Topics | Search Log Out | Register | Edit Profile
Hide Clipart | Banned/Unbanned User Log | Moderator Login History | Thread Delete/Move Log | Last 30 mins | 1 | 2
Sugar Conspiracy - reason for obesity

Chalanachithram.com DB » New TF Industry Related » Archive through April 28, 2016 » Sugar Conspiracy - reason for obesity « Previous Next »
Author Message
 

Kkd
Legend
Username: Kkd

Post Number: 30096
Registered: 02-2008
Posted From: 103.10.109.1

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 07:02 am:       


Bharateeyudu:

traditional indian sweets are good to eat maan...they dont use sugar jaggery is used..inka cheppali ante any sugar used sweet is not indian sweet


rasogullo, laddu, pootharekulu, sweets given in restaurants etc anni sugar ye kadha tammudu....

again i am against any kind of sweet to eat on daily basis....kids or elders....once a while on occassion okay....my elder is averse to all sweets except chocolate...she never touches any of em...
 

Bharateeyudu
Comedian
Username: Bharateeyudu

Post Number: 1218
Registered: 03-2016
Posted From: 117.221.91.1

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 06:48 am:       


Awara1984:

edo share chesanu, i am not an expert

kakapothe sugar, especially fructose which are part and parcel of any packaged food has more bad impact than fats ani cheptunnadu

ala ani fat ekkuva tinte good ani kaadu, but sugar has more bad effects than fat  




okay already bottomline pettava..chudaledu..
 

Bharateeyudu
Comedian
Username: Bharateeyudu

Post Number: 1217
Registered: 03-2016
Posted From: 117.221.91.1

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 06:46 am:       


Kkd:

agree...i am more concious on sugar and junk foods...kaka pothe kids ni control seyyatam kashtam aithandhi...my elder is averse to indian sweets but eats chocolates...my younger adhi idhi ani ledhu sweets anni attract avuthadhu....i do not keep/buy sweets at home...kani groceries or any shopping ellinappud billing time lo maa vodu chocoltes esestheadu trolley lo.....




traditional indian sweets are good to eat maan...they dont use sugar jaggery is used..inka cheppali ante any sugar used sweet is not indian sweet :-)...you must encourage your kid to eat indian sweets nuvvula laddu..sunni vundalu etc..
 

Bharateeyudu
Comedian
Username: Bharateeyudu

Post Number: 1216
Registered: 03-2016
Posted From: 117.221.91.1

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 06:43 am:       


Awara1984:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/07/the-sugar-con spiracy-robert-lustig-john-yudkin




inta pedda article etta chadivedi... :-( ..kallu concentrate cheyyaniyyatledu..
asalu emi raasundi anedi oka 2 lines lo cheppu... if you read it..
 

Right_wing
Comedian
Username: Right_wing

Post Number: 1117
Registered: 12-2014
Posted From: 1.144.96.179

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 06:31 am:       

High fructose Corn Syrup which has changed 2world's diet for ever.
 

Kkd
Legend
Username: Kkd

Post Number: 30094
Registered: 02-2008
Posted From: 103.10.109.129

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 05:30 am:       


Awara1984:


agree...i am more concious on sugar and junk foods...kaka pothe kids ni control seyyatam kashtam aithandhi...my elder is averse to indian sweets but eats chocolates...my younger adhi idhi ani ledhu sweets anni attract avuthadhu....i do not keep/buy sweets at home...kani groceries or any shopping ellinappud billing time lo maa vodu chocoltes esestheadu trolley lo.....
 

Awara1984
Side Hero
Username: Awara1984

Post Number: 5768
Registered: 12-2010
Posted From: 125.16.29.3

Rating: 
Votes: 3 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 05:03 am:       


Kkd:




edo share chesanu, i am not an expert

kakapothe sugar, especially fructose which are part and parcel of any packaged food has more bad impact than fats ani cheptunnadu

ala ani fat ekkuva tinte good ani kaadu, but sugar has more bad effects than fat
 

Kkd
Legend
Username: Kkd

Post Number: 30092
Registered: 02-2008
Posted From: 103.10.109.1

Rating: 
Votes: 2 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 04:41 am:       

tammud confusing ga vundhi....bottomline ettu...edhi tinali...edhi tinoddu...asala tinala vadda seppu
 

Awara1984
Side Hero
Username: Awara1984

Post Number: 5767
Registered: 12-2010
Posted From: 125.16.29.3

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 04:37 am:       

Today, as nutritionists struggle to comprehend a health disaster they did not predict and may have precipitated, the field is undergoing a painful period of re-evaluation. It is edging away from prohibitions on cholesterol and fat, and hardening its warnings on sugar, without going so far as to perform a reverse turn. But its senior members still retain a collective instinct to malign those who challenge its tattered conventional wisdom too loudly, as Teicholz is now discovering.
 

Awara1984
Side Hero
Username: Awara1984

Post Number: 5766
Registered: 12-2010
Posted From: 125.16.29.3

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 04:36 am:       

seems increasingly likely, the nutritional advice on which we have relied for 40 years was profoundly flawed, this is not a mistake that can be laid at the door of corporate ogres. Nor can it be passed off as innocuous scientific error. What happened to John Yudkin belies that interpretation. It suggests instead that this is something the scientists did to themselves – and, consequently, to us.
 

Awara1984
Side Hero
Username: Awara1984

Post Number: 5765
Registered: 12-2010
Posted From: 125.16.29.3

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 04:36 am:       

Energy from food comes to us in three forms: fat, carbohydrate, and protein. Since the proportion of energy we get from protein tends to stay stable, whatever our diet, a low-fat diet effectively means a high-carbohydrate diet. The most versatile and palatable carbohydrate is sugar, which John Yudkin had already circled in red. In 1974, the UK medical journal, the Lancet, sounded a warning about the possible consequences of recommending reductions in dietary fat: “The cure should not be worse than the disease.”

Still, it would be reasonable to assume that Yudkin lost this argument simply because, by 1980, more evidence had accumulated against fat than against sugar.

After all, that’s how science works, isn’t it?
 

Awara1984
Side Hero
Username: Awara1984

Post Number: 5764
Registered: 12-2010
Posted From: 125.16.29.3

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2016 - 04:33 am:       

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/07/the-sugar-con spiracy-robert-lustig-john-yudkin

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image HASH(0x9951660){Movie Clipart}
Show / hide regular icons selection options

Click on following links to open cliparts by Alphabetical Order

 A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M  

N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Show / Hide Filmy icons selection options

Click on following links to open cliparts by Alphabetical Order

  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M  

N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: