| Author | Message | ||
Seinfeld Megastar Username: Seinfeld Post Number: 27945 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 166.137.248.117 Rating: N/A |
Asal match fixing jarigindi ani doubt ga undi..evadayya ala 3 wkts pogottukunedi? | ||
Gold Side Hero Username: Gold Post Number: 2047 Registered: 04-2015 Posted From: 99.228.23.116 Rating: N/A |
Musalodiki chaadastham perigindi Harsha is a legend himself in commentary department Very dignified and unbiased as he said his voice is fed globally and he should stay unbiased Amitabh ki ok musalodu commentary basics theliyavu anukundaam Dhoni gaadiki emi ayyindi? Match gelichindi pure sheer vatra sudi tho ...bangla stupids back to back glamour shots valla Noru moosukunte better Otherwise harsha gaadi just english tho champesthaadu time vasthey dhoni ni Member since 200& | ||
Bharateeyudu Junior Artist Username: Bharateeyudu Post Number: 27 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 117.215.188.91 Rating: N/A |
Ohh brendon julianaa nenu tom moody anukunnaa.. by the way amitabh annadi english vallane hindi commentry ni kaadu( which obviously is india centric) | ||
Stellar Junior Artist Username: Stellar Post Number: 179 Registered: 02-2016 Posted From: 24.44.8.218 Rating: N/A |
athani intensity chinnappudu cricket cheusetappudu feeling kaligindi. recent ga commentary ante more analysis type vuntandi. | ||
Jai_tdp Legend Username: Jai_tdp Post Number: 32173 Registered: 02-2009 Posted From: 182.72.170.154 Rating: N/A |
Brendon Julian from Australia. 1999 WC lo aadadu | ||
Stellar Junior Artist Username: Stellar Post Number: 178 Registered: 02-2016 Posted From: 24.44.8.218 Rating: N/A |
Ind vs bang match lo last over commentary cheppindi gavaskar tho paatu inkokaru.. baaga chepparu. nenu oka aa 10 times paina chusi vunta aa last over  amitabh cheppedi hindi or english commentary? | ||
Jai_tdp Legend Username: Jai_tdp Post Number: 32168 Registered: 02-2009 Posted From: 182.72.170.154 Rating: N/A |
Last Moments lo Brendon Julian Commentary was good. Manjrekar gaaniki Paki gaalla bowlers ni choosthe guddali nilavvu onti meeda | ||
Bharateeyudu Junior Artist Username: Bharateeyudu Post Number: 22 Registered: 03-2016 Posted From: 117.221.94.19 Rating: N/A |
I didn't find any thing wrong with commentary...ippatike naaku india bias to cheptaru anipistindu.. especially aa sanjay gaadu..nohit gaadini chuste vonti meeda battale nilavavu Last 5 overs lo Tom moody and Sunil commentary chesaaru...they were unbiased every one knows india gelavaledu bangladesh vodipoindi ani .. Pakistan match taravaatha taatha jenda voopudu inka aagaledu anukunta ...controversies ki duramgaa vunde vaadu ila irukunnadu... inkokadini aithe media aadukunedi dhonappa gurinchi enta takkuva chepte anta manchidi | ||
Teluguvaadu Junior Artist Username: Teluguvaadu Post Number: 569 Registered: 11-2012 Posted From: 117.195.252.6 Rating: |
Mumbai: While the entire country burst out in celebrations following Team Indiaâs nerve-wracking one run win against Bangladesh in the ICC World T20 recently, there was one person who was not so happy. It had nothing to do with the Indian win but with the commentary. Bollywood actor Amitabh Bachchan has been an ardent follower of Mahendra Singh Dhoni-led Indian cricket team and has also shared his emotions on Twitter. Read: Complaint filed against Amitabh for singing National Anthem incorrectly After India registered a resounding win over âThe Tigersâ at the M Chinnaswamy stadium in Bengaluru on Wednesday, Big B, who kept a close eye on the game, was not too happy with the commentary. Going by his tweet, it looks like Senior Bachchan was unhappy with the commentators who spoke more about other players rather than Indian players. And he found the right support in India skipper Dhoni, who backed him. âNothing to add,â Dhoni tweeted. Dhoni too seems to have been disappointed with the commentators Renowned cricket commentator Harsha Bhogle was taken aback after Bachchan-Dhoni tweet but also expressed his huge respect for the Bollywood star. I must confess to being a bit taken aback by the intensity of the criticism yesterday over the question of focussing more on Indian players during the telecast. It emerged after a tweet from Mr. Amitabh Bachchan, someone I admire enormously for the dignified way in which he has always conducted himself,â Bhogle wrote on his Facebook page. Bhogle also gave a detailed account on how commentators are supposed to look at a match. There are two kinds of broadcasts available to Indian viewers. One, on Star Sports 1 is the world feed. That is the telecast, and commentary that goes to everyone around the world. That includes passionate fans in Bangladesh and Pakistan, in South Africa, Australia, England, the USA, everywhere. That broadcast must necessarily be an objective, balanced portrayal of events,â he added. Here is Harsha Bhogleâs full post: I must confess to being a bit taken aback by the intensity of the criticism yesterday over the question of focussing more on Indian players during the telecast. It emerged after a tweet from Mr Amitabh Bachchan, someone I admire enormously for the dignified way in which he has always conducted himself. The assumption among some people was that he was referring to me and while I don't know if that is true, it did strike me that there seems a slight misconception about the role of a commentator in a telecast. I will try and clarify here. I have, incidentally, sent Mr. Bachchan a DM on twitter offering an explanation (in passing, the fact that he follows me gives me a great buzz!). There are two kinds of broadcasts available to Indian viewers. One, on Star Sports 1 is the world feed. That is the telecast, and commentary that goes to everyone around the world. That includes, passionate fans in Bangladesh and Pakistan, in South Africa, Australia, England, the USA, everywhere. That broadcast must necessarily be an objective, balanced portrayal of events. Making that excessively India-centric means being unfair to other teams playing and to viewers from their countries who have the right to be as passionately involved as Indian supporters. And so, talking more about India, in a game like yesterday's, would be letting down viewers in, say, Bangladesh. But the viewer must get insights into either team and so producers have commentators from each country who can draw a better picture of the players, and of the sentiments of their land. I remember, as a young man, listening to radio broadcasts of matches India played overseas, and occasionally watching highlights on a tv in a neighbour's house, and being very hurt at the fact that they focussed almost entirely on their own players. It was something that stayed in my mind long before I dreamt that I could be a commentator. Then there is the Hindi feed that you watch on Star Sports 3. The pictures are largely the same but the telecast goes to a fairly well defined geographical zone. And, obviously, to people who understand Hindi. There the commentary can be India-centric, not biased but India-centric. You can look at every situation from an Indian point of view and that is acceptable. I believe you must still explain what the opposition feels but you can look at the story through Indian eyes, something you cannot do on a world feed. I hope that explains things. A commentator is still open to criticism but ideally, in the light of what I have just outlined. On a slightly different note, I have always felt that people take commentary, and commentators, too seriously. We are merely storytellers, the players create the story. We don't influence the game and our role is no more than to be a guide to watching the game. |
