. | ||
Sannayi_nokkulu Hero Username: Sannayi_nokkulu Post Number: 12545 Registered: 06-2014 Posted From: 68.100.238.187 Rating: N/A |
slowly enti ehe....vey slow...entha mandiki vastunnayi pacha cards early....2800 mandhi ki mana desam vallaki eb2 lo vachedi... sachipotava , avineethi ga batukutava okkate option ante alochinchakunda chachipotaa ane type cbn - OT | ||
Sesani Legend Username: Sesani Post Number: 48504 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 204.128.4.5 Rating: N/A |
Bongu kooda kaadu idi pass... 2011 la kuda same story... house la pass senate la D They reason they gave was immigration should be 'balanced'.. lekapothe amrika mottam brown and asians thoti full ayipotadi... but vaallaki telvani fact is that wat is happening but slowly... idi pass aithe fast ga aithadi.. ade diparence | ||
Sannayi_nokkulu Hero Username: Sannayi_nokkulu Post Number: 12544 Registered: 06-2014 Posted From: 68.100.238.187 Rating: N/A |
current kavu gani chala fast ga move avutayi I think sachipotava , avineethi ga batukutava okkate option ante alochinchakunda chachipotaa ane type cbn - OT | ||
Andhravodu Side Hero Username: Andhravodu Post Number: 5465 Registered: 07-2015 Posted From: 69.62.241.11 Rating: N/A |
Country limits in Employment and Family based GC's teesestaru adi pass aite Indians ki benefit, rest of the world wet cloth | ||
Gandhiguevara Legend Username: Gandhiguevara Post Number: 62499 Registered: 10-2009 Posted From: 67.191.221.7 Rating: N/A |
avi pedathaaru ani ikkada vesaa | ||
Sannayi_nokkulu Hero Username: Sannayi_nokkulu Post Number: 12541 Registered: 06-2014 Posted From: 68.100.238.187 Rating: N/A |
avutadi antava Gagu...esari konchem momentum vundi ade bill ni ankelu marchi marchi pedtune vunnaru.... sachipotava , avineethi ga batukutava okkate option ante alochinchakunda chachipotaa ane type cbn - OT | ||
Meghan Side Hero Username: Meghan Post Number: 3035 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 50.155.109.127 Rating: N/A |
points ento pettu Removing Removing tappa naku em artham kaala | ||
Gandhiguevara Legend Username: Gandhiguevara Post Number: 62498 Registered: 10-2009 Posted From: 67.191.221.7 Rating: N/A |
Full text https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/392/ text?r=3 |