Topics | Search Log Out | Register | Edit Profile
Hide Clipart | Banned/Unbanned User Log | Moderator Login History | Thread Delete/Move Log | Last 30 mins | 1 | 2
Why TTs Crying on Jaya's Court Case V...

Chalanachithram.com DB » New TF Industry Related » Archive through May 12, 2015 » Why TTs Crying on Jaya's Court Case Verdict? « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

Nice
Side Hero
Username: Nice

Post Number: 9599
Registered: 05-2009
Posted From: 115.112.100.10

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, May 12, 2015 - 05:09 am:       


Abhysg:

now they are scared... jagan case kooda ilane avuddi ani..



 

Bluelagoon
Comedian
Username: Bluelagoon

Post Number: 1569
Registered: 12-2013
Posted From: 202.65.144.206

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, May 12, 2015 - 03:41 am:       

hihihihi rohini madam maaya lokamatha kooooooo

akakda jagagd case lo emo 24 hours gadavakunda ENQUIRY START vicharana madhya lo undhi so emi cheyalemu ani SC ceppindhi


ikkada emo mana CIDDU MAAYA cbi did not start any enquiry so SC ki poyinappudu SC HC ki refer cesindhi HC judgement icchian judge ni emnaa ledhu SC ( idhi TTs 5 th class fail batch kalpitham)

ika HC ki poyian tharuvatha asalu sisalu drama start same judge or kottha CJ in highcourt mundhuku velthe ekkada mana pappul udakavu ani LOAKAMAATHA ROHINI MADAM bench mundhuku raaataniki NOT BEFORE ME DRAMAS VESAARU RELIANCE THO IMPLEAD CEYINCHI koooooooo

fonal gaa LOAKMAATAH ROHINI judgement icchindhi ee mathram dhnaiki CBN pure inko anna hazare koooooooooooo
 

Abhysg
Megastar
Username: Abhysg

Post Number: 22933
Registered: 08-2008
Posted From: 73.29.102.28

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, May 11, 2015 - 04:18 pm:       

now they are scared... jagan case kooda ilane avuddi ani..

inni rojulu laksha kotlu ani pracharam chesina court lu nammatledu ani
 

Avrajesh
Side Hero
Username: Avrajesh

Post Number: 5338
Registered: 01-2013
Posted From: 116.14.12.200

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, May 11, 2015 - 03:58 pm:       


Ramramesh:




Yemi Baavi logic babu. Saana kastapaddav.

One month lo retire avaboye Justice Kukrooo Jagan case lo PIL meeda CBI inquiry ki veyochu. GULAM AHMAD bench veyakoodadanta. Vallaki meeru Paathalu Seppali. Btw. judge Kukroo was immediately appointed as HRC chaiman (first time a non-local quota judge for HRC post itseems) by AP state govt.

Ayinaa akkada Babu meeda case kottesidni , So and so judge gaaru Inquiry ki order chesinanduku kaadu. Judge Rohini felt the PIL was politically motivated anta. :D
 

Ramramesh
Side Hero
Username: Ramramesh

Post Number: 4107
Registered: 03-2014
Posted From: 216.31.219.19

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, May 11, 2015 - 03:49 pm:       


Avrajesh:

Meeremo, Babu meeda AP High Court Judge Gulam Ahmed bench CBI Inquiry(Preliminary) veyagane petitions meeda, petitions veyinchukoni bench lu marchi kavalasina Judge daggariki case vachedaaka "NOT Before Me" drama laadi, chivariki preliminary inquiry kooda lekundaa "Its not a Public Interest Litigation(PIL) but it is Political Interest Litigation(PIL) " ani seppi case kotteyinchukontara?




Justice Ghulam Ahmed was a temporary placed holder Chief Justice till the permananet one came. Itlaanti temporaru justice asalu PIL thoo deal cheyyatam was illegal and unethical. 2 days before the full-time Chief justice Madhan Lokur was to join, suddenly Ghulam Ahmed brought to the bench a case that was NOT EVEN LISTED in the case roster and suddenly gave an ex-party judgment
that a ED/CBI/CID and every tom-dick and harry investigation in to the likes of Reliance-Ramaoji-MM-CBN-TDP and what not? Meantal nako judge gaadu ammudu poyaadani seppataniki inthakante emi kaavaali?

Asalu case roster loo leni case ni sudden gaa teesuku vacchi ex-party judgement isthaara evaranna? THat too when the permannet Chief justice Lokur was going to come the next day and take charge of the case?

This is exactly why the Supreme court asked CBN and other to go back and fight the case in the high court as it felt the judges were biased. Jagan also approached the Supreme court, how come Jagan didn't get the same relief? Bottom line, Supreme court was convinced of Jagan's corruption evidences and the aim-in-the-dark-with-no-evidences case of Vijayamma against CBN!!!
 

Avrajesh
Side Hero
Username: Avrajesh

Post Number: 5336
Registered: 01-2013
Posted From: 116.14.12.200

Rating: 
Votes: 4 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, May 11, 2015 - 03:12 pm:       

Meeremo, Babu meeda AP High Court Judge Gulam Ahmed bench CBI Inquiry(Preliminary) veyagane petitions meeda, petitions veyinchukoni bench lu marchi kavalasina Judge daggariki case vachedaaka "NOT Before Me" drama laadi, chivariki preliminary inquiry kooda lekundaa "Its not a Public Interest Litigation(PIL) but it is Political Interest Litigation(PIL) " ani seppi case kotteyinchukontara?

TN CM meeda 18 years investigation jarigina tharvatha kooda the judge found NOTHING .

Jaya ni Modi save chesadani meerantunnaru, Babu ni Chidhu/Sonia save chesaadani lokam andhi.

Jaya future lo NDA ki support isthundemo. May be she is following Babu who saved congress govt in AP from 2012- 2014

So, why are you crying on Judiciary or Jaya or MODI? Mee Guriginja buddhi soopinchukonnaru gaa?

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image HASH(0x9c0c37c){Movie Clipart}
Show / hide regular icons selection options

Click on following links to open cliparts by Alphabetical Order

 A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M  

N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Show / Hide Filmy icons selection options

Click on following links to open cliparts by Alphabetical Order

  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M  

N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: