| Author | Message | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 8547 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 124.123.70.189 Rating: N/A |
Swamy, in his plea, also referred that the memo sent by the PMO to Ministry of Civil Aviation on May 22, 2013 had raised serious reservations in respect of the growth of the middle eastern carriers including Etihad, the development of middle eastern hubs for servicing traffic from India at the cost and expense of Indian carriers as well as domestic hubs - | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 8546 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 124.123.70.189 Rating: N/A |
http://indianexpress.com/article/business/companies/jet-etih ad-airways-deal-sc-seeks-centre-reply-on-swamys-plea/ | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 8545 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 124.123.70.189 Rating: N/A |
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/whic h-airlines-will-benefit-from-india-uae-deal-asks-sc/ upa lo jarigina deal idhi airindia ki prathi yr 9500 rs brokka pette ee deal ni modi govt venekesuku raavatam too bad yaar I did not expect this âI am very much surprised why the present government is defending the UPAâs deal. I know that this deal was done to mollify the Emir of UAE who was hurt after the Supreme Court cancelled all 2G licenses, including those of his company,â said Swamy. The BJP leader said the Parliamentary sub-committee as well as the CAG had also opposed the Jet-Etihad agreement but the UPA government had done it to help Etisalat, which lost money due to cancellation of 2G spectrum licenses. - seems modi is protecting OR HAS TO PROTECT lutyens gang and subbu thatha still fighting in court cha bjp in power and sti this is happening MODI IS PAPER TIGER |