| Author | Message | ||
Theaviator Junior Artist Username: Theaviator Post Number: 275 Registered: 07-2014 Posted From: 124.123.217.103 Rating: N/A |
Tata was appointed as evironmental consultant for preparation of Envr impact assessment report as per the plan They will follow all procedures and get MoEF approval for project.. State will support through liaison with center to get approval faster.. CRDA plan by s'pore has given top priority for Green preservation.. There is no need to worry that process can be stalled Ina MoEF tho issues vasthe Green tribunal ki velthundi case, so ••••• sunrise ki mundee kuusi natty vunnai.. State did not even file application yet with MoEF.. Green tribunal em chestedhi MoEF clear cheyyakunda.. GT cheppina cheppakapoyina existing MoEF committees will do their job | ||
Inquisitive Junior Artist Username: Inquisitive Post Number: 372 Registered: 09-2014 Posted From: 72.201.252.26 Rating: N/A |
Supreme Court has rarely agreed to even hear appeals on the orders and judgements of this tribunal so in a way, it is more powerful than a HC because HC's orders are more often modified/reversed by the SC than those of this tribunal. The reason for that is that this tribunal has both Judicial Member (legal background) as well as Expert Member (Environment and Forests expert) and they only listen to cases in division benches. | ||
Inquisitive Junior Artist Username: Inquisitive Post Number: 371 Registered: 09-2014 Posted From: 72.201.252.26 Rating: N/A |
Absolutely wrong, this tribunal has enormous powers, in order to enforce its orders, the tribunal can convict the person responsible for violating its orders by conviction unto three years as well as enormous fines. And it is true that appeal lies only with the Supreme Court of India. In fact, every bench of this tribunal has a current or former High Court Judge as Judicial Member in addition to an Expert Member (who is designated as equivalent to Union Secretary, i.e., Chief Secretary in state). The Chairperson of this tribunal also actively hears many cases by Presiding over the principal bench, he resigned as the judge of SC to join this tribunal as Chairperson. Look at NGT Act. if you have doubts on this: http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/NGT-fin. pdf | ||
Ramramesh Side Hero Username: Ramramesh Post Number: 4275 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 216.31.211.11 Rating: N/A |
It's not binding....they have no powers to enforce, the tribunal goes to supreme court to enforce things....
antha scene ledu....Supreme court Chief justice HL Dattu already gave his opinon... The Supreme Court today declined to entertain a PIL questioning the decision to develop new capital city of Andhra Pradesh on the southern side of river Krishna near Vijayawada without adequate environment clearances. “Only at the time of construction activities, environment clearances are required and not before that,” a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justices M Y Eqbal and Arun Mishra said. “For developing a new capital city, there will be some or the other problem. Here it is about acquiring 30,000 hectares of land. All sorts of problems will be there. Can the Supreme Court say that the capital city will be in this part or that part?” the Bench observed. The PIL by Andhra Pradesh residents P Srimannarayana and others had raised several questions and their advocate Prashant Bhushan contended that how can the super city be developed without environment impact assessment when it involved 7000 sq km of area. “It is very difficult for us (to pass direction),” the Bench said, following which Bhushan sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to approach the National Green Tribunal. Allowing withdrawal of the PIL, the bench said the petitioners are at liberty to approach an appropriate forum. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-decline s-to-hear-pil-on-developing-new-capital-city-of-andhra-prade sh/#sthash.MQwKptje.dpuf | ||
Royyala_nayudu Side Hero Username: Royyala_nayudu Post Number: 5102 Registered: 04-2014 Posted From: 99.108.229.196 Rating: |
Wrong ee nandi, BOB edhi chesthe adhi correct, thappu ani chepthe ani rastraniki center chesthunna droham quota lo vesestham. | ||
Saint Legend Username: Saint Post Number: 52006 Registered: 01-2011 Posted From: 12.22.163.132 Rating: N/A |
ante ippudu capital construction start avvada ee case televaraku? licked aa? | ||
Boston_baba Side Hero Username: Boston_baba Post Number: 7428 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 198.175.68.37 Rating: |
green tribunal is binding and can only be challenged in SC. http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-andhrapradesh/tdp-claims-denied-by-its-own-budget/article6336996.ece http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra_pradesh/article41814.ece 1991- AP debt 22% of GSDP, 2004 - 34% of GSDP, 2014 - 22% of GSDP. | ||
Kadapanagfan Legend Username: Kadapanagfan Post Number: 60061 Registered: 12-2006 Posted From: 103.246.197.12 Rating: |
happy ga govt land lo9 kattukoni migatha land ammuku denkachu ga yendi ra ayya yeee fooling sekarana grreeen beltu black belttu lol | ||
Aggipette Junior Artist Username: Aggipette Post Number: 59 Registered: 04-2015 Posted From: 115.242.247.153 Rating: N/A |
akada kattedi enviromental friendly gane. master plan chudu. 25% green cover. 13000 acres lo trees eh. | ||
Ramramesh Side Hero Username: Ramramesh Post Number: 4274 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 50.131.147.69 Rating: N/A |
There is NO clerance necessary for a capital city apriori....please read what HLDattu said in his judgement in the same case....!! Environmental impact is done at the stage of planning the capital which has been done as per the green cover specified in the singapore govt provided plan.... All necessary permissions in place...you further need to understand that green tribunal has no binding authority, it has as much power as human rights commission, its the supreme court that will decide this and the chief justice HL Dattu has already given his opinion....all these central govt committees are a big showofff...nothing will come out of this, it wont even delay the capital building activity.... | ||
Platypus Side Hero Username: Platypus Post Number: 2079 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 125.62.207.153 Rating: |
This is exactly what I have been saying... Why don't we understand that there is a need to preserve the environment? Akkada capital vaddhu ani cheppatledu evaru... Get proper environmental clearances before building anything annadhi point. Is that wrong? Naaku nacchindi janaalaki nacchadu... Janaalaki nacchindi naaku nacchadu... Nenanthe.. adho type. | ||
Ramramesh Side Hero Username: Ramramesh Post Number: 4273 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 50.131.147.69 Rating: N/A |
UPA govt was ready to denotify forest lands for this....this plan is a hell lot better than that....no chance for any adverse remark in this matter, besides Green trbunal ruling is not binding.... | ||
Ramramesh Side Hero Username: Ramramesh Post Number: 4272 Registered: 03-2014 Posted From: 50.131.147.69 Rating: N/A |
Supreme court struck down this case once...if at all green tribunal pokes its nose after environ ministry report (highly unlikely since Javadekar is the environmental minister and a good friend of Bob), supreme court will strike this down again....mch ado about nothing.... | ||
Platypus Side Hero Username: Platypus Post Number: 2078 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 125.62.207.153 Rating: |
Natural ga form ayina cities gurinchi kaadu... Ippudu kotthagaa katte city environment friendly gaa undaalannadhi point. Naaku nacchindi janaalaki nacchadu... Janaalaki nacchindi naaku nacchadu... Nenanthe.. adho type. | ||
Aggipette Junior Artist Username: Aggipette Post Number: 58 Registered: 04-2015 Posted From: 115.242.247.153 Rating: N/A |
veela bonda. ipudu vijayawada lo people andaru vijayawada ni khali chesi vere cities ki vellala river pakkane city vundani ? | ||
Dhonifan Side Hero Username: Dhonifan Post Number: 3881 Registered: 12-2012 Posted From: 208.102.170.10 Rating: N/A |
itu vja undhi river bed painey kadha | ||
Boston_baba Side Hero Username: Boston_baba Post Number: 7425 Registered: 07-2012 Posted From: 198.175.68.39 Rating: N/A |
early stages lo manage cheste better..otherwise, big issue avochu. http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-andhrapradesh/tdp-claims-denied-by-its-own-budget/article6336996.ece http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra_pradesh/article41814.ece 1991- AP debt 22% of GSDP, 2004 - 34% of GSDP, 2014 - 22% of GSDP. | ||
Platypus Side Hero Username: Platypus Post Number: 2075 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 125.62.207.153 Rating: N/A |
NGT issues notice to CRDA on Capital city project http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/ngt-iss ues-notice-to-crda-on-capital-city-project/article7253244.ec e The National Green Tribunal has issued notices to the Ministry of Forests and Environment, Andhra Pradesh government and the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA) for undertaking development works for the new capital city on the Krishna River bank without conducting appropriate environmental impact assessment. The Tribunal has directed the Union environment and Forests Ministry to constitute an expert committee to analyse the environmental and social impact for developing the new capital city. It has also directed the Andhra Pradesh government and the APCRDA to not undertake any development activity including urbanisation or infrastructure development on river floodplain, wetlands and fertile agricultural lands. The AP government has been further directed to examine the feasibility of large-scale urbanisation and infrastructure development on the areas identified for formation of the capital city and to propose alternatives which could lead to minimum devastation of natural resources. The intervention follows concerns regarding large-scale development activities planned for the new capital over one lakh hectares of land acquired by the A.P. government. An expert committee set up by the Centre had earlier raised issues of acquisition of fertile agricultural land, high water table of the region, vulnerable soil type and the flood-prone nature of the region to suggest that the nature of development planned in this region may not be appropriate for it. The NGT’s order came after two individuals Pandalaneni Srimannarayana from Vijayawada and Anthati Kamalakar from Nellore moved the Tribunal after the Supreme Court heard their petition on March 20 and asked them to withdraw the petition and approach an appropriate agency to raise the matter. The appellants were concerned that the development of the new capital in the present manner may adversely impact the livelihood of residents and environment of the region overall. Naaku nacchindi janaalaki nacchadu... Janaalaki nacchindi naaku nacchadu... Nenanthe.. adho type. |
