| Author | Message | ||
Mental_sachinodu Hero Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 18017 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 209.60.166.146 Rating: N/A |
1942 - quit india movement was a very crucial time for India. India/Congress knew British is knee deep in the war and they could not afford any more nuisance in India. China, USA were putting pressure on British to deal with India, even if it meant granting freedom before the end of the war, as Japanese reached borders of india. time was ripe for the indians for putting a strong bid. although they tried, it did not pan out as fruitful, unless considering uniting alot of youth against the british. ofcourse of the war, Brits were not the same super power anymore. | ||
Savyasachi Junior Artist Username: Savyasachi Post Number: 681 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 8.39.116.254 Rating: N/A |
Modi andhra ki special status ichinattu pakistan terrorism ni anachi vesinattu same to same ade vidham ga US india freedom fight ki support extend chesindi | ||
Mental_sachinodu Hero Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 18016 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 209.60.166.146 Rating: N/A |
vunkl... its the same support as we indians gave to African countries under british rule. on paper we are against british, but that does not mean we did anything. lets see, did they have any trade embargo disruption, did they wage war against them in the name of establishing democracy(keeping in mind that indians had no voting rights), did they have trade sanctions against british. that support was meant nothing to anyone, except for the gullible US voters, who were shown that their interest in the region was to grant independence to india. if you have any proof otherwise i am willing to disco further, but just statements like overt and covert, continous support lantivi use chesi nijam ani thelchesthe.. chesedhi eti ledhu. | ||
Kindal Side Hero Username: Kindal Post Number: 3413 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 14.139.128.21 Rating: N/A |
I never thought US had an iota of interest in helping India in Independence, but after looking at the evidence given in that book and reading more, I can say that despite several constraints, US did it's best in helping us.
Every country act's in it's own interests and so did US. Despite ww2 & resistance from Churchill, US extended continuous support during freedom struggle. !ntfi | ||
Cocanada Legend Username: Cocanada Post Number: 51625 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 70.178.255.236 Rating: N/A |
thanks for the info re | ||
Tilak Legend Username: Tilak Post Number: 34827 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 49.207.186.183 Rating: N/A |
you nailed it .. specially clinton, obama gallu as it is ga ide chesaru .. buss gadu first term lo paki ni encourage chesina .. second term lo koddiga balance chesadu .. Narendra Modi, Pradhan Mantri, Bharata Ganarajya - www.pmindia.nic.in - www.narendramodi.in | ||
Savyasachi Junior Artist Username: Savyasachi Post Number: 680 Registered: 12-2013 Posted From: 8.39.116.254 Rating: N/A |
this is what i feel after reading the articles. every time there is a terrorist attack in india us president holds a press conference, talks about 911 and assures that they are with india and it will help strategically and all other bull crap. go and signs another arms deal to supply f16 fighter jets to pak. during the first and second ww US is the major arms dealer for allied forces. so even if us wanted to help india it wouldnt have forced uk to do it. | ||
Tilak Legend Username: Tilak Post Number: 34800 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 49.207.186.183 Rating: N/A |
1942 Quit India movement appudu USofA response enti? Narendra Modi, Pradhan Mantri, Bharata Ganarajya - www.pmindia.nic.in - www.narendramodi.in | ||
Mental_sachinodu Hero Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 18005 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 24.125.46.70 Rating: N/A |
does this statement mean that while there is no way to quantify or qualify the help done by US in indian freedom struggle, but they have done siginificant and more deserving mention of their acts  LOL Just kidding .. anyway I suggest you do more reading of the political aspirations of US of the 30s and 40s. US of that era is not the same all powerful US of today. It was a government while against Colonialism, a word that riles US citizenry, used to convince US citizens to justify actions against British any where in the world, was to spread capitalist imperialism, which means remove British control and change it with control of US. You also might be aware of that India was the command base in East Asia for US and UK, during WWII. So How did the brutish(yes not just british ) Churchill respond to dear ole Freddie Roosevelt, he simply asked him to shove his reservations against india. dont get me wrong FDR was a deccent bloke, but he neither had enough clout nor enough reason to push for independence to put a phrase "overtly and covertly help india" | ||
Kindal Side Hero Username: Kindal Post Number: 3412 Registered: 09-2007 Posted From: 14.139.128.20 Rating: N/A |
Saw this in yesterday's thread http://www.chalanachithram.com/discus/messages/115/306562.ht ml?1447775401
There is ample evidence that US overtly and covertly helped India in many ways during freedom struggle. Read Rudhra Chaudhari's Forged in Crisis in which he documented those details briefly. Few online sources that I could find http://www.bl.uk/reshelp/findhelpregion/asia/india/indianind ependence/ww2/ww23/ http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/01/03/fdrs_war_for_in/ Gandhi's letter asking for help https://research.archives.gov/id/7065056 !ntfi |