| Author | Message | ||
Durgamma Junior Artist Username: Durgamma Post Number: 828 Registered: 09-2014 Posted From: 194.69.198.228 Rating: N/A |
The benifits Kapus will get will be similar to madigas.. Madigas oka 3 years education and state jobs lo kummesaru due to their numerical strength and fair share of 7% until the reservation was squashed in supreme court. Similar gaa next vachey panchaythi elections and local body elections lo Rayalseema/Praksam /Nellore lo social justice and taste of power overnight will go to Kapu's and BC's .. Some kamma and reddy will also get Kapu reservations due to surnames/gothrams etc etc.. TDP for life. Nationalism does nothing but teach you to hate people you never met and to take pride in accomplishments you had not part in. | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 6557 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 183.82.194.189 Rating: N/A |
oka commission esthadu cbn aa commisiion oppukunnadhi ani reservations penchuthu oka G.O ISTHADU dhani meedha SC court stay isthadhi IDHI JARAGABOYE EVENTS | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 6556 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 183.82.194.189 Rating: N/A |
impossible KNF idhi cheyyatam ee okkadu court ki velina SC deeni meedha stay isthadhi ika constitutional amendment anedhi jaragatam kooda almost impossible ee ee issue lo | ||
Dma Hero Username: Dma Post Number: 17058 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 70.176.175.122 Rating: N/A |
oka question: Mandal commission agitations 1986 time lo jariginappudu, my understanding was - as per constitution, - reservations never should cross 50%. - every 5 year plan ki 5% tagginchaali ani.. why did they not reduce 5% per year? was constitution amemded to that effect? Jai Andhra!! Jai Jai Andhra!!! | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 6555 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 183.82.194.189 Rating: N/A |
cconstitutional emendment cesi AP resrvations ni 69% ni and ofcourse rajasthan ni include seyyali ninth schedule lo kaani ADHI JARAGATAM IMPOSSIBLE bcos ALMOST EVERY STATE WILL COME UP WITH 69% reservations ila chesthey reservations thene thuttani DESAM lo kudhupuddhi idhi once again | ||
Kadapanagfan Legend Username: Kadapanagfan Post Number: 66742 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 103.246.197.13 Rating: N/A |
BL ippudu yela CBN cheppinatttu BC laku anyayam cheyyakunda antey 50% ni penchali | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 6554 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 183.82.194.189 Rating: N/A |
Yesterday, the Rajasthan Assembly passed two legislations aimed at providing reservation in educational institutions and government jobs to economically backward classes and special backward classes. These Bills are the Rajasthan Economically Backward Classes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions in the State and of Appointments and Posts in Services under the State) Bill, 2015, and the Rajasthan Special Backward Classes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions in the State and of Appointments and Posts in Services under the State) Bill, 2015. Among the special backward classes that stand to benefit from the legislations are politically-influential Gujjars, who have been demanding reservation since 2007. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1429260192255-0'); }); Share This Article Related Article Simply Put: How, what next in Vasundhara Rajeâs quota gambit Claiming to placate âanger,â Rajasthan govt clears quotas for poor among upper castes Rajasthanâs new quota proposals unlikely to stand legal scrutiny, say experts Rajasthan Cabinet clears Bills for Gujjar, EWS reservationAssembly passes Bill for OBC quota in collegesGurjjar quota: Rajasthan seeks CentreÂs help Simply Put: How, what next in Vasundhara Rajeâs quota gambit Claiming to placate âanger,â Rajasthan govt clears quotas for poor among upper castes Rajasthanâs new quota proposals unlikely to stand legal scrutiny, say experts Rajasthan Cabinet clears Bills for Gujjar, EWS reservationAssembly passes Bill for OBC quota in collegesGurjjar quota: Rajasthan seeks CentreÂs help Simply Put: How, what next in Vasundhara Rajeâs quota gambit Claiming to placate âanger,â Rajasthan govt clears quotas for poor among upper castes Rajasthanâs new quota proposals unlikely to stand legal scrutiny, say experts Rajasthan Cabinet clears Bills for Gujjar, EWS reservationAssembly passes Bill for OBC quota in collegesGurjjar quota: Rajasthan seeks CentreÂs help123456PrevNext jQuery(document).ready(function(){ jQuery('.rel-article').bxSlider({ maxSlides: 6, slideMargin: 3 }); }); While the state government had earlier issued an executive order, providing for five per cent reservation to Gujjars and four other special backward classes, the Bill passed by the Assembly yesterday is aimed at giving statutory backing to the decision. Put together, the two sections â economically backward classes and the special backward classes â Banjara/Baldiya/Labana, Gadiya Lohar/Gadoliya, Gujjar/Gurjar, Raika/Rebari/Debasi and Gadariya/Gadri/Gayari â will take the total reservation upto 68 per cent, 18 per cent beyond the 50 per cent cut-off prescribed by the Supreme Court in the landmark Indra Sawhney judgment. While the Rajasthan Assembly passed both the Bills by voice vote, there are adequate reasons to believe that the constitutionality of the fresh reservation could be put to test in the appropriate court in the near future. To say that there are enough grounds for challenging the constitutional validity of the two laws either in the Rajasthan High Court or the Supreme Court would be stating the obvious. Even though the Vasundhara Raje government in Rajasthan did the smart thing by citing the November 2012 report of the Rajasthan State Backward Classes Commission, which recommended reservation for Gujjars and other deprived backward classes, which were not beneficiaries of earlier reservation, it may have erred in dealing with a legally sensitive question in a very simplistic manner. It has also referred to Clause (4) of Article 15 of the Constitution, which allows the State to make any special provisions for the advancement of any socially and educationally Backward Classes of citizens to strengthen its case. Incidentally, in its report, the Rajasthan State Backward Classes Commission had referred to the Indra Sawhney case, saying that âif a special caseâ was made out, reservation could be given âin excess of the 50 per centâ. âAfter analyzing quantifiable data and considering other indexes, the Commission has come to the conclusion that for advancement of these five castes/classes, viz. Gadiya Lohar, Rebari, Banjara, Gurjar and Gadariya, special case is made out to give them status of Special Backward Classes,â its report said. Similarly, the state government cited another Commission â this one appointed to identify and examine the requirements of the economically backward classes of general categories not covered by the existing reservation available to the SCs, STs and Bcs â in its Bill to seek 14 per cent reservation for this section of people. But, in doing so, the State Government may have gone beyond what was settled in M R Balaji versus Mysore and Indra Sawhney and many judgments before and after them. For one, the settled law is that reservation under Articles 15(4), cited by the Raje government in its Bill, âshould not exceed 50 per centâ and that any reservation âbeyond 50 per cent would liable to be struck downâ. Also, the same judgment holds that no reservation can be made for any class other than backward class. By taking the reserved quota to 68 per cent, Rajasthan has joined Tamil Nadu, which has 69 per cent reservation. But, there is a reason why Tamil Nadu has been able to retain the reservation cut off at such a high level despite successive Supreme Court judgments and the Mandal Commission report. First, the state Assembly passed the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of seats in educational institutions and appointments or posts in the service under the state) Act, 1993, to keep reservation at 69 per cent. The President gave his assent to the Bill on July 19, 1994. Thereafter, in 1994, the 76th Constitution Amendment Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament, with then President Shankar Dayal Sharma granting his assent on August 31,1994. As a result of this amendment to the Ninth Schedule of Constitution, the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of seats in educational institutions and appointments or posts in the service under the state) Act, 1993, was included in the Constitution. However, even then, the issue of Tamil Nadu reservation cap being way over the 50 per cent cut-off remains a subject matter of litigation in the Supreme Court. Attempts by other states to emulate Tami Nadu have not borne fruit, mainly because of lack of Constitutional backing. Attempts by various states like Uttar Pradesh to bring in reservation in promotions have also met with judicial resistance. The landmark SC judgment in M Nagaraj and others versus Union of India categorically held that before providing for reservations âthe concerned State will have to show in each case the existence of the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiencyâ. As for the Rajasthan law providing for reservation to economically-weaker sections, Indra Sawhney has categorically settled this issue. âSince the employment under the State is really conceived to serve the people (that it may also be a source of Livelihood is secondary) no such bar can be created. Any such bar would be inconsistent with the guarantee of equal opportunity held out by Clause (1) of Article 16,â the Bench ruled. It remains to be see what justification, apart from the reports of the two Commissions, does Rajasthan government offer in case the fresh reservations are challenged before any court. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/why-rajasthan-res ervation-may-run-afoul-of-constitution/#sthash.l7mq24lm.dpuf Attempts by other states to emulate Tami Nadu have not borne fruit, mainly because of lack of Constitutional backing. First, the state Assembly passed the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of seats in educational institutions and appointments or posts in the service under the state) Act, 1993, to keep reservation at 69 per cent. The President gave his assent to the Bill on July 19, 1994. Thereafter, in 1994, the 76th Constitution Amendment Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament, with then President Shankar Dayal Sharma granting his assent on August 31,1994. As a result of this amendment to the Ninth Schedule of Constitution, the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of seats in educational institutions and appointments or posts in the service under the state) Act, 1993, was included in the Constitution. However, even then, the issue of Tamil Nadu reservation cap being way over the 50 per cent cut-off remains a subject matter of litigation in the Supreme Court - The 76th Amendment accommodated Tamil Nadu Governmentâs legislation in the ninth schedule, which provides for reservations to the level of 69 percent for SC/ST and OBCs.} so final gaa CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT CESI NINTH SCHEDULE lo include sesthay thappa above 50% reservations next to impossible constitutional amendment antey adhi jaragatam kastam in parliament 2/3 majority kaavali tamilnadu vishayam lo 1994 lo constitutional amendment cesi tamilnadu 69% ni ninth schedule lo include sesaru even jarigina SC in its judgement clearly said recently that including some laws in ninth schedule to escape judicial purview can be challenged in court if it violates fundamental rights so even then 69% reservation amalu jaragatam kastam recently rajasthan govt 69% icchindhi reservations But the law has to pass the litmus test of the judicial review as it would defy the Supreme Court injunction that overall reservation should not exceed 50%} |