| Author | Message | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 5698 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 183.82.194.189 Rating: N/A |
Hooda govt gave prime Panchkula plot to Associated Journal at throwaway price Chandigarh, Dec 12, 2015, (PTI): A A Senior Haryana minister Anil Vij today charged the previous Bhupinder Singh Hooda-led Congress regime with bending rules and giving 3,360 square metres of prime land in Panchkula to Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) ten years ago."This is the property of Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) now which was given this prime plot in upscale Sector 6 of Panchkula by the previous Hooda government, just six months after it came to power in Haryana in 2005. As this fact has come to light now, we hope the matter will be inquired into as entire National Herald case is before the court," said Haryana Health Minister told reporters at Ambala.Vij alleged that "it is a serious issue which has come to fore, which shows how rules were bend/ignored by the previous Hooda government, which gave 3,360 square metres of prime plot in Panchkula at throwaway prices". - See more at: http://m.deccanherald.com/content/517182/hooda-govt-gave-pri me-panchkula.html/#sthash.NB2bKhaD.x8fFEPFb.dpuf idhi recent gaa icchina plot to AJ by Haryana govt at throw away price ila govt lands pondina samsthalu ila vere charitable trusts lo vileenam ayithe or shares transfer cheyatam poorthi gaa PRIVATE AFAFIR kaadhu anukunta wells fargo . I think govt can take action . | ||
Wellsfargo Side Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 5002 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.39.12 Rating: N/A |
again appati terms and conditions batti untayi. also ippudu AJL properties are not yet transferred. I doubt they will be transferred anytime soon. AJL will have it for ever. also Young India should have paid an income tax on the debt converted into equity as it paid only 50 lakhs to congress to get the debt to its name. India lo companies act is too •••••• up... | ||
Bluelagoon Side Hero Username: Bluelagoon Post Number: 5695 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 183.82.194.189 Rating: N/A |
AJ ki govt lands icchindhi akdha adhi complete private company kaadhu kadha appudu govt can atke action if its assets r gone to other trust | ||
Wellsfargo Side Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 5001 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.39.12 Rating: N/A |
public company story veru. sebi rules untayi. private ki aa scene ledu. even private companies ki aa scene ledu ippudu as per 2013 companies act.
Jagan case lo kooda main issues are money laundering and quid pro-quo.
shares unte sari podu kada. company affairs lo participate cheyyali. 2010 lo dilute cheste evado subramanya swamy vacche daka pattinchukoni share holders ki, ippudu gola cheste vacche use enti. https://www.zaubacorp.com/company-directors/THE-ASSOCIATED-J OURNALS-LIMITED/U22122DL1937PLC215943 Legal gaa vallu chesindi pedda issue kaadu. ethical gaa, moral gaa tappu kaani chatta prakaram they are okay ani naa second sense goshisthundi | ||
Mahesh_fan Megastar Username: Mahesh_fan Post Number: 20592 Registered: 09-2010 Posted From: 167.219.88.140 Rating: N/A |
share holders can go to court aa roju naa adhi best price vachindha ledha annadhi chustharu .. 100c will not be aa best price in any way .. ekkada public companies medha kuda veltharu share holders aa company ni under value ga amithey | ||
Asdf Hero Username: Asdf Post Number: 16088 Registered: 12-2014 Posted From: 76.109.163.196 Rating: N/A |
http://www.firstpost.com/business/national-herald-case-we-ow ned-more-shares-in-associated-journals-than-nehru-did-says-s hanti-bhushan-2543294.html | ||
Gotcha Megastar Username: Gotcha Post Number: 23049 Registered: 02-2008 Posted From: 172.87.48.134 Rating: N/A |
ED jagan meeda case vesinatu veyavachu company matters lo intent to cheat anipiste case veyachu emo kada. ... | ||
Wellsfargo Side Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 5000 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.39.12 Rating: N/A |
judge interpret chesedenti. repu evado subramanya swamy vacchi redbus, 800 crores ki ibibo ki ammaru board. vallaki unna sales ki it will become a 80000 crores company. board didn't act in favour of the share holders ante konna ibibo ganni/ valla share holders ni bokka lo esthara? | ||
Jai_ycp Side Hero Username: Jai_ycp Post Number: 2629 Registered: 04-2015 Posted From: 166.137.240.46 Rating: N/A |
That is interpretable by judge boss. the story of YCP and TDP in 2014 (AP)- http://goo.gl/zgrYmQ http://goo.gl/gn6XL5 the story of TDP in 2014 (T) - http://goo.gl/nyu1Wu | ||
Wellsfargo Side Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 4999 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.39.12 Rating: N/A |
How do you say this. 1956 companies act batti board lo veto power unna vaallu + majority okay chesthe adi company interest kosam chesinattu gaa ne bhavinchali. | ||
Wellsfargo Side Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 4998 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.39.12 Rating: N/A |
Nyayam, dharmam anevi court choodadu sir. Chattam mathrame choosthadi court. chatta prakaram (1956 companies act), the board has the right to raise investments to take care of the expenses, business development and loan repayment. aa mode lo when the AJL had to repay the money to YI, their board made a decision not to dilute their existing assets but to convert their liability into equity. If the board comes and say a weird reason that we expected the 2000 crore properties to become 2 million crores by 2015 and hence we did not want to sell the assets to pay off the debt. Hence we have sold 99% of the equity for debt write off. even in that case, we expected the 1% value for the existing shareholders will become 20k crores. anduke aa ani chesamu ante. what are the factors that helped you to come up with that decision etc ani questions adagadu court. aa rojullo unna law batti that was okay. | ||
Mahesh_fan Megastar Username: Mahesh_fan Post Number: 20591 Registered: 09-2010 Posted From: 167.219.88.140 Rating: N/A |
shares dilute chesina company value untundhi kadha adhi mari 100c loan echadu ani ela echestharu .. board company interest or share holders kosam work cheyaledhu kadha ? | ||
Mahesh_fan Megastar Username: Mahesh_fan Post Number: 20590 Registered: 09-2010 Posted From: 167.219.88.140 Rating: N/A |
5000c property ni 2500 fine katesthay vadilesthara.. epudu aa property evadhi ..court kuda young india ki isthundha ? lekapthay aa share holders ki isthundha ? clear criminal case kadha . | ||
Wellsfargo Side Hero Username: Wellsfargo Post Number: 4997 Registered: 06-2012 Posted From: 183.83.39.12 Rating: N/A |
subramanya swamy kakunda asalu NH share holders case enduku veyya ledu. Valla shares 99% dilution ki enduku vellayi? Board decision ayyi untadi. I don't see serious case here except the case where congress being a political party lending its money to a company. shareholder pattern change ainappudu, they need to report to ROC in that year. Adi already chesi untaru. so appudu dilution chesthunnamu ane daniki board resolution undali. company secretary endorse cheyyali. aa rendu chese untaru. so technically there is no issue. There is a legal issue if 1. someone from the board comes out and says that their signatures were forged. 2. some shareholder comes and says that his/her opinion was not considered when the board was appointed. Remember the law prevelant at that time was the old 1956 act and not the 2013 companies act which ironiclly congress government had brought out to fix such issues. so congress president capacity lo non compliance ki Rs 2500 fine katti soniamma bayata paduthundi... | ||
Tilak Legend Username: Tilak Post Number: 35528 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 183.83.48.28 Rating: N/A |
LOL Narendra Modi, Pradhan Mantri, Bharata Ganarajya - www.pmindia.nic.in - www.narendramodi.in | ||
Sesani Legend Username: Sesani Post Number: 33588 Registered: 08-2014 Posted From: 207.140.166.10 Rating: |
Thokkala few thousand crores kosam endi ee racchaaa.... There should be a rule - any scam under 10k crores shouldnt be considered for investigation... chusss.. mari chillara cases meeda kuda enduku intha concentration... | ||
Ringo_rangaswamy Hero Username: Ringo_rangaswamy Post Number: 13338 Registered: 02-2011 Posted From: 162.134.88.1 Rating: N/A |
Amma kodukulni long vacation ki Andaman ki pampandi vayya. Country sick of these fake Gandhis | ||
Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 51704 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 63.79.89.18 Rating: N/A |
"nee bank balance emanna taggindaaa" kikiki typical congress corruption fan arguement | ||
Time_pass Side Hero Username: Time_pass Post Number: 6900 Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 104.129.204.60 Rating: N/A |
// At the same time, the weak point in Dr. Swamy�s case seems to be the absence of any identifiable victim who has been cheated or whose funds have been misappropriated. // red flower ga the share holders of National Herald lost money ra vall company was sold for 90 crores when it had 2000 croroes of assets avi ammi 90 c appu teerchi panchi vunte each would have recieved a lot of money ellemma ellu malli THE HINDU ani cheppukuntaru, naakudu gallu | ||
Aggipidugu116 Junior Artist Username: Aggipidugu116 Post Number: 883 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 72.78.82.30 Rating: N/A |
that is called MAFIASO baby.. | ||
Aristotle Junior Artist Username: Aristotle Post Number: 629 Registered: 01-2013 Posted From: 117.194.137.93 Rating: N/A |
At the same time, the weak point in Dr. Swamyâs case seems to be the absence of any identifiable victim who has been cheated or whose funds have been misappropriated. After all, the various assets of AJL still stand in its name and the shareholders of Young Indian, which being a Section 25 (non-profit) company, cannot get any dividend or profit out of the companyâs rental income. | ||
Aristotle Junior Artist Username: Aristotle Post Number: 628 Registered: 01-2013 Posted From: 117.194.137.93 Rating: N/A |
Whatever be the merits of the charges against the principal office-bearers of the Congress party in the âNational Heraldâ case, it is an issue that has to be settled in a court of law, and not in the wider political arena, much less in Parliament. If the Congress believes there has been no wrongdoing in the transactions related to the acquisition of Associated Journals Private Ltd. by Young Indian, a non-profit company in which the party's president, Sonia Gandhi, and vice-president, Rahul Gandhi, are the main shareholders, it must simply choose the judicial route to establish their innocence. The Delhi High Court order upholding the trial court summons to both of them, along with other directors of Young Indian, is based on what it sees as prima facie evidence of criminality. The best way to deal with the situation is to face it legally. When Subramanian Swamy first questioned the legality of the transactions, it was the Congress that challenged him to take Ms. Gandhi and her son to court. âIt is for those who make allegations to prove their charges,â the party had said in 2012. It cannot then turn around now and say that the entire proceedings amount to political vendetta. Even if there is a political motive, the partyâs president and vice-president have to provide answers to the questions that have arisen from the trial court summons and the High Courtâs refusal to intervene. To disrupt Parliament on an issue that involves no larger public interest goes against all democratic norms, and it cannot be justified on any count. Indeed, to speak of political vendetta following a court summons is to cast aspersions on the very independence of the judiciary. A look at the facts of the case does make one doubt whether AJL could not have protected its shareholdersâ interests by liquidating some of its assets in order to return its loan to the Congress. The floating of Young Indian, described by the court as a âspecial purpose vehicleâ, does cast some suspicion. At the same time, the weak point in Dr. Swamyâs case seems to be the absence of any identifiable victim who has been cheated or whose funds have been misappropriated. After all, the various assets of AJL still stand in its name and the shareholders of Young Indian, which being a Section 25 (non-profit) company, cannot get any dividend or profit out of the companyâs rental income. The Congress will have to believe in its own contention that there was no âentrustmentâ in the first place for anyoneâs trust to be breached and that no one claims to be deceived or cheated. But the judicial process will have to be faced squarely without resort to political theatre. The charges of cheating and criminal breach of trust against the Congress leaders will have to be countered only through the legal route. http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/sonia-and-rahul-su mmoned-in-national-herald-case/article7966764.ece | ||
Aristotle Junior Artist Username: Aristotle Post Number: 627 Registered: 01-2013 Posted From: 117.194.137.93 Rating: N/A |
Whatever be the merits of the charges against the principal office-bearers of the Congress party in the âNational Heraldâ case, it is an issue that has to be settled in a court of law, and not in the wider political arena, much less in Parliament. If the Congress believes there has been no wrongdoing in the transactions related to the acquisition of Associated Journals Private Ltd. by Young Indian, a non-profit company in which the party's president, Sonia Gandhi, and vice-president, Rahul Gandhi, are the main shareholders, it must simply choose the judicial route to establish their innocence. The Delhi High Court order upholding the trial court summons to both of them, along with other directors of Young Indian, is based on what it sees as prima facie evidence of criminality. The best way to deal with the situation is to face it legally. When Subramanian Swamy first questioned the legality of the transactions, it was the Congress that challenged him to take Ms. Gandhi and her son to court. âIt is for those who make allegations to prove their charges,â the party had said in 2012. It cannot then turn around now and say that the entire proceedings amount to political vendetta. Even if there is a political motive, the partyâs president and vice-president have to provide answers to the questions that have arisen from the trial court summons and the High Courtâs refusal to intervene. To disrupt Parliament on an issue that involves no larger public interest goes against all democratic norms, and it cannot be justified on any count. Indeed, to speak of political vendetta following a court summons is to cast aspersions on the very independence of the judiciary. A look at the facts of the case does make one doubt whether AJL could not have protected its shareholdersâ interests by liquidating some of its assets in order to return its loan to the Congress. The floating of Young Indian, described by the court as a âspecial purpose vehicleâ, does cast some suspicion. At the same time, the weak point in Dr. Swamyâs case seems to be the absence of any identifiable victim who has been cheated or whose funds have been misappropriated. After all, the various assets of AJL still stand in its name and the shareholders of Young Indian, which being a Section 25 (non-profit) company, cannot get any dividend or profit out of the companyâs rental income. The Congress will have to believe in its own contention that there was no âentrustmentâ in the first place for anyoneâs trust to be breached and that no one claims to be deceived or cheated. But the judicial process will have to be faced squarely without resort to political theatre. The charges of cheating and criminal breach of trust against the Congress leaders will have to be countered only through the legal route. http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/sonia-and-rahul-su mmoned-in-national-herald-case/article7966764.ece | ||
Teluguhero Comedian Username: Teluguhero Post Number: 1662 Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 63.151.12.167 Rating: |
http://www.niticentral.com/2015/12/10/lutyens-medias-deafeni ng-silence-on-nationalherald-338096.html National Herald and Nehru-Gandhis Lutyens Media Editorial Silence The Indian main stream media has tendency to pick up topics for discussion and debate as per its own likes and dislikes. It has been evident more so in the recent past where we hear all scream themselves hoarse over the so-called rise in âintoleranceâ in India and then they become mute on issue like âNational Heraldâ; where a political partyâs president and vice president take their own political party for a ride. While the Indian Express has done a couple of investigative news reports on the murky real estate deals of AJL it is yet to make up its mind editorially on both the National Herald Case and on the manner which the Congress is attributing political motives to the Court order. We are yet to see anything substantial editorially from the ever so vocal Telegraph which in recent days went out of its way to make a political statement on its front page on issues negative to the BJP. Loyal to its political affinities the Telegraph went on to inform us on how the Nehru-Gandhi scion was preparing to brazen it out in Jail so he could milk some political sympathy â this when the Court merely asked him to make an appearance, forget detaining him or requiring him to post bail. But for a mildly admonishing editorial from The Hindu all the main newspapers have ensured that their editorials remained blank as far as #NationalHerald case is concerned. The Hinduâs editorial reads, âWhen Subramanian Swamy first questioned the legality of the transactions, it was the Congress that challenged him to take Ms. Gandhi and her son to court. âIt is for those who make allegations to prove their charges,â the party had said in 2012. It cannot then turn around now and say that the entire proceedings amount to political vendetta. Even if there is a political motive, the partyâs president and vice-president have to provide answers to the questions that have arisen from the trial court summons and the High Courtâs refusal to intervene. To disrupt Parliament on an issue that involves no larger public interest goes against all democratic norms, and it cannot be justified on any count.â When the Business Standard did manage squeeze an OpEd or two by guest columnists it did so interrogating Subramanian Swamy, the petitioner, rather than calling to question the Nehru-Gandhis, the accused in this case. It seems the only angle worthy of editorial space in the Business Standard was probing Swamy on the strength of his case rather than quizzing the Nehru-Gandhis on the ethics of the transactions. Here in this video also one can see Rajdeep Sardesai playing Defense Lawyer to question Dr. Subramanian Swamy on the #NationalHerald case while insinuating personal malice on the part of Dr. Swamy against Congress President Sonia Gandhi instead of questioning those against whom charges have been laid. The likes of Barkha Dutt suddenly have found more pressing issues to discuss than National Herald case. The amount of disinterest that the mainstream media has shown for the case has forced likes of Minhaz Merchant ask questions that they find should have been probed in detail. It is not surprising to see ever so vocal and opinionated Sagarika Ghose and her likes try to figure out as to what is National Herald case in all about in the first place. Abhishek M Chaudhari had way back in November 2012 tracked major newspapers for the coverage of allegations against Nitin Gadkari by Arvind Kejriwal vis a vis the coverage of allegations against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi by Dr. Subramanian Swamy. The way main stream media has covered National Herald case it has been left for people to show the bias Readers have been waiting to read an OpEd by the likes of Pratap Bhanu Mehta on National Herald case where they question the first family of Congress party on defrauding its own party. May be it will a long long wait till the Lutyensâ media poses some challenge to the Gandhis too the way they do others |
