| Author | Message | ||
     Vejo Junior Artist Username: Vejo Post Number: 194 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 67.234.86.124 Rating: N/A |
parasuram evaru bhayya | ||
| Mental_sachinodu Hero Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 14505 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 208.85.131.68 Rating: N/A |
wow ... too much summarize chesaru evaro .. hmmm | ||
| Jambalahaart_raja Side Hero Username: Jambalahaart_raja Post Number: 4730 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 171.159.194.11 Rating: N/A |
DB parasuram ROM lo tiruguthunnadu ani confirmed!!! There is only so much we can do VS There is something more we could do. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151917303374436 | ||
| Vejo Junior Artist Username: Vejo Post Number: 193 Registered: 10-2013 Posted From: 72.37.171.140 Rating: |
kinda okadi comment NonPseudo Secularist 19 mins ago Anti-Modi endorsement is just the tip of the iceberg. A far larger problem is extremely high level of anti-Hindu prejudice at the Economist: Examples of TE articles with name and publication date: 1) “Bitter Fruit”, Aug 2008: Article exercises double standard by calling relatively peaceful J&K's Hindu minority protester “Militant” and aggressive J&K's Muslim Majority protester “Protester”. 2) “An uphill walk”, Sept 2012: Amarnath pilgrimage is called “INVASION”. 3) “Kashmir’s future: Fleeting Chance”, July 2011;”An uphill walk”, Sept 2012, “Bitter Fruit”, Aug 2008: Amarnath shrine called “penis-shaped lump of ice”. 4) “Shaking the mountains”, Dec 2010: Article states that Amarnath pilgrims are unmolested; However, nothing can be further from truth. Amarnath pilgrims were massacred on several occasions. For instance, on August 2nd 2000, 34 pilgrims were murdered by terrorist who attacked makeshift pilgrim tents. 5) “The Hindu rate of self-deprecation”, April 2011: The title itself is unjustly anti-hindu. Both,red tape and corruption, are legacy of Nehruvian Socialism and has nothing to do with Hinduism but Economist does not blame Nehruvian license, quota, permit raj. Instead, it cleverly abuses Hindus. 6) “In search of a dream”, Sept 2012; “Now finish the job” April 2012; “The Hindu rate of self-deprecation”, April 2011: Economist refers to India’s socialist era GDP growth rate as “Hindu rate of growth” but it is actually 'Nehruvian Socialist rate of growth' 7) “The Swami’s Curse”, June 2011: Article indirectly describes Ayurveda and Yoga as quack cures. Personally, I am neither a follower nor a supporter of Baba Ramdev and Lokpal movement but I was shocked by the tone, tenure, bias and foul language of the article. 8) Economist has many articles on Kashmir like Nov. 2010 “The K Word”. They almost always omits “The P Word” (i.e., indirectly deny/downplay Hindu Pandit Plight). Only once “The P Word” was reluctantly mentioned. 9) In 2012/2013 year, Economist has many articles on Bangladesh war crime trial & political crisis. Most articles condemn the war crime trial, attack the evidence, and question eyewitness account. The omissions and commissions, of this articles, indirectly deny/downplay 1971 Hindu Genocide, and 2012/2013 attacks on Hindus. 10) Economist has printed many articles about Ayodhya dispute. Almost all articles omit/suppress entire history and deny archeological evidence. Example, Oct 2010 article “The uneasy split” falsely claims that “there is no archaeological evidence to support either belief”; However, nothing can be further from truth. Archeological evidence of Hindu temple is a fact proven beyond reasonable doubt in India’s high court. 12) “Witchcraft in Assam Toil and trouble”, April 2012: Article touts superiority and rationality of Islam and Christianity, dismisses native beliefs as superstition, and omits social reforms carried out by mainstream Hindu organisation like Rama-Krishna mission. 13) “Shadow of a darker decade”, Aug 2012: This article is directly and indirectly justifying the latest muslim violence in mumbai based on bogus accusations and numbers.Firstly, Economist claimed that "In 1992,Muslims were targeted by Hindu-nationalist mobs and hundreds were killed" but, in reality, Islamist, who got angry in wake of demolition at Ayodhya, started targeting hindus. In first 2 days( January 6 and 7 1992) of rioting, 34 Hindus and 8 Muslims got killed, 138 Hindus and 34 Muslims were injured. On January 8 1992 at 0030 hours, 6 Hindus, including 5 women, residing at Radhabai Chawl were burnt alive. Radhabai Chawl massacre triggered hindu backlash. Official death toll is 900 (575 Muslims, 275 Hindus, 45 unknown and 5 others).(*) Secondly,About 2002 Gujarat riots,. Economist wrote "2,000 people, most of them Muslims, were killed" but here are the factual numbers: 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed.(*) (*) All numbers cited are from official government reports published by Justice SriKrishna Commission for Mumbai, and parliament report for Gujarat. 14) “Bleak House” , March 2012: Article cleverly tries to blame Hindu victim of Godhra train massacre for their death, indirectly suggests that nearly nil (official number 254) Hindus died in subsequent riots, and exercises double standard. The Economist stealthily planted a seed of doubt on Godhra verdict, and it keeps alive canards like "dispute" and "accident". The truth is that there was no major dispute which would spark such a horrific massacre. Abduction story was proven wrong beyond reasonable doubt. Only an extremely prejudiced media would try to dismiss fire started in the middle of an attack as mere accident, and indirectly absolve attackers of all responsibility. Firstly, Coach S6 would not have caught fire, at that precise moment, without attack. Secondly, In absence of attackers, passengers would be able to get out of coach. Finally, it's already proven wrong beyond reasonable doubt - See more at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/06/ec onomist-explains?fsrc=rss#sthash.hhscKxWm.dpuf | ||
| Mental_sachinodu Hero Username: Mental_sachinodu Post Number: 14504 Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 208.85.131.68 Rating: N/A |
nenu chadivaanu.. economist vadi vi Modi meedha week ki two artciles paduthunaayi.. prathi dhaani lo we do not support ani explicit ga septhunnaad  | ||
| Tilak Megastar Username: Tilak Post Number: 22166 Registered: 02-2012 Posted From: 14.99.71.39 Rating: N/A |
LOL .. read on .. http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/06/ec onomist-explains?fsrc=rss Narendra Modi, Pradhan Mantri, Bharata Ganarajya - www.pmindia.nic.in - www.narendramodi.in |
