| Author | Message | ||
Fargo Hero Username: Fargo Post Number: 12774 Registered: 04-2012 Posted From: 137.254.4.12 Rating: N/A |
"D. R. Bhandarkar and R. G. Bhandarkar believed that Gautamiputra and his son Vasishthiputra Pulumavi ruled jointly during the last years of his reign.[27] This theory is based on their interpretations of the various Satavahana inscriptions. In Nashik prashasti, Gautami Balashri calls herself the mother of the great king as well as the grandmother of the great king, indicating that both were kings at that time. There are also indications that Gautamiputra was alive, when this inscription was issued in the 19th regnal year of his son. Despite this, the inscription describes the achievements of Gautamiputra Satakarni, but remains silent about the exploits of his son. Based on these arguments, Bhandarkar speculated that Gautamiputra ruled eastern Deccan, while Vasishthiputra ruled western Deccan.[28] This theory has been dismissed by several other scholars, including K. A. Nilakanta Sastri and H. C. Raychaudhuri. G.J. Dubreuil theorizes that the excavation of the cave (where this inscription was found) began during the reign of Gautamiputra. However, the work was finished only after his death, and the inscription was placed on his behalf by his mother, during the reign of his son.[29] Bhandarkar's theory is further weakened by the fact that there is clear historical evidence of Gautamiputra's rule over western Deccan. Moreover, no inscriptions issued jointly by the father-son duo are available.[30]" So, he is a middle aged ruler not youth STEROIDS ante sex ke vadataru anukunee VP lu vunnarannamata db lo | ||
Telugu_times Legend Username: Telugu_times Post Number: 48759 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 99.0.30.9 Rating: N/A |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautamiputra_Satakarni Ignore spam and AJ. |