| Author |
Message |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Jalsa
Legend Username: Jalsa
Post Number: 34434 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 159.53.46.140
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 - 12:24 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Platypus:So, the reading experience is similar to reading a book in an iPad? T
Not at all...
Platypus:That's not what Kindle is supposed to be, right?
Yes, backlight is not straining on the eye. I can't read with iPad no matter how low I go on brightness. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Platypus
Side Hero Username: Platypus
Post Number: 3594 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 125.62.196.161
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 - 12:13 pm: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I thought Kindle's USP was that it is was not a backlit display and so the strain on the eyes was minimal. Been using a Kindle 3rd generation Keyboard version since 2011. However, two days ago - it simply froze and stopped working. Amazon customer support says I have to buy a new device. Now, apparently there's a paperwhite model that everyone's praising saying it has "back light". So, the reading experience is similar to reading a book in an iPad? That's not what Kindle is supposed to be, right? Why introduce a back light when the purpose was to reduce strain on the eyes? I have to pay 100% premium on the basic model to get the backlit display! Why would anyone do it? I could as well use the Kindle app on my iPad to read it if I want back light? About to place the order for the basic kindle. Just wanted to understand this whole puzzle. Naaku nacchindi janaalaki nacchadu... Janaalaki nacchindi naaku nacchadu... Nenanthe.. adho type. |
|