Posted on Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 02:05 am:

---

quote:

Apart from the editorials, take the reportage in the press: On January 4, the Times of India referred to the terrorists as fidayeen five times in one report. Have the reporters not been told that terrorists on suicide missions use this term to glorify themselves in the name of Allah while on suicide missions? Why do we want to give them this honour when they are brutal murderers? So is the expression mujahedeen. Let's get it right: They are all terrorists, bar none.

The Indian Express report freely cites a senior officer's comments and those of a military officer. Is there no gag order? There is an imaginative report of how the Research and Analysis Wing or R&AW was able to identify five terrorists. How does the reporter know this? Has some one told him? Has he seen the report? Is it necessary to disclose this? Would it not be better to keep the opposition guessing? It is also described how the terrorists, after entering India, changed into military fatigues. Where and when did they do this? Who saw them? Or is this deduction? Did they really use this route that evening or had they slipped in even earlier? Who escorted them? It should be easy to confirm.

---

Posted on Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 12:56 am:

---

Tilak:

no info ani tweet chesindi ga anduke .. adi kuda undi ee article lo ..

---

Posted on Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 12:47 am:

---

Prouddesi:

kargil live cover sesina barkaa gang entha pisukknnaro ee incident ki

---