| Author | Message | ||
     Lenin Side Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 2955 Registered: 02-2014 Posted From: 122.107.192.235 Rating: N/A |
mari appudu concenrs unnai ani cheppi ippudue egeskunta implement cheyataniki ready avuthunna batch enti? Congress pakkaleste , Vachi poolu jalli elle batch aa.. | ||
| Rbabu Comedian Username: Rbabu Post Number: 1948 Registered: 09-2013 Posted From: 24.211.170.243 Rating: N/A |
Foreign policy commitments are not reneged every 5 years with change of governments. | ||
| Thokkalohdi Side Hero Username: Thokkalohdi Post Number: 2966 Registered: 01-2008 Posted From: 24.130.117.120 Rating: N/A |
 attallo arati pandu... bayataki vachaka..bengal kuda poyindi lol... Ranbir Kapoor is god of acting | ||
| Lenin Side Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 2954 Registered: 02-2014 Posted From: 122.107.192.235 Rating: N/A |
I mean we communists supported UPA - 1 , but due to civil nuke deal we withdrew our support to UPA apati nunde UPA kumbhakonallo irukkopotam start aindi | ||
| Nippu Side Hero Username: Nippu Post Number: 6340 Registered: 12-2008 Posted From: 24.190.235.29 Rating: N/A |
2008 lo UPA - 1 nundi denni oppose chese mem bayatakocham // evaru vacharu upa -I nunchi baytaki. | ||
| Lenin Side Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 2952 Registered: 02-2014 Posted From: 122.107.192.235 Rating: N/A |
2007 lo same deal gurinchi BJP leaders express chesina concenrs Rejecting the Indo-US civil nuclear deal in its current form on the ground that it amounted to an "assault on the nuclear sovereignty and foreign policy options" of India, the BJP on Saturday demanded that a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) be set up to examine it and the deal be finalised only after getting Parliament’s approval. "Right since July 2005 (when a joint statement was issued after PM Manmohan Singh’s meeting with US President George Bush in Washington), the government has been spreading the canard that the deal would recognise India as a de-facto nuclear power. Nothing could be further from the truth," asserted Sinha who was the External Affairs Minister in the Vajpayee-led NDA government. The inspections that India would be subject to and the conditions imposed on it under the agreement would be equivalent to those applicable to non-nuclear weapons nations, both he and Shourie stated. For these reasons, the BJP had consistently opposed the deal and former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee had expressed his reservations on the issue even in 2005 with regard to its impact on India’s strategic nuclear programme, they added. Sinha found US commitment on fuel supplies "vague and futuristic". Besides, as the US would, under the provisions of the deal, retain the right of end-use verification of all its supplies, it would ensure that American inspectors would roam around all Indian nuclear installations, he felt. | ||
| Lenin Side Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 2951 Registered: 02-2014 Posted From: 122.107.192.235 Rating: N/A |
2008 lo UPA - 1 nundi denni oppose chese mem bayatakocham we are not against nuclear energy and nuclear co-operation, but only against the terms the deals has to come under!! | ||
| Lenin Side Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 2950 Registered: 02-2014 Posted From: 122.107.192.235 Rating: N/A |
mem jaathiya vaadulam... ma raktam la haemoglobin kadu..."b h a r a t" untadi...come on gusa gusa  | ||
| Lenin Side Hero Username: Lenin Post Number: 2949 Registered: 02-2014 Posted From: 122.107.192.235 Rating: N/A |
India is currently in the process of ratifying an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that would allow the international nuclear watchdog to oversee New Delhi’s civilian nuclear program with greater access than in the past. Specifically, India will ratify an additional protocol to the IAEA Safeguards Agreement it agreed to in 2009. ”I can confirm that we are ratifying the Additional Protocol to the IAEA Safeguards Agreement,” noted Syed Akbaruddin, a spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs. According to the Wall Street Journal, “the ratification by India furthers a process under way for several years designed to allow India to have commercial relations with other countries in the civilian nuclear field.” Following widespread international sanctions and condemnation for its nuclear weapons tests in 1998, India managed to normalize itself as a nuclear power outside of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 2008 following a civil nuclear cooperation deal with the United States and receipt of a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group. India currently holds a unique position among world nuclear powers given that is allowed to engage in normal civilian nuclear commerce despite its position outside the NPT regime. India currently abides by a self-enforced moratorium on nuclear testing and is engaged in civil nuclear cooperation with several countries. The primary significance of this new deal with the IAEA is that it will serve to bolster the level of confidence other states will have in India’s ability to pursue civilian nuclear development in a responsible manner. While India has maintained a relatively clean record on nuclear proliferation, it has a long way to go in terms of nuclear materials security. In the Nuclear Threat Initiatives 2014 Security Index, India scored worse than both Pakistan and China for nuclear materials security. This agreement with the IAEA should, in theory, allow India to begin addressing some of its nuclear security deficits. Currently, India’s primarily lacks in the area of regulatory safeguards — many of its nuclear regulations are written as guidance instead of enforceable law. Following India’s historic nuclear deal with the United States, it signed a limited safeguards agreement with the IAEA that gave the group access to India’s civilian nuclear facilities. As a non-signatory to the NPT, India’s military nuclear weapons facilities and programs are currently not inspected by the IAEA. The IAEA deal also has important implications for India’s new government under Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party-led (BJP) National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which pledged to improve India’s infrastructure, including nuclear power for civilian purposes. Expanding IAEA oversight of India’s civil nuclear program should allow India to conclude pending civil nuclear cooperation deals, which have been held up in part due to India’s unique status as a nuclear power outside the NPT. For example, India and Japan have been engaged in negotiations for a civil nuclear cooperation agreement for some years now. As the Wall Street Journal notes, allowing the IAEA greater scrutiny over India’s civil nuclear program could also help “India’s quest for membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group.” |
