| Author |
Message |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Tilak
Legend Username: Tilak
Post Number: 41725 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 116.51.10.61
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - 08:24 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Awara1984:Swadeshi is not protectionism. It is a philosophy that links culture and economics. It rules out the idea of 'fit-all' model for development and makes development culturally compatible. This actually is the future global idea.
super da .. Team India : NaMo - Parrikar - Gadkari - Prabhu - Piyush - Smriti - Uma Bharti - Sushma |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Awara1984
Side Hero Username: Awara1984
Post Number: 6180 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 125.16.29.3
Rating:  Votes: 1 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - 01:33 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Swadeshi is not protectionism. It is a philosophy that links culture and economics. It rules out the idea of 'fit-all' model for development and makes development culturally compatible. This actually is the future global idea. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Awara1984
Side Hero Username: Awara1984
Post Number: 6179 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 125.16.29.3
Rating:  Votes: 1 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - 01:33 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is 'Indianness' of key technocrats a relevant factor in discharging their job well? Indianness means an Indianised mind. It has two elements — love for India and experience of India. One without the other is truncated. We can engage foreign technocrats as one-time advisers, like Jawaharlal Nehru engaged Nicholas Kaldor — though the choice was wrong. Whether a foreign technocrat's advice will suit us or not can be decided only by an Indianised mind. Deng Xiaoping m mandated his government to examine all ideas but take only that would work in China. The Modi cabinet has told the NITI Aayog 'to zero in on what will work in and for India'. Ideas are welcome from everywhere. But whether they will suit India can be decided only by those who have Indian experience. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Awara1984
Side Hero Username: Awara1984
Post Number: 6178 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 125.16.29.3
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - 01:32 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Do you think the economic reform agenda of the Narendra Modi government is in consonance with the ideology of Indianness pursued by the BJP and the SJM? Indianness does not mean being insulated or autarkic. It means being balanced in favour of India. Actually, the term 'reform' is itself wrong. It presumes an external benchmark. I would prefer the word 'change'. The unregulated financial model of the US in 1990 was once the benchmark for all, but not any more, with the US itself moving towards regulation. Change is a continuous process. If the economists understand this, many a misunderstanding could be removed |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Awara1984
Side Hero Username: Awara1984
Post Number: 6177 Registered: 12-2010 Posted From: 125.16.29.3
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - 01:31 am: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/expert-view/cult urally-rajan-is-more-indian-than-many-of-our-liberals-my-obj ections-are-about-his-policies-s-gurumurthy/articleshow/5291 8515.cms |